Skip to content

Pediatric Resuscitation With Feedback CPR Devices

Is Chest Compressions Using the TrueCPRTM Feedback Device More Effective Than Manual Compressions During Pediatric Resuscitation? A Manikin Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02281903
Acronym
PRFD
Enrollment
132
Registered
2014-11-04
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2014-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to compare the TrueCPR feedback device (with metronome) to standard basic life support (BLS) in terms of the quality of single rescuer pediatric resuscitation. Therefore, our hypothesis was that there would be no difference between both CPR methods in terms of chest compression quality parameters.

Detailed description

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death worldwide. High-quality chest compressions are of paramount importance for survival and good neurological outcome. Unfortunately, even health professionals have difficulty performing effective CPR. Chest compression (CC) is often too shallow, compression ratio is inadequate, and hands-off time is too long. CPR feedback devices might be an option for rescuers to in order to increase CC efficiency.

Interventions

DEVICEThe TrueCPR feedback device

feedback devices

Standard basic life support = chest compressions without any feedback device (manual resuscitation)

Sponsors

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* give voluntary consent to participate in the study * medical profession (paramedics, nurses, physicians) or medical students (nurses, paramedics, physicians)

Exclusion criteria

* not meet the above criteria * wrist or low back diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effective compressions compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions1 montheffective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
effective compressions ratio effective compressions [%] multiplied by flow time [%]1 montheffective compressions ratio was defined as effective compressions \[%\] multiplied by flow time \[%\]
Flow time sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed.1 monthflow time was defined as the sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed.
absolute hands-off time sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation1 monthabsolute hands-off time (HOT) was defined as the sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation
Compression depth compression in correct depth (40-50mm) measured by the software is connected to the manikin and computer1 monthcompression in correct depth (40-50mm) measured by the software is connected to the manikin and computer

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026