Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nusinersen (ISIS 396443) in Participants With Later-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-Procedure Controlled Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of ISIS 396443 Administered Intrathecally in Patients With Later-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02292537
Acronym
CHERISH
Enrollment
126
Registered
2014-11-17
Start date
2014-11-24
Completion date
2017-02-20
Last updated
2021-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Keywords

Spinal Muscular Atrophy, SMA, SMN, SMNRx, ISIS-SMNRx, ISIS-SMN Rx, ISIS 396443, CHERISH, IONIS-SMNRx, IONIS-SMN Rx

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to examine the clinical efficacy of nusinersen (ISIS 396443) administered intrathecally to participants with later-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). The secondary objective is to examine the safety and tolerability of nusinersen administered intrathecally to participants with later-onset SMA.

Detailed description

This study was conducted and the protocol was registered by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In August 2016, sponsorship of the trial was transferred to Biogen.

Interventions

DRUGNusinersen

Administered by intrathecal (IT) lumbar puncture (LP) injection

PROCEDURESham procedure

Small needle prick on the lower back at the location where the IT injection is normally made

Sponsors

Biogen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Parent or guardian has signed informed consent and, if indicated per participant's age and institutional guidelines, participant has signed informed assent * Be medically diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) * Have onset of clinical signs and symptoms consistent with SMA at greater than 6 months of age * Be able to sit independently, but has never had the ability to walk independently * Have Motor Function Score (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded) greater than or equal to 10 and less than or equal to 54 at Screening * Be able to complete all study procedures, measurements and visits and parent or guardian and subject has adequately supportive psychosocial circumstances, in the opinion of the Investigator * Have an estimated life expectancy of greater than 2 years from Screening, in the opinion of the Investigator * Meet age-appropriate institutional criteria for use of anesthesia and sedation, if use is planned for study procedures * For subjects who have reached reproductive maturity, satisfy study contraceptive requirements Key

Exclusion criteria

* Respiratory insufficiency, defined by the medical necessity for invasive or non-invasive ventilation for greater than 6 hours during a 24 hour period, at Screening * Medical necessity for a gastric feeding tube, where the majority of feeds are given by this route, as assessed by the Site Investigator * Severe contractures or severe scoliosis evident on X-ray examination at Screening * Hospitalization for surgery (i.e., scoliosis surgery, other surgery), pulmonary event, or nutritional support within 2 months of Screening or planned during the duration of the study * Presence of an untreated or inadequately treated active infection requiring systemic antiviral or antimicrobial therapy at any time during the screening period * History of brain or spinal cord disease, including tumors, or abnormalities by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) that would interfere with the LP procedures or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation * Presence of an implanted shunt for the drainage of CSF or an implanted central nervous system (CNS) catheter * History of bacterial meningitis * Dosing with IONIS-SMN Rx in any previous clinical study * Prior injury (e.g., upper or lower limb fracture) or surgical procedure which impacts the subject's ability to perform any of the outcome measure testing required in the protocol and from which the subject has not fully recovered or achieved a stable baseline * Clinically significant abnormalities in hematology or clinical chemistry parameters or electrocardiogram (ECG), as assessed by the Site Investigator, at the Screening visit that would render the subject unsuitable for inclusion * Treatment with another investigational drug (e.g., oral albuterol or salbutamol, riluzole, carnitine, creatine, sodium phenylbutyrate, et.c), biological agent, or device within 1-month of Screening or 5 half-lives of study agent, whichever is longer. Treatment with valproate or hydroxyurea within 3-months of Screening. Any history of gene therapy, antisense oligonucleotide therapy, or cell transplantation. * Ongoing medical condition that according to the Site Investigator would interfere with the conduct and assessments of the study. Examples are medical disability (e.g., wasting or cachexia, severe anemia, etc.) that would interfere with the assessment of safety or would compromise the ability of the subject to undergo study procedures. NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded (HFMSE) Score at Month 15Baseline and Month 15The HFMSE consists of 33 scored activities used to assess motor function in children with SMA. The scale was originally developed with 20 scored activities and was devised for use in children with SMA Type 2 and Type 3 with limited ambulation to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The expanded scale includes an additional module of 13 items developed to allow for evaluation of ambulatory SMA patients. Participants were asked to do a specific activity (such as rolling) and they were then graded on the quality and execution of that movement on a scale of 0=being unable, 1=performed with some compensation, and 2=unaided. The overall score is the sum of the scores for all activities with a maximum achievable score of 66. Higher scores indicate increased motor function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Any New Motor Milestone at Month 15Month 15New motor milestones are defined as sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone and walking alone.
Number of New Motor Milestones Achieved Per ParticipantMonth 15New motor milestones are defined as sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone and walking alone.
Change From Baseline in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) TestBaseline and Month 15The RULM Test is used in patients with SMA to assess upper limb functional ability items that are reflective of activities of daily living (i.e., raise a can to mouth as if drinking, take a coin and place it in a box, remove the lid of a container). The RULM test has a total of 20 items with an entry item that serves as functional class identification and does not contribute to the total score. The remaining 19 scorable items reflect different functional domains and are graded on a 3-point system with a score of 0 (unable), 1 (able, with modification), and a maximum of 2 (able, no difficulty). There is only 1 item (item I) that is scored as a can/cannot score, with 1 as the highest score. Scorable items are summed for a total score range of 0-37, with higher scores increased great upper limb function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Standing AloneMonth 15If the participant was unable to achieve standing alone at Baseline but could achieve this at Month 15 then they were considered a responder. If they could not achieve this or if a participant terminated the study prior to the 15-month assessment due to treatment failure or death, then any imputed value was ignored and the participant was considered as a non-responder.
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Walking With AssistanceMonth 15If the participant was unable to achieve walking with assistance at baseline but could achieve this at Month 15 then they were considered a responder. If they could not achieve this or if a participant terminated the study prior to the 15-month assessment due to treatment failure or death, then any imputed value was ignored and the participant was considered as a non-responder.
Number of Participants That Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline through Month 15AEs: any sign, symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that is new, or if pre-existing, worsens in participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs: an event that results in death; an event that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death; an outcome that results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect diagnosed in a child of a participant; an event that requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; an event that results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. Any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above.
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a 3-Point Increase From Baseline in HFMSE Score at Month 15Baseline and Month 15The HFMSE consists of 33 scored activities used to assess motor function in children with SMA. The scale was originally developed with 20 scored activities and was devised for use in children with SMA Type 2 and Type 3 with limited ambulation to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The expanded scale includes an additional module of 13 items developed to allow for evaluation of ambulatory SMA patients. Participants were asked to do a specific activity (such as rolling) and they were then graded on the quality and execution of that movement on a scale of 0=being unable, 1=performed with some compensation, and 2=unaided. The overall score is the sum of the scores for all activities with a maximum achievable score of 66. Higher scores indicate increased motor function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Weight AbnormalitiesBaseline through Month 15Weight changes assessed from Baseline to Month 15.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination AbnormalitiesBaseline through Month 15Neurological changes assessed for clinical significance include assessment of mental status, level of consciousness, sensory function, motor function, cranial nerve function, and reflexes.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination AbnormalitiesBaseline through Month 15Physical examination changes were assessed for clinical significance.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBaseline through Month 15Laboratory parameter changes assessed for clinical significance include serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation and urinalysis.
Number of Participants With Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Post-Baseline Worsening in Electrocardiogram (ECG) in ResultsBaseline through Month 15The number of participants with abnormal, clinically relevant worsening, defined as participants with an ECG interpreted as abnormal and clinically relevant, with a comparison with Baseline value is reported.
Number of Participants Taking Any Concomitant Medication Related to Dosing Procedure or Sham ProcedureBaseline through Month 15Concomitant medications include prescription and over-the-counter medications administered to participants on or after the first day of study treatment.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesBaseline through Month 15Vital signs assessed for clinical significance include resting blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, and temperature.

Countries

Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After parental informed consent was obtained and prior to any treatment, participants entered a Screening Period of up to 21 days to determine their eligibility for the study. Of the 179 participants screened, 53 were screening failures.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sham Procedure
Sham comparator on Days 1, 29, 85 and 274.
42
Nusinersen
Nusinersen 12 mg solution via intrathecal (IT) injection on Days 1, 29, 85 and 274.
84
Total126

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham ProcedureNusinersenTotal
Age, Continuous3.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61
3.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63
3.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63
Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded (HFMSE) Score19.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.23
22.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33
21.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.03
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 Participants16 Participants23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants80 Participants122 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
30 Participants64 Participants94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants46 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants38 Participants59 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 420 / 84
other
Total, other adverse events
42 / 4275 / 84
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 4214 / 84

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded (HFMSE) Score at Month 15

The HFMSE consists of 33 scored activities used to assess motor function in children with SMA. The scale was originally developed with 20 scored activities and was devised for use in children with SMA Type 2 and Type 3 with limited ambulation to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The expanded scale includes an additional module of 13 items developed to allow for evaluation of ambulatory SMA patients. Participants were asked to do a specific activity (such as rolling) and they were then graded on the quality and execution of that movement on a scale of 0=being unable, 1=performed with some compensation, and 2=unaided. The overall score is the sum of the scores for all activities with a maximum achievable score of 66. Higher scores indicate increased motor function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 15

Population: ITT Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. Missing postbaseline HFMSE data were imputed using the multiple imputation method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Sham ProcedureChange From Baseline in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded (HFMSE) Score at Month 15-1.0 scores on a scale
NusinersenChange From Baseline in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded (HFMSE) Score at Month 153.9 scores on a scale
p-value: 1e-795% CI: [3.1, 6.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) Test

The RULM Test is used in patients with SMA to assess upper limb functional ability items that are reflective of activities of daily living (i.e., raise a can to mouth as if drinking, take a coin and place it in a box, remove the lid of a container). The RULM test has a total of 20 items with an entry item that serves as functional class identification and does not contribute to the total score. The remaining 19 scorable items reflect different functional domains and are graded on a 3-point system with a score of 0 (unable), 1 (able, with modification), and a maximum of 2 (able, no difficulty). There is only 1 item (item I) that is scored as a can/cannot score, with 1 as the highest score. Scorable items are summed for a total score range of 0-37, with higher scores increased great upper limb function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 15

Population: ITT Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. Missing postbaseline data were imputed using multiple imputation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Sham ProcedureChange From Baseline in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) Test0.5 scores on a scale
NusinersenChange From Baseline in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) Test4.2 scores on a scale
95% CI: [2.3, 5]
Secondary

Number of New Motor Milestones Achieved Per Participant

New motor milestones are defined as sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone and walking alone.

Time frame: Month 15

Population: Efficacy Set: All participants with a Day 456 Visit and all participants with a time difference of at least 463 days (456 days plus a 7-day window) between the date of first dose and the date for the final analysis. Based on imputed data where there was missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham ProcedureNumber of New Motor Milestones Achieved Per Participant-0.2 milestones achievedStandard Deviation 0.54
NusinersenNumber of New Motor Milestones Achieved Per Participant0.2 milestones achievedStandard Deviation 0.51
95% CI: [0.2, 0.7]
Secondary

Number of Participants Taking Any Concomitant Medication Related to Dosing Procedure or Sham Procedure

Concomitant medications include prescription and over-the-counter medications administered to participants on or after the first day of study treatment.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 15

Population: Safety Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants Taking Any Concomitant Medication Related to Dosing Procedure or Sham Procedure42 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants Taking Any Concomitant Medication Related to Dosing Procedure or Sham Procedure84 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants That Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AEs: any sign, symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that is new, or if pre-existing, worsens in participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs: an event that results in death; an event that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death; an outcome that results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect diagnosed in a child of a participant; an event that requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; an event that results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. Any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 15

Population: Safety Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. All participants with AEs were reported in this outcome measure, whereas in Adverse Event section there was at 5% reporting threshold to be met.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants That Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs42 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants That Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs12 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants That Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs78 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants That Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs14 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Post-Baseline Worsening in Electrocardiogram (ECG) in Results

The number of participants with abnormal, clinically relevant worsening, defined as participants with an ECG interpreted as abnormal and clinically relevant, with a comparison with Baseline value is reported.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 15

Population: Safety Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Post-Baseline Worsening in Electrocardiogram (ECG) in Results2 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Post-Baseline Worsening in Electrocardiogram (ECG) in Results0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter Abnormalities

Laboratory parameter changes assessed for clinical significance include serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation and urinalysis.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 15

Population: Safety Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. Any new or worsening clinical laboratory parameter findings were reported as AEs and are presented in the AE/SAE section of the results.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Bicarbonate - Low11 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total bilirubin - direct - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: BUN - High1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Creatinine - Low17 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Creatinine- High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Sodium - Low1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Potassium - Low2 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total protein - Low1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total protein - High9 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Calcium - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Cystatin C - Low18 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Specific gravity - High2 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: pH- Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: pH - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Blood - High1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: RBC - High1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Hyaline casts - High1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Crystals - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Amorphous crystals - High10 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Hemoglobin - High2 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Hemoglobin - Low7 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Hematocrit - High3 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Hematocrit - Low6 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Red blood cells - High2 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Red blood cells - Low7 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: White blood cells - High11 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: White blood cells - Low10 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Platelet Count - High5 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Platelet count - Low10 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Bilirubin - Low19 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Bilirubin - High1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total bilirubin - indirect- Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total bilirubin - indirect- High1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Alkaline phosphatase - Low1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Alkaline phosphatase - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: ALT - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: ALT - High4 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: AST - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: AST- High2 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: BUN - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Sodium - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Potassium - High1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Chloride - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Chloride - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Albumin - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Albumin - High19 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Calcium - High9 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Phosphorus - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Phosphorus - High8 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total bilirubin - direct - Low5 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Bicarbonate - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Glucose - Low7 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Glucose - High26 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Cystatin C -High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: CPK - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: CPK - High10 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Specific gravity - Low0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Protein - High14 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Glucose - High2 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Ketones - High18 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Bilirubin - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: WBC - High4 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Epithelial Cells - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Bacteria - High15 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Casts - High0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Calcium oxalate crystals - High17 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Uric acid crystals - High5 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total bilirubin - indirect- High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total bilirubin - direct - Low8 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Phosphorus - High8 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Alkaline phosphatase - Low10 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: BUN - High2 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: WBC - High13 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Creatinine - Low39 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Alkaline phosphatase - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Creatinine- High1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Bicarbonate - Low29 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Sodium - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: ALT - Low1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Chloride - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Protein - High43 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total protein - Low7 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: ALT - High3 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Albumin - High27 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Bicarbonate - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Calcium - Low1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Glucose - High44 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: AST - Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Cystatin C - Low36 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Specific gravity - Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Calcium oxalate crystals - High26 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Specific gravity - High1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: AST- High3 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: pH- Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Glucose - Low17 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: BUN - Low2 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Blood - High1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Sodium - Low1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: RBC - High6 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Casts - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Epithelial Cells - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Hyaline casts - High5 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Potassium - Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Crystals - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Ketones - High29 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Uric acid crystals - High5 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Potassium - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Hemoglobin - High2 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Cystatin C -High1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Hemoglobin - Low15 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Chloride - Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Hematocrit - High1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Amorphous crystals - High16 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Hematocrit - Low18 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total protein - High13 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Red blood cells - High2 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: CPK - Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Red blood cells - Low13 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Albumin - Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: White blood cells - High12 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Bilirubin - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: White blood cells - Low20 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Glucose - High2 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Platelet Count - High10 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: CPK - High16 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesHematology: Platelet count - Low15 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Calcium - High20 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Bilirubin - Low36 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: Bacteria - High24 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Bilirubin - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total bilirubin - direct - High0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Phosphorus - Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesBlood Chemistry: Total bilirubin - indirect- Low0 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter AbnormalitiesUrinalysis: pH - High0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination Abnormalities

Neurological changes assessed for clinical significance include assessment of mental status, level of consciousness, sensory function, motor function, cranial nerve function, and reflexes.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 15

Population: Safety Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. Neurological examination clinical significance was not collected.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities

Physical examination changes were assessed for clinical significance.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 15

Population: Safety Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. Physical examination clinical significance was not collected.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities

Vital signs assessed for clinical significance include resting blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, and temperature.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 15

Population: Safety Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. Any new or worsening vital sign findings were reported as AEs and are presented in the AE/SAE section of the results.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDiastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg2 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHeart rate <60 beats/min0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSystolic blood pressure <90 mmHg33 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSystolic blood pressure >140 mmHg1 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSystolic blood pressure >160 mmHg0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDiastolic blood pressure <50 mmHg31 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDiastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg7 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHeart rate >100 beats/min42 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesTemperature >38.0 C4 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesTemperature <36.0 C14 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate <12 breaths/min0 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate >20 breaths/min42 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate <12 breaths/min1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDiastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg2 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDiastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg11 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHeart rate <60 beats/min1 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesTemperature <36.0 C33 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSystolic blood pressure <90 mmHg80 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesHeart rate >100 beats/min84 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSystolic blood pressure >140 mmHg4 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate >20 breaths/min84 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesSystolic blood pressure >160 mmHg2 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesTemperature >38.0 C10 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesDiastolic blood pressure <50 mmHg65 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Weight Abnormalities

Weight changes assessed from Baseline to Month 15.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 15

Population: Safety Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. Any new or worsening weight abnormality findings were reported as AEs and are presented in the AE/SAE section of the results.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Weight AbnormalitiesWeight decrease of >=7% from baseline3 participants
Sham ProcedureNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Weight AbnormalitiesWeight increase of >=7% from baseline38 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Weight AbnormalitiesWeight decrease of >=7% from baseline4 participants
NusinersenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Weight AbnormalitiesWeight increase of >=7% from baseline77 participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants That Achieved Any New Motor Milestone at Month 15

New motor milestones are defined as sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone and walking alone.

Time frame: Month 15

Population: Efficacy Set: All participants with a Day 456 Visit and all participants with a time difference of at least 463 days (456 days plus a 7-day window) between the date of first dose and the date for the final analysis. Based on imputed data where there was missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureProportion of Participants That Achieved Any New Motor Milestone at Month 155.9 Proportion of participants
NusinersenProportion of Participants That Achieved Any New Motor Milestone at Month 1519.7 Proportion of participants
p-value: 0.081195% CI: [-6.64, 34.17]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Proportion of Participants That Achieved Standing Alone

If the participant was unable to achieve standing alone at Baseline but could achieve this at Month 15 then they were considered a responder. If they could not achieve this or if a participant terminated the study prior to the 15-month assessment due to treatment failure or death, then any imputed value was ignored and the participant was considered as a non-responder.

Time frame: Month 15

Population: Efficacy Set: All participants with a Day 456 Visit and all participants with a time difference of at least 463 days (456 days plus a 7-day window) between the date of first dose and the date for the final analysis. Based on imputed data where there was missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureProportion of Participants That Achieved Standing Alone2.9 Proportion of participants
NusinersenProportion of Participants That Achieved Standing Alone1.5 Proportion of participants
95% CI: [-21.84, 19.34]
Secondary

Proportion of Participants That Achieved Walking With Assistance

If the participant was unable to achieve walking with assistance at baseline but could achieve this at Month 15 then they were considered a responder. If they could not achieve this or if a participant terminated the study prior to the 15-month assessment due to treatment failure or death, then any imputed value was ignored and the participant was considered as a non-responder.

Time frame: Month 15

Population: Efficacy Set: All participants with a Day 456 Visit and all participants with a time difference of at least 463 days (456 days plus a 7-day window) between the date of first dose and the date for the final analysis. Based on imputed data where there was missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureProportion of Participants That Achieved Walking With Assistance0.0 Proportion of participants
NusinersenProportion of Participants That Achieved Walking With Assistance1.5 Proportion of participants
95% CI: [-19.1, 22.1]
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a 3-Point Increase From Baseline in HFMSE Score at Month 15

The HFMSE consists of 33 scored activities used to assess motor function in children with SMA. The scale was originally developed with 20 scored activities and was devised for use in children with SMA Type 2 and Type 3 with limited ambulation to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The expanded scale includes an additional module of 13 items developed to allow for evaluation of ambulatory SMA patients. Participants were asked to do a specific activity (such as rolling) and they were then graded on the quality and execution of that movement on a scale of 0=being unable, 1=performed with some compensation, and 2=unaided. The overall score is the sum of the scores for all activities with a maximum achievable score of 66. Higher scores indicate increased motor function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 15

Population: ITT Set: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug/sham procedure. Missing postbaseline HFMSE data were imputed using multiple imputation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham ProcedureProportion of Participants Who Achieved a 3-Point Increase From Baseline in HFMSE Score at Month 1526.3 Proportion of participants
NusinersenProportion of Participants Who Achieved a 3-Point Increase From Baseline in HFMSE Score at Month 1556.8 Proportion of participants
p-value: 0.000695% CI: [2.09, 14.91]Regression, Logistic
95% CI: [12.74, 48.31]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026