Skip to content

Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA

Comparison of Modified Programmed Intermittent Bolus (MPIB), Computer-integrated Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (CIPCEA) and Conventional Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) During Labour

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02278601
Acronym
COLEUS
Enrollment
839
Registered
2014-10-30
Start date
2015-01-28
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breakthrough Pain

Keywords

Breakthrough pain

Brief summary

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard of pain relief for labour pain. Despite this, more than 50% of parturients continue to experience pain leading to suffering and increased caregiver workload. Women who have increased pain tend to have lower successful patient bolus demands when patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is utilised and have dysfunctional labour requiring obstetric intervention such as Caesarean or instrumental delivery. Labour pain often escalates and worsens as labour progresses requiring an individualized, variable, flexible analgesic regimen. Bolus epidural administrations have been shown to improve uniform spread of local anaesthetics with better pain relief, compared to fixed background infusions.

Detailed description

The research team developed two novel epidural delivery regimens: computer-integrated PCEA (CIPCEA) and modified programmed intermittent bolus (MPIB) focused on individualization of analgesic requirements. This phase 3 double-blinded randomized controlled trial will compare the two novel regimens, and each with conventional PCEA with basal infusion (BI), in reducing breakthrough pain (failure of the regimen to provide adequate pain relief, necessitating unscheduled epidural supplementation) incidence as the primary outcome in nulliparous term women requesting labour epidural analgesia. In addition, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in the format of a survey will be administered to estimate the women's preferences in treatment attributes related to epidural analgesia, including control over epidural dosage, chance of having breakthrough pain, motor block, instrumental delivery and out-of-pocket cost for epidural analgesia. We will also look into the association model for breakthrough pain that would take into account pre-delivery factors to better understand the mechanism of breakthrough pain during labor process.

Interventions

epidural delivery system for maintenance of labour epidural analgesia using 0.1% ropivacaine (amide local anaesthetic) with 2mcg/ml fentanyl (opioid) as maintenance solution

DRUGRopivacaine

epidural delivery system for maintenance of labour epidural analgesia using 0.1% ropivacaine (amide local anaesthetic) with 2mcg/ml fentanyl (opioid) as maintenance solution

DRUGFentanyl

epidural delivery system for maintenance of labour epidural analgesia using 0.1% ropivacaine (amide local anaesthetic) with 2mcg/ml fentanyl (opioid) as maintenance solution

Sponsors

KK Women's and Children's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Healthy (ASA physical status 1 and 2) nulliparous parturients at term (≥36 weeks gestation); 2. Singleton foetus 3. Early labour (cervical dilation ≤5cm) 4. Request labour epidural analgesia 5. At least 21 years of age

Exclusion criteria

1. parturients with multiple pregnancies 2. non-cephalic foetal presentation 3. obstetric (e.g. pre-eclampsia, premature rupture of amniotic membranes, gestational diabetes on insulin) and uncontrolled medical (e.g. cardiac disease) complications 4. have contraindications to neuraxial blockade or have received parenteral opioids with the last 2 hours.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of subjects with Breakthrough pain1 dayUnscheduled epidural supplementation by anaesthetist due to pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of subjects with Caesarean section1 dayNumber of subjects with Caesarean section
Number of subjects with Instrumental delivery1 dayNumber of subjects with Instrumental delivery (forceps, vacuum delivery)
Foetal outcome1 dayAPGAR scores
Willingness to pay1 dayDiscrete choice experiments (DCE) in survey format will be given to patients to determine patient's mean willingness to pay for epidural features, including control over epidural dosage, chance of having breakthrough pain, motor block, instrumental delivery and out-of-pocket cost for epidural analgesia)
Factors associated with epidural decisions1 dayParticipants will be exposed to 8 pairs of hypothetical medical scenarios as per the design of DCE. Participants have to choose the ideal scenario (A or B) that provides the highest perceived benefits. Each pair of scenarios represents a comprehensive combination of possible attributes related to epidural analgesia, including control over epidural dosage, chance of having breakthrough pain, motor block, instrumental delivery and out-of-pocket cost for epidural analgesia. The most common factors associated with optimal perceived benefits will be assessed based on these experimental design. A weighted estimate will be calculated for each attribute.
Pain vulnerability: Pain Catastrophizing Scale1 dayAssessment will be done via Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaire before delivery. Pain catastrophizing refers to the negative thought processes patients have when they are exposed to pain or painful experiences. The PCS is a 13-item scale, with each item rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (all the time). It is broken into three subscales being magnification (0-12), rumination (0-16), and helplessness (0-24). A higher value in each subscale indicates a higher tendency to that subscale (worse outcome).
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale before and after delivery5-9 weeksAssessment will be done via Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before delivery, and again 5 to 9 weeks after delivery to assess patient's status on postnatal depression. The EPDS is a 10 item self-reported questionnaire validated for use as a screening tool for antenatal and postpartum depression in the clinical setting. Participants are asked to respond according to how they have felt in the past seven days, by which the questions correspond to common depressive symptoms. Each item is measured on a 4-point scale, with a total score in the range of 0 to 30. A higher total score indicates a greater degree of depressive symptoms. A score of 13 and above indicates clinically significant depressive symptom.
Sub-acute pain after childbirth5-9 weeksAssessment will be done via a pain survey at 5-9 weeks after delivery to ask on patient's pain experience, including the presence of sub-acute pain after childbirth, defined by presence or absence of pain that lasted for 4 weeks or more) (binary variable with categories "yes" or "no").

Countries

Singapore

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBan L Sng, FANZCA

KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 8, 2026