Skip to content

Respiratory Complaints Checklist Trial

Randomized Clinical Trial of the Impact of a Respiratory Complaints Assessment Checklist on Resources Utilization and Clinical Outcomes in an Acute Evaluation Outpatient Clinic

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02283892
Acronym
RCC
Enrollment
39
Registered
2014-11-05
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2016-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cough, Dyspnea

Keywords

respiratory complaints, dyspnea, cough, checklist

Brief summary

This is a randomized clinical trial that evaluates the impact of using an internet-based checklist for systematic assessment of patients reporting respiratory complaints with the conventional assessment, without using the checklist.

Detailed description

This is a randomized clinical trial that evaluates the impact of using an internet-based checklist for systematic assessment of patients reporting respiratory complaints with the conventional assessment, without using the checklist. Study setting: emergency department related acute evaluation outpatient clinic Inclusion criteria: 18 years of age or older; patients presenting to the ED reporting cough or dyspnea; Exclusion criteria: acute respiratory failure; SpO2 \< 92%; any signs of hemodynamic or respiratory instability; possible concurrent diagnosis requiring immediate assessment (e.g..: acute coronary syndrome or stroke; ) Primary outcome: need of reassessment in the ED or hospitalization within 1 month of index evaluation (intervention). Secondary outcomes: number of complete blood counts ordered in the index evaluation; number of other diagnostic tests ordered in the index evaluation; Randomization: block 1:1; stratified by gender and age (\>50 years old). Masking will be appllied to: patients; outcome assessors; data analysts;

Interventions

3 page checklist with suggestions of possible diagnosis according to clinical presentation of patients presenting with dyspnea or cough; also suggests diagnostic tests that are likely to be useful in each situation.

OTHERConventional evaluation

Physician evaluation without the use of checklists

Sponsors

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

18 years of age or older; patients presenting to the ED reporting cough or dyspnea; legally capable.

Exclusion criteria

acute respiratory failure; SpO2 \< 92%; any signs of hemodynamic or respiratory instability; possible concurrent diagnosis requiring immediate assessment (e.g..: acute coronary syndrome or stroke; )

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Need to visit the emergency department or acute evaluation outpatient clinic1 month
Complete blood count ordered in the index evaluation1 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of diagnostic tests ordered in the index evaluation1 month
Hospital admission1 month
Antibiotics prescription1 monthFrequency and type of antibiotic prescribed in each study arm
Major events1 monthComposite endpoint: revisit to emergency department OR hospital admission OR death

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026