Skip to content

Pediatric Intubation by Nurses

Comparison of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope, Intubrite, AirTraq and Miller Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation by Nurses During Chest Compression in a Pediatric Manikin: A Randomised Crossover Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02294916
Acronym
NURS_ETI
Enrollment
150
Registered
2014-11-19
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2014-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Cardiac Arrest

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the Pentax AWS, Intubrite and AirTraq to Miller laryngoscope during pediatric resuscitation with and without chest compressions.

Detailed description

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a life-saving procedure performed daily in emergency medicine. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines suggest that intubators should be able to secure the airway without interrupting chest compression. However, ETI with uninterrupted chest compression in patients can be a very difficult skill to acquire.

Interventions

DEVICEAWS

Video-laryngoscopy 1

DEVICEIntubrite

Video-laryngoscopy 2

DEVICEAirTraq

Optical-laryngoscopy

DEVICEMIL

Direct-laryngoscopy

Sponsors

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* give voluntary consent to participate in the study * minimum 1 year of work experience in emergency medicine * experienced emergency medical personnel - nurses

Exclusion criteria

* not meet the above criteria * wrist or low back diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to intubation1 daytime from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success of intubation1 dayeffectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.
VAS score1 dayparticipants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation.
Cormack-Lehan scale1dayself reported Cormack-Lehan scale during intubation

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactAndrzej Kurowski
andrzejkurowski987@gmail.com+48500186225

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026