Skip to content

Midline Lumbar Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Minimal Access Midline Lumbar Fusion Versus Traditional Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02290314
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-11-14
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2018-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Brief summary

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is the forward displacement (slip) of one vertebra on an adjacent vertebra resulting in narrowing of the spinal canal or compression of the exiting nerve roots. It is commonly associated with low back and leg pain, and is a frequent reason for spine surgery particularly in individuals over age 65 years. Recently novel minimally invasive surgical techniques have heightened public and government interest by touting benefits of reduced approached-related morbidity which in turn leads to quicker recovery, shorter hospital stay, improved short-term clinical outcomes, and reduced health care cost. However, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to describe the actual advantages and disadvantages associated with minimally invasive spinal fusion. This pilot study is a randomized control trial comparing minimally invasive MID-line Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF) to traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with respect to length of stay, approach related morbidity, patient centered outcome measures, and cost-effectiveness in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREminimally invasive MID-line Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF)

Sponsors

The London Spine Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients attending Victoria Hospital * Degenerative spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine at one level * Medically Suitable for surgical management * Able to consent for surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Lytic spondylolisthesis * Non degenerative stenosis: tumor, trauma * Active infection * On long term disability or workers compensation claims * Drug or alcohol misuse * Lack of permanent home residence * Previous surgery in the lumbar spine at the surgical level * Previous fusion in the lumbar spine * Contraindication to surgery: medical co morbidities * Unable to complete questionnaire: eg dementia * Unable to give voluntary consent * Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to dischargeLength of inhospital stay after surgery - average 4 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Approach-related in-hospital morbidityAt time of index surgeryBlood loss, length of surgery, narcotic usage, nursing care, and adverse events will be compared between groups
Oswestry Disability IndexEnrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 5 yearsThe Oswestry Disability Index is an effective method of measuring disability in patients with back and leg pain and is well suited to patients who have had persistent severe disability. It is commonly utilized, validated and highly reproducible.
Cost-effectiveness of the two surgical approachesEnrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 5 yearsEconomic score and cost analysis for each procedure

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric rating scale for back pain intensity (0-10; 0=no pain; 10= worst pain)Enrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 5 years
Numeric rating scale for leg pain intensity (0-10; o=no pain; 10=worst pain)Enrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 5 years
General Health outcome measure (SF12)Enrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 5 yearsThe SF12 is a standardized health related quality of life outcome questionnaire, which assesses 8 health domains. The physical and mental component can be derived. It has been validated and reliable when applied to the spine patient population
Patient satisfactionEnrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 5 yearsAll things considered, how satisfied are you with the results of your recent treatment for your spine condition 1-7. This sentence is the recommended tool for assessing global satisfaction.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactJennifer Urquhart
jennifer.urquhart@lhsc.on.ca5196858500

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026