Cardiac Arrest, Intubation
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study was to compare time, success rates of different tracheal tubes (standard tube and ETView VivaSight SL) for intubation with an immobilized cervical spine in a standardized manikin model.
Interventions
DEVICEStandard tracheal tube
ETI with standard tracheal tube and Macintosh laryngoscope
DEVICEETView VivaSight SL
ETI with ETView VivaSight SL
Sponsors
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* give voluntary consent to participate in the study * minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine * experienced emergency medicine personnel (physicians, nurses, paramedics)
Exclusion criteria
* not meet the above criteria * wrist or low back diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Success of intubation | 1 day | effectiveness of first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Preferred ETI device | 1day | participants were asked which method of ETI they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation. |
| Intubation time | 1 day | time in seconds required for a successful intubation attempt |
| Cormack-Lehane grading | 1 day | self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4) |
Countries
Poland
Contacts
Primary ContactAndrzej Kurowski
Outcome results
None listed