Cardiac Arrest
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of the study was to compare two methods of training in CPR, standard basic life support and CPR using CPR feedback device.
Interventions
DEVICEStandard BLS
basic life support without any feedback device
DEVICETrueCPR
CPR with feedback device
Sponsors
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Give voluntary consent to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
* Not meet the above criteria * Wrist or low back diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Effective compressions compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions | 1 month | effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| effective compressions ratio effective compressions [%] multiplied by flow time [%] | 1 month | effective compressions ratio was defined as effective compressions \[%\] multiplied by flow time \[%\] |
| Flow time sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed. | 1 month | flow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed. |
| absolute hands-off time sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation | 1 month | absolute hands-off time (HOT) was defined as the sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation |
| Compression depth compression in correct depth (40-50mm) measured by the software is connected to the manikin and computer | 1 month | compression in correct depth (40-50mm) measured by the software is connected to the manikin and computer |
Countries
Poland
Contacts
Primary ContactAndrzej Kurowski
Outcome results
None listed