Skip to content

Pediatric Difficult Intubation

Can the Vividtrac Laryngoscope Rival the Miller Laryngoscope for Child Tracheal Intubation During Chest Compression in a Manikin? A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02295670
Acronym
3V-L DL
Enrollment
180
Registered
2014-11-20
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2014-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Cardiac Arrest

Brief summary

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is perceived as the optimal method of providing and maintaining a clear and secure airway. The 2010 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines emphasized the importance of minimal interruption during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These guidelines also suggest that skilled operators should be able to secure the airway without interrupting chest compression. The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of the Vividtrac video-laryngoscope and the Miller laryngoscope for emergency intubation during simulated pediatric CPR.

Interventions

DEVICEVividtrac

video-laryngoscopy

DEVICEMIL

direct-laryngoscopy

Sponsors

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Give voluntary consent to participate in the study * Paramedic student

Exclusion criteria

* Not meet the above criteria * Wrist or Low back diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to intubation1 daytime from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success of intubation1 dayeffectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations. Visual Analog scale (VAS) score
Cormack-Lehane grading1 dayself-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactLukasz Szarpak
lukasz.szarpak@gmail.com+48500186225

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026