Skip to content

Superior Labral Tear From Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Repair Versus Biceps Tenodesis for SLAP Tears in the Shoulder

SLAP Repair Versus Biceps Tenodesis for SLAP Tears in the Shoulder: A Randomized Outcomes Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02296554
Acronym
SLAP
Enrollment
150
Registered
2014-11-20
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2018-12-30
Last updated
2019-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

SLAP Tear

Keywords

SLAP Repair, Biceps Tenodesis

Brief summary

Biceps Tenodesis is currently advocated for older, less active patients, but to date is not often advocated for Superior Labral Tear from Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) tears in young, active patients. The ideal surgical management for this pathology is not clearly known. More surgeons are using biceps tenodesis as a treatment for SLAP tears, including in the young, active population. If this study were to demonstrate that biceps tenodesis is similar to or better than SLAP repair, this would fundamentally change the treatment of SLAP tears. Perhaps more importantly, it would likely mean a less involved rehabilitation and earlier return to activities for patients with this pathology.

Interventions

PROCEDURESLAP Repair

SLAP repair for SLAP tear

Biceps tenodesis for SLAP tear

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
CollaboratorOTHER
HealthPartners Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Primary isolated SLAP tear, confirmed on MRI

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant procedure needed such as a labral repair, rotator cuff repair or distal clavicle excision. * Revision Surgery * Previous shoulder surgery * Major medical illness * Inability to speak or read English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient reported function and painBaselineAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of Motion & StrengthBaselineShoulder/elbow range of motion and strength measurements
Range of Motion3 monthsShoulder/elbow range of motion

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026