Skip to content

Long-term Study of Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Pediatric Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

A Single Arm, Open-label, Long-term Efficacy and Safety Study of Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Pediatric Subjects With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02279173
Enrollment
203
Registered
2014-10-30
Start date
2014-12-10
Completion date
2019-08-08
Last updated
2022-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immune Thrombocytopenia

Keywords

Pediatric, Immune Thrombocytopenia, Amgen

Brief summary

This is a phase 3b single arm, open label, multicenter study describing the percentage of time pediatric participants with ITP have a platelet response while receiving romiplostim, defined as a platelet count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L in the absence of ITP rescue medications for the past 4 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGRomiplostim

Romiplostim subcutaneous weekly injection

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary ITP according to The American Society of Hematology (ASH) Guidelines at least 6 months before screening, regardless of splenectomy status * Age ≥ 1 year and \< 18 years of age * Refractory to prior ITP therapy, relapsed after at prior ITP therapy, or be ineligible for other therapies. Examples of prior therapy include: corticosteroids, intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG), anti-D immunoglobulin, platelet transfusions. * Platelet count ≤ 30 x10\^9/L or is experiencing uncontrolled bleeding * Has provided informed consent before any study-specific procedure; * Adequate hematologic, renal, and liver function during screening: * Hemoglobin \> 10.0 g/dL * Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) * Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x the ULN * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3.0 x the ULN * For the EU, Switzerland and Turkey protocol supplement, subject must agree to a scheduled bone marrow biopsy and aspirate at Year 1 or Year 2 following romiplostim treatment and any unscheduled biopsies if clinically indicated * For the EU, Switzerland and Turkey protocol supplement, a reticulin grade of 0, 1, 2, or 3 according to the modified Bauermeister grading scale, as assessed by central laboratory from a bone marrow biopsy performed within 1 year prior to planned first dose of romiplostim or consent to a pre-treatment bone marrow biopsy and aspirate prior to planned first dose of romiplostim

Exclusion criteria

* History of a bone marrow stem cell disorder (Any abnormal bone marrow findings other than those typical of ITP must be approved by Amgen before a subject may be enrolled) * Prior bone marrow transplant or peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant * Active or prior malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancers within the last 5 years * History of myelodysplastic syndrome * History of bleeding diathesis * History of congenital thrombocytopenia * History of Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * History of systemic lupus erythematosus, Evans syndrome, or autoimmune neutropenia * History of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome or known positive for lupus anticoagulant * History of disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemolytic uremic syndrome, or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura * History of venous thromboembolism or thrombotic events * Previous use of romiplostim or previous use of eltrombopag within 4 weeks of enrollment * Previous use of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF), recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO) or any other platelet producing agent * Rituximab (for any indication) or 6-mercaptopurine within 8 weeks of enrollment, or anticipated use at any time during the study * Splenectomy within 4 weeks of the screening visit * Alkylating agents within 8 weeks before the screening visit or anticipated use during the time of the proposed study * Vaccinations known to decrease platelet counts within 8 weeks before the screening visit * Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending investigational study * Will have investigational procedures while enrolled on study * Female subject of child bearing potential (defined as having first menses) not willing to use, in combination with her partner highly effective methods of birth control during treatment and for 1 month after the end of treatment * Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or might become pregnant within 1 month after the end of treatment * Subject has known hypersensitivity to any recombinant Escherichia coli derived product (eg, Infergen®, Neupogen®, somatropin, and Actimmune®) * Has previously enrolled into this study * Will not be available for protocol-required study visits or procedures, to the best of the subject's and investigator's knowledge * Any kind of disorder that, may compromise the subject to give written informed consent and/or to comply with all required study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Time With a Platelet Response During the First 6 Months of TreatmentWeek 2 to Month 6, platelet response was assessed every week.Platelet response was defined as a platelet count of ≥ 50 x 10⁹/L with no rescue medication use for ITP in the past 4 weeks. Monthly platelet response was calculated based on the median platelet count during each month. For each participant, the percentage of time with platelet response during the first 6 months was calculated as the number of months a platelet response was observed divided by the total number of months response was assessed.
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Collagen After Exposure to RomiplostimYear 1 (Cohort 1) and year 2 (Cohort 2)The percentage of participants who developed collagen as evidenced by trichrome staining, defined as a Grade 4 on the modified Bauermeister grading scale: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining) Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining)
Percentage of Participants With Increased Modified Bauermeister GradeBaseline, year 1 (Cohort 1) and year 2 (Cohort 2)The percentage of participants with an increased modified Bauermeister grade defined as an increase by ≥ 2 severity grades or an increase to grade 4 (i.e., grade 0 to 2-4, grade 1 to 3-4, grade 2 to 4, or grade 3 to 4 over baseline). The modified Bauermeister grading scale: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining) Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining) Participants without an evaluable baseline result were assumed to have a baseline modified Bauermeister score of 0.
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Bone Marrow AbnormalitiesYear 1 (Cohort 1) and year 2 (Cohort 2)The percentage of participants with bone marrow abnormalities (eg, myelodysplastic syndrome, monosomy 7) based on analysis of bone marrow biopsy and aspirate samples using cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsSAEs were collected from Screening through end-of-study follow-up (up to 38 months). Nonserious AEs were collected from first to last dose of study drug during the treatment period (up to 36 months).An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: * fatal * life threatening * required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * congenital anomaly/birth defect * other medically important serious event Adverse events were graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 grading scale, where Grade 1 = mild AE; Grade 2 = moderate AE; Grade 3 = severe AE; Grade 4 = life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5 = death related to AE.
Percentage of Time With a Platelet Response During the Overall Treatment PeriodFrom week 2 to the end of the treatment period, 36 monthsPlatelet response was defined as a platelet count of ≥ 50 x 10⁹/L with no rescue medication use in the past 4 weeks. Monthly platelet response was calculated based on the median platelet count during each month. For each participant, the percentage of time with platelet response was calculated as the number of months a platelet response was observed divided by the total number of months response was assessed.
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Increased ReticulinBaseline, year 1 (Cohort 1) and year 2 (Cohort 2)The percentage of participants with increased reticulin as evidenced by silver staining and defined as any increase from baseline in the modified Bauermeister grade: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining) Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining) Participants without an evaluable baseline result were assumed to have a baseline modified Bauermeister score of 0.
Percentage of Time With an Increase in Platelet Count ≥ 20 x 10⁹ Cells/L Above BaselineBaseline and from week 2 to month 36The percentage of time with an increase in platelet count ≥ 20 x 10⁹ cells/L above baseline from week 2 until the end of the treatment period without rescue medication use within the past 4 weeks. For each participant, the percentage of time with an increase in platelet count ≥ 20 x10⁹ cells/L above baseline was calculated as the number of months the median platelet count was ≥ 20 x10⁹ cells/L above baseline divided by the total number of months assessed.
Number of Participants Reporting Use of Rescue Medications for ITP During the Treatment PeriodFrom first dose of romiplostim to the end of the treatment period, 36 monthsRescue medication is defined as any medication or transfusion, other than romiplostim and excluded medications, that is administered after enrollment to the participant with the intent of raising platelet counts or to prevent bleeding and includes concomitant medications for ITP in which the dose and/or schedule was increased. Permitted rescue medications included the following: * corticosteroids * platelet transfusions * Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) * azathioprine * anti-D immunoglobulin * danazol
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Romiplostim or Anti-Thrombopoietin Neutralizing AntibodiesWeek 12, week 52 and every 24 weeks thereafter up to month 36Blood samples were first tested for the presence of binding antibodies to romiplostim or the peptide portion of romiplostim, and to endogenous thrombopoietin (eTPO). Samples testing positive for binding antibodies were then tested for neutralizing antibodies by assessing their ability to neutralize romiplostim and/or eTPO in a cell-based bioassay. Participants who developed neutralizing antibodies are those who had a postbaseline positive result with a negative or no result at baseline. Transient is defined as a negative result at the participant's last time point tested within the study period.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, France, Hungary, Israel, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Children with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and platelet counts ≤ 30×10⁹/L or uncontrolled bleeding were enrolled from December 2014 to August 2016 at 66 centers in 16 countries worldwide, including Eastern Europe (44%), Western Europe (25%), and US/Canada (21%).

Pre-assignment details

All participants were assigned to receive weekly romiplostim. A subset of participants enrolled under a protocol supplement in the European Union (EU), Switzerland, and Turkey were enrolled into the following 2 cohorts: * bone marrow biopsy and aspirate at baseline and year 1 * bone marrow biopsy and aspirate at baseline and year 2

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Romiplostim
Participants received romiplostim administered weekly by subcutaneous injection for up to 3 years. The starting dose was 1 µg/kg titrated in 1 µg/kg increments up to a maximum of 10 µg/kg to reach a target platelet count ≥ 50 x 10⁹/L.
203
Total203

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDecision by Sponsor4
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3
Overall StudyProtocol-specified Criteria67
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRomiplostim
Age at ITP Diagnosis5.97 years
Age, Continuous10.0 years
Age, Customized
≥ 12 to < 18 years
73 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 1 to < 6 years
49 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 6 to < 12 years
81 Participants
Number of Prior ITP Treatments2.0 prior ITP treatments
Platelet Count14.00 10⁹ cells/L
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other, Not Specified
11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
164 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
100 Participants
Splenectomy Done
No
193 Participants
Splenectomy Done
Yes
10 Participants
Years Since ITP Diagnosis1.75 years

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 203
other
Total, other adverse events
183 / 203
serious
Total, serious adverse events
60 / 203

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Developed Bone Marrow Abnormalities

The percentage of participants with bone marrow abnormalities (eg, myelodysplastic syndrome, monosomy 7) based on analysis of bone marrow biopsy and aspirate samples using cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Time frame: Year 1 (Cohort 1) and year 2 (Cohort 2)

Population: Bone marrow analysis set participants with an on-study bone marrow abnormality assessment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RomiplostimPercentage of Participants Who Developed Bone Marrow Abnormalities0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants Who Developed Bone Marrow Abnormalities0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Developed Collagen After Exposure to Romiplostim

The percentage of participants who developed collagen as evidenced by trichrome staining, defined as a Grade 4 on the modified Bauermeister grading scale: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining) Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining)

Time frame: Year 1 (Cohort 1) and year 2 (Cohort 2)

Population: The bone marrow analysis set includes participants who received at least 1 dose of romiplostim, who were recruited within the protocol supplement for the EU, Switzerland and Turkey and who had at least 1 bone marrow biopsy during the study after initiation of study treatment. Participants with available core biopsy results are included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RomiplostimPercentage of Participants Who Developed Collagen After Exposure to Romiplostim0.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants Who Developed Collagen After Exposure to Romiplostim0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Increased Modified Bauermeister Grade

The percentage of participants with an increased modified Bauermeister grade defined as an increase by ≥ 2 severity grades or an increase to grade 4 (i.e., grade 0 to 2-4, grade 1 to 3-4, grade 2 to 4, or grade 3 to 4 over baseline). The modified Bauermeister grading scale: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining) Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining) Participants without an evaluable baseline result were assumed to have a baseline modified Bauermeister score of 0.

Time frame: Baseline, year 1 (Cohort 1) and year 2 (Cohort 2)

Population: The bone marrow analysis set includes participants who received at least 1 dose of romiplostim, who were recruited within the protocol supplement for the EU, Switzerland and Turkey and who had at least 1 bone marrow biopsy during the study after initiation of study treatment. Participants with available core biopsy results are included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RomiplostimPercentage of Participants With Increased Modified Bauermeister Grade3.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants With Increased Modified Bauermeister Grade0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Time With a Platelet Response During the First 6 Months of Treatment

Platelet response was defined as a platelet count of ≥ 50 x 10⁹/L with no rescue medication use for ITP in the past 4 weeks. Monthly platelet response was calculated based on the median platelet count during each month. For each participant, the percentage of time with platelet response during the first 6 months was calculated as the number of months a platelet response was observed divided by the total number of months response was assessed.

Time frame: Week 2 to Month 6, platelet response was assessed every week.

Population: The efficacy analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of romiplostim

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RomiplostimPercentage of Time With a Platelet Response During the First 6 Months of Treatment50.00 percentage of time
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Use of Rescue Medications for ITP During the Treatment Period

Rescue medication is defined as any medication or transfusion, other than romiplostim and excluded medications, that is administered after enrollment to the participant with the intent of raising platelet counts or to prevent bleeding and includes concomitant medications for ITP in which the dose and/or schedule was increased. Permitted rescue medications included the following: * corticosteroids * platelet transfusions * Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) * azathioprine * anti-D immunoglobulin * danazol

Time frame: From first dose of romiplostim to the end of the treatment period, 36 months

Population: Efficacy analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RomiplostimNumber of Participants Reporting Use of Rescue Medications for ITP During the Treatment Period60 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-Romiplostim or Anti-Thrombopoietin Neutralizing Antibodies

Blood samples were first tested for the presence of binding antibodies to romiplostim or the peptide portion of romiplostim, and to endogenous thrombopoietin (eTPO). Samples testing positive for binding antibodies were then tested for neutralizing antibodies by assessing their ability to neutralize romiplostim and/or eTPO in a cell-based bioassay. Participants who developed neutralizing antibodies are those who had a postbaseline positive result with a negative or no result at baseline. Transient is defined as a negative result at the participant's last time point tested within the study period.

Time frame: Week 12, week 52 and every 24 weeks thereafter up to month 36

Population: Participants who received at least 1 dose of romiplostim and with a post-baseline antibody result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RomiplostimNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Romiplostim or Anti-Thrombopoietin Neutralizing AntibodiesAnti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies7 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Romiplostim or Anti-Thrombopoietin Neutralizing AntibodiesTransient anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies4 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Romiplostim or Anti-Thrombopoietin Neutralizing AntibodiesAnti-eTPO neutralizing antibodies1 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Romiplostim or Anti-Thrombopoietin Neutralizing AntibodiesTransient anti-eTPO neutralizing antibodies1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: * fatal * life threatening * required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * congenital anomaly/birth defect * other medically important serious event Adverse events were graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 grading scale, where Grade 1 = mild AE; Grade 2 = moderate AE; Grade 3 = severe AE; Grade 4 = life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5 = death related to AE.

Time frame: SAEs were collected from Screening through end-of-study follow-up (up to 38 months). Nonserious AEs were collected from first to last dose of study drug during the treatment period (up to 36 months).

Population: Participants who received at least 1 dose of romiplostim

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event (AE)193 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events (SAE)60 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs leading to discontinuation of romiplostim15 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAdverse event Grade ≥ 366 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAdverse event Grade ≥ 419 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAdverse event Grade ≥ 50 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events (TRAE)56 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events8 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAEs leading to discontinuation of romiplostim8 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events Grade ≥ 38 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events Grade ≥ 40 Participants
RomiplostimNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events Grade ≥ 50 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Developed Increased Reticulin

The percentage of participants with increased reticulin as evidenced by silver staining and defined as any increase from baseline in the modified Bauermeister grade: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining) Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining) Participants without an evaluable baseline result were assumed to have a baseline modified Bauermeister score of 0.

Time frame: Baseline, year 1 (Cohort 1) and year 2 (Cohort 2)

Population: The bone marrow analysis set includes participants who received at least 1 dose of romiplostim, who were recruited within the protocol supplement for the EU, Switzerland and Turkey and who had at least 1 bone marrow biopsy during the study after initiation of study treatment. Participants with available core biopsy results are included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RomiplostimPercentage of Participants Who Developed Increased Reticulin18.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2Percentage of Participants Who Developed Increased Reticulin47.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Time With an Increase in Platelet Count ≥ 20 x 10⁹ Cells/L Above Baseline

The percentage of time with an increase in platelet count ≥ 20 x 10⁹ cells/L above baseline from week 2 until the end of the treatment period without rescue medication use within the past 4 weeks. For each participant, the percentage of time with an increase in platelet count ≥ 20 x10⁹ cells/L above baseline was calculated as the number of months the median platelet count was ≥ 20 x10⁹ cells/L above baseline divided by the total number of months assessed.

Time frame: Baseline and from week 2 to month 36

Population: Efficacy analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RomiplostimPercentage of Time With an Increase in Platelet Count ≥ 20 x 10⁹ Cells/L Above Baseline80.13 percentage of time
Secondary

Percentage of Time With a Platelet Response During the Overall Treatment Period

Platelet response was defined as a platelet count of ≥ 50 x 10⁹/L with no rescue medication use in the past 4 weeks. Monthly platelet response was calculated based on the median platelet count during each month. For each participant, the percentage of time with platelet response was calculated as the number of months a platelet response was observed divided by the total number of months response was assessed.

Time frame: From week 2 to the end of the treatment period, 36 months

Population: Efficacy analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RomiplostimPercentage of Time With a Platelet Response During the Overall Treatment Period78.21 percentage of time

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026