Skip to content

Effect of Precariousness in RUral Areas During preGNANCY

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02275442
Acronym
PRUGNANCY
Enrollment
190
Registered
2014-10-27
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2014-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

EPICES Scale, General Practice, Precarious Situation, Pregnancy, Rural Parturient Women

Keywords

EPICES scale, Precarious situation, Rural parturient women, Access to care, Global Initiative for Sentinel E-health Network on Grid, General practice

Brief summary

The link between precarious situations and health conditions are more described in previous study. Precarious situations are more frequent and complex especially in rural areas. There are recognized like a risk factor of complications during pregnancy and delivery. It's necessary to describe antenatal cares for rural women in precarious situations to prevent those situations, to understand their difficulties in order to reduce inequalities and health spending. The aim of the PRUGNANCY study is to understand the difficulties of rural parturient women and the strategies developed to overcome them. Recognized earlier precarious situations and valorized General Practitioners and restore them to the follow-up or parturient women.

Detailed description

It's a multicenter prospective observational study with a quali-quantitative method. This study involved three maternities in Auvergne region (Issoire, Thiers, Saint-Flour). Precarious women living in rural areas are included. They will be followed during a period of two months after childbirth. The main assessment criterion is the adequation rate between antenatal care for those women and the HAS recommendation's. The amount necessary to highlight a significant difference is 190 patients (IC 95% \[0.429 - 0.571\] ; risk = 5 % ; Adequation rate = 50 % ; lost to follow-up rate = 10 % ; deprivation rate = 27 %). The secondary criteria of judgment are the reasons for not realized antenatal and postnatal cares, the difficulties of realized antenatal and postnatal cares, the strategies developed to overcome them, the term and health status of the child birth (Apgar score, birth weight), the health status of the child birth and his mother during the two post-partum months (HAS recommendation's).

Interventions

OTHEREPICES scale

Sponsors

Hospital Center of Issoire : Maternity unit
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
PEPRADE label unit EA 4681 : Department of general practice - Clermont-Ferrand AND Unit of Epidemiology, economic health and prevention - C.H.U Clermont-Ferrand
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Perinatal cares Auvergne network - C.H.U Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women old enough to procreate. Precariousness: EPICES scale \> 30, 17. Live in rural areas (INSEE definition).

Exclusion criteria

* To be unable to answer the questionnaire: intellectual disability or no French speaker or illiterates. EPICES scale not completed. Women who gave birth to a stillborn child. Medical interruption of pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
rate for prenatal caresat 9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
antenatal and postnatal caresat day 1
strategies to overcome difficulties to realize antenatal and postanatal caresat 2 monthsquestionnaires with open-ended questions to invite further comments

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026