Skip to content

Benfotiamine in Alzheimer's Disease: A Pilot Study

Benfotiamine in Alzheimer's Disease: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02292238
Acronym
Benfotiamine
Enrollment
71
Registered
2014-11-17
Start date
2015-02-15
Completion date
2020-09-08
Last updated
2022-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease, benfotiamine, glucose, Amyloid

Brief summary

General Investigational Plan Study Objectives The goal of this proposal is to determine whether enhancing brain glucose utilization minimizes cognitive decline in patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (AMCI) or mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. We propose a proof of concept double-blind, placebo controlled pilot study to determine if increasing brain thiamine availability with the investigational new drug benfotiamine, will minimize the decline in glucose utilization and slow the cognitive decline associated with the progression AMCI/AD dementia. Specifically, our objectives are two-fold: * To test whether increasing brain thiamine by administering 600 mg per day (300 mg/morning and 300 mg/evening) of benfotiamine for one year can slow cognitive decline in these patients as measured with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-COG). * To determine whether increasing brain thiamine availability with 600 mg (300 mg/morning and 300 mg/evening) per day of benfotiamine for one year can slow the decline in brain glucose metabolism in these patients as measured with Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography(FGPET) in the posterior cingulate. We will also carry out the following secondary objectives: * Assess if there are differences in secondary clinical outcome measures (NPI, ADCSADL, CDR, Buschke) between benfotiamine and placebo groups and whether specific cognitive domains (ie: activities of daily living, learning and memory verbal memory, behavioral, etc.) are driving these changes. * Compare ADAS-COG change scores in the benfotiamine and placebo groups within and between strata that were defined by initial cognitive impairment, to attempt to identified the population that most benefits from benfotiamine. * Compare changes in glucose utilization between the benfotiamine and placebo groups in secondary Regions of Interest (ROIs) including the hippocampus, prefrontal regions and entorhinal cortex. * Compare changes in whole brain glucose utilization between the benfotiamine and placebo groups using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). * Assess the correlation between changes in glucose utilization with changes in ADAS Cog. * Determine if ApoE4 genotype alters the response to benfotiamine.

Detailed description

Study Design This study will be conducted at the Burke Rehabilitation Hospital under an IRB protocol. Wplan to accrue a total of 76 male and/or female patients (\> 65 years) with a diagnosis of AMCI/AD dementia that are also amyloid positive by PET scan. Patients will be randomized and blinded to either a benfotiamine or placebo group. Because it is unknown whether there will be differential responses to treatment according to initial cognitive impairment, participants will be stratified according to the median MMSE cut-off score of our historical METS population who are \> 65 years old and have an MMSE \>21. In this double-blind study, patients and their caregivers, as well as all physicians, clinicians, coordinators and investigators interacting with the patients, will be unaware of the treatment assignments. Treatment assignments will be available to the safety-monitoring physician, Dr. Michael Reding, who will have no unnecessary subject contact. If necessary, the code will be revealed to Dr. Reding by the pharmacist, Dr. Thomas Grandville. Each patient will make six visits to the Memory Evaluation and Treatment Service (METS) clinic at Burke Rehabilitation Hospital. Information on medication use, vital signs, outcome measures, compliance and safety/tolerability will be collected at each time point. The screening visit (visit 1) will take place within 30 days prior to baseline visit (visit 2). Informed consent/assent will be obtained from each subject or his/her caregiver prior to conducting any study related procedures. During the screening visit a review of inclusion/exclusion criteria will be completed along with the collection of demographic data, disease history, and information about prior and concomitant medications. A complete medical history, physical examination, neurological examination, including the MMSE, CDR, CSDD and vital signs, will be collected. Blood will be drawn to assess blood glucose Patients that are diagnosed as likely Alzheimer patients that are not hyperglycemic will then have an amyloid PET scan. Only patients with a diagnosis of AD and a positive amyloid scan will be included. Prior to baseline (visit 2), FDGPET studies will be completed for each subject. At the baseline visit (visit 2) blood will be drawn to determine APOE and thiamine (vitamin B1 status). At visits 2-6, information on concomitant medications will be updated, vitals will be taken, medication compliance will be assessed and the following study measures will be administered: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADASCog), Buschke SRT, Neuropsychological Inventory (NPI), Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADLs). The final PET scan will be conducted approximately one week prior to the last visit. In addition to safety assessments at time of each visit, each patient will receive a call from the clinical coordinator at weeks 2 and 6 to assess for adverse events. The benfotiamine and placebo will be dispensed by the pharmacy at Burke under the direction of Thomas Grandville, D. Pharm. The caregiver will administer the drug since patients with memory problems may forget to take it on a regular basis. In the placebo group, the active compound benfotiamine will be replaced with microcrystalline cellulose. The other components, shape and color are identical to the treatment. Caregivers will be instructed to oversee the administration of the study medication as prescribed to ensure compliance. A record of the number of capsules dispensed, number returned, and actual number taken will be recorded at scheduled visits. Each patient will be treated for 12 months. The study cognitive measures include: the ADAS-Cog (our primary outcome measure), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, Buschke Selective Reminding Test (SRT). is a standard diagnostic tool in the assessment of verbal memory. The Biological/Mechanistic Outcome Measures will be FDG-PET Scanning Procedures Data Analysis Preliminary analyses will be conducted to describe the study sample and to confirm the relationship between level of glucose utilization and severity of cognitive impairment. For continuous variables (eg cognitive function, glucose utilization), we will first examine distributions to assess normality assumptions. We will perform transformations as needed to stabilize the variance, and to reduce skewness and kurtosis. We will use means (sd) and proportions n (%) to characterize the study sample. T-tests and Chi-square, or Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher, where appropriate, will be used to assess for any differences in patient characteristics according to treatment group. We will use spearman correlation coefficients and linear regression, unadjusted and adjusted for covariates, to assess the relationship between FDG-PET and MMSE in the whole population as well as in MMSE stratified groups to examine the relationship between initial MMSE score and glucose uptake. All analyses to test study hypotheses will be run as intention to treat (ITT). Missing observations will be addressed by using the method of last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Interventions

* To test whether increasing brain thiamine by administering 600 mg per day (300 mg/morning and 300 mg/evening) of benfotiamine for one year can slow cognitive decline in these patients as measured with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-COG). * To determine whether increasing brain thiamine availability with 600 mg (300 mg/morning and 300 mg/evening) per day of benfotiamine for one year can slow the decline in brain glucose metabolism in these patients as measured with Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography(FGPET) in the posterior cingulate.

Sponsors

Burke Rehabilitation Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Montefiore Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Burke Medical Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 60 years of age or older * Clinical diagnosis of AMCI by the Peterson criteria or probable AD dementia according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease related Disorders Association (NINCDS/ADRDA) * MMSE score \> or equal to 21 * CDR score \> or equal to 0.5 and \< or equal to1 * Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia(CSDD) score \<10. * Ambulatory or ambulatory with aide * Have a caregiver willing to accompany the patient to each visit, accept responsibility for supervising treatment and provided input to clinical outcome assessments * Reside at home * Speak English * Amyloid positive PET-scan * If they are on AD medications they must be stable on AD medications for at least three months prior to baseline * Subjects ore willing/able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with significant neurological disorder other than AD including hypoxia, stroke, traumatic brain injury * A current psychiatric disorder according the DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression unless successfully treated on a stable dose of an antidepressant for at least 4 weeks and continues on stable dose throughout the study * Any other DSM-IV Axis l diagnosis including other primary neurodegenerative dementia schizophrenia or bipolar depression * A current diagnosis of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (glucose values \> 200 mg/ml). * Patients with uncontrolled diabetes will be excluded because high glucose will alter the FDG-PET studies. The clinic that does PET (Columbia University Medical Center) excludes patients if glucose values exceed 200 mg/ml. * A current diagnosis of active, uncontrolled seizure disorder * A current diagnosis of probable or possible vascular dementia according to NINDS-AIREN * An investigational drug during the previous 4 weeks * A current diagnosis of severe unstable cardiovascular disease * A current diagnosis of acute severe, or unstable asthmatic condition (e.g., severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), * A current diagnosis of cardiac, renal or hepatic disease * History of alcoholism, current or within past 5 years * A disability that may prevent the patient from completing all study requirements (e.g., blindness, deafness, severe language difficulty) * A1C less than or equal to 8 * Current diagnosis of cancer/active treatments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog ScoreBaseline, 1 yearThe Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) is a brief neuropsychological assessment used to assess the severity of cognitive symptoms of dementia. It is one of the most widely used cognitive scales in clinical trials and is considered to be the gold standard for assessing antidementia treatments. The ADAS-Cog range from 0 to 70, where higher scores indicate greater cognitive dysfunction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Brain Glucose UtilizationBaseline, 1 yearThe AAL (Automatic Anatomical Labeling) atlas provides the taxonomy for 116 regions of interest, 90 of which capture non-cerebellar cortical regions. Signal averages from 9 cerebellar regions from each hemisphere were further averaged into one composite cerebellar region for each hemisphere, 'Cerebellum\_L' and 'Cerebellum\_R', which were comprised of the respective laterality averages of the regions: 'Cerebellum\_Crus1 ' 'Cerebellum\_Crus2 'Cerebellum\_3' 'Cerebellum\_4\_5' 'Cerebellum\_6' 'Cerebellum\_7b' 'Cerebellum\_8' 'Cerebellum\_9' 'Cerebellum\_10 '. Subsequently, these two composite regions are further combined with the bilateral paracentral lobules to provide one final composite for reference scaling. Concretely, the values from 'Cerebellum\_L', 'Cerebellum\_R', 'Paracentral\_Lobule\_L', and 'Paracentra\_Lobule\_R' were averaged. This final composite will serve as the denominator for the scaling operation of any ROI value prior to group-level analysis.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) ScoreBaseline, 1 yearAlzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) is a caregiver-based Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale composed of 23 items developed for use in dementia clinical studies. It was designed to assess the patient's performance of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living such as those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, as well as making judgments and decisions. The range for the total ADCS-ADL score is 0 to 78. Higher scores equate with higher functioning.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) ScoreBaseline, 1 yearThe NPI assesses a wide range of behaviors encountered in dementia patients to provide a means of distinguishing frequency and severity of behavioral changes. Ten behavioral and two neuro-vegetative domains are evaluated through an interview with the caregiver. The total score ranges from 0 to 144. Higher scores suggest greater psychiatric impairment.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ScoreBaseline, 1 yearThe CDR was developed primarily for use in persons with dementia of the Alzheimer type (the equivalent of probable Alzheimer's Disease) and can also be used to stage dementia in other illnesses as well. The scores for the multiple items are summarized in one score. The CDR examines 6 categories of cognitive functioning domains. Each domain is scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (including 0.5). A CDR-SB was generated as the sum of the values in each of the 6 domains. The CDR-SB sum scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and a 1 point worsening is considered a clinically significant symptom change.
Change From Baseline in Buschke Selective Reminding Test (SRT) ScoreBaseline, 1 yearThe SRT is a standard diagnostic tool in the assessment of verbal memory. The Buschke SRT immediate total scores are compared between treated (benfotiamine) and control (placebo) groups. The immediate total score is the sum of correct responses over the 6 learning trials with scores ranging from 0 to 72. A score of 0 means severe impairment in memory. A score of 72 means there is no impairment in memory. For the purpose of determining effect over several trials between groups, the fractional change from the baseline of each group is compared.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All patients were recruited from the Memory Evaluation and Treatment Service at the Burke Rehabilitation Center.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Benfotiamine
The patients in this arm will be treated with benfotiamine Benfotiamine: • To test whether increasing brain thiamine by administering 600 mg per day (300 mg/morning and 300 mg/evening) of benfotiamine for one year can slow cognitive decline in these patients as measured with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-COG). • To determine whether increasing brain thiamine availability with 600 mg (300 mg/morning and 300 mg/evening) per day of benfotiamine for one year can slow the decline in brain glucose metabolism in these patients as measured with Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography(FGPET) in the posterior cingulate.
34
Placebo
The patients in this arm will be treated with placebo Benfotiamine: • To test whether increasing brain thiamine by administering 600 mg per day (300 mg/morning and 300 mg/evening) of benfotiamine for one year can slow cognitive decline in these patients as measured with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-COG). • To determine whether increasing brain thiamine availability with 600 mg (300 mg/morning and 300 mg/evening) per day of benfotiamine for one year can slow the decline in brain glucose metabolism in these patients as measured with Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography(FGPET) in the posterior cingulate.
36
Total70

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBenfotiaminePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
34 Participants36 Participants70 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous75.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.91
75.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.19
75.77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.01
MMSE Scores25.32 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.78
25.33 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52
25.33 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.63
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
33 Participants35 Participants68 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
34 Participants36 Participants70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants18 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants18 Participants29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 340 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 3423 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 343 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Score

The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) is a brief neuropsychological assessment used to assess the severity of cognitive symptoms of dementia. It is one of the most widely used cognitive scales in clinical trials and is considered to be the gold standard for assessing antidementia treatments. The ADAS-Cog range from 0 to 70, where higher scores indicate greater cognitive dysfunction.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

Population: 1 subject on the placebo arm was excluded from analysis due to taking benfotiamine from a commercial vendor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BenfotiamineChange From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Score1.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Score3.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.52
Comparison: Power was calculated based on expected difference in change on the ADAS-Cog of 3 points between the treatment and control groups. Estimates based on using a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and a standard deviation of 4, enrolling 29 patients per group, (N = 58) suggest 80% power to detect a mean change of 3 between treatment and placebo.p-value: 0.125t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score

Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) is a caregiver-based Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale composed of 23 items developed for use in dementia clinical studies. It was designed to assess the patient's performance of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living such as those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, as well as making judgments and decisions. The range for the total ADCS-ADL score is 0 to 78. Higher scores equate with higher functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

Population: 1 subject on the placebo arm was excluded from analysis due to taking benfotiamine from a commercial vendor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BenfotiamineChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score-1.931 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9028
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score-3.16129 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9816
p-value: 0.3687t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brain Glucose Utilization

The AAL (Automatic Anatomical Labeling) atlas provides the taxonomy for 116 regions of interest, 90 of which capture non-cerebellar cortical regions. Signal averages from 9 cerebellar regions from each hemisphere were further averaged into one composite cerebellar region for each hemisphere, 'Cerebellum\_L' and 'Cerebellum\_R', which were comprised of the respective laterality averages of the regions: 'Cerebellum\_Crus1 ' 'Cerebellum\_Crus2 'Cerebellum\_3' 'Cerebellum\_4\_5' 'Cerebellum\_6' 'Cerebellum\_7b' 'Cerebellum\_8' 'Cerebellum\_9' 'Cerebellum\_10 '. Subsequently, these two composite regions are further combined with the bilateral paracentral lobules to provide one final composite for reference scaling. Concretely, the values from 'Cerebellum\_L', 'Cerebellum\_R', 'Paracentral\_Lobule\_L', and 'Paracentra\_Lobule\_R' were averaged. This final composite will serve as the denominator for the scaling operation of any ROI value prior to group-level analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

Population: 1 subject on the placebo arm was excluded from analysis due to taking benfotiamine from a commercial vendor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BenfotiamineChange From Baseline in Brain Glucose Utilization-0.02 ratioStandard Error 0.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brain Glucose Utilization-0.01 ratioStandard Error 0.002
p-value: 0.7529t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Buschke Selective Reminding Test (SRT) Score

The SRT is a standard diagnostic tool in the assessment of verbal memory. The Buschke SRT immediate total scores are compared between treated (benfotiamine) and control (placebo) groups. The immediate total score is the sum of correct responses over the 6 learning trials with scores ranging from 0 to 72. A score of 0 means severe impairment in memory. A score of 72 means there is no impairment in memory. For the purpose of determining effect over several trials between groups, the fractional change from the baseline of each group is compared.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

Population: 1 subject on the placebo arm was excluded from analysis due to taking benfotiamine from a commercial vendor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BenfotiamineChange From Baseline in Buschke Selective Reminding Test (SRT) Score0.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Buschke Selective Reminding Test (SRT) Score-1.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
p-value: 0.315t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Score

The CDR was developed primarily for use in persons with dementia of the Alzheimer type (the equivalent of probable Alzheimer's Disease) and can also be used to stage dementia in other illnesses as well. The scores for the multiple items are summarized in one score. The CDR examines 6 categories of cognitive functioning domains. Each domain is scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 3 (including 0.5). A CDR-SB was generated as the sum of the values in each of the 6 domains. The CDR-SB sum scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and a 1 point worsening is considered a clinically significant symptom change.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

Population: 1 subject on the placebo arm was excluded from analysis due to taking benfotiamine from a commercial vendor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BenfotiamineChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Score0.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Score0.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.06
p-value: 0.0337t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score

The NPI assesses a wide range of behaviors encountered in dementia patients to provide a means of distinguishing frequency and severity of behavioral changes. Ten behavioral and two neuro-vegetative domains are evaluated through an interview with the caregiver. The total score ranges from 0 to 144. Higher scores suggest greater psychiatric impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year

Population: 1 subject on the placebo arm was excluded from analysis due to taking benfotiamine from a commercial vendor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BenfotiamineChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score6.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Score9.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
p-value: 0.485t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026