Cystic Fibrosis
Conditions
Brief summary
It is the goal of the proposed study to compare the efficacy, as assessed primarily by sputum weight, of these two different devices (the Electroflo 500 and VEST therapy) for airway clearance (AC) in CF patients with mild to moderate lung disease, who have stable lung health and perform AC at home as part of their routine therapeutic regimen.
Interventions
Airway clearance device
Airway Clearance Device
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Diagnosis of CF established by standard criteria (sweat chloride \> 60 mmol/L and/or two alleles affected by gene mutations know to be associated with CF). 2. Age older than 12 years. 3. Known to consistently produce sputum. 4. Currently on a home therapeutic regimen that includes some form of AC performed at least 2 times daily. 5. FVC and FEV1 \> 40%-predicted, and with stable lung function (no greater than a 10% variation in lung function parameters over the preceding 3 months).
Exclusion criteria
1. Hospitalization for CF pulmonary complications in the 2 months preceding enrollment. 2. Hemoptysis \> 60 cc in a single episode in the 4 weeks preceding enrollment. 3. Chronic chest pain. 4. Participation in another interventional clinical trial in the previous 30 days. -
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Sputum Weight | End of study visit per intervention | Sputum was collected in pre-measured cups in a blinded fashion |
| Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / VEST. | End of study visit per intervention | Comparison of pulmonary function by doing spirometry testing on study patients during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions. Will also compare the results based on the therapies they receive. |
| Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / Vest. | End of study visit per intervention | Comparison of pulmonary function by doing spirometry testing on study patients during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions. Will also compare the results based on the therapies they receive. |
| Comfort Level After Receiving Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / Vest | End of study visit per intervention | Comfort assessed on a scale of 1-10 by patients after therapy after each visit (1 being most comfortable, 10 being most un-comfortable) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Sputum Weight | End of study visit per intervention | Sputum was collected in pre-measured cups in a blinded fashion, dessicated and measured dry |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Total Number of Participants | 15 |
| Total | 15 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total Number of Participants |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 33.33 years |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
Outcome results
Comfort Level After Receiving Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / Vest
Comfort assessed on a scale of 1-10 by patients after therapy after each visit (1 being most comfortable, 10 being most un-comfortable)
Time frame: End of study visit per intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Vest | Comfort Level After Receiving Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / Vest | 3.93 units on a scale |
| Elecflo Arm | Comfort Level After Receiving Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / Vest | 2.67 units on a scale |
Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / Vest.
Comparison of pulmonary function by doing spirometry testing on study patients during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions. Will also compare the results based on the therapies they receive.
Time frame: End of study visit per intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Vest | Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / Vest. | 75.8 percentage of predicted value |
| Elecflo Arm | Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted AFTER Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / Vest. | 75.73 percentage of predicted value |
Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / VEST.
Comparison of pulmonary function by doing spirometry testing on study patients during their Day 1 & Day 2 therapy sessions. Will also compare the results based on the therapies they receive.
Time frame: End of study visit per intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Vest | Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / VEST. | 72.43 percentage of predicted value |
| Elecflo Arm | Pulmonary Function Measured as a Percent Predicted BEFORE Therapy With Either ElectroFlo 5000 / VEST. | 72.93 percentage of predicted value |
Wet Sputum Weight
Sputum was collected in pre-measured cups in a blinded fashion
Time frame: End of study visit per intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Vest | Wet Sputum Weight | 3.8 grams |
| Elecflo Arm | Wet Sputum Weight | 4.6 grams |
Dry Sputum Weight
Sputum was collected in pre-measured cups in a blinded fashion, dessicated and measured dry
Time frame: End of study visit per intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Vest | Dry Sputum Weight | 0.15 gram |
| Elecflo Arm | Dry Sputum Weight | 0.18 gram |