Skip to content

Rapid Sequence Intubation at the Emergency Department

The C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Compared With Conventional Laryngoscopy for Rapid Sequence Intubation at the Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02297113
Enrollment
150
Registered
2014-11-21
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergency

Keywords

patients, departement, requiring Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI)

Brief summary

All patients undergoing emergent endotracheal intubation (RSI) at the Emergency Department will be screened for inclusion in this clinical study. The indication of endotracheal intubation is an exclusively clinical decision and is not affected by this study protocol in any aspect. If fulfilling the In- and exclusion criteria's, patient will be randomly assigned to one of two groups 1. C-MAC Videolaryngoscope in appropriate size 2. conventional endotracheal intubation using Macintosh Blade in appropriate size Randomization (1:1) will be based on computer-generated codes maintained in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes that will be opened immediately before randomization.

Interventions

conventional endotracheal intubation

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients requiring emergency Rapid Sequence Intubation at the emergency department * Male and Female subjects 18 years to 99 years of age * Written confirmation by a physician not involved in this study * Written informed consent by the participant (obtained afterwards) * Patient not showing remarkable rejection in participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

* Maxilla-Facial trauma * Immobilized cervical spine * Indication for fiberoptic guided intubation (known difficult airway) * Ongoing Cardio-Pulmonary-Resuscitation (CPR) * Involvement in any other clinical trial during the course of this trial, within a period of 30 days prior to its beginning or 30 days after its completion * Severe or immediately life-treating injury requiring immediate medical treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success Rate10 minutesdefined as successful placement of endotracheal tube within the trachea and

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to intubation10 minutesdefined as time between insertion of the videolaryngoscope/ Macintosh blade into the mouth until detection of end-tidal CO2
Laryngoscopic view10 minutesCormack and Lehane Score
Number of intubation attempts10 minutes
Maximum drop of saturation10 minutesSpo2 will be measured continuously and documented accordingly
Ease of intubation (1-5)10 minuteso (1) very easy, (2) easy, (3) somewhat difficult, (4) difficult, (5) impossible
Violations of the teeth10 minutesnumber of patients; teeth will be inspected for potential damage and documented accordingly
Necessity of using further, alternative airway devices for successful intubation (if randomized airway device failed)10 minutesnumber of patients, requiring alternate device
Unrecognized esophageal intubation10 minutes

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026