Skip to content

A Study of MHAA4549A in Combination With Oseltamivir Versus Oseltamivir in Participants With Severe Influenza A Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02293863
Enrollment
168
Registered
2014-11-18
Start date
2015-01-14
Completion date
2017-05-23
Last updated
2018-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that will investigate the safety and clinical activity of a single intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A in adult participants hospitalized with severe influenza A in combination with oseltamivir versus a comparator arm of placebo with oseltamivir.

Interventions

Participants will receive a single dose of MHAA4549A by IV infusion on Day 1

DRUGOseltamivir

Participants will receive oseltamivir capsule either 75 mg or 150 mg BID orally for minimum of 5 days. Dosage and administration should follow local prescribing information for oseltamivir.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of influenza A where a Sponsor-approved influenza test is used as an aid in diagnosis. A Sponsor-approved influenza test includes: Influenza antigen test or Influenza polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test * One of the following markers of severity within 24 hours of admission: requirement for O2 supplementation to maintain SpO2 greater than (\>) 92 %; or requirement for Positive Pressure Ventilation (PPV) * A negative urine or serum pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential within 2 days prior to study treatment * Participants of reproductive potential must agree to use acceptable contraceptive measures as per the protocol as a minimum, and local guidelines, if more stringent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women, or women who intend to become pregnant during the study * Hypersensitivity to monoclonal antibodies or any constituents (sodium succinate, sucrose, polysorbate 20) of study drug * Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any excipients of oseltamivir * Investigational therapy within the 30 days prior to study treatment * Received prior therapy with any anti-influenza monoclonal antibody therapy (including MHAA4549A) within 8 months prior to study treatment * Current treatment (within 7 days of dosing) with probenecid, amantadine or rimantidine * Participants who have taken more than a total of 6 doses (3 doses for peramivir) of anti-influenza therapy (e.g., oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, peramivir) in the period from onset of symptoms and prior to study treatment * Admission \>48 hours prior to study treatment * Onset of influenza symptoms (including fever, chills, malaise, dry cough, loss of appetite, myalgias, coryza, or nausea) \>5 days prior to study treatment * Positive influenza B or influenza A + B infection within 2 weeks prior to study treatment * High probability of mortality in the next 48 hours as determined by the investigator * Participants requiring home or baseline oxygenation therapy * Participants with history of chronic lung disease with a documented SpO2 less than (\<) 95% off oxygen * Participants on chronic dose of corticosteroids exceeding 10 milligrams per day (mg/day) of prednisone or equivalent steroid dose for duration of greater than 14 days within 30 days of entry into study * Participants with the following significant immune suppression: bone marrow or solid organ transplant in the previous 12 months; cancer chemotherapy in the previous 12 months, HIV infection with most recent Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) \<200 cells per milliliter (cells/mL), or other significant immune suppression as determined by the investigator in discussion with the Sponsor Medical Monitor * Participants on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at time of randomization * Any disease or condition that would, in the opinion of the site investigator or Sponsor, place the participant at an unacceptable risk of injury or render the participant unable to meet the requirements of the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom randomization up to 60 daysAn adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549AFrom randomization up to 60 daysReported are the number of participants positive for ATAs at baseline, the number of participants with treatment-induced ATAs and the number of participants with treatment-enhanced ATAs.
Time to Normalization of Respiratory FunctionFrom randomization up to 60 daysThe time to normalization of respiratory function was defined as the time to removal of the participant from oxygen (O2) supplementation in order to maintain a blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) equal to or greater than 95% as measured by pulse oximetry.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDays 14, 30 and 60
Area Under Viral Load-Time Curve (AUEC ) of Influenza A VirusImmediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)Influenza A viral load was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. AUEC is the area under the viral load-time curve expressed as log10 (viral particles/milliliter x hour) = log10 (vp/mL x hour).
Peak Influenza A Viral LoadImmediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)Influenza A viral load was measured by qPCR in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. Reported here is the peak Influenza A viral load expressed as log10 vp/mL.
Duration of Viral SheddingImmediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)Influenza A viral load was measured by qPCR in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. Reported here is the duration of viral shedding.
Duration of HospitalizationFrom randomization up to 60 days
Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) StayFrom randomization up to 60 days
Percentage of Participants Using Antibiotics for Respiratory InfectionsFrom randomization up to 60 days
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDays 1-7, 14 and 30The clinical status of participants was defined by five mutually exclusive categories: 1. Death; 2. In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU); 3. Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2); 4. Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (O2); 5. Not hospitalized.
Percentage of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Due to Any CauseDays 30 and 60
Duration of VentilationFrom randomization up to 60 days
Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ) of MHAA4549A30 minutes (min) before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)AUC0-inf is reported as day\*microgram/milliliter (day\*mcg/mL).
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax ) of MHAA4549A30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)
Elimination Half-Life (Terminal t1/2) of MHAA4549A30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)
Observed Clearance (CL-obs) of MHAA4549A30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)
Observed Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss_obs) of MHAA4549A30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Complications of InfluenzaFrom randomization up to 60 daysThe following were considered secondary complications of influenza: pneumonia, including hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilation-acquired pneumonia (VAP), exacerbations of chronic lung disease, myocarditis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), otitis media, or other related complications.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Failure24 hours after end of infusion (infusion duration = approximately 120 minutes) up to Day 60Clinical failure after 24 hours post-infusion of study drug was defined as progression to increased O2 requirement defined by an increase in oxygen supplementation from low flow oxygen (i.e., 2-6 liters per minute \[L/min\]) to high flow oxygen (i.e., \> 6 L/min) or from oxygen supplementation alone to any positive pressure ventilation (PPV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), progression to ICU, prolonged ventilation or O2 support defined by \> 2 weeks, or death.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Resolution of Abnormal Vital SignsFrom randomization up to 60 daysDescription: Clinical resolution of abnormal vital signs was defined as meeting three out of five of the following criteria: 1. SpO2 ≥ 95% without supplemental O2; 2. Respiratory rate \< 24 breaths per minute without supplemental O2; 3. Core temperature \< 37.2 Celsius (C) immediately prior to receipt of any antipyretic drug, and at least 6-8 hours from the last dose of antipyretic or core temperature \> 36 C in participants who are initially hypothermic; 4. Heart rate (HR) \< 100 beats/minute; 5. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>90 mmHg. Reported here is the percentage of participants who had clinical resolution of at least three out of five abnormal vital signs by the end of study.

Countries

Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrolled in the study were 168 participants. The participant flow is reported for the safety population (158 participants), which included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
56
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
55
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
47
Total158

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath464
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up222
Overall StudyReason Not Specified022
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject331

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalMHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirMHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPlacebo + Oseltamivir
Age, Continuous60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska native
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
6 Participants2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
41 Participants8 Participants20 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
99 Participants34 Participants28 Participants37 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Stated
18 Participants5 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
19 Participants5 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
128 Participants39 Participants44 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
71 Participants22 Participants25 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
87 Participants25 Participants30 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 566 / 554 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 5626 / 5518 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 5611 / 5512 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549A

Reported are the number of participants positive for ATAs at baseline, the number of participants with treatment-induced ATAs and the number of participants with treatment-enhanced ATAs.

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549ATreatment-induced ATAs0 participants
Placebo + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549APositive for ATAs at baseline0 participants
Placebo + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549ATreatment-enhanced ATAs0 participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549ATreatment-induced ATAs0 participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549APositive for ATAs at baseline1 participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549ATreatment-enhanced ATAs0 participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549APositive for ATAs at baseline1 participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549ATreatment-enhanced ATAs0 participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirNumber of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549ATreatment-induced ATAs0 participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events80.4 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events67.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events74.5 percentage of participants
Primary

Time to Normalization of Respiratory Function

The time to normalization of respiratory function was defined as the time to removal of the participant from oxygen (O2) supplementation in order to maintain a blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) equal to or greater than 95% as measured by pulse oximetry.

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: Intent-to-treat infected (ITTi) population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + OseltamivirTime to Normalization of Respiratory Function4.28 days
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirTime to Normalization of Respiratory Function2.78 days
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirTime to Normalization of Respiratory Function2.65 days
p-value: 0.60580% CI: [0.83, 1.4]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.202880% CI: [0.85, 1.51]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ) of MHAA4549A

AUC0-inf is reported as day\*microgram/milliliter (day\*mcg/mL).

Time frame: 30 minutes (min) before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK)-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + OseltamivirArea Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ) of MHAA4549A11400 day*mcg/mLStandard Deviation 4530
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirArea Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ) of MHAA4549A26700 day*mcg/mLStandard Deviation 9810
Secondary

Area Under Viral Load-Time Curve (AUEC ) of Influenza A Virus

Influenza A viral load was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. AUEC is the area under the viral load-time curve expressed as log10 (viral particles/milliliter x hour) = log10 (vp/mL x hour).

Time frame: Immediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + OseltamivirArea Under Viral Load-Time Curve (AUEC ) of Influenza A Virus25.72 log10 (vp/mL x hour).Standard Deviation 15.92
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirArea Under Viral Load-Time Curve (AUEC ) of Influenza A Virus21.99 log10 (vp/mL x hour).Standard Deviation 16.57
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirArea Under Viral Load-Time Curve (AUEC ) of Influenza A Virus25.03 log10 (vp/mL x hour).Standard Deviation 13.48
p-value: 0.240780% CI: [-6.41, -1.06]ANOVA
p-value: 0.833980% CI: [-3.49, 2.1]ANOVA
Secondary

Duration of Hospitalization

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + OseltamivirDuration of Hospitalization8.95 days
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirDuration of Hospitalization7.65 days
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirDuration of Hospitalization6.69 days
p-value: 0.880680% CI: [0.78, 1.32]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.544780% CI: [0.8, 1.38]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + OseltamivirDuration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay4.66 days
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirDuration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay6.60 days
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirDuration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay5.29 days
p-value: 0.417180% CI: [0.47, 1.03]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.832280% CI: [0.61, 1.34]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Duration of Ventilation

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + OseltamivirDuration of Ventilation4.11 days
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirDuration of Ventilation7.05 days
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirDuration of Ventilation5.89 days
p-value: 0.782780% CI: [0.41, 1.07]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.252280% CI: [0.36, 0.96]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Duration of Viral Shedding

Influenza A viral load was measured by qPCR in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. Reported here is the duration of viral shedding.

Time frame: Immediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + OseltamivirDuration of Viral Shedding4.00 days
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirDuration of Viral Shedding4.63 days
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirDuration of Viral Shedding4.60 days
p-value: 0.741380% CI: [0.77, 1.32]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.476380% CI: [0.99, 1.77]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Elimination Half-Life (Terminal t1/2) of MHAA4549A

Time frame: 30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)

Population: PK-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + OseltamivirElimination Half-Life (Terminal t1/2) of MHAA4549A19.0 dayStandard Deviation 4.91
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirElimination Half-Life (Terminal t1/2) of MHAA4549A17.8 dayStandard Deviation 3.88
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax ) of MHAA4549A

Time frame: 30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)

Population: PK-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + OseltamivirMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax ) of MHAA4549A916 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 294
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax ) of MHAA4549A2220 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 556
Secondary

Observed Clearance (CL-obs) of MHAA4549A

Time frame: 30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)

Population: PK-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + OseltamivirObserved Clearance (CL-obs) of MHAA4549A288 mL/dayStandard Deviation 158
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirObserved Clearance (CL-obs) of MHAA4549A350 mL/dayStandard Deviation 130
Secondary

Observed Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss_obs) of MHAA4549A

Time frame: 30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)

Population: PK-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + OseltamivirObserved Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss_obs) of MHAA4549A6410 mLStandard Deviation 3170
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirObserved Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss_obs) of MHAA4549A7450 mLStandard Deviation 2270
Secondary

Peak Influenza A Viral Load

Influenza A viral load was measured by qPCR in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. Reported here is the peak Influenza A viral load expressed as log10 vp/mL.

Time frame: Immediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + OseltamivirPeak Influenza A Viral Load5.70 log10 vp/mLStandard Deviation 1.32
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPeak Influenza A Viral Load5.37 log10 vp/mLStandard Deviation 1.39
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPeak Influenza A Viral Load5.28 log10 vp/mLStandard Deviation 1.71
p-value: 0.27980% CI: [-0.6, -0.07]ANOVA
p-value: 0.190980% CI: [-0.7, -0.15]ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome

The clinical status of participants was defined by five mutually exclusive categories: 1. Death; 2. In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU); 3. Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2); 4. Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (O2); 5. Not hospitalized.

Time frame: Days 1-7, 14 and 30

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Not hospitalized11.1 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: In ICU42.6 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Not hospitalized25.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Death0.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Not hospitalized70.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O227.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: In ICU35.2 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Death0.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O222.2 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O225.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Death0.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: In ICU22.2 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O222.2 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O214.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Death1.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Not hospitalized16.7 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: In ICU42.6 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Not hospitalized22.2 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Death0.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O25.6 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O224.1 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: In ICU27.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O27.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O225.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O240.7 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O257.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: In ICU5.6 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O211.1 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O21.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Death1.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Not hospitalized5.6 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: In ICU1.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Not hospitalized40.7 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Death0.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O20.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O214.8 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: In ICU37.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Not hospitalized85.2 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O224.1 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O231.5 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Death5.6 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: In ICU18.5 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O220.4 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Not hospitalized0.0 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Death1.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O23.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O23.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Death0.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: In ICU38.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O261.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O20.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Not hospitalized0.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Death0.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: In ICU38.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O251.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O27.7 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Not hospitalized1.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Death0.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: In ICU32.7 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O242.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O219.2 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Not hospitalized5.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Death0.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: In ICU30.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O221.2 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O236.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Not hospitalized11.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Death0.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: In ICU26.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O219.2 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O234.6 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Not hospitalized19.2 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Death1.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: In ICU23.1 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O215.4 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O234.6 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Not hospitalized25.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Death1.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: In ICU21.2 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O213.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O228.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Not hospitalized34.6 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Death3.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: In ICU11.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O23.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Not hospitalized76.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Death7.7 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: In ICU3.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O21.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Not hospitalized82.7 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Not hospitalized11.4 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Not hospitalized81.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Not hospitalized34.1 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O225.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Not hospitalized72.7 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Death2.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O227.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O24.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: In ICU20.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: In ICU34.1 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O20.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O215.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 3: Death2.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Death9.1 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O225.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Not hospitalized6.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O252.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 7: Not hospitalized36.4 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O220.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Death0.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Death6.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O231.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: In ICU4.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: In ICU9.1 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: In ICU27.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: In ICU38.6 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O218.2 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Death2.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: In ICU43.2 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O227.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Not hospitalized20.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O26.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 5: Not hospitalized25.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O229.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 2: Death2.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Death2.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O218.2 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 30: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O24.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: In ICU22.7 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: In ICU29.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 14: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O24.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O215.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 4: Death2.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 1: Not hospitalized0.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal OutcomeDay 6: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O225.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Due to Any Cause

Time frame: Days 30 and 60

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Due to Any Cause1.9 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Due to Any Cause3.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Due to Any Cause0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.537980% CI: [-5.57, 9.56]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.366780% CI: [-9.88, 6.18]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Using Antibiotics for Respiratory Infections

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Using Antibiotics for Respiratory Infections13.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Using Antibiotics for Respiratory Infections11.5 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Using Antibiotics for Respiratory Infections11.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.82480% CI: [-10.61, 7.76]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.811180% CI: [-11.48, 8.28]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause

Time frame: Days 14, 30 and 60

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 305.6 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 141.9 percentage of participants
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 607.4 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 307.7 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 143.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 609.6 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 146.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 609.1 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseDay 309.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 14p-value: 0.537980% CI: [-5.57, 9.56]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 14p-value: 0.218980% CI: [-3.12, 13.05]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 30p-value: 0.659480% CI: [-6.04, 10.31]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 30p-value: 0.501380% CI: [-5.24, 12.31]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 60p-value: 0.684980% CI: [-6.28, 10.69]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 60p-value: 0.763380% CI: [-7.38, 10.74]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Failure

Clinical failure after 24 hours post-infusion of study drug was defined as progression to increased O2 requirement defined by an increase in oxygen supplementation from low flow oxygen (i.e., 2-6 liters per minute \[L/min\]) to high flow oxygen (i.e., \> 6 L/min) or from oxygen supplementation alone to any positive pressure ventilation (PPV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), progression to ICU, prolonged ventilation or O2 support defined by \> 2 weeks, or death.

Time frame: 24 hours after end of infusion (infusion duration = approximately 120 minutes) up to Day 60

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Clinical Failure14.8 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Clinical Failure25.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Clinical Failure22.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.190580% CI: [-0.15, 20.52]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.316880% CI: [-2.64, 18.47]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Resolution of Abnormal Vital Signs

Description: Clinical resolution of abnormal vital signs was defined as meeting three out of five of the following criteria: 1. SpO2 ≥ 95% without supplemental O2; 2. Respiratory rate \< 24 breaths per minute without supplemental O2; 3. Core temperature \< 37.2 Celsius (C) immediately prior to receipt of any antipyretic drug, and at least 6-8 hours from the last dose of antipyretic or core temperature \> 36 C in participants who are initially hypothermic; 4. Heart rate (HR) \< 100 beats/minute; 5. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>90 mmHg. Reported here is the percentage of participants who had clinical resolution of at least three out of five abnormal vital signs by the end of study.

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Clinical Resolution of Abnormal Vital Signs81.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Clinical Resolution of Abnormal Vital Signs73.3 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Clinical Resolution of Abnormal Vital Signs66.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.604380% CI: [-27.5, 11.66]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.386580% CI: [-36.13, 6.97]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Complications of Influenza

The following were considered secondary complications of influenza: pneumonia, including hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilation-acquired pneumonia (VAP), exacerbations of chronic lung disease, myocarditis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), otitis media, or other related complications.

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days

Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Secondary Complications of Influenza13.0 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Secondary Complications of Influenza15.4 percentage of participants
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + OseltamivirPercentage of Participants With Secondary Complications of Influenza13.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.721980% CI: [-6.96, 11.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.922580% CI: [-9.29, 10.64]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026