Skip to content

Pediatric Intubation

Comparison of the TruView PCD Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Pediatric Tracheal Intubation by Novice Paramedics: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02289872
Acronym
ETICPR
Enrollment
120
Registered
2014-11-13
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest, Intubation

Brief summary

The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of TruView PCD video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for the pediatric emergency intubation with three airway scenarios in a standardized manikin model.

Interventions

DEVICEMacintosh Laryngoscope

Direct-Laryngoscopy

DEVICETruView PCD Video laryngoscope

Video-Laryngoscopy

Sponsors

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* give voluntary consent to participate in the study * inexperienced in pediatric intubation paramedics

Exclusion criteria

* not meet the above criteria * participants who had performed intubation in pediatric humans prior the trial or had previously TruView experience

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to intubation1 daythe time to intubation, defined as the time from insertion of the laryngoscope blade between the teeth to the first manual ventilation of the mannequin's lungs

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success of intubation1 daysuccess of the intubation attempt (i.e. tracheal or oesophageal placement of the tube) with was recorded when the success of the ventilation attempt was seen by the manikin's ventilation indicators.
Cormack-Lehan scale1 dayself reported Cormack-Lehan scale during intubation
Dental compression1daydental compression, with was assessed using a visual scale grading the pressure applied on the upper teeth (n=none, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3).
Ease of intubation (VAS)1 dayTo access subjective opinion about the difficulty of the each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026