Skip to content

Skin Traction Versus Position Splint in Patients With Hip Fracture

The Effects of Preoperative Skin Traction and Position Splint on Pain, Comfort and Satisfaction in Patients With Hip Fracture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02287571
Enrollment
68
Registered
2014-11-10
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2014-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fractures, Complication of Traction Procedure, Pain, Splints

Keywords

comfort, satisfaction

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of preoperative skin traction and position splint on pain, comfort, complications, difficulty level of nursing interventions, satisfaction from treatment and nursing care in patients with hip fracture. The sample is comprised of 34 patients with hip fracture in each group, totally 68 patients. Skin traction and position splint were applied after block randomization. Data regarding pain, comfort, satisfaction from care, immobilization comfort, complications, time of operation and hospitalization time were collected after intervention.

Interventions

DEVICEDerotation splint

This group is the actual intervention group.

This group is the routine treatment (control) valid in the clinical practice.

Sponsors

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being inpatient who were planned the surgery due to the hip fracture (caput femur fracture, collum femur fracture, femur intertrochanteric fracture and subtrochanteric fracture) diagnosis in the Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic * Being 50 years old or more * Patients who speak and literate in Turkish * Patients who gave informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Any condition that emerges an obstacle for verbal and written interaction during data collection phase * Unable to perform written or verbal communication in Turkish * Withdrawal from the study due to medical reasons or death, at his/her will prior to preoperative data collection * Urgent non-elective surgery * Physician decision that do accept the method of immobilization assigned to the patient as appropriate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Painup to 7 daysPain was assessed by VAS score prior to intervention, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after intervention and daily from the next morning of intervention till the surgery.
Comfortup to 7 daysComfort was assessed by VAS score prior to intervention, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after intervention and by Immobilization Comfort Questionnaire daily from the next morning of intervention till the surgery.
Satisfaction from the treatmentUp to 7 daysSatisfaction from the treatment was assessed by VAS score from the next day after intervention till the surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospitalization durationparticipants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeksTime spent in the hospital till discharge was assessed.
ComplicationsUp to 7 daysComplications (pressure ulcer, deep vein thrombosis, allergic skin reaction, pulmonary and urinary tract infection and constipation due to immobilization) were evaluated daily after intervention till the surgery.
Surgery durationparticipants were followed for the duration of surgical procedure, an average of 2 hoursTime that the surgical procedure has taken was assessed.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026