Skip to content

Intubation of a Pediatric Manikin in Difficult Airway by Novice Personnel: A Comparison of Glidescope and Airtraq

Face-to-face Intubation With Glidescope or Airtraq

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02290249
Enrollment
36
Registered
2014-11-14
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2015-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edema of the Tongue, Intubation; Difficult

Brief summary

Background and aims: Glidescope and Airtraq were designed to facilitate intubation and to improve teaching intubation. The investigators want to find their efficacy in normal airway, tongue edema and face-to-face orotracheal intubation models by novice personal. Material and Methods: After Kocaeli Human Researches Ethics Committee approval, thirty six medical students who were on the beginning of their third year were enrolled in this study. After watching a video about the intubation of one of these devices, they attempted to intubate an adult manikin in three different airway models in a random order; first in normal airway, second, tongue edema and finally, in an entrapped manikin by face-to-face approach with Glidescope or Airtraq. Intubation attempts, insertion and intubation times, success rates, Cormack-Lehane grades, need of maneuvers of these devices were recorded.

Detailed description

Trauma victims mostly had to be intubated at the scene of the area with the paramedics. In a suspect of a cervical trauma, patients must be intubated with the least movement. Videolaryngoscopic techniques had several advantages at this condition. We want to investigate which can be used easily by novice personnel.

Interventions

DEVICEGlidescope

Manikin was intubated by different novice personal with glidescope videolaryngoscope

DEVICEAirtraq

Pediatric manikin was intubated by novice personal with airtraq

Sponsors

Kocaeli University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* medical students at their third year, * novice personnel

Exclusion criteria

* anesthesists, * anesthesia residents, * skilled investigators of tracheal intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intubation success rates5 minutesWe recorded the first and total intubation success rates of the intubation with one of these devices

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intubation time5 minutesfrom the handling of the device till viewing the endotracheal tube entering the vocal cords
Esophageal intubation5 minutesis there an esophageal intubation occurred while inserting the tube or not
need of optimisation maneuvers5 minutesdo we need an optimization maneuver while intubating or while viewing the glottis or not

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026