Skip to content

Adverse Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Unifying Hypothesis (Aim 3)

Adverse Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Unifying Hypothesis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02280655
Acronym
INOBA
Enrollment
43
Registered
2014-10-31
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2016-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

Blood Transfusions

Brief summary

Transfusion of red blood cells is often used in critically ill patients with low red blood cell counts to prevent disease progression and death. Recent studies suggest that the use of aged versus fresh red blood cells are associated with worse clinical outcomes. There is evidence that red blood cells work with the cells lining our blood vessels to produce a variety of substances that normally cause arteries to relax and increase blood supply. Two of these substances are called nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). The investigators are trying to determine the nature of these substances in human beings when they are transfused aged versus fresh red blood cells. The purpose of the study is to test the effects of transfusing aged versus fresh red blood cells in volunteers with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, and tobacco use) on 1) the degree of relaxation in the arteries and subsequent changes in blood flow, 2) blood levels of oxidant molecules, 3) inflammation, and 4) stem cells. A similar study with healthy volunteers are further described in NCT00838331.

Detailed description

Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is often effective at preventing morbidity and mortality in anemic patients. In contrast, recent studies indicate that some RBC components may have functional defects (RBC storage lesions) that actually cause morbidity and mortality when transfused. For example, patients transfused with RBCs stored \>14 days have statistically worse outcomes than those receiving fresher RBC units. In addition to the age of stored RBCs, the volume transfused may be important. The Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) study showed that specific patients whose transfusions were limited by a restrictive trigger (RBCs transfusions only when hemoglobin \[Hb\] \< 7 g/dL) had significantly better outcomes than those transfused with a more liberal trigger (\[Hb\] \< 10 g/dL Hb). This finding has been particularly difficult to understand since conventional wisdom suggests that an elevated \[Hb\] should be beneficial because it supports increased oxygen (O2) delivery. Recipient-specific factors may also contribute to the occurrence of these adverse events. Unfortunately, these events have been difficult to investigate because up to now they have existed only as statistical occurrences of increased morbidity and mortality in large data sets. There are currently no clinical or laboratory methods to detect or study them in individual patients. The microcirculation is composed of a continuum of small vessels including small arterioles, capillaries, and post-capillary venules. The microcirculation represents an actively-adjusting vascular circuit that matches blood flow (and O2 delivery) to local tissue oxygen demands. While the physiologic mechanisms that match O2 delivery to local requirements are incompletely understood, endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) clearly plays an important role. Interestingly, recent work has revealed that in addition to transporting O2 and carbon dioxide (CO2), the RBC also controls local NO concentrations and thus may also play a surprisingly important role in regulating blood flow in the microcirculation. Herein, the investigators bring together previously unconnected data to propose a unifying hypothesis, centered on insufficient NO bioavailability (INOBA), to explain the increased morbidity and mortality observed in some patients following RBC transfusion. In this model, variables associated with RBC units (storage time; 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) concentration) and transfusion recipients (endothelial dysfunction; hematocrit \[Hct\]) collectively lead to changes in NO levels in vascular beds. Under certain circumstances, these variables are aligned such that NO concentrations are markedly reduced, leading to vasoconstriction, decreased local blood flow and insufficient O2 delivery to end organs. Under these circumstances, the likelihood of morbidity and mortality escalates. The INOBA hypothesis is attractive because of its explanatory power and because it leads to a number of readily testable predictions, which will be investigated t determine the effects of transfused RBCs in patients with endothelial dysfunction due to cardiovascular disease. A non-invasive ultrasound assay will be used to test whether patients with cardiovascular disease and endothelial dysfunction (who have intrinsic defects in NO synthesis) are more susceptible to adverse effects from stored/processed RBCs (impaired in NO bioavailability) than fresh RBC units. Vasodilation and tissue oxygenation in response to transfusion will be monitored, and Framingham risk scores and cardiovascular disease biomarkers will be tested as potential predictive factors to identify patients most at risk from adverse effects of RBC transfusions.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALStorage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units

Packed RBCs units stored for greater than 21 days, with a mean storage duration of 29.6 ± 4.9 days (mean ± SD)

BIOLOGICALFresh red blood cells units

Packed RBCs units stored for less than 14 days, with a mean storage duration of 9.6 ± 3.9 days (mean ± SD)

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inpatient or outpatient at Emory University Hospital who's physicians have ordered a transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) of 1 or more units * Cardiovascular risk factors (hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, and tobacco smoking) or known cardiovascular disease) will be carefully documented for each subject Cardiac risk factors are defined as follows: * Hypercholesterolemia: Defined as serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol \> 140 mg/dL if not currently on lipid-lowering therapy or \> 100 mg/dL if on lipid-lowering therapy * Diabetes: Defined as having fasting blood glucose sample of \> 126 mg/dL or a hemoglobin A1c of \> 7% or being treated with diabetes medications such as oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin sensitizing agents, or subcutaneous insulin * Smoking: active tobacco use, 20 cigarettes per day for the past year * Hypertension: Blood pressure of \> 140/90 or currently on anti-hypertensive medications * Cardiovascular disease: known coronary artery disease by angiogram or documented myocardial infarction

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Previous transfusion within one week. * Inability to give informed consent * On oral or IV nitrate therapy * On vasopressor agents * Active illicit drug use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at BaselineBaselineUltrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter - baseline diameter)/baseline diameter × 100.
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at 24 Hours After Transfusion24 hours after transfusionUltrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter -24 hour diameter)/24 hour diameter × 100.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects recruited from Emory University Hospital. 142 patients were screened and of those, 99 failed screening or were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs)
Subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with older stored red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for greater than 21 days. Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units: Packed RBCs units stored for greater than 21 days, with a mean storage duration of 29.6 ± 4.9 days (mean ± SD)
25
Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs)
Subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with fresh red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for less than 14 days. Fresh red blood cells units: Packed RBCs units stored for less than 14 days, with a mean storage duration of 9.6 ± 3.9 days (mean ± SD)
18
Total43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStorage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs)Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs)Total
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants18 participants43 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants11 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at 24 Hours After Transfusion

Ultrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter -24 hour diameter)/24 hour diameter × 100.

Time frame: 24 hours after transfusion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs)Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at 24 Hours After Transfusion2.47 percentage of brachial artery diameterStandard Deviation 4.88
Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs)Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at 24 Hours After Transfusion4.7 percentage of brachial artery diameterStandard Deviation 6.19
Primary

Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at Baseline

Ultrasonography of the brachial artery performed at the bedside using a high-resolution 10-megahertz (MHz) ultrasound transducer before and after suprasystolic inflation of a blood pressure cuff for 5 minutes in the ipsilateral upper arm. Brachial artery FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter - baseline diameter)/baseline diameter × 100.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs)Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at Baseline4.87 percentage of brachial artery diameterStandard Deviation 5.011
Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs)Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation (FMD) After Fresh Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Transfusions vs. Storage-aged Red Blood Cells (saRBCs) Transfusions at Baseline5.38 percentage of brachial artery diameterStandard Deviation 6.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026