Skip to content

Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study

Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02285127
Enrollment
168
Registered
2014-11-06
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2023-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture

Brief summary

Is there a functional outcome difference when treating pertrochanteric fractures with a short or long cephalomedullary nail?

Interventions

PROCEDUREShort versus long cephalomedullary Intramedullary nail

Biomet Affixus Short and Long hip fracture nail. Stryker Gamma Short and Long hip fracture nail.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* AO/OTA fracture classification 31(A-B) (1-3). * Age greater than 18 years old.

Exclusion criteria

-Less than 18 years old.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
SF (short form)-363 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Harris Hip Score3 months

Other

MeasureTime frame
Reoperationwithin 1 year
Mortality1 year

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026