Skip to content

A Comparison of Stryker Hybrid Arch Bars

A Comparison of Stryker Hybrid Arch Bars Versus Erich Arch Bars for Maxillomandibular Fixation of Mandibular Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02283528
Acronym
Hybrid
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-11-05
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2017-12-21
Last updated
2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fracture Mandible

Brief summary

Patients who sustain a fracture of the lower jaw are typically treated by wiring the teeth together or using small titanium plates and screws to fix the fracture. With either technique the upper and lower teeth are held together to ensure that the fracture is held in the correct position during healing (for closed reduction) or while the plate and screws are applied (for open reduction). The teeth can be held together using Erich arch bars which are a type of braces that are temporarily wired to the existing teeth. These stay in place for 6 weeks until the fracture has healed even though the patient is able to open his mouth immediately after the surgery is complete. The alternative to the traditional Erich arch bars is a relatively new type of arch bar (Stryker Hybrid) that is screwed to the jaw bone rather than wired to the teeth. The purpose of this study is to compare the two types of arch bars in terms of the speed with which they can be applied as well as any difference in fracture healing

Interventions

DEVICEStryker Hybrid

Place Hybrid arch bars

DEVICEErich

Control group is Erich arch bars

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Mandible fracture involving subcondyle, ramus, angle, body, parasymphysis and symphysis 2. Age 18 years - 90 years 3. Ability to give informed consent 4. Minimum 6 weeks follow-up 5. Pre and post-operative panoramic xrays

Exclusion criteria

1. Comminuted fractures 2. Infected fractures 3. Previously treated fractures 4. Complete edentulism 5. Gun shot wounds 6. Pregnancy or breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Place ArchbarsDuring initial admission and surgeryTime taken to place archbars

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Fracture Healing at 6 Weeks6 weeksRadiographic healing
Number of Participants With Complications Including Loosening of Archbars, Loosening of MMF, or Damage to Adjacent Teeth and Structuresup to 6 weeks post operativelyassess operative and post-operative complications to include loosening of archbars, loosening of MMF if stratified to closed reduction and damage to adjacent teeth and structures

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hybrid
Placement of Hybrid arch bars for open or closed reduction of mandible fractures Stryker Hybrid: Place Hybrid arch bars
26
Erich
Placement of Erich archbars for open or closed reduction of mandible fractures Erich: Control group is Erich arch bars
24
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHybridErichTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants24 Participants50 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants17 Participants38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants24 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants20 Participants42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Place Archbars

Time taken to place archbars

Time frame: During initial admission and surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HybridTime to Place Archbars14.07 minutesStandard Deviation 8.4
ErichTime to Place Archbars37.29 minutesStandard Deviation 15.1
Secondary

Number of Participants With Complications Including Loosening of Archbars, Loosening of MMF, or Damage to Adjacent Teeth and Structures

assess operative and post-operative complications to include loosening of archbars, loosening of MMF if stratified to closed reduction and damage to adjacent teeth and structures

Time frame: up to 6 weeks post operatively

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HybridNumber of Participants With Complications Including Loosening of Archbars, Loosening of MMF, or Damage to Adjacent Teeth and Structures5 Participants
ErichNumber of Participants With Complications Including Loosening of Archbars, Loosening of MMF, or Damage to Adjacent Teeth and Structures0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Fracture Healing at 6 Weeks

Radiographic healing

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HybridNumber of Participants With Fracture Healing at 6 Weeks18 Participants
ErichNumber of Participants With Fracture Healing at 6 Weeks18 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026