Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of I10E in Treatment of Patients With CIDP

An International, Multicentre, Efficacy and Safety Study of I10E in Initial and Maintenance Treatment of Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02293460
Acronym
PRISM
Enrollment
44
Registered
2014-11-18
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2017-09-29
Last updated
2021-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Keywords

Peripheral neuropathy, Disimmune disease, Neurology Chronic disease, Rare disease

Brief summary

Primary objective: To assess the efficacy of I10E in improving the disability of patients with CIDP. Secondary objective: To assess the safety of I10E in patients with CIDP.

Interventions

DRUGI10E

Patients who meet all eligibility criteria will receive one dose of IMP at 2g/kg over 2-5 days followed by 7 doses of IMP at 1g/kg over 1-2 day(s), every 3 weeks. Duration of treatment period: 21 weeks +/- 7 days.

Sponsors

Laboratoire français de Fractionnement et de Biotechnologies
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female patient aged 18 years or more 2. Definite or probable CIDP according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) guidelines 2010 clinical and neurophysiological criteria Pure motor CIDP, provided that a diagnosis of multifocal motor neuropathy has been ruled out CIDP associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), provided that anti-MAG antibodies titer is lower than the used technique's negativity threshold (1000 BTU for Bühlmann ELISA technique) Lewis-Sumner syndrome 3. Score of at least 2 on the adjusted INCAT disability scale 4. Patient who either : 1. has never been previously treated with Ig (Ig-naive patient) Or 2. was previously treated with Ig but is in clinical relapse following treatment withdrawal. In the latter case, the last Ig course shall have been administered no less than 3 months prior to screening

Exclusion criteria

1. History of IgA deficiency, unless the absence of anti-IgA antibodies has been documented 2. History of cardiac insufficiency (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] III/IV), uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, unstable ischemic heart disease, or uncontrolled hypertension 3. History of venous thrombo-embolic disease, myocardial infarction or, cerebrovascular accident 4. Risk factor for blood hyperviscosity such as cryoglobulinemia or haematologic malignancy with monoclonal gammopathy 5. Body mass Index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m² 6. Glomerular filtration rate \<80 mL/min/1.73m² measured according to the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) calculation 7. Any other ongoing disease that may cause chronic peripheral neuropathy, such as toxin exposure, dietary deficiency, uncontrolled diabetes, hyperthyroidism, cancer, systemic lupus erythematosus or other connective tissue diseases, infection with HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), Lyme disease, multiple myeloma, Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia, amyloid, and hereditary neuropathy 8. Woman with positive results on a urine pregnancy test or breastfeeding woman or woman of childbearing potential without an effective contraception. 9. Any other serious medical condition that would interfere with the clinical assessment of CIDP or use of I10E or prevent the patient from complying with the protocol requirements 10. Increasing dosage or introduction of a corticotherapy within the last 3 months prior to screening, with oral or systemic corticosteroids at a dose higher than 10 mg daily prednisolone or equivalent. Topical corticosteroids are permitted 11. Treatment within 12 months prior to screening with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressant agents (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, interferon-alfa, interferon-beta1a, anti-CD20, alemtuzumab, aziathioprine, etanercept, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate and haemopoetic stem cell transplantation) 12. Plasma exchange, blood products or derivatives administered within the last 3 months prior to screening 13. Administration of another investigational product within the last month prior to screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy Endpoint: Responder Rate at End of Study24 weeks after first treament injectionResponders were defined as patients with a decrease ≥1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score compared to baseline. Adjusted INCAT disability score can vary from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximal disability). If a patient was treated with a not-allowed treatment during the study period, then all adjusted INCAT disability score measured after the intake of these not-allowed treatments were censored. If the score at EoS visit was missing, then the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was applied to replace this missing value.

Countries

France, Italy, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between 24 February 2015 and 22 March 2017, 59 subjects from 23 sites signed an informed consent.

Pre-assignment details

59 subjects signed an informed consent in the pre-assigment period. Among them, 18 subjects were considered as a screening failure including 3 subjects re-screened and finally enrolled. Of 44 enrolled subjects, on subject was discontinued (consent withdrawn by subject) from the study before the first administration of study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Treated Set
All subjects who received at least one infusion of I10E
43
Total43

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Treated Set
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
32 Participants
Age, Continuous50.0 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Tunisia
8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy Endpoint: Responder Rate at End of Study

Responders were defined as patients with a decrease ≥1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score compared to baseline. Adjusted INCAT disability score can vary from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximal disability). If a patient was treated with a not-allowed treatment during the study period, then all adjusted INCAT disability score measured after the intake of these not-allowed treatments were censored. If the score at EoS visit was missing, then the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was applied to replace this missing value.

Time frame: 24 weeks after first treament injection

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Full Analysis SetEfficacy Endpoint: Responder Rate at End of Study32 Participants
Comparison: For this single-arm study, the response rate was tested against the historical response rate of 33.3% with a 1-sided Clopper-Pearson exact test at the nominal level of significance of 2.5% on the Full Analysis Set. The null and alternative hypotheses were as follows:~H0: pI10E \<= 33.3% H1: pI10E \> 33.3%p-value: <0.000195% CI: [60.5, 87.9]exact binomial Clopper-Pearson

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026