Skip to content

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Cesarean Section

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in High Risk Patients Undergoing Cesarean

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02289157
Acronym
NPWTCS
Enrollment
441
Registered
2014-11-13
Start date
2015-01-27
Completion date
2016-10-21
Last updated
2018-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Wound Complications

Brief summary

The investigators propose a prospective, randomized trial evaluating the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with high risk obstetrical patients. The investigators hypothesize that negative pressure wound therapy will decrease the wound complications in these patients. The investigators aim to look at all wound complications such as infection and disruption and will be using Prevena incision management system for our NPWT device .

Detailed description

This will be a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of pregnant women who present for prenatal care at Parkland Health and Hospital System. The participants will be limited to women undergoing a cesarean section who are high risk for wound complications: all patients with a BMI \> 40 undergoing cesarean section. The primary outcome will be wound complication defined as wound disruption or wound infection. A wound disruption will be defined as the partial or complete opening of the deep subcutaneous space, not to include superficial skin separation. Underlying causes will include seroma, hematoma, abscess, and facial dehiscence. Wound infection will be defined as a physician diagnosis of wound infection with erythema and warmth extending beyond the immediate area adjacent to the incision and requiring treatment with antibiotics. All patients with a BMI \> 40 undergoing scheduled cesarean section and patients with a BMI \>40 who are admitted in labor will be approached to participate in the study. If patients meeting this criteria undergo cesarean section, they will be randomized to negative pressure wound therapy or a standard dressing. All labor treatment, pre-operative antibiotics, surgical technique, and post-operative care will not differ from current standard of care. All patients randomized will be included in the study. All study participants will have the thickness of their subcutaneous tissue measured with a sterile ruler. Patients randomized to NPWT will have a negative pressure wound therapy system placed over her incision per the manufacturer's protocol. All patients randomized to standard dressing will have the customary dressing of gauze and surgical tape placed over her incision. The investigators will be utilizing a single use negative pressure wound therapy system for the study. Single use negative pressure wound therapy systems are composed of a pressure pump and dressing kit. The pump creates a negative pressure of 125 mmHg (+/- 20 mgHg) and the dressing directly covers surgical incision. The system is battery-powered and designed to be used for a minimum of two days and a maximum of seven days of continuous use. All randomized patients will undergo an examination of their incision by a research physician or nurse prior to discharge. The NPWT will be removed prior to discharge or on post-operative day seven, whichever comes first. All postpartum patients who undergo a cesarean delivery are inpatients until at least post-operative day three and will continue use of NPWT until day of discharge. In patients randomized to a standard dressing, the dressing will be removed prior to discharge per current standard of care. All randomized patients will also undergo a 2 week post-operative incisional examination by a research physician or nurse at the obstetrical complications clinic. Patients will be followed until 30 days postpartum for any wound complications to include wound infection (superficial and deep), readmission to the hospital, re-operation for wound complications, hematoma, seroma, dehiscence, superficial infection requiring antibiotics, or additional clinical evaluations for wound care in the emergency room or clinic setting. A research physician or nurse will contact each after at least 30 days post-operative to confirm the patients' status and ensure no evaluations, admissions, or interventions were done at outside facilities. Subjects will exit the study if they are unable to complete the post-operative visit or withdrawal consent for participation.

Interventions

DEVICENegative pressure wound therapy

Single use negative pressure wound therapy systems are composed of a pressure pump and dressing kit. The pump creates a negative pressure of 125 mmHg (+/- 20 mgHg) and the dressing directly covers surgical incision. The system is battery-powered and designed to be used for a minimum of two days and a maximum of seven days of continuous use. The investigators hypothesize that negative pressure wound therapy will decrease the wound complications in these patients. The investigators will be using Prevena Incision Management System as the negative pressure device in our study.

Sponsors

KCI USA, Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial - Open Label

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
10 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women with BMI \> 40 undergoing a cesarean delivery at Parkland Health and Hospital System.

Exclusion criteria

* Any patient not meeting inclusion criteria will be deemed ineligible. * All HIV positive patients will be excluded due to the increased risk of infectious complications in these patients. * Although patients on anticoagulants can use NPWT, they will be excluded as there may be an increased risk of bleeding in these patients. * according to the wound therapy manufacturer's instructions patients with: * fragile skin * allergy to silver or acrylic adhesives * a malignancy in the wound bed or margins of the wound bed * non-enteric and unexplored fistulas * necrotic tissue with eschar present * exposed arteries, veins, nerves or organs, anastomotic sites, or surgical suction are not candidates for usage of the device.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Wound ComplicationDay of surgery to 30 days postoperativeNumber of Patients with Wound infection complications: hematoma, seroma, dehiscence, or Surgical Site Infection.
Number of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperativeListing of different types of wound morbidity in the 2 cohorts: dehiscence, cellulitis, superficial SSI, deep SSI, organ space SSI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Emergency Room Visits After DischargeDay of surgery to 30 days postoperativeNumber of emergency room visits made after initial discharge by the study (icNPT) and comparison groups.
Number of Patients With Number of Clinic VisitsDay of surgery to 30 days postoperativeNumber of clinic visits made by patients after surgery concerning wound morbidity per patient
Number of Participants With Morbid Outcomes After DeliveryDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperative
Number of Participants With Scheduled and Unscheduled Cesarean SectionDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperativeCochran Mantel-Hanzel measures used to compare interactions between scheduled and unscheduled cesarean sections stratified by icNPT and standard dressing, for wound morbidity
Number of Participants With Pfannenstiel Versus Midline Abdominal Incisions for Cesarian SectionDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperativeCochran-Mantel-Haenzel test for interactions between pfannenstiel and midline abdominal incisions stratified by icNPT vs Standard dressing, for wound morbidity
Length of Stay After ReadmissionAfter dismissal and readmitted within 30 days for wound morbidityNumber of days in hospital after readmission for wound morbidity
Number of Patients in Labor Versus no Labor Prior to Cesarean SectionDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperativeCochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to compare interaction in icNPT and Standard dressing stratified by patients in labor and patients not in labor
Number of Patients With Hypertension Versus no HypertensionDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperativeCochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to compare interaction between patients with hypertension versus no hypertension stratified by icNPT versus standard dressing, in wound morbidity
Number of Patients With Insulin Requiring Diabetes Versus no Insulin Requiring DiabetesDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperativeCochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to compare interaction in icNPT and Standard wound dressings stratified by women with insulin requiring diabetes and no insulin requiring Diabetes.
Number of Patients With Chorioamnionitis Versus no ChorioamnionitisDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperativeCochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to estimate interaction between chorioamnionitis and no chorioamnionitis stratified by icNPT and standard dressing, for wound morbidity
Number of Patients With Ruptured and Unruptured Membranes Prior to Cesarean SectionDay of Surgery to 30 days postoperativeCochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to compare interaction in icNPT and Standard dressing stratified by Ruptured vs Unruptured membranes
Length of Postoperative StayLength of Postoperative StayNumber of Days in Hospital after Initial Surgery

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients recruited in the Parkland Hospital Maternal-Fetal Medicine High Risk Clinic, on the Antepartum Floor, in Labor and Delivery, and in the preoperative holding area. January 2015 until July 2016. 850 screened. See Figure 1 Flow Diagram.

Pre-assignment details

Patients were excluded for pre-specified exclusion criteria and if they delivered vaginally after consent was obtained. 850 patients were screened. 173 declined participation, 5 withdrew consent, 2 delivered at outside facility, 211 delivered vaginally, 10 did not meet inclusion criteria, and 8 not identified to be enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
After standard cesarean section completed patients will have Prevena negative pressure wound therapy system placed. Negative pressure wound therapy: Single use negative pressure wound therapy systems are composed of a pressure pump and dressing kit. The pump creates a negative pressure of 125 mmHg (+/- 20 mgHg) and the dressing directly covers surgical incision. The system is battery-powered and designed to be used for a minimum of two days and a maximum of seven days of continuous use. The investigators hypothesize that negative pressure wound therapy will decrease the wound complications in these patients. The investigators will be using Prevena Incision Management System as the negative pressure device in our study.
222
Standard Dressing
After standard cesarean section completed patients will have standard dressing placed.
219
Total441

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard DressingTotalNegative Pressure Wound Therapy
Age, Continuous30.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
29.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
29.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
BMI at Delivery45.8 BMI = kg/meter^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
46.3 BMI = kg/meter^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
46.6 BMI = kg/meter^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Cesarean Priority
ASAP
138 participants279 participants141 participants
Cesarean Priority
Emergent
9 participants18 participants9 participants
Cesarean Priority
Scheduled
72 participants144 participants72 participants
Chorioamnionitis12 Participants27 Participants15 Participants
Chronic hypertension36 participants76 participants40 participants
Estimated blood loss1136 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 285
1159 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 291
1181 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 294
Gestational age at delivery38.7 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
38.6 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
38.6 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Incision length in cm14.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
14.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
14.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
Induction Labor43 Participants90 Participants47 Participants
Insulin Requiring Diabetes24 participants60 participants36 participants
Length of Surgery80 minutes82 minutes84 minutes
Midline skin incision158 participants328 participants170 participants
Number subcutaneous layers closed3 layers3 layers3 layers
Parity
Parity 0
42 participants97 participants55 participants
Parity
Parity 1
68 participants132 participants64 participants
Parity
Parity 2
57 participants119 participants62 participants
Parity
Parity > 2
52 participants93 participants41 participants
Patients in labor prior cesarean32 Participants76 Participants44 Participants
Primary Cesarean80 participants175 participants95 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race Black
60 participants116 participants56 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race Hispanic
146 participants297 participants151 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race White
13 participants28 participants15 participants
Ruptured Membranes59 Participants136 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
219 Participants441 Participants222 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Subcutaneous skin depth in cm5.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
5.4 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
5.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
Suture skin closure211 Participants421 Participants210 Participants
Tobacco use15 participants33 participants18 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2220 / 219
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2220 / 219
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2220 / 219

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Classification of Wound Morbidity

Listing of different types of wound morbidity in the 2 cohorts: dehiscence, cellulitis, superficial SSI, deep SSI, organ space SSI

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityCellulitis12 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityDeep incisional SSI0 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbiditySuperficial incisional SSI20 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityOrgan space infection1 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityDehiscence4 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityOrgan space infection0 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityDehiscence1 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityCellulitis16 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbiditySuperficial incisional SSI25 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Classification of Wound MorbidityDeep incisional SSI0 Participants
Comparison: Ho: There is no difference between the types wound morbidity in the study (icNPT) and comparison groups.p-value: 0.31Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Participants With Wound Complication

Number of Patients with Wound infection complications: hematoma, seroma, dehiscence, or Surgical Site Infection.

Time frame: Day of surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Wound Complication37 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Wound Complication42 Participants
p-value: 0.5495% CI: [0.5, 1.4]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Length of Postoperative Stay

Number of Days in Hospital after Initial Surgery

Time frame: Length of Postoperative Stay

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyLength of Postoperative Stay3 days
Standard DressingLength of Postoperative Stay3 days
p-value: 0.54Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Length of Stay After Readmission

Number of days in hospital after readmission for wound morbidity

Time frame: After dismissal and readmitted within 30 days for wound morbidity

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyLength of Stay After Readmission16 days
Standard DressingLength of Stay After Readmission21 days
Comparison: Ho: There is no difference in length of stay after readmission for wound morbidity between the study (icNPT) and comparison groups.p-value: 0.41Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Number of Participants With Morbid Outcomes After Delivery

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Morbid Outcomes After DeliveryReoperation for I and D/Extirpation14 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Morbid Outcomes After DeliveryReadmission12 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Morbid Outcomes After DeliveryPostoperative antimicrobials33 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Morbid Outcomes After DeliveryReadmission9 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Morbid Outcomes After DeliveryPostoperative antimicrobials39 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Morbid Outcomes After DeliveryReoperation for I and D/Extirpation10 Participants
Comparison: Ho: There is no difference between number of readmissions between the study (icNPT) and comparison groups.p-value: 0.52Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Ho: There is no difference in the use of post operative antimicrobials between the the study (icNPT) and comparison groups.p-value: 0.45Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Ho: There is no difference in the number of patients with Incision and Drainage and/or Extirpation between the study (icNPT) and comparison groups.p-value: 0.44Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Number of Participants With Pfannenstiel Versus Midline Abdominal Incisions for Cesarian Section

Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel test for interactions between pfannenstiel and midline abdominal incisions stratified by icNPT vs Standard dressing, for wound morbidity

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Pfannenstiel Versus Midline Abdominal Incisions for Cesarian Sectionpfannenstiel3 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Pfannenstiel Versus Midline Abdominal Incisions for Cesarian Sectionmidline34 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Pfannenstiel Versus Midline Abdominal Incisions for Cesarian Sectionpfannenstiel8 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Pfannenstiel Versus Midline Abdominal Incisions for Cesarian Sectionmidline34 Participants
p-value: 0.27Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With Scheduled and Unscheduled Cesarean Section

Cochran Mantel-Hanzel measures used to compare interactions between scheduled and unscheduled cesarean sections stratified by icNPT and standard dressing, for wound morbidity

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Scheduled and Unscheduled Cesarean SectionScheduled12 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Participants With Scheduled and Unscheduled Cesarean SectionUnscheduled25 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Scheduled and Unscheduled Cesarean SectionScheduled12 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Participants With Scheduled and Unscheduled Cesarean SectionUnscheduled30 Participants
p-value: 0.68Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Patients in Labor Versus no Labor Prior to Cesarean Section

Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to compare interaction in icNPT and Standard dressing stratified by patients in labor and patients not in labor

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients in Labor Versus no Labor Prior to Cesarean SectionLabor15 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients in Labor Versus no Labor Prior to Cesarean SectionNo labor22 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients in Labor Versus no Labor Prior to Cesarean SectionLabor17 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients in Labor Versus no Labor Prior to Cesarean SectionNo labor25 Participants
p-value: 0.49Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Patients With Chorioamnionitis Versus no Chorioamnionitis

Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to estimate interaction between chorioamnionitis and no chorioamnionitis stratified by icNPT and standard dressing, for wound morbidity

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Chorioamnionitis Versus no Chorioamnionitischorioamnionitis4 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Chorioamnionitis Versus no Chorioamnionitisno chorioamnionitis33 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Chorioamnionitis Versus no Chorioamnionitischorioamnionitis3 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Chorioamnionitis Versus no Chorioamnionitisno chorioamnionitis39 Participants
p-value: 0.74Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Patients With Emergency Room Visits After Discharge

Number of emergency room visits made after initial discharge by the study (icNPT) and comparison groups.

Time frame: Day of surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Emergency Room Visits After DischargeNo ER visits190 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Emergency Room Visits After Discharge1 ER visit30 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Emergency Room Visits After Discharge2 ER visits2 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Emergency Room Visits After DischargeNo ER visits190 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Emergency Room Visits After Discharge1 ER visit28 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Emergency Room Visits After Discharge2 ER visits1 Participants
Comparison: Ho: There is no difference between the number of ER visits made per person between the study (icNPT) and comparison groups.p-value: 0.38Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Patients With Hypertension Versus no Hypertension

Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to compare interaction between patients with hypertension versus no hypertension stratified by icNPT versus standard dressing, in wound morbidity

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Hypertension Versus no HypertensionHypertension8 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Hypertension Versus no HypertensionNo Hypertension29 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Hypertension Versus no HypertensionHypertension8 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Hypertension Versus no HypertensionNo Hypertension34 Participants
p-value: 0.92Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Patients With Insulin Requiring Diabetes Versus no Insulin Requiring Diabetes

Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to compare interaction in icNPT and Standard wound dressings stratified by women with insulin requiring diabetes and no insulin requiring Diabetes.

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Insulin Requiring Diabetes Versus no Insulin Requiring DiabetesInsulin Diabetes5 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Insulin Requiring Diabetes Versus no Insulin Requiring DiabetesNo Diabetes32 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Insulin Requiring Diabetes Versus no Insulin Requiring DiabetesInsulin Diabetes7 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Insulin Requiring Diabetes Versus no Insulin Requiring DiabetesNo Diabetes35 Participants
p-value: 0.22Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits

Number of clinic visits made by patients after surgery concerning wound morbidity per patient

Time frame: Day of surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits2 visits4 participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits4 visits1 participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits3 visits5 participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits5 visits1 participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits1 visit15 participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits5 visits0 participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits1 visit15 participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits2 visits6 participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits3 visits2 participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Number of Clinic Visits4 visits4 participants
p-value: 0.48Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Patients With Ruptured and Unruptured Membranes Prior to Cesarean Section

Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel measure used to compare interaction in icNPT and Standard dressing stratified by Ruptured vs Unruptured membranes

Time frame: Day of Surgery to 30 days postoperative

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Ruptured and Unruptured Membranes Prior to Cesarean SectionRuptured15 Participants
Negative Pressure Wound TherapyNumber of Patients With Ruptured and Unruptured Membranes Prior to Cesarean SectionUnruptured22 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Ruptured and Unruptured Membranes Prior to Cesarean SectionRuptured17 Participants
Standard DressingNumber of Patients With Ruptured and Unruptured Membranes Prior to Cesarean SectionUnruptured25 Participants
p-value: 0.55Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026