Skip to content

Patient- and Caregiver-reported Symptoms and Outcomes With Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel for the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson's Disease

Study on Patient- and Caregiver-reported Symptoms and Outcomes With Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel for the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02289729
Acronym
ADEQUA
Enrollment
62
Registered
2014-11-13
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2019-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Duodopa, Advanced Parkinson's Disease, Levodopa/Carbidopa intestinal gel

Brief summary

Patient reported outcomes (PRO) have become an important endpoint assessed in clinical trials. It is important to understand the relationship between medication and patients' symptomatology, quality of life and well-being. We predict levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG; Duodopa) will significantly improve quality of life and emotional well-being compared to baseline in patients with advance Parkinson disease (APD) not well controlled with conventional treatment.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with advanced levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease, with at least, 2 hours off time or 2 hours of dyskinesia based on clinician's/investigator's medical judgment * Patients with advanced Parkinson's disease with severe motor fluctuations and dyskinesia when combination of conventional PD treatments was unable to satisfactory control symptoms. * Patients with advanced Parkinson's disease who meet the criteria for use of Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) established in the summary of product characteristics, Spanish Neurology Society (SEN) guidelines, local/regional directories (CCAA) or site's protocols for use of LCIG in common clinical practice. * The decision to treat with LCIG is made by the physician prior to any decision to approach the patient to participate in this study. * Patients with a cognitive level enough to complete the questionnaires, confirmed by a Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score of at least 26 points, according to the recommendation of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) task force on dementia in Parkinson's Disease (PD)

Exclusion criteria

* LCIG's contraindications included in the Summary of Product Characteristics (product label)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Item (PDQ-39) Global Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (score 0 to 4 on a Likert scale). The global score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Mobility Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The mobility domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The activities of daily living domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The emotional well-being domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Stigma Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The stigma domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Social Support Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The social support domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Cognition Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The cognition domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Communication Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The communication domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The bodily discomfort domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in NMSS Sexual Function Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The sexual function domain score ranges from 0 to 24 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in NMSS Miscellaneous Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The miscellaneous domain score ranges from 0 to 48 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Mean Global Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The Norris/Bond-Lader VAS measures emotional well-being status with a 16-item visual analogue mood rating scale. The VAS consisted of 16 visual analogue items each representing opposite extremes of mood, with the following labels at each end: alert/drowsy, calm/excited, strong/weak, muzzy/clear-headed, well-coordinated/clumsy, lethargic/energetic, contented/dreamy, incompetent/proficient, happy/sad, antagonistic/amicable, interested/bored, withdrawn/gregarious. These scales loaded on 3 domains (alert, strong, clear-headed, well-coordinated, energetic, quick-witted, attentive, proficient, interested); (contented, tranquil, happy, amicable, gregarious); (calm, relaxed). For each individual scale, a line was drawn between each mood state and its opposite and participants rated their current mood by placing a vertical mark on the line. Scores (global, and for each domain) ranged from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more positive mood.
Change From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Alertness/Sedation Sub-Scale Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The Norris/Bond-Lader VAS measures emotional well-being status with a 16-item visual analogue mood rating scale. The VAS consisted of 16 visual analogue items each representing opposite extremes of mood, with the following labels at each end: alert/drowsy, calm/excited, strong/weak, muzzy/clear-headed, well-coordinated/clumsy, lethargic/energetic, contented/dreamy, incompetent/proficient, happy/sad, antagonistic/amicable, interested/bored, withdrawn/gregarious. These scales loaded on 3 domains (alert, strong, clear-headed, well-coordinated, energetic, quick-witted, attentive, proficient, interested); (contented, tranquil, happy, amicable, gregarious); (calm, relaxed). For each individual scale, a line was drawn between each mood state and its opposite and participants rated their current mood by placing a vertical mark on the line. Scores (global, and for each domain) ranged from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more positive mood.
Change From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Contented/Discontented Sub-Scale Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The Norris/Bond-Lader VAS measures emotional well-being status with a 16-item visual analogue mood rating scale. The VAS consisted of 16 visual analogue items each representing opposite extremes of mood, with the following labels at each end: alert/drowsy, calm/excited, strong/weak, muzzy/clear-headed, well-coordinated/clumsy, lethargic/energetic, contented/dreamy, incompetent/proficient, happy/sad, antagonistic/amicable, interested/bored, withdrawn/gregarious. These scales loaded on 3 domains (alert, strong, clear-headed, well-coordinated, energetic, quick-witted, attentive, proficient, interested); (contented, tranquil, happy, amicable, gregarious); (calm, relaxed). For each individual scale, a line was drawn between each mood state and its opposite and participants rated their current mood by placing a vertical mark on the line. Scores (global, and for each domain) ranged from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more positive mood.
Change From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Calmness/Relaxation Sub-Scale Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The Norris/Bond-Lader VAS measures emotional well-being status with a 16-item visual analogue mood rating scale. The VAS consisted of 16 visual analogue items each representing opposite extremes of mood, with the following labels at each end: alert/drowsy, calm/excited, strong/weak, muzzy/clear-headed, well-coordinated/clumsy, lethargic/energetic, contented/dreamy, incompetent/proficient, happy/sad, antagonistic/amicable, interested/bored, withdrawn/gregarious. These scales loaded on 3 domains (alert, strong, clear-headed, well-coordinated, energetic, quick-witted, attentive, proficient, interested); (contented, tranquil, happy, amicable, gregarious); (calm, relaxed). For each individual scale, a line was drawn between each mood state and its opposite and participants rated their current mood by placing a vertical mark on the line. Scores (global, and for each domain) ranged from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more positive mood.
Change From Baseline in Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The PFS-16 comprises 16 items with five polytomous response categories (strongly disagree, disagree, do not agree or disagree, agree, and strongly agree). Responses were scored from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), yielding a summed total score ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 64 (most severe fatigue). The cut-point of ≥ 3.30 was used to identified those perceiving fatigue to be a problem.
Change From Baseline in the Score of the Apathy Scale (AS) to Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The AS is an inventory of 14 questions that assess cognitive and behavioral symptoms of emotional apathy. Each is rated from 0 to 3 on a Likert scale. The total scores for AS ranges from 0 (no apathy) to 42 (most apathetic). AS scores ≥ 14 were considered apathetic.
Change From Baseline in Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report multiple-choice inventory. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 based on severity of each item. The maximum total score is 63. Raw scores from 0-13 indicates minimal depression, 14-19 indicates mild depression, 20-28 indicates moderate depression, and 29-63 indicates severe depression.
Change From Baseline in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The BAI is a 21-item self-report multiple-choice inventory. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 based on severity of each item. The maximum total score is 63. Raw scores from 0-7 indicates minimal anxiety, 8-15 indicates mild anxiety, 16-25 indicates moderate anxiety, and 25-63 indicates severe anxiety.
Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Composite Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total composite score ranging between 0 and 68, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).
Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Undesirable Side Effects at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total undesirable side effects score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).
Change From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Social and Leisure Activities at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SQLC is designed to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the impact of a patient's disease on the caregiver's quality of life. The SQLC questionnaire consists of 16 questions that evaluate 3 domains: professional activities (questions 1-4), social and leisure activities (questions 5-9), and caregiving responsibilities (questions 10-16). Social and leisure activities scores range from 0 to 58, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Treatment Effectiveness at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total treatment effectiveness score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).
Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Convenience of Use at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total convenience of use score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).
Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Impact on Daily Living Activities at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total impact on daily living activities score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).
Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Medical Care at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total medical care score ranging between 0 and 8, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).
Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Global Satisfaction at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total global satisfaction score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).
Change From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Composite Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SQLC is designed to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the impact of a patient's disease on the caregiver's quality of life. The SQLC questionnaire consists of 16 questions that evaluate 3 domains: professional activities (questions 1-4), social and leisure activities (questions 5-9), and caregiving responsibilities (questions 10-16). Composite scores range from 0 to 149, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
Change From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Professional Activities at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SQLC is designed to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the impact of a patient's disease on the caregiver's quality of life. The SQLC questionnaire consists of 16 questions that evaluate 3 domains: professional activities (questions 1-4), social and leisure activities (questions 5-9), and caregiving responsibilities (questions 10-16). Professional activities scores range from 0 to 38, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
Change From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Caregiving Responsibilities at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The SQLC is designed to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the impact of a patient's disease on the caregiver's quality of life. The SQLC questionnaire consists of 16 questions that evaluate 3 domains: professional activities (questions 1-4), social and leisure activities (questions 5-9), and caregiving responsibilities (questions 10-16). Caregiving responsibilities scores range from 0 to 53, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The ZBI is a 22-item questionnaire in which caregivers must evaluate the level of agreement on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. The total score is obtained by the sum of the scores of the items. This total score represents a level of caregiver burden, with a range of 0 indicating no burden to 88 indicating completely overloaded.
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III): Motor Examination at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The UPDRS is an investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The UPDRS-III was used in ON state. The motor examination contains 27 items. Each item is scored in a Likert scale from 0 to 4. The UPDRS-III score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 108, with higher score indicating more impairment.
Change From Baseline in Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Score (GADS): Depression Sub-Scale for Caregivers at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The GADS is an 18-item self-report symptom inventory made up of two sub-scales, one for the detection of anxiety and another one for the detection of depression. Both sub-scales are composed of 9 questions. Answers are in yes/no format. Scoring is 1 point for each yes and 0 for each no, with a total sub-scale score of 0 (no anxiety/depression) to 9 (worst anxiety/depression). In the Spanish validation of GADS, the cutoff point to consider probable anxiety disorder is 4 and 2 for probable depression.
Change From Baseline in Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Score (GADS): Anxiety Sub-Scale for Caregivers at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The GADS is an 18-item self-report symptom inventory made up of two sub-scales, one for the detection of anxiety and another one for the detection of depression. Both sub-scales are composed of 9 questions. Answers are in yes/no format. Scoring is 1 point for each yes and 0 for each no, with a total sub-scale score of 0 (no anxiety/depression) to 9 (worst anxiety/depression). In the Spanish validation of GADS, the cutoff point to consider probable anxiety disorder is 4 and 2 for probable depression.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Work Time Missed (Absenteeism) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)Absenteeism, presented as the mean percentage of work time missed due to caregiving (as reported on the WPAI), and calculated as: 100\*number of hours of work missed due to caregiving / (number of hours of work missed due to caregiving + number of hours worked). WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.
Change From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Impairment While Working Due to Caregiving (Presenteeism)Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)Presenteeism (the extent to which caregiving decreased productivity) is presented as the mean percentage of impairment while working due to caregiving, and calculated as: 100\*scale value of question 5 on the WPAI (between 0 and 10) / 10. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.
Change From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Overall Work Productivity Impairment (OWPI) Due to CaregivingBaseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The mean percentage of OWPI due to caregiving (based on the WPAI questionnaire) is presented, calculated as: Absenteeism (%) + extent to which caregiving decreased productivity (%)\* \[number of hours worked / (number of hours of work missed due to caregiving + number of hours worked)\]. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.
Change From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Activity Impairment Due to CaregivingBaseline, Month 6 (±15 days)Activity impairment due to caregiving (the extent to which caregiving affected the ability to perform usual daily activities) is presented as the mean percentage of activity impairment, calculated as 100\*scale value of WPAI question 6 (between 0 and 10) / 10. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity/activity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity/activity.
Correlation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineBaselineSpearman correlation statistics were calculated for the quality of life of the participants (Global PDQ-39, see Outcome Measure 1) and the following scales: UPDRS-III (see Outcome Measure 10), UPDRS-IV (see description below), NMSS (see Outcome Measure 11), BAI (see Outcome Measure 28), BDI-III (see Outcome Measure 27), AS (see Outcome Measure 26), PFS (see Outcome Measure 25), Norris Bond-Lader (NBL) Alertness-Sedation (A-S; see Outcome Measure 22), NBL Contented-Discontented (C-D; see Outcome Measure 23), NBL Calm-Relaxed (C-R; see Outcome Measure 24), ZBI (see Outcome Measure 40), GADS-Anxiety (see Outcome Measure 43), and GADS-Depression (see Outcome Measure 42). The UPDRS-IV contains 11 items, each scored in a Likert scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe); or a 2-point scale (yes/no format), with 1 point for yes and 0 for no. The global score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 23, where higher scores are associated with more disability.
Correlation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6Month 6 (±15 days)Spearman correlation statistics were calculated for the quality of life of the participants (Global PDQ-39, see Outcome Measure 1) and the following scales: UPDRS-III (see Outcome Measure 10), UPDRS-IV (see description below), NMSS (see Outcome Measure 11), BAI (see Outcome Measure 28), BDI-III (see Outcome Measure 27), AS (see Outcome Measure 26), PFS (see Outcome Measure 25), Norris Bond-Lader (NBL) Alertness-Sedation (A-S; see Outcome Measure 22), NBL Contented-Discontented (C-D; see Outcome Measure 23), NBL Calm-Relaxed (C-R; see Outcome Measure 24), ZBI (see Outcome Measure 40), GADS-Anxiety (see Outcome Measure 43), and GADS-Depression (see Outcome Measure 42). The UPDRS-IV contains 11 items, each scored in a Likert scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe); or a 2-point scale (yes/no format), with 1 point for yes and 0 for no. The global score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 23, where higher scores are associated with more disability.
Correlation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineBaselineSpearman correlation statistics were calculated for the quality of life of the caregivers (Global SQLC, see Outcome Measure ) and the following scales: ZBI (see Outcome Measure 40), GADS-Anxiety (see Outcome Measure 43), and GADS-Depression (see Outcome Measure 42), NBL A-S (see Outcome Measure 22), NBL C-D (see Outcome Measure 23), NBL C-R (see Outcome Measure 24), Global PDQ-39 (see Outcome Measure 1), UPDRS-III (see Outcome Measure 10), UPDRS-IV (see description below), and Global NMSS (see Outcome Measure 11). The UPDRS-IV contains 11 items, each scored in a Likert scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe); or a 2-point scale (yes/no format), with 1 point for yes and 0 for no. The global score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 23, where higher scores are associated with more disability.
Correlation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6Month 6 (±15 days)Spearman correlation statistics were calculated for the quality of life of the caregivers (Global SQLC, see Outcome Measure ) and the following scales: ZBI (see Outcome Measure 40), GADS-Anxiety (see Outcome Measure 43), and GADS-Depression (see Outcome Measure 42), NBL A-S (see Outcome Measure 22), NBL C-D (see Outcome Measure 23), NBL C-R (see Outcome Measure 24), Global PDQ-39 (see Outcome Measure 1), UPDRS-III (see Outcome Measure 10), UPDRS-IV (see description below), and Global NMSS (see Outcome Measure 11). The UPDRS-IV contains 11 items, each scored in a Likert scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe); or a 2-point scale (yes/no format), with 1 point for yes and 0 for no. The global score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 23, where higher scores are associated with more disability.
Change From Baseline in the Caregiver Stress Index (CSI) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The CSI is a 13-item questionnaire based on identified common stressors. Answers are in yes/no format. Scoring is 1 point for each yes and 0 for each no. The total score is obtained by the sum of the scores of the items. Minimum score is 0 (no stress) and maximum score is 13 (most stress). A score ≥ 7 indicates a high level of stress.
Change From Baseline in the Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS) Global Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The global score was calculated summing the score of each item (severity x frequency), ranging from 0 to 360, with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in NMSS Cardiovascular Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The cardiovascular domain score ranges from 0 to 24 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in NMSS Sleep/Fatigue Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The sleep/fatigue domain score ranges from 0 to 48 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in NMSS Mood/Cognition Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The mood/cognition domain score ranges from 0 to 72 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in NMSS Perceptual Problems/Hallucinations Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The perceptual problems/hallucinations domain score ranges from 0 to 36 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in NMSS Attention/Memory Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The attention/memory domain score ranges from 0 to 36 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in NMSS Gastrointestinal Tract Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The gastrointestinal tract domain score ranges from 0 to 36 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in NMSS Urinary Domain Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The urinary domain score ranges from 0 to 36 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms.A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 62 participants were enrolled; 59 were evaluable and 3 were non-evaluable because they did not participate in the nasoduodenal test phase and they did not receive any dose of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal infusion gel (LCIG).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
LCIG prescribed in the usual manner, in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization, for participants with advanced Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuation not well responding to conventional therapies.
59
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3
Overall StudyVery Narrow Therapeutic Margin1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous67.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Item (PDQ-39) Global Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (score 0 to 4 on a Likert scale). The global score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Item (PDQ-39) Global Score at Month 6-12.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.65
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The activities of daily living domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Activities of Daily Living Domain Score at Month 6-18.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.52
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The bodily discomfort domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Bodily Discomfort Domain Score at Month 6-9.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.93
p-value: 0.0109t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Cognition Domain Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The cognition domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Cognition Domain Score at Month 6-13.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.94
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Communication Domain Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The communication domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Communication Domain Score at Month 6-9.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.17
p-value: 0.0003t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The emotional well-being domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Emotional Well-Being Domain Score at Month 6-13.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.56
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Mobility Domain Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The mobility domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Mobility Domain Score at Month 6-16.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Social Support Domain Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The social support domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Social Support Domain Score at Month 6-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.56
p-value: 0.4183t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Stigma Domain Score at Month 6

The PDQ-39 contains 39 items grouped in 8 domains: mobility (items 1-10), activities of daily living (items 11-16), emotional well-being (items 17-22), stigma (items 23-26), social support (items 27-29), cognitions (items 30-33), communication (items 34-36), and bodily discomfort (items 37-39). Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never, occasionally, sometimes, often, always or cannot do at all, scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4, respectively. The stigma domain score was calculated by expressing summed item scores as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. The lower scores indicate a better perceived health status and higher scores are associated with more health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Stigma Domain Score at Month 6-6.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.53
p-value: 0.0328t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at Month 6

The BAI is a 21-item self-report multiple-choice inventory. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 based on severity of each item. The maximum total score is 63. Raw scores from 0-7 indicates minimal anxiety, 8-15 indicates mild anxiety, 16-25 indicates moderate anxiety, and 25-63 indicates severe anxiety.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at Month 6-6.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.57
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II) at Month 6

The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report multiple-choice inventory. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 based on severity of each item. The maximum total score is 63. Raw scores from 0-13 indicates minimal depression, 14-19 indicates mild depression, 20-28 indicates moderate depression, and 29-63 indicates severe depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II) at Month 6-5.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.39
p-value: 0.0002t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Score (GADS): Anxiety Sub-Scale for Caregivers at Month 6

The GADS is an 18-item self-report symptom inventory made up of two sub-scales, one for the detection of anxiety and another one for the detection of depression. Both sub-scales are composed of 9 questions. Answers are in yes/no format. Scoring is 1 point for each yes and 0 for each no, with a total sub-scale score of 0 (no anxiety/depression) to 9 (worst anxiety/depression). In the Spanish validation of GADS, the cutoff point to consider probable anxiety disorder is 4 and 2 for probable depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Score (GADS): Anxiety Sub-Scale for Caregivers at Month 6-1.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
p-value: 0.0234signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Score (GADS): Depression Sub-Scale for Caregivers at Month 6

The GADS is an 18-item self-report symptom inventory made up of two sub-scales, one for the detection of anxiety and another one for the detection of depression. Both sub-scales are composed of 9 questions. Answers are in yes/no format. Scoring is 1 point for each yes and 0 for each no, with a total sub-scale score of 0 (no anxiety/depression) to 9 (worst anxiety/depression). In the Spanish validation of GADS, the cutoff point to consider probable anxiety disorder is 4 and 2 for probable depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Score (GADS): Depression Sub-Scale for Caregivers at Month 60.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
p-value: 0.7937t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Attention/Memory Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The attention/memory domain score ranges from 0 to 36 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Attention/Memory Domain Score at Month 6-1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.21
p-value: 0.0274signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Cardiovascular Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The cardiovascular domain score ranges from 0 to 24 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Cardiovascular Domain Score at Month 6-1.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.51
p-value: 0.0002signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Gastrointestinal Tract Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The gastrointestinal tract domain score ranges from 0 to 36 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Gastrointestinal Tract Domain Score at Month 6-3.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08
p-value: <0.0001signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Miscellaneous Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The miscellaneous domain score ranges from 0 to 48 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Miscellaneous Domain Score at Month 6-4.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
p-value: 0.0002t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Mood/Cognition Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The mood/cognition domain score ranges from 0 to 72 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Mood/Cognition Domain Score at Month 6-5.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.84
p-value: 0.0038t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Perceptual Problems/Hallucinations Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The perceptual problems/hallucinations domain score ranges from 0 to 36 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Perceptual Problems/Hallucinations Domain Score at Month 62.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.03
p-value: <0.0001signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Sexual Function Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The sexual function domain score ranges from 0 to 24 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Sexual Function Domain Score at Month 6-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
p-value: 0.001signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Sleep/Fatigue Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The sleep/fatigue domain score ranges from 0 to 48 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Sleep/Fatigue Domain Score at Month 6-8.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.77
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMSS Urinary Domain Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The urinary domain score ranges from 0 to 36 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms.A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in NMSS Urinary Domain Score at Month 6-5.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.24
p-value: 0.0006t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) at Month 6

The PFS-16 comprises 16 items with five polytomous response categories (strongly disagree, disagree, do not agree or disagree, agree, and strongly agree). Responses were scored from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), yielding a summed total score ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 64 (most severe fatigue). The cut-point of ≥ 3.30 was used to identified those perceiving fatigue to be a problem.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) at Month 6-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
p-value: 0.0003t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Caregiver Stress Index (CSI) at Month 6

The CSI is a 13-item questionnaire based on identified common stressors. Answers are in yes/no format. Scoring is 1 point for each yes and 0 for each no. The total score is obtained by the sum of the scores of the items. Minimum score is 0 (no stress) and maximum score is 13 (most stress). A score ≥ 7 indicates a high level of stress.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Caregiver Stress Index (CSI) at Month 6-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
p-value: 0.1945signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS) Global Score at Month 6

The NMSS measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease. It consists of 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular including falls (items 1-2), sleep/fatigue (items 3-6), mood/cognition (items 7-12), perceptual problems/hallucinations (items 13-15), attention/memory (items 16-18), gastrointestinal tract (items 19-21), urinary (items 22-24), sexual function (items 25-26), and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating; items 27-30). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). The global score was calculated summing the score of each item (severity x frequency), ranging from 0 to 360, with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS) Global Score at Month 6-35.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.12
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Alertness/Sedation Sub-Scale Score at Month 6

The Norris/Bond-Lader VAS measures emotional well-being status with a 16-item visual analogue mood rating scale. The VAS consisted of 16 visual analogue items each representing opposite extremes of mood, with the following labels at each end: alert/drowsy, calm/excited, strong/weak, muzzy/clear-headed, well-coordinated/clumsy, lethargic/energetic, contented/dreamy, incompetent/proficient, happy/sad, antagonistic/amicable, interested/bored, withdrawn/gregarious. These scales loaded on 3 domains (alert, strong, clear-headed, well-coordinated, energetic, quick-witted, attentive, proficient, interested); (contented, tranquil, happy, amicable, gregarious); (calm, relaxed). For each individual scale, a line was drawn between each mood state and its opposite and participants rated their current mood by placing a vertical mark on the line. Scores (global, and for each domain) ranged from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more positive mood.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Alertness/Sedation Sub-Scale Score at Month 6-7.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.27
p-value: 0.0279t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Calmness/Relaxation Sub-Scale Score at Month 6

The Norris/Bond-Lader VAS measures emotional well-being status with a 16-item visual analogue mood rating scale. The VAS consisted of 16 visual analogue items each representing opposite extremes of mood, with the following labels at each end: alert/drowsy, calm/excited, strong/weak, muzzy/clear-headed, well-coordinated/clumsy, lethargic/energetic, contented/dreamy, incompetent/proficient, happy/sad, antagonistic/amicable, interested/bored, withdrawn/gregarious. These scales loaded on 3 domains (alert, strong, clear-headed, well-coordinated, energetic, quick-witted, attentive, proficient, interested); (contented, tranquil, happy, amicable, gregarious); (calm, relaxed). For each individual scale, a line was drawn between each mood state and its opposite and participants rated their current mood by placing a vertical mark on the line. Scores (global, and for each domain) ranged from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more positive mood.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Calmness/Relaxation Sub-Scale Score at Month 6-11.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.94
p-value: 0.0047t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Contented/Discontented Sub-Scale Score at Month 6

The Norris/Bond-Lader VAS measures emotional well-being status with a 16-item visual analogue mood rating scale. The VAS consisted of 16 visual analogue items each representing opposite extremes of mood, with the following labels at each end: alert/drowsy, calm/excited, strong/weak, muzzy/clear-headed, well-coordinated/clumsy, lethargic/energetic, contented/dreamy, incompetent/proficient, happy/sad, antagonistic/amicable, interested/bored, withdrawn/gregarious. These scales loaded on 3 domains (alert, strong, clear-headed, well-coordinated, energetic, quick-witted, attentive, proficient, interested); (contented, tranquil, happy, amicable, gregarious); (calm, relaxed). For each individual scale, a line was drawn between each mood state and its opposite and participants rated their current mood by placing a vertical mark on the line. Scores (global, and for each domain) ranged from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more positive mood.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Contented/Discontented Sub-Scale Score at Month 6-3.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.92
p-value: 0.2777t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Mean Global Score at Month 6

The Norris/Bond-Lader VAS measures emotional well-being status with a 16-item visual analogue mood rating scale. The VAS consisted of 16 visual analogue items each representing opposite extremes of mood, with the following labels at each end: alert/drowsy, calm/excited, strong/weak, muzzy/clear-headed, well-coordinated/clumsy, lethargic/energetic, contented/dreamy, incompetent/proficient, happy/sad, antagonistic/amicable, interested/bored, withdrawn/gregarious. These scales loaded on 3 domains (alert, strong, clear-headed, well-coordinated, energetic, quick-witted, attentive, proficient, interested); (contented, tranquil, happy, amicable, gregarious); (calm, relaxed). For each individual scale, a line was drawn between each mood state and its opposite and participants rated their current mood by placing a vertical mark on the line. Scores (global, and for each domain) ranged from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more positive mood.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Norris/Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Mean Global Score at Month 6-6.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.15
p-value: 0.0297t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Caregiving Responsibilities at Month 6

The SQLC is designed to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the impact of a patient's disease on the caregiver's quality of life. The SQLC questionnaire consists of 16 questions that evaluate 3 domains: professional activities (questions 1-4), social and leisure activities (questions 5-9), and caregiving responsibilities (questions 10-16). Caregiving responsibilities scores range from 0 to 53, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Caregiving Responsibilities at Month 60.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.11
p-value: 0.4048t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Composite Score at Month 6

The SQLC is designed to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the impact of a patient's disease on the caregiver's quality of life. The SQLC questionnaire consists of 16 questions that evaluate 3 domains: professional activities (questions 1-4), social and leisure activities (questions 5-9), and caregiving responsibilities (questions 10-16). Composite scores range from 0 to 149, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Composite Score at Month 63.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.57
p-value: 0.3126t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Professional Activities at Month 6

The SQLC is designed to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the impact of a patient's disease on the caregiver's quality of life. The SQLC questionnaire consists of 16 questions that evaluate 3 domains: professional activities (questions 1-4), social and leisure activities (questions 5-9), and caregiving responsibilities (questions 10-16). Professional activities scores range from 0 to 38, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Professional Activities at Month 62.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.06
p-value: 0.1533t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Social and Leisure Activities at Month 6

The SQLC is designed to both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the impact of a patient's disease on the caregiver's quality of life. The SQLC questionnaire consists of 16 questions that evaluate 3 domains: professional activities (questions 1-4), social and leisure activities (questions 5-9), and caregiving responsibilities (questions 10-16). Social and leisure activities scores range from 0 to 58, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Scale of Quality of Life of Caregivers (SQLC) Social and Leisure Activities at Month 6-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.18
p-value: 0.8145t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Score of the Apathy Scale (AS) to Month 6

The AS is an inventory of 14 questions that assess cognitive and behavioral symptoms of emotional apathy. Each is rated from 0 to 3 on a Likert scale. The total scores for AS ranges from 0 (no apathy) to 42 (most apathetic). AS scores ≥ 14 were considered apathetic.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Score of the Apathy Scale (AS) to Month 6-0.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.86
p-value: <0.5877t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Composite Score at Month 6

The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total composite score ranging between 0 and 68, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Composite Score at Month 616.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Convenience of Use at Month 6

The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total convenience of use score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Convenience of Use at Month 619.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.83
p-value: 0.0001t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Global Satisfaction at Month 6

The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total global satisfaction score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Global Satisfaction at Month 644.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
p-value: 0.0687t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Impact on Daily Living Activities at Month 6

The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total impact on daily living activities score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Impact on Daily Living Activities at Month 618.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.78
p-value: <0.0001signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Medical Care at Month 6

The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total medical care score ranging between 0 and 8, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Medical Care at Month 64.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.51
p-value: 0.2428signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Treatment Effectiveness at Month 6

The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total treatment effectiveness score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Treatment Effectiveness at Month 630.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.57
p-value: <0.0001t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Undesirable Side Effects at Month 6

The SATMED-Q is a 17-item questionnaire. Items are grouped in 6 domains: undesirable side effects (items 1-3), treatment effectiveness (items 4-6), convenience of use (items 7-9), impact on daily living activities (items 10-12), medical care (items 13-14), and global satisfaction (items 15-17). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. Summing up the direct scores of the items yields a total undesirable side effects score ranging between 0 and 12, which was transformed to a minimum of 0 (most satisfied) and a maximum of 100 (least satisfied).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction With Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Undesirable Side Effects at Month 6-25.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.05
p-value: <0.0001signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III): Motor Examination at Month 6

The UPDRS is an investigator-used rating tool to follow the longitudinal course of Parkinson's disease. The UPDRS-III was used in ON state. The motor examination contains 27 items. Each item is scored in a Likert scale from 0 to 4. The UPDRS-III score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 108, with higher score indicating more impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III): Motor Examination at Month 6-6.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.83
p-value: 0.0002t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Work Time Missed (Absenteeism) at Month 6

Absenteeism, presented as the mean percentage of work time missed due to caregiving (as reported on the WPAI), and calculated as: 100\*number of hours of work missed due to caregiving / (number of hours of work missed due to caregiving + number of hours worked). WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Work Time Missed (Absenteeism) at Month 6-7.56 percentage of work time missedStandard Deviation 40.68
p-value: 0.5922t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Activity Impairment Due to Caregiving

Activity impairment due to caregiving (the extent to which caregiving affected the ability to perform usual daily activities) is presented as the mean percentage of activity impairment, calculated as 100\*scale value of WPAI question 6 (between 0 and 10) / 10. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity/activity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity/activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Activity Impairment Due to Caregiving-3.33 percentage of activity impairmentStandard Deviation 22.91
p-value: 0.6741t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Impairment While Working Due to Caregiving (Presenteeism)

Presenteeism (the extent to which caregiving decreased productivity) is presented as the mean percentage of impairment while working due to caregiving, and calculated as: 100\*scale value of question 5 on the WPAI (between 0 and 10) / 10. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Impairment While Working Due to Caregiving (Presenteeism)0.00 percentage of work impairmentStandard Deviation 18.03
p-value: 1t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Overall Work Productivity Impairment (OWPI) Due to Caregiving

The mean percentage of OWPI due to caregiving (based on the WPAI questionnaire) is presented, calculated as: Absenteeism (%) + extent to which caregiving decreased productivity (%)\* \[number of hours worked / (number of hours of work missed due to caregiving + number of hours worked)\]. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in WPAI Questionnaire: Mean Percentage of Overall Work Productivity Impairment (OWPI) Due to Caregiving-6.69 percentage of overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 42.34
p-value: 0.6481t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) at Month 6

The ZBI is a 22-item questionnaire in which caregivers must evaluate the level of agreement on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. The total score is obtained by the sum of the scores of the items. This total score represents a level of caregiver burden, with a range of 0 indicating no burden to 88 indicating completely overloaded.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and end-of-treatment assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) at Month 6-0.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.26
p-value: 0.8321t-test
Secondary

Correlation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Baseline

Spearman correlation statistics were calculated for the quality of life of the caregivers (Global SQLC, see Outcome Measure ) and the following scales: ZBI (see Outcome Measure 40), GADS-Anxiety (see Outcome Measure 43), and GADS-Depression (see Outcome Measure 42), NBL A-S (see Outcome Measure 22), NBL C-D (see Outcome Measure 23), NBL C-R (see Outcome Measure 24), Global PDQ-39 (see Outcome Measure 1), UPDRS-III (see Outcome Measure 10), UPDRS-IV (see description below), and Global NMSS (see Outcome Measure 11). The UPDRS-IV contains 11 items, each scored in a Likert scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe); or a 2-point scale (yes/no format), with 1 point for yes and 0 for no. The global score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 23, where higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with Global PDQ-39-0.35125 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with ZBI-0.51735 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with GADS-Anxiety-0.16188 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with GADS-Depression-0.44739 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with NBL A-S0.06318 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with NBL C-D0.17492 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with NBL C-R0.28618 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with UPDRS-III-0.13353 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with UPDRS-IV0.17659 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at BaselineSQLC with Global NMSS0.01625 correlation coefficient
Comparison: SQLC with ZBIp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.689585, -0.289724]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with Goldberg Anxietyp-value: 0.414295% CI: [-0.504489, 0.224771]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with Goldberg Depressionp-value: 0.023995% CI: [-0.715956, -0.063481]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with NBL A-Sp-value: 0.654695% CI: [-0.210715, 0.327872]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with NBL C-Dp-value: 0.211495% CI: [-0.100105, 0.425116]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with NBL C-Rp-value: 0.037495% CI: [0.017222, 0.516523]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with Global PDQ-39p-value: 0.008895% CI: [-0.565795, -0.092154]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with UPDRS-IIIp-value: 0.337495% CI: [-0.387439, 0.139207]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with UPDRS-IVp-value: 0.202595% CI: [-0.095693, 0.424291]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with Global NMSSp-value: 0.907695% CI: [-0.252613, 0.282777]Fisher's z Transformation
Secondary

Correlation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6

Spearman correlation statistics were calculated for the quality of life of the caregivers (Global SQLC, see Outcome Measure ) and the following scales: ZBI (see Outcome Measure 40), GADS-Anxiety (see Outcome Measure 43), and GADS-Depression (see Outcome Measure 42), NBL A-S (see Outcome Measure 22), NBL C-D (see Outcome Measure 23), NBL C-R (see Outcome Measure 24), Global PDQ-39 (see Outcome Measure 1), UPDRS-III (see Outcome Measure 10), UPDRS-IV (see description below), and Global NMSS (see Outcome Measure 11). The UPDRS-IV contains 11 items, each scored in a Likert scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe); or a 2-point scale (yes/no format), with 1 point for yes and 0 for no. The global score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 23, where higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed Month 6 assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with UPDRS-III-0.23226 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with Global NMSS0.11635 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with ZBI-0.63324 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with GADS Anxiety0.17735 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with GADS Depression-0.06976 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with NBL A-S-0.11015 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with NBL C-D0.00326 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with NBL C-R-0.10256 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with Global PDQ-39-0.32445 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Caregivers' Quality of Life (SQLC) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6SQLC with UPDRS-IV-0.12942 correlation coefficient
Comparison: SQLC with ZBIp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.777482, -0.425693]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with Goldberg Anxietyp-value: 0.534795% CI: [-0.368382, 0.632178]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with Goldberg Depressionp-value: 0.825195% CI: [-0.597767, 0.500464]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with NBL A-Sp-value: 0.458195% CI: [-0.382323, 0.179601]Fisher's z transformation
Comparison: SQLC with NBL C-Dp-value: 0.982695% CI: [-0.281136, 0.287128]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with NBL C-Rp-value: 0.489995% CI: [-0.375749, 0.187021]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with Global PDQ-39p-value: 0.023995% CI: [-0.557217, -0.044411]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with UPDRS-IIIp-value: 0.112595% CI: [-0.484427, 0.055538]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with UPDRS-IVp-value: 0.382695% CI: [-0.398887, 0.16062]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: SQLC with Global NMSSp-value: 0.438295% CI: [-0.176724, 0.390468]Fisher's z Transformation
Secondary

Correlation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Baseline

Spearman correlation statistics were calculated for the quality of life of the participants (Global PDQ-39, see Outcome Measure 1) and the following scales: UPDRS-III (see Outcome Measure 10), UPDRS-IV (see description below), NMSS (see Outcome Measure 11), BAI (see Outcome Measure 28), BDI-III (see Outcome Measure 27), AS (see Outcome Measure 26), PFS (see Outcome Measure 25), Norris Bond-Lader (NBL) Alertness-Sedation (A-S; see Outcome Measure 22), NBL Contented-Discontented (C-D; see Outcome Measure 23), NBL Calm-Relaxed (C-R; see Outcome Measure 24), ZBI (see Outcome Measure 40), GADS-Anxiety (see Outcome Measure 43), and GADS-Depression (see Outcome Measure 42). The UPDRS-IV contains 11 items, each scored in a Likert scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe); or a 2-point scale (yes/no format), with 1 point for yes and 0 for no. The global score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 23, where higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with UPDRS-III0.27148 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with UPDRS-IV0.07346 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with NMSS0.20994 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with BAI0.28271 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with BDI-II0.46174 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with AS0.08846 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with PFS0.33361 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with NBL A-S0.22085 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with NBL C-D0.35742 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with NBL C-R0.00011 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with ZBI-0.35125 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with GADS-Anxiety0.21311 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at BaselinePDQ-39 with GADS-Depression0.51846 correlation coefficient
Comparison: PDQ-39 with NBL A-Sp-value: 0.098995% CI: [-0.042139, 0.455224]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with UPDRS-IIIp-value: 0.038995% CI: [0.014175, 0.495059]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with UPDRS-IVp-value: 0.585295% CI: [-0.188409, 0.32558]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with NMSSp-value: 0.11495% CI: [-0.051127, 0.444152]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with BAIp-value: 0.031195% CI: [0.026334, 0.504186]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with BDI-IIp-value: 0.000295% CI: [0.230995, 0.643312]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with ASp-value: 0.514695% CI: [-0.176169, 0.341163]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with PFSp-value: 0.010895% CI: [0.079996, 0.546657]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with NBL C-Dp-value: 0.00695% CI: [0.106797, 0.565335]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with NBL C-Rp-value: 0.999395% CI: [-0.260462, 0.260673]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with ZBIp-value: 0.008895% CI: [-0.565795, -0.092154]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with Goldberg-Anxietyp-value: 0.122295% CI: [-0.057959, 0.454911]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with Goldberg-Depressionp-value: 0.004195% CI: [0.180247, 0.74704]Fisher's z Transformation
Secondary

Correlation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6

Spearman correlation statistics were calculated for the quality of life of the participants (Global PDQ-39, see Outcome Measure 1) and the following scales: UPDRS-III (see Outcome Measure 10), UPDRS-IV (see description below), NMSS (see Outcome Measure 11), BAI (see Outcome Measure 28), BDI-III (see Outcome Measure 27), AS (see Outcome Measure 26), PFS (see Outcome Measure 25), Norris Bond-Lader (NBL) Alertness-Sedation (A-S; see Outcome Measure 22), NBL Contented-Discontented (C-D; see Outcome Measure 23), NBL Calm-Relaxed (C-R; see Outcome Measure 24), ZBI (see Outcome Measure 40), GADS-Anxiety (see Outcome Measure 43), and GADS-Depression (see Outcome Measure 42). The UPDRS-IV contains 11 items, each scored in a Likert scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe); or a 2-point scale (yes/no format), with 1 point for yes and 0 for no. The global score was calculated summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 23, where higher scores are associated with more disability.

Time frame: Month 6 (±15 days)

Population: Intent-to-Treat population: participants (and caregivers) who received at least one dose of the study medication (LCIG) and completed baseline and Month 6 assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with UPDRS-III0.30902 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with UPDRS-IV0.35220 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with NMSS0.36814 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with BAI0.60620 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with BDI-II0.56325 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with AS0.23657 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with PFS0.58572 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with NBL A-S0.54139 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with NBL C-D0.54140 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with NBL C-R0.38968 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with ZBI-0.32445 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with GADS-Anxiety0.56873 correlation coefficient
All ParticipantsCorrelation Between Participants' Quality of Life (PDQ-39) and Different Questionnaires at Month 6PDQ-39 with GADS-Depression0.10855 correlation coefficient
Comparison: PDQ-39 with UPDRS-IIIp-value: 0.023995% CI: [0.042257, 0.534657]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with UPDRS-IVp-value: 0.009395% CI: [0.090528, 0.568388]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with NMSSp-value: 0.006995% CI: [0.105875, 0.582517]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with BAIp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.40173, 0.753097]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with BDI-IIp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.345567, 0.72341]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with ASp-value: 0.088295% CI: [-0.036024, 0.476404]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with PFSp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.374757, 0.739016]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with NBL A-Sp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.317572, 0.708072]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with NBL C-Dp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.31758, 0.708076]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with NBL C-Rp-value: 0.003695% CI: [0.133445, 0.597087]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with ZBIp-value: 0.023995% CI: [-0.557217, -0.044411]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with Goldberg-Anxietyp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.339454, 0.734221]Fisher's z Transformation
Comparison: PDQ-39 with Goldberg-Depressionp-value: 0.705895% CI: [-0.427482, 0.588111]Fisher's z Transformation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026