Skip to content

Trial of HoLEP vs. PVP in Treating BPH in Patients With Bleeding Tendency

Prospective Non-randomized Trial Comparing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Versus Greenlight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate in Treating Benign Prostate Hyperplasia in Patients With Bleeding Tendency

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02293759
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-11-18
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2016-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

BPH- LASER- PROSTATE- BLEEDING TENDENCY

Brief summary

Patients presented for BPH surgery at our out patient clinic will be assessed for abnormal bleeding profile. Patients with bleeding tendency will be offered either HoLEP or Greenlight laser PVP based on prostate size cut off point of 80ml Larger prostates will be treated with HoLEP Smaller prostates will be treated with greenlight PVP

Detailed description

Elderly patients with bleeding tendency either secondary; 1. Strict antiplatelet intake 2. Strict anticoagulant intake 3. uncorrected natural bleeding tendency e.g; patients with liver cell failure are at higher risk of perioperative bleeding when subjected to prostate surgery. Laser prostate surery was introduced to overcome this difficulty. However, till now there is no head to head comparision of different types of laser procedures in treating this subset of patients In the current study patients presented for BPH surgery in a tertiarry referral prostate unit will be assessed for bleeding tendency and will be treated either by Holmium laser enucleatiuon of the prostate or Greenlight laser vaporization of the prostate Single surgeon will perform all cases

Interventions

PROCEDUREHoLEP

Holmium laser enucleation of the prsotate

Greenlight laser (532nm) Photoslective vaporization of the prostate

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* BPH patients candidate for transurethral prostate surgery after failure of medical treatment * Perioperative uncorrected Blleding tendency 1. patients with naturally induced uncorrectable bleeding tendency; 1. platelet count less than 100000/mm3 2. INR more than 1.5 2. Patients on oral antiplatlet that deemed unsafe to stop prior to surgery as per intenist 3. Patients on oral anticoagulant that deemed unsafe to stop prior to surgery as per intenist

Exclusion criteria

* Correctable bleeding tendency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
perioperative blood loss48 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
readmission30 days
blood transfusion30 days
flow rate3 months

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed m Elshal, MD
ELSHALAM@GMAIL.COM+20502262222

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026