Pediatric Endotracheal Intubation During Resuscitation

Comparison of Intubation Through the McGrath® MAC, GlideScope®, AirTraq® and Miller Laryngoscope by Paramedics During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial.

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02286297

Acronym

PETI

Enrollment

100

Registered

2014-11-07

Start date

2014-11-30

Completion date

2014-11-30

Last updated

2014-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric, Cardiopulmonary

Keywords

Intubation

Brief summary

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is perceived as the optimal method of providing and maintaining a clear and secure airway. The 2010 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines emphasized the importance of minimal interruption during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These guidelines also suggest that skilled operators should be able to secure the airway without interrupting chest compression. The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of different available video laryngoscopes and the Miller laryngoscope for emergency intubation during simulated pediatric CPR.

Interventions

DEVICEMcGRATH® MAC

video-laryngoscopy-1

DEVICEAirTraq

video-laryngoscopy-2

DEVICEGlideScope

video-laryngoscopy-3

DEVICEMiller

Direct laryngoscopy

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

CROSSOVER

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* give voluntary consent to participate in the study * paramedics, nurses, physicians

Exclusion criteria

* not meet the above criteria * wrist or low back diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Time to intubation	intraoperative	time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Success of intubation	intraoperative	effectiveness of the first, second and third intubation attempts and overall effectiveness of intubation by participants using four intubation devices. If the examinee failed at all attempts, the case was excluded from the time calculations.
Visual Analog scale (VAS) score	1 day	participants were asked which method they would prefer in a real-life resuscitation

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactLukasz Czyżewski

rn.czyzewski@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026