Skip to content

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Four Different Doses of BI 409306 Compared to Placebo Given for 12 Weeks in Patients With Schizophrenia on Stable Antipsychotic Treatment.

A Phase II Randomised, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Four Orally Administrated Doses of BI 409306 During a 12-week Treatment Period in Patients With Schizophrenia on Stable Antipsychotic Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02281773
Enrollment
518
Registered
2014-11-04
Start date
2014-11-10
Completion date
2016-06-13
Last updated
2017-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of four different doses of BI 409306 once daily compared to placebo given for 12 weeks in patients with schizophrenia on stable antipsychotic treatment.

Interventions

DRUGBI 409306 100 mg QD
DRUGBI 498306 50 mg QD
DRUGPlacebo
DRUGBI 498306 25 mg QD
DRUGBI 409306 10 mg QD

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with established diagnoses of schizophrenia (per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)) with the following clinical features: a) Clinically stable and are in the residual (non-acute) phase of their illness for at least 8 weeks b) Current antipsychotic and concomitant psychotropic medications must meet the criteria below: b)-1 Maintained on current atypical (second generation) antipsychotic medications (in any approved dosage form) other than Clozapine and on current dose for at least 8 weeks prior to randomisation, and/or b)-2 Maintained on current typical (first generation) antipsychotic medications and on current dose for at least 6 months, optionally combined with anticholinergics if treated with a stable dose for at least 6 months prior to randomisation, and/or b)-3 Maintained on current concomitant psychotropic medications other than anticholinergics, antiepileptics and lithium, and on current dose for at least 8 weeks prior to randomisation. Antiepileptics and lithium are allowed if initiated at least 6 months prior to randomisation. b)-4 Anticholinergics, antiepileptics and lithium have been washed out for at least 6 months prior to randomisation if the treatments that patients were using before entering the clinical trial are discontinued. c) Have no more than a moderate severity rating on hallucinations and delusions (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-positive syndrome Hallucinatory Behavior item score \< =4 and Delusions item score \< = 4) d) Have no more than a moderate severity rating on positive formal thought disorder (PANSS-positive syndrome Conceptual Disorganization item score \< = 4) e) Have a minimal level of extrapyramidal symptoms (Simpson-Angus Scale total score \< 6) and depressive symptoms (PANSS-general psychopathology syndrome Depression item score \< = 4) 2. Male or female patients age 18 to 55 years 3. Patients must exhibit reliability, physiologic capability, and an educational level sufficient to comply with all protocol procedures,in the investigator's opinion. 4. Signed and dated written informed consent by date of Visit 1 in accordance with GCP and the local legislation. If the patient needs a legal representative, then this legal representative must give written informed consent as well. 5. Patients must have an identified informant who will be consistent throughout the study. The informant must interact with the subject at least 2 times a week. Note: Informant ratings are needed for SCoRS global ratings at Randomisation Visit (Visit 2) and (early) End of Treatment Visit. In person informant ratings on the study visits are preferred whenever possible. However, if the informant is not available for in person ratings, telephone interview is acceptable. The informant must be available for a telephone interview at Visit 2 and (e)EOT Visit.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient treated with more than two antipsychotic medications (including more than two dosage forms) 2. Patient's cognitive impairment severity compromises the validity of the cognitive outcome measures, in the clinical judgment of the investigator 3. Any suicidal behavior in the past 2 years (i.e. actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, or preparatory acts or behavior) 4. Any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 in the Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in the past 3 months (i.e. active suicidal thought with intent but without specific plan, or active suicidal thought with plan and intent) 5. In the judgment of the investigator, any clinically significant finding of the medical examination (including BP, PR and ECG) or laboratory value deviating from normal or any evidence of a clinically significant concomitant disease or any other clinical condition that would jeopardize a patient's safety while participating in the clinical trial 6. History or diagnosis of symptomatic and unstable/uncontrolled gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, immunological, hematological or hormonal disorders 7. For female patients: Pre-menopausal women (last menstruation \< =1 year prior to informed consent) who: * are nursing or pregnant or * are of child-bearing potential and are not practicing an acceptable method of birth control, or do not plan to continue using this method throughout the trial until 28 days after the last treatment administration, and do not agree to submit to periodic pregnancy testing during participation in the trial. Acceptable methods of birth control include tubal ligation, vasectomized partner, transdermal patch, intra uterine devices/systems (IUDs/IUSs), combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives as well as implantable or injectable hormonal contraceptives. Complete sexual abstinence (if acceptable by local health authorities) is allowed when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptom-thermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception. Double barrier methods are permissible (if acceptable by local health authorities, note that this is not an acceptable method in EU countries). For male patients: Men who are able to father a child, unwilling to be abstinent or use adequate contraception for the duration of study participation and for at least 28 days after treatment has ended. 8. Known history of HIV infection 9. Diseases of the central nervous system (including but not limited to any kind of seizures, stroke or any psychiatric disorders other than schizophrenia) 10. Any subject who on the Mini-international neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) has a categorical diagnosis of another current major psychiatric disorder. 11. History of malignancy within the last 5 years, except for basal cell carcinoma 12. Planned elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia, or hospitalisation for more than 1 day during the study period 13. Significant history of drug dependence or abuse (including alcohol, as defined in DSM-5-substance use disorder or in the opinion of the investigator) within the last two years prior to informed consent, or a positive urine drug screen for cocaine, opioid, PCP, amphetamine, heroin, or marijuana at screening 14. Patient needs to take long-acting hypnotics and anxiolytics (i.e. Diazepam) 15. Patients taking medications that are known to be strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors 16. Participation in another trial with an investigational drug or procedure within 30 days or 6 half-lives (whichever is longer) or participation in another trial with any cognitive-enhancing therapy or procedure within 90 days prior to screening 17. Previous participation in any BI 409306 study 18. Not fluent in the language of the batteries/questionnaires which will be used in the country

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Suicidality as Assessed by Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)Up to 12 weeksC-SSRS: Number (%) of subjects with an event of Suicidal Ideation (Wish to be dead, Non-specific active suicidal thoughts, Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act, Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent) or Suicidal Behavior (Preparatory acts or behavior, Aborted attempt, Interrupted attempt, Non-fatal suicide attempt, Completed suicide) or Self-injurious behavior without suicidal intent is presented. C-SSRS used only to evaluate whether the patient developed suicidal ideation or behavior and no composite score will be used. Questions in the 1st section of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior assessments in C-SSRS are yes and no type questions. If patient had suicidal ideation or behavior, 2nd section will be performed to evaluate the details with the scale from 0 to 5 or 0 to 2 and the larger number means the more severe condition.
Change From Baseline in the Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of TreatmentBaseline and Week 12MCCB comprises 10 tests, which assess 7 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score was calculated by summing over the standardised score of each domain for analysis and it varies from -20 to 99 with higher score indicating better outcome. The trial was set up as learn and confirm model including 2 stages. Stage 1 analysis was conducted to identify the meaningful cognition endpoint(s) (CANTAB domain(s)) and the selected endpoint(s) were to be pre-specified as the primary endpoint(s) for Stage 2 analysis. Since none of the CANTAB outcome measures was selected in the Stage 1 analysis at planned time based on the pre-specified criteria, the MCCB composite score was chosen as the primary endpoint in the Stage 2 analysis, as pre-defined.
Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Including the Abnormalities of Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) Test and Laboratory Tests)Up to 20 weeksOccurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) (including the abnormalities of physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) test and laboratory tests).
Occurrence of Protocol-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Up to 20 weeksOccurrence of Protocol-specified adverse events of special interest (AESI).
Dramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Dramatic worsening of disease state as assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). It contains 30-items including seven positive symptom items, seven negative symptom items and 16 general psychopathology symptom items. Each item was scored on the same seven point severity scale. Fourteen of the PANSS items required input from an informant. Total score ranges from 30 to 210 (minimum is better). The descriptive statistics of change from baseline (CFB) in PANSS score at week 6 (W6) and week 12 (W12) are presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Everyday Functional Capacity as Measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Global Ratings After 12 Weeks of TreatmentBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in everyday functional capacity as measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) global ratings after 12 weeks of treatment. SCoRS is a 20-item interview-based assessment of cognitive deficits and the degree to which they affect day-to-day functions. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale. Higher ratings reflected a greater degree of impairment. The SCoRS global total scores is the sum of the 20 items and it varies from 20 to 80 with 20 being the best outcome and 80 being the worst. If any individual item was missing, it was imputed with the average of that patient's non missing responses. If \>5 items were missing, the total score was missing.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score After 12 Weeks of TreatmentBaseline and Week 12Change from baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scale score after 12 weeks of treatment. The CGI-S is a one-item evaluation completed by the clinician on the patient's severity of psychopathology. The CGI-S was rated ordinally from one to 7. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score Measured After 12 Weeks of TreatmentUp to 12 weeksPatient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) scale score measured after 12 weeks of treatment. The PGI of improvement is a simple evaluation completed by the patient to assess the patient's overall evaluation of his/her status. The PGI of improvement was rated ordinally from one to 7. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Symptom Factor Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment (for Subset of Patients Diagnosed With Negative Symptom)Baseline and Week 12Change from baseline in PANSS negative symptom factor score after 12 weeks of treatment (for subset of patients diagnosed with negative symptom). This outcome measure was not analysed due to low number of patients in the PANSS negative symptom subgroup. The PANSS negative symptom scale has 7 items. Each was rated from one to 7 points. The total factor score was the summation of the 7 points for each item, leading the total score ranging from 7 to 49.
Change in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12Change in psychopathology symptoms as assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). It contains 30-items including seven positive symptom items, seven negative symptom items and 16 general psychopathology symptom items. Each item was scored on the same seven point severity scale. Fourteen of the PANSS items required input from an informant. Total score ranges from 30 to 210 (minimum is better). The descriptive statistics of change from baseline (CFB) in PANSS score at week 6 (W6) and week 12 (W12) are presented.

Countries

Canada, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A phase II multi-centre, multi-national, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of four orally administrated doses of BI 409306 during a 12-week treatment period in patients with schizophrenia on stable antipsychotic treatment.

Pre-assignment details

Actually, 518 subjects were entered/randomised however 2 subjects were not treated and hence the number of subjects that started equals 516. One belongs to BI 409306 - 25 milligram and another to Placebo group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BI 409306 - 10 Milligram
Subject received single oral dose of 10 milligram (mg) BI 409306 (film-coated tablet) along with two placebo matching 25mg/50mg tablets once daily for 12 weeks.
87
BI 409306 - 25 Milligram
Subject received single oral dose of 25 milligram (mg) BI 409306 (film-coated tablet) along with placebo matching 10mg and 25mg/50mg tablet once daily for 12 weeks.
85
BI 409306 - 50 Milligram
Subject received single oral dose of 50 milligram (mg) BI 409306 (film-coated tablet) along with placebo matching 10mg and 25mg/50mg tablet once daily for 12 weeks.
85
BI 409306 - 100 Milligram
Subject received single oral dose of 100 milligram (mg) BI 409306 (2 film-coated tablets of 50 mg) along with placebo matching 10mg tablet once daily for 12 weeks.
86
Placebo
Subject received single oral dose of placebo matching tablets (one placebo matching 10mg tablet and two placebo matching 25mg/50mg tablets) once daily for 12 weeks.
173
Total516

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event61489
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up226210
Overall StudyOther Reason04231
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10022
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject28668

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBI 409306 - 10 MilligramBI 409306 - 25 MilligramBI 409306 - 50 MilligramBI 409306 - 100 MilligramPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous44.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
43.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
41.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
42.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
41.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
42.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants29 Participants20 Participants28 Participants45 Participants156 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants56 Participants65 Participants58 Participants128 Participants360 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 879 / 859 / 8512 / 8612 / 173
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 870 / 850 / 850 / 8610 / 173

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of Treatment

MCCB comprises 10 tests, which assess 7 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score was calculated by summing over the standardised score of each domain for analysis and it varies from -20 to 99 with higher score indicating better outcome. The trial was set up as learn and confirm model including 2 stages. Stage 1 analysis was conducted to identify the meaningful cognition endpoint(s) (CANTAB domain(s)) and the selected endpoint(s) were to be pre-specified as the primary endpoint(s) for Stage 2 analysis. Since none of the CANTAB outcome measures was selected in the Stage 1 analysis at planned time based on the pre-specified criteria, the MCCB composite score was chosen as the primary endpoint in the Stage 2 analysis, as pre-defined.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was to consist of all randomisation patients who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline and at least one post baseline on treatment primary endpoint MCCB composite score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramChange From Baseline in the Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of Treatment1.2 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.71
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramChange From Baseline in the Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of Treatment2.7 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.74
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramChange From Baseline in the Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of Treatment2.8 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.75
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramChange From Baseline in the Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of Treatment1.8 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Composite Score of Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of Treatment2.5 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.57
Comparison: The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based mixed effects model with repeated measurements (MMRM) was used with baseline value as fixed covariate and planned treatment, analysis visit, first test done, geographic region grouping 1, planned treatment by analysis visit and baseline value by analysis visit as fixed effects.p-value: 0.125695% CI: [-2.76, 0.34]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based mixed effects model with repeated measurements (MMRM) was used with baseline value as fixed covariate and planned treatment, analysis visit, first test done, geographic region grouping 1, planned treatment by analysis visit and baseline value by analysis visit as fixed effects.p-value: 0.733795% CI: [-1.3, 1.84]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based mixed effects model with repeated measurements (MMRM) was used with baseline value as fixed covariate and planned treatment, analysis visit, first test done, geographic region grouping 1, planned treatment by analysis visit and baseline value by analysis visit as fixed effects.p-value: 0.699495% CI: [-1.31, 1.95]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based mixed effects model with repeated measurements (MMRM) was used with baseline value as fixed covariate and planned treatment, analysis visit, first test done, geographic region grouping 1, planned treatment by analysis visit and baseline value by analysis visit as fixed effects.p-value: 0.42795% CI: [-2.19, 0.93]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Dramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

Dramatic worsening of disease state as assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). It contains 30-items including seven positive symptom items, seven negative symptom items and 16 general psychopathology symptom items. Each item was scored on the same seven point severity scale. Fourteen of the PANSS items required input from an informant. Total score ranges from 30 to 210 (minimum is better). The descriptive statistics of change from baseline (CFB) in PANSS score at week 6 (W6) and week 12 (W12) are presented.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: TS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-0.68 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 6.022
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-2.59 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 5.342
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-0.28 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 4.507
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-0.97 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 5.42
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-1.09 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 5.415
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-1.58 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 6.99
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-0.94 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 6.315
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-1.20 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 5.426
PlaceboDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-1.81 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 5.895
PlaceboDramatic Worsening of Disease State as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-1.66 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 6.942
Primary

Occurrence of Protocol-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

Occurrence of Protocol-specified adverse events of special interest (AESI).

Time frame: Up to 20 weeks

Population: The treated set (TS) was to consist of all patients who were randomised and treated with at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramOccurrence of Protocol-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of Participants
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramOccurrence of Protocol-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of Participants
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramOccurrence of Protocol-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of Participants
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramOccurrence of Protocol-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboOccurrence of Protocol-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Including the Abnormalities of Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) Test and Laboratory Tests)

Occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) (including the abnormalities of physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) test and laboratory tests).

Time frame: Up to 20 weeks

Population: The treated set (TS) was to consist of all patients who were randomised and treated with at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramOccurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Including the Abnormalities of Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) Test and Laboratory Tests)0.0 Percentage of Participants
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramOccurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Including the Abnormalities of Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) Test and Laboratory Tests)0.0 Percentage of Participants
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramOccurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Including the Abnormalities of Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) Test and Laboratory Tests)0.0 Percentage of Participants
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramOccurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Including the Abnormalities of Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) Test and Laboratory Tests)0.0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboOccurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Including the Abnormalities of Physical Examination, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) Test and Laboratory Tests)5.8 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Suicidality as Assessed by Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

C-SSRS: Number (%) of subjects with an event of Suicidal Ideation (Wish to be dead, Non-specific active suicidal thoughts, Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act, Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent) or Suicidal Behavior (Preparatory acts or behavior, Aborted attempt, Interrupted attempt, Non-fatal suicide attempt, Completed suicide) or Self-injurious behavior without suicidal intent is presented. C-SSRS used only to evaluate whether the patient developed suicidal ideation or behavior and no composite score will be used. Questions in the 1st section of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior assessments in C-SSRS are yes and no type questions. If patient had suicidal ideation or behavior, 2nd section will be performed to evaluate the details with the scale from 0 to 5 or 0 to 2 and the larger number means the more severe condition.

Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

Population: TS (Number of subjects with a post baseline C-SSRS)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramSuicidality as Assessed by Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)0.0 Percentage of Participants 3.677
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramSuicidality as Assessed by Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)1.2 Percentage of Participants 3.262
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramSuicidality as Assessed by Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)2.5 Percentage of Participants 3.759
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramSuicidality as Assessed by Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)1.2 Percentage of Participants 3.497
PlaceboSuicidality as Assessed by Columbia Suicidal Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)3.6 Percentage of Participants 3.954
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Change from baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scale score after 12 weeks of treatment. The CGI-S is a one-item evaluation completed by the clinician on the patient's severity of psychopathology. The CGI-S was rated ordinally from one to 7. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was to consist of all randomisation patients who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline and at least one post baseline on treatment primary endpoint MCCB composite score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment-0.1 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.05
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment-0.1 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.05
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment-0.1 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.05
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment-0.1 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment-0.1 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.03
Comparison: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess between-group differences (BI 409306 group minus placebo group) in the modelled changes from baseline to Week 12. The dependent variable was the change from the baseline score at Week 12 during the treatment period adjusted for fixed categorical covariates of treatment as well as fixed continuous covariates of baseline score.p-value: 0.939995% CI: [-0.1, 0.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess between-group differences (BI 409306 group minus placebo group) in the modelled changes from baseline to Week 12. The dependent variable was the change from the baseline score at Week 12 during the treatment period adjusted for fixed categorical covariates of treatment as well as fixed continuous covariates of baseline score.p-value: 0.991995% CI: [-0.1, 0.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess between-group differences (BI 409306 group minus placebo group) in the modelled changes from baseline to Week 12. The dependent variable was the change from the baseline score at Week 12 during the treatment period adjusted for fixed categorical covariates of treatment as well as fixed continuous covariates of baseline score.p-value: 0.302795% CI: [-0.1, 0.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess between-group differences (BI 409306 group minus placebo group) in the modelled changes from baseline to Week 12. The dependent variable was the change from the baseline score at Week 12 during the treatment period adjusted for fixed categorical covariates of treatment as well as fixed continuous covariates of baseline score.p-value: 0.390195% CI: [-0.1, 0.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Everyday Functional Capacity as Measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Global Ratings After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Change from baseline in everyday functional capacity as measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) global ratings after 12 weeks of treatment. SCoRS is a 20-item interview-based assessment of cognitive deficits and the degree to which they affect day-to-day functions. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale. Higher ratings reflected a greater degree of impairment. The SCoRS global total scores is the sum of the 20 items and it varies from 20 to 80 with 20 being the best outcome and 80 being the worst. If any individual item was missing, it was imputed with the average of that patient's non missing responses. If \>5 items were missing, the total score was missing.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was to consist of all randomisation patients who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline and at least one post baseline on treatment primary endpoint MCCB composite score.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramChange From Baseline in Everyday Functional Capacity as Measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Global Ratings After 12 Weeks of Treatment-2.2 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.53
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramChange From Baseline in Everyday Functional Capacity as Measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Global Ratings After 12 Weeks of Treatment-3.1 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.56
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramChange From Baseline in Everyday Functional Capacity as Measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Global Ratings After 12 Weeks of Treatment-2.0 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.56
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramChange From Baseline in Everyday Functional Capacity as Measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Global Ratings After 12 Weeks of Treatment-2.3 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Everyday Functional Capacity as Measured by Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Global Ratings After 12 Weeks of Treatment-2.5 Unit on ScaleStandard Error 0.39
Comparison: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess between-group differences (BI 409306 group minus placebo group) in the modelled changes from baseline to Week 12. The dependent variable was the change from the baseline score at Week 12 during the treatment period adjusted for fixed categorical covariates of treatment as well as fixed continuous covariates of baseline score.p-value: 0.597295% CI: [-0.9, 1.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess between-group differences (BI 409306 group minus placebo group) in the modelled changes from baseline to Week 12. The dependent variable was the change from the baseline score at Week 12 during the treatment period adjusted for fixed categorical covariates of treatment as well as fixed continuous covariates of baseline score.p-value: 0.381795% CI: [-1.9, 0.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess between-group differences (BI 409306 group minus placebo group) in the modelled changes from baseline to Week 12. The dependent variable was the change from the baseline score at Week 12 during the treatment period adjusted for fixed categorical covariates of treatment as well as fixed continuous covariates of baseline score.p-value: 0.4895% CI: [-0.9, 1.8]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to assess between-group differences (BI 409306 group minus placebo group) in the modelled changes from baseline to Week 12. The dependent variable was the change from the baseline score at Week 12 during the treatment period adjusted for fixed categorical covariates of treatment as well as fixed continuous covariates of baseline score.p-value: 0.750795% CI: [-1.1, 1.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Symptom Factor Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment (for Subset of Patients Diagnosed With Negative Symptom)

Change from baseline in PANSS negative symptom factor score after 12 weeks of treatment (for subset of patients diagnosed with negative symptom). This outcome measure was not analysed due to low number of patients in the PANSS negative symptom subgroup. The PANSS negative symptom scale has 7 items. Each was rated from one to 7 points. The total factor score was the summation of the 7 points for each item, leading the total score ranging from 7 to 49.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: This endpoint was not analysed because as per internal Boehringer Ingelheim rules, descriptive statistics are not calculated if data is available for less than 2/3rds of participants.

Secondary

Change in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

Change in psychopathology symptoms as assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). It contains 30-items including seven positive symptom items, seven negative symptom items and 16 general psychopathology symptom items. Each item was scored on the same seven point severity scale. Fourteen of the PANSS items required input from an informant. Total score ranges from 30 to 210 (minimum is better). The descriptive statistics of change from baseline (CFB) in PANSS score at week 6 (W6) and week 12 (W12) are presented.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12

Population: TS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-0.39 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 3.677
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-1.36 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 3.039
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-0.22 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 3.262
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-0.79 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 3.277
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-0.31 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 3.759
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-0.68 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 4.253
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-0.38 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 3.587
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-0.79 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 3.497
PlaceboChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W6-Number of participants analyzed:79,74,67,71,154-0.99 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 3.954
PlaceboChange in Psychopathology Symptoms as Assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)W12-Number of participant analyzed:83,78,76,81,157-0.76 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 4.007
Secondary

Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score Measured After 12 Weeks of Treatment

Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) scale score measured after 12 weeks of treatment. The PGI of improvement is a simple evaluation completed by the patient to assess the patient's overall evaluation of his/her status. The PGI of improvement was rated ordinally from one to 7. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BI 409306 - 10 MilligramPatient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score Measured After 12 Weeks of Treatment2.988 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 1.117
BI 409306 - 25 MilligramPatient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score Measured After 12 Weeks of Treatment2.883 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 1.124
BI 409306 - 50 MilligramPatient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score Measured After 12 Weeks of Treatment3.192 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 1.101
BI 409306 - 100 MilligramPatient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score Measured After 12 Weeks of Treatment3.049 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 1.342
PlaceboPatient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score Measured After 12 Weeks of Treatment3.038 Unit on ScaleStandard Deviation 1.109

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026