Skip to content

Nutrition, Inflammation and Insulin Resistance in End Stage Renal Disease-Aim 2

Nutrition, Inflammation and Insulin Resistance in End-Stage Renal Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02278562
Acronym
INSPIRED
Enrollment
33
Registered
2014-10-30
Start date
2014-10-22
Completion date
2017-03-01
Last updated
2025-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ESRD

Brief summary

By 2030 an estimated 2 million people in the US will need dialysis or transplantation for advanced kidney failure. An even more disturbing statistic is that mortality in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is six times higher than in the general Medicare population with adjustment for age, gender and ethnicity. Protein energy wasting is highly prevalent in these patients and is one of the most important determinants of their poor clinical outcome. Despite its well-recognized occurrence, the etiology and the mechanisms leading to protein energy wasting observed in chronic hemodialysis patients cannot be attributed to any single factor. However, irrespective of the specific etiologic mechanisms, it appears that the common pathway for all the metabolic derangements is related to exaggerated protein degradation relative to protein synthesis (47). Two well-recognized and presumably interrelated metabolic abnormalities, insulin resistance and chronic inflammation, may be the major determinants of protein catabolism in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. There are no studies examining the effects of anti-inflammatory interventions and/or insulin sensitizers on protein homeostasis in CHD. Due to their established anti-inflammatory and other pleiotropic effects, Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist Anakinra and insulin sensitizer peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) agonist Actos represent two such promising interventions. By modulating inflammatory response and insulin signaling through two pharmacological interventions, the investigators will have the unique opportunity to clarify mechanisms contributing of these two particular metabolic derangements in the development of protein energy wasting observed in chronic hemodialysis patients. The overall goal is to elucidate the mechanisms by which chronic inflammation and insulin resistance influence the development of protein energy wasting in hemodialysis patients. Specific Aim: To test the hypothesis that inhibiting inflammatory response by administration of an Interleukin1receptor antagonist (Anakinra) or increasing insulin sensitivity by administration of a PPAR agonist (Actos) will improve net protein metabolism. Hypothesis: The chronic inflammatory component of protein energy wasting (PEW) observed in hemodialysis patients is, at least in part, mediated by insulin resistance. Interim analysis may be performed (no specific plan at this time).

Interventions

DRUGanakinra

100 mg in syringes; administered subcutaneously 3 times a week for 12 weeks (3 months)

DRUGactos

30 mg capsules; administered orally 1 capsule per day for 12 weeks (3 months)

OTHERplacebo

placebo capsules and injection

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients on CHD undergoing three time a week therapy for more than 6 months; * Age 21 years old; * Acceptable dialysis adequacy (spKt/V \> 1.2); * A patent, well-functioning, arterio-venous dialysis access; * Ability to give informed consent; * Life expectancy greater than 6 months; * BMI \>=20 and \<=45.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy; * Intolerance or allergy to the study medication (including the metabolic clamp studies); * Severe, unstable, active inflammatory disease (active infection, active connective tissue disorder), active cancer or cancer history in the prior 5 years except skin cancer, AIDS-HIV, active or history of liver disease (including hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus); * Hospitalization or infection within 1 month prior to the study; * Patients receiving steroids and/or other immunosuppressive agents (Prednisone \> 5 mg/day; excluding inhaled and topical steroids); * Diabetes Mellitus on insulin therapy; * Previous history of tuberculosis (TB) with or without documented adequate therapy; * Patients with recent close exposure to an individual with active TB; * Females using oral contraceptives; * Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure; * Patients with a history of angina, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attacks, or strokes within the last 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Leucine Disposal Rate (LDR)baseline and 3 monthsLDR is a sensitive laboratory assessment of amino acid metabolism

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Whole-body Net Protein Balancebaseline and 3 monthsWhole-body net protein balance is the difference between protein synthesis (anabolism) and protein breakdown (catabolism) in the whole body
Change in Skeletal Muscle Net Protein Balancebaseline and 3 monthsSkeletal muscle net protein balance is the difference between protein synthesis (anabolism) and protein breakdown (catabolism) in the skeletal muscles.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at the VA Nashville and the Vanderbilt University Medical Center between October 2014 and March 2017.

Pre-assignment details

There is about a 2-week screening period between enrollment and assignment to a treatment group to access inclusion/exclusion criteria. Although 33 subjects were enrolled, only 24 subjects were assigned to a treatment group (6 subjects were screen failures and 3 subjects withdrew prior to being randomized).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anakinra
100 mg of Anakinra in syringes administered subcutaneously 3 times a week for 3 months and lactose (placebo) in capsules administered orally 1 capsule per day for 3 months anakinra: 100 mg in syringes; administered subcutaneously 3 times a week for 12 weeks (3 months)
9
Actos
Normal saline (placebo) in syringes administered subcutaneously 3 times a week for 3 months and 30 mg of Actos in capsules administered orally 1 capsule per day for 3 months actos: 30 mg capsules; administered orally 1 capsule per day for 12 weeks (3 months)
7
Placebo 1 and 2
Normal saline (placebo) in syringes administered subcutaneously 3 times a week for 3 months and lactose (placebo) in capsules administered orally 1 capsule per day for 3 months placebo: placebo capsules and injection
8
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnakinraTotalPlacebo 1 and 2Actos
Age, Continuous45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants23 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants19 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants5 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 Participants24 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants7 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants17 Participants6 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 70 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 91 / 72 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 70 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Leucine Disposal Rate (LDR)

LDR is a sensitive laboratory assessment of amino acid metabolism

Time frame: baseline and 3 months

Population: The number of participants for analysis was based on those subjects who completed the 3-month study. The analysis was per protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AnakinraChange in Leucine Disposal Rate (LDR)-0.011 mg/kg/min
ActosChange in Leucine Disposal Rate (LDR)0.005 mg/kg/min
Placebo 1 and 2Change in Leucine Disposal Rate (LDR)0.001 mg/kg/min
Comparison: Prior data indicate that LDR is normally distributed with standard deviation ranging from 0.16 to 0.23 in hemodialysis and control patients, respectively. If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 0.21, we will be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 0.933. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05.p-value: 0.37Wilcoxon Rank-Sum
Comparison: Prior data indicate that LDR is normally distributed with standard deviation ranging from 0.16 to 0.23 in hemodialysis and control patients, respectively. If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 0.21, we will be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 0.933.p-value: 0.955Wilcoxon Rank-Sum
Secondary

Change in Skeletal Muscle Net Protein Balance

Skeletal muscle net protein balance is the difference between protein synthesis (anabolism) and protein breakdown (catabolism) in the skeletal muscles.

Time frame: baseline and 3 months

Population: The number of participants for analysis was based on those subjects who completed the 3-month study. The analysis was per protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AnakinraChange in Skeletal Muscle Net Protein Balance-5.1 μg/100 ml/min
ActosChange in Skeletal Muscle Net Protein Balance11.8 μg/100 ml/min
Placebo 1 and 2Change in Skeletal Muscle Net Protein Balance134.1 μg/100 ml/min
Secondary

Change in Whole-body Net Protein Balance

Whole-body net protein balance is the difference between protein synthesis (anabolism) and protein breakdown (catabolism) in the whole body

Time frame: baseline and 3 months

Population: The number of participants for analysis was based on those subjects who completed the 3-month study. The analysis was per protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AnakinraChange in Whole-body Net Protein Balance-0.184 mg/kg/min
ActosChange in Whole-body Net Protein Balance-0.215 mg/kg/min
Placebo 1 and 2Change in Whole-body Net Protein Balance0.018 mg/kg/min

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026