Skip to content

Dose Finding Safety Study of VAL201 in Cancer Patients

A Phase I/II, Dose Escalation Study To Assess The Safety and Tolerability of VAL201 In Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Prostate Cancer and Other Advanced Solid Tumours

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02280317
Acronym
VAL201-001
Enrollment
12
Registered
2014-10-31
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2020-01-27
Last updated
2021-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stage III Prostate Carcinoma, Stage IV Prostate Carcinoma

Brief summary

Dose finding safety study of VAL201 in cancer patients.

Detailed description

A Phase I/II, dose escalation study to assess the safety and tolerability of VAL201 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer and other advanced solid tumours.

Interventions

DRUGVAL201

VAL201-001 Sub-cutaneous injection.

Sponsors

ValiRx Plc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Dose Escalation sequential assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The study will enrol patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. The MTD/MAD may also be evaluated in patients with other advanced tumour types for whom no standard effective therapy is available and a rationale for use of VAL201 exists. The average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subject and the outcome measured is a composite average for each group. * Inclusion criteria: * Specific Inclusion Criteria for Patients with Prostate Cancer * Patients with incurable, locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer where a policy of intermittent hormone therapy has been decided. Who have specific clinical parameters. * Specific Inclusion Criteria for Patients with Other Advanced Solid Tumours * Patients with histologically and/or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumour for whom no standard effective therapy is available and a rationale for use of VAL201 exists. * Patients with incurable, locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer where a policy of intermittent hormone therapy has been decided. These patients must also have the following: 1. Rising PSA on three samples (once non-castrate levels established); each over 2 weeks apart, with the last two values being greater than 2 ng/mL. Higher than and at least 25% over the nadir. 2. Absent or very mild prostate cancer-related symptoms. 3. No plans for any therapy for prostate cancer in the next two months. * General Inclusion Criteria for all Patients * Adult patients defined by age greater than 18 years at time of consent. * Ability to give written, informed consent prior to any study-specific Screening procedures, with the understanding that the consent may be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice. * Patient is capable of understanding the protocol requirements, is willing and able to comply with the study protocol procedures, and has signed the informed consent document. * Evaluable disease, either measurable on imaging, or with informative tumour marker(s) and a set of specific biochemical and haematological parameters relating to the specific cancer. * Negative human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test in women of childbearing potential. * Sexually active male and female patients of childbearing potential must agree to use an effective method of birth control. Female patients may be surgically sterile. * Laboratory values at Screening: * Absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 x 109/L. * Platelets ≥100 x 109/L. * Haemoglobin ≥9 g/dL without blood transfusion or colony stimulating factor support. * Total bilirubin \<1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); * AST (SGOT) ≤2.5 times the ULN; * ALT (SGPT) ≤2.5 times the ULN; ≤5 x ULN for patients with advanced solid tumours with liver metastases. * Serum creatinine ≤1.5 x ULN or estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of \>50 mL/min based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula. *

Exclusion criteria

* Specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose-Limiting ToxicityThe average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subjectThe number of Dose-Limiting Toxicity events is used to determine whether a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is obtained.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacokinetics of VAL201. (Cmax)The average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subjectAssessment of pharmacokinetic variables at multiple time points (5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours after dosing) and multiple dosing days (Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1 and Cycle 6 Day 1) for each patient analysed.
Pharmacokinetics of VAL201 (AUC 0-inf)The average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subjectAssessment of pharmacokinetic variables at multiple time points (5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours after dosing) and multiple dosing days (Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1 and Cycle 6 Day 1) for each patient analysed.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentThe average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subjectThe number of patients who completed 6 cycles of treatment is compared with the number who withdrew prior to completion of the scheduled 6 cycles
Number of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaThe average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subjectAssessment of disease response to treatment by PCWG2 and/or RECIST. Disease progression is defined by RECIST 1.1 as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; and by PCWG2 criteria that PSA values did not see an increase of 25% or more and absolute increase of 2 ng/mL or more from the nadir.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study will enrol patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. The MTD/MAD may also be evaluated in patients with other advanced tumour types for whom no standard effective therapy is available and a rationale for use of VAL201 exists.

Pre-assignment details

Interventional Study Model; Sequential Assignment -Dose Escalation sequential assignment-

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kg
VAL201: VAL201-001 Sub-cutaneous injection 0.5 mg/kg.
1
Cohort 2: 1 mg/kg
VAL201: VAL201-001 Sub-cutaneous injection 1.0 mg/kg.
1
Cohort 3: 2 mg/kg
VAL201: VAL201-001 Sub-cutaneous injection 2.0 mg/kg.
3
Cohort 4: 4 mg/kg
VAL201: VAL201-001 Sub-cutaneous injection 4.0 mg/kg.
5
Cohort 5: up to 8 mg/kg
VAL201-001 Sub-cutaneous injection. 8.0 mg/kg; potential to escalate to 16 mg/kg after 3 cycles according to clinician decision Flexibility of dosing enabled under protocol.
2
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgCohort 2: 1 mg/kgCohort 3: 2 mg/kgCohort 4: 4 mg/kgCohort 5: up to 8 mg/kg
Age, Continuous72.4 years70 years62 years76 years72.6 years73 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Black/African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
White
10 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
12 participants1 participants1 participants3 participants5 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Stage of Cancer at Screening
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
7 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Stage of Cancer at Screening
Metastatic Prostate Cancer
5 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 10 / 30 / 50 / 10 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 11 / 13 / 35 / 51 / 11 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 10 / 32 / 51 / 10 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Dose-Limiting Toxicity

The number of Dose-Limiting Toxicity events is used to determine whether a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is obtained.

Time frame: The average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subject

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-limiting Toxicity observed (DLT)0 Participants
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityMTD or MAD proposed0 Participants
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-reduction required0 Participants
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-reduction required0 Participants
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-limiting Toxicity observed (DLT)0 Participants
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityMTD or MAD proposed0 Participants
Cohort 3: 2.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-reduction required0 Participants
Cohort 3: 2.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-limiting Toxicity observed (DLT)0 Participants
Cohort 3: 2.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityMTD or MAD proposed0 Participants
Cohort 4: 4.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-limiting Toxicity observed (DLT)0 Participants
Cohort 4: 4.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityMTD or MAD proposed0 Participants
Cohort 4: 4.0 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-reduction required0 Participants
Cohort 5: up to 8 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-reduction required0 Participants
Cohort 5: up to 8 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityDose-limiting Toxicity observed (DLT)1 Participants
Cohort 5: up to 8 mg/kgDose-Limiting ToxicityMTD or MAD proposed0 Participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of VAL201 (AUC 0-inf)

Assessment of pharmacokinetic variables at multiple time points (5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours after dosing) and multiple dosing days (Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1 and Cycle 6 Day 1) for each patient analysed.

Time frame: The average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subject

Population: Cohort 5 consisted of one participant dosed at 8 mg/kg and one participant dosed at 4 mg/kg, on which pharmacokinetic parameters were measured; pharmacokinetic data was not analysed for Cohorts 1-4. Pharmacokinetic profiles were collected on multiple dosing days.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgPharmacokinetics of VAL201 (AUC 0-inf)5.0 ug/mL*h
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgPharmacokinetics of VAL201 (AUC 0-inf)3.8 ug/mL*h
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics of VAL201. (Cmax)

Assessment of pharmacokinetic variables at multiple time points (5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours after dosing) and multiple dosing days (Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1 and Cycle 6 Day 1) for each patient analysed.

Time frame: The average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subject

Population: Cohort 5 consisted of one participant dosed at 8 mg/kg and one participant dosed at 4 mg/kg, on which pharmacokinetic parameters were measured; pharmacokinetic data was not analysed for Cohorts 1-4. Pharmacokinetic profiles were collected on multiple dosing days.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgPharmacokinetics of VAL201. (Cmax)3323 ng/mL
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgPharmacokinetics of VAL201. (Cmax)2205 ng/mL
Other Pre-specified

Number of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST Criteria

Assessment of disease response to treatment by PCWG2 and/or RECIST. Disease progression is defined by RECIST 1.1 as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; and by PCWG2 criteria that PSA values did not see an increase of 25% or more and absolute increase of 2 ng/mL or more from the nadir.

Time frame: The average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subject

Population: Excludes one participant from Cohort 4 who received a single dose

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed progressive disease at any point during trial period according to PCWG20 Participants
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed no progressive disease during trial period according to PCWG21 Participants
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed progressive disease at any point during trial period according to PCWG21 Participants
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed no progressive disease during trial period according to PCWG20 Participants
Cohort 3: 2.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed no progressive disease during trial period according to PCWG21 Participants
Cohort 3: 2.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed progressive disease at any point during trial period according to PCWG22 Participants
Cohort 4: 4.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed no progressive disease during trial period according to PCWG23 Participants
Cohort 4: 4.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed progressive disease at any point during trial period according to PCWG21 Participants
Cohort 5: up to 8 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed progressive disease at any point during trial period according to PCWG21 Participants
Cohort 5: up to 8 mg/kgNumber of Patients Displaying Disease Progression by PCWG2 and/or RECIST CriteriaShowed no progressive disease during trial period according to PCWG21 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of Treatment

The number of patients who completed 6 cycles of treatment is compared with the number who withdrew prior to completion of the scheduled 6 cycles

Time frame: The average timeframe is 18-26 weeks per subject

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentCompleted 6 cycles of treatment1 Participants
Cohort 1: 0.5 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentWithdrew from trial prior to completion0 Participants
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentCompleted 6 cycles of treatment1 Participants
Cohort 2: 1.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentWithdrew from trial prior to completion0 Participants
Cohort 3: 2.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentCompleted 6 cycles of treatment0 Participants
Cohort 3: 2.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentWithdrew from trial prior to completion3 Participants
Cohort 4: 4.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentWithdrew from trial prior to completion4 Participants
Cohort 4: 4.0 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentCompleted 6 cycles of treatment1 Participants
Cohort 5: up to 8 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentCompleted 6 cycles of treatment1 Participants
Cohort 5: up to 8 mg/kgNumber of Patients Who Completed 6 Cycles of TreatmentWithdrew from trial prior to completion1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026