Skip to content

Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel 120 MG in Treatment of Clinical Symptoms Associated With Inoperable Malignant Intestinal Obstruction

An International, Multicentric, Prospective, Open Label Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel 120 MG Associated to Standard of Care in the Treatment of Clinical Symptoms Associated With Inoperable Malignant Intestinal Obstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02275338
Acronym
IMIO
Enrollment
52
Registered
2014-10-27
Start date
2014-11-19
Completion date
2017-11-09
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intestinal Obstruction

Brief summary

To assess the efficacy of Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg for the relief of vomiting due to inoperable malignant intestinal obstruction in patients without nasogastric tube (NGT) and to assess the efficacy of lanreotide Autogel 120 mg on removal of nasogastric tube without the recurrence of vomiting in patients with an inoperable malignant intestinal obstruction with a nasogastric tube.

Interventions

120mg administered via deep subcutaneous injection at Day 0 and Day 28.

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent before any study related procedure * Male and female patients age 18 years or older at time of enrollment * Diagnosis of intestinal obstruction of malignant origin * In case of peritoneal carcinomatosis, confirmation by CT or MRI scan within the 3 months preceding the inclusion in the study * Confirmed as inoperable after surgical advice * Patient with a nasogastric tube OR presenting with 3 or more episodes of vomiting / 24h in the last 48 hours * Estimated life expectancy 1 month or more

Exclusion criteria

* Operable obstruction or subobstruction * Bowel obstruction due to a non-malignant cause * Signs of bowel perforation * Prior treatment with somatostatin or any other analogue within the previous 60 days * A known hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments or related compounds * Previous participation in this study * Is likely to require treatment during the study with drugs that are not permitted by the study protocol * Has abnormal baseline findings, any other medical condition(s) or laboratory findings that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might jeopardise the subject's safety

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Responders Before or at Day 7From Day 0 to Day 7The primary endpoint assessed the percentage of responding subjects before or at Day 7. A responder was defined as a subject experiencing ≤2 vomiting episodes/day during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Day 7 (for subjects without NGT at baseline), or as a subject in whom the NGT had been removed during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Day 7 without vomiting recurrence (for subjects with NGT at baseline), as recorded on diary cards which were completed every day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Time Between First Lanreotide Autogel® Injection and Clinical Response in Phase 1From Day 0 to Day 28The time for clinical response in Phase 1 (up to Day 28) was defined as the time from inclusion (Day 0) to the date of clinical response. A response was defined as occurrence of ≤ 2 vomiting episodes/day for at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Day 28 (for patients without NGT use at baseline) or the removal of NGT for at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Day 28 without vomiting recurrence (for patients with NGT use at baseline). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time to clinical response are presented.
Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Phase 1Days 0, 7, 14 and 28Quality of Life was assessed by both subject and investigator based on the ESAS. The ESAS scale evaluates 9 symptoms common in cancer subjects: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, wellbeing and shortness of breath. The severity at the time of assessment of each symptom is rated from 0 to 10 on a numerical scale; 0 = symptom is absent and 10 = worst possible severity. Each symptom rating was interpreted independently and a total symptom distress score was calculated for both subject and investigator assessed scores as the sum of the 9 items. Median change from baseline (Day 0) in total symptom distress score, at each of the Phase 1 timepoints is presented and a positive change indicates a worsening condition.
Median Change From Baseline in General Activity as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale in Phase 1Days 0, 7, 14 and 28The KPS scale was used to quantify subject's general well-being and activities of daily life. Subjects were classified based on their functional impairment and KPS scores range from 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). KPS scores are classified as 0-40 = unable to care for self; requires equivalent of institutional or hospital care; disease may be progressing rapidly; 50-70 = unable to work; able to live at home and care for most personal needs; varying amount of assistance needed; 80-100 = able to carry on normal activity and to work; no special care needed. Median change from baseline (Day 0) at each of the Phase 1 timepoints is presented and a negative change indicates a worsening condition.
Percentage of Responders in Phase 1From Day 0 to Day 28This endpoint assessed the overall percentage of responding subjects at the Phase 1 timepoints of Days 14 and 28. A responder was defined as a subject experiencing ≤ 2 vomiting episodes/day during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Days 14 or 28 (for subjects without NGT at baseline) or as a subject in whom the NGT has been removed, during at least 3 consecutive days without vomiting recurrence, at any timepoint between Day 0 and Days 14 and 28 (for subjects with NGT at baseline), as recorded on diary cards which were completed every day.
Median Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Scores Assessed Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Phase 1Days 0, 7, 14 and 28Abdominal pain was assessed using the VAS numeric pain distress scale. The VAS is a 100-millimetre (10-centimetre) scoring scale on which subjects marked on their perceived level of pain. Score range on VAS is from 0 to 100 where 0 = no pain and 100 = unbearable pain. Median change from baseline (Day 0) at each of the Phase 1 timepoints is presented and a positive change indicates a worsening condition.
Percentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsFrom Day 0 to Day 56This endpoint assessed the overall percentage of subjects continuing from Phase 1 and confirmed as a responder at the end of Phase 1, showing a continued response at Days 35, 42 and 56. A responder was defined as a subject experiencing ≤2 vomiting episodes/day during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Days 35, 42, 56 (for subjects without NGT at baseline), or as a subject in whom the NGT had been removed during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Days 35, 42, 56 without vomiting recurrence (for subjects with NGT at baseline), as recorded on diary cards which were completed every day.
Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by ESAS in Phase 2Days 0, 35, 42 and 56Quality of Life was assessed by both subject and investigator based on the ESAS. The ESAS scale evaluates 9 symptoms common in cancer subjects: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, wellbeing and shortness of breath. The severity at the time of assessment of each symptom is rated from 0 to 10 on a numerical scale, 0 = symptom is absent and 10 = worst possible severity. Each symptom rating was interpreted independently and a total symptom distress score was calculated for both subject and investigator assessed scores as the sum of the 9 items. Median change from baseline (Day 0) in total symptom distress score, at each of the Phase 2 timepoints is presented and a positive change indicates a worsening condition.
Median Change From Baseline in Number of Daily Episodes of Nausea in Phase 1Days 0, 7, 14 and 28The mean number of daily episodes of nausea were calculated as the sum of episodes of nausea reported the last 3 days before the corresponding visit, divided by 3. The median change from baseline (Day 0) at each of the Phase 1 timepoints is presented and positive change indicates a worsening condition.

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects diagnosed with inoperable malignant intestinal obstruction were recruited into this single arm, open label study in 15 study centres in Belgium between November 2014 and November 2017.

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 52 subjects were enrolled into this 2 phase study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg - All Subjects
All subjects were administered an initial injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg via subcutaneous injection at Day 0 (Phase 1). Subjects who completed the 28 days of Phase 1 and who were responders as defined by the protocol, had the opportunity to enter Phase 2 and receive a second subcutaneous injection of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg. All subjects continued to receive standard of care throughout the study.
52
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event15
Overall StudyDisease progression (death)1
Overall StudyDoes not meet entry criteria1
Overall StudyIneligible to start Phase 24
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3
Overall StudyReason not specified5
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLanreotide Autogel® 120 mg - All Subjects
Age, Continuous66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Age, Customized
40-49 years
3 Participants
Age, Customized
<40 years
1 Participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years
9 Participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years
17 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 70 years
22 Participants
Nasogastric tube (NGT) Status at Baseline
With NGT at baseline
35 Participants
Nasogastric tube (NGT) Status at Baseline
Without NGT at baseline
17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
15 / 52
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
29 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Responders Before or at Day 7

The primary endpoint assessed the percentage of responding subjects before or at Day 7. A responder was defined as a subject experiencing ≤2 vomiting episodes/day during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Day 7 (for subjects without NGT at baseline), or as a subject in whom the NGT had been removed during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Day 7 without vomiting recurrence (for subjects with NGT at baseline), as recorded on diary cards which were completed every day.

Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 7

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Day 7Without NGT at Baseline88.2 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Day 7With NGT at Baseline25.7 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Day 7All Subjects46.2 percentage of responders
Comparison: One sided binomial test to compare percentage of responding subjects to theoretical proportion of 30%.p-value: 0.0055Binomial test
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Scores Assessed Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Phase 1

Abdominal pain was assessed using the VAS numeric pain distress scale. The VAS is a 100-millimetre (10-centimetre) scoring scale on which subjects marked on their perceived level of pain. Score range on VAS is from 0 to 100 where 0 = no pain and 100 = unbearable pain. Median change from baseline (Day 0) at each of the Phase 1 timepoints is presented and a positive change indicates a worsening condition.

Time frame: Days 0, 7, 14 and 28

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population). Only subjects with data available for analysis at each timepoint are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Scores Assessed Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Phase 1At Day 280.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Scores Assessed Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Phase 1At Day 7-3.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Scores Assessed Using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in Phase 1At Day 14-1.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in General Activity as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale in Phase 1

The KPS scale was used to quantify subject's general well-being and activities of daily life. Subjects were classified based on their functional impairment and KPS scores range from 0 (death) to 100 (no evidence of disease). KPS scores are classified as 0-40 = unable to care for self; requires equivalent of institutional or hospital care; disease may be progressing rapidly; 50-70 = unable to work; able to live at home and care for most personal needs; varying amount of assistance needed; 80-100 = able to carry on normal activity and to work; no special care needed. Median change from baseline (Day 0) at each of the Phase 1 timepoints is presented and a negative change indicates a worsening condition.

Time frame: Days 0, 7, 14 and 28

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population). Only subjects with data available for analysis at each timepoint are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in General Activity as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale in Phase 1At Day 70.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in General Activity as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale in Phase 1At Day 140.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in General Activity as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale in Phase 1At Day 2810.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Number of Daily Episodes of Nausea in Phase 1

The mean number of daily episodes of nausea were calculated as the sum of episodes of nausea reported the last 3 days before the corresponding visit, divided by 3. The median change from baseline (Day 0) at each of the Phase 1 timepoints is presented and positive change indicates a worsening condition.

Time frame: Days 0, 7, 14 and 28

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population). Only subjects with data available for analysis at each timepoint are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Number of Daily Episodes of Nausea in Phase 1At Day 7-0.17 Daily episodes of nausea
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Number of Daily Episodes of Nausea in Phase 1At Day 14-1.50 Daily episodes of nausea
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Number of Daily Episodes of Nausea in Phase 1At Day 28-1.50 Daily episodes of nausea
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Phase 1

Quality of Life was assessed by both subject and investigator based on the ESAS. The ESAS scale evaluates 9 symptoms common in cancer subjects: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, wellbeing and shortness of breath. The severity at the time of assessment of each symptom is rated from 0 to 10 on a numerical scale; 0 = symptom is absent and 10 = worst possible severity. Each symptom rating was interpreted independently and a total symptom distress score was calculated for both subject and investigator assessed scores as the sum of the 9 items. Median change from baseline (Day 0) in total symptom distress score, at each of the Phase 1 timepoints is presented and a positive change indicates a worsening condition.

Time frame: Days 0, 7, 14 and 28

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population). Only subjects with data available for analysis at each timepoint are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Phase 1Day 28 - assessed by subject-5.5 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Phase 1Day 7 - assessed by subject-3.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Phase 1Day 7 - assessed by investigator-4.5 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Phase 1Day 14 - assessed by subject-2.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Phase 1Day 14 - assessed by investigator-7.5 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in Phase 1Day 28 - assessed by investigator-5.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by ESAS in Phase 2

Quality of Life was assessed by both subject and investigator based on the ESAS. The ESAS scale evaluates 9 symptoms common in cancer subjects: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, wellbeing and shortness of breath. The severity at the time of assessment of each symptom is rated from 0 to 10 on a numerical scale, 0 = symptom is absent and 10 = worst possible severity. Each symptom rating was interpreted independently and a total symptom distress score was calculated for both subject and investigator assessed scores as the sum of the 9 items. Median change from baseline (Day 0) in total symptom distress score, at each of the Phase 2 timepoints is presented and a positive change indicates a worsening condition.

Time frame: Days 0, 35, 42 and 56

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population) and were continuing in Phase 2 of the study. Only subjects with data available for analysis at each timepoint are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by ESAS in Phase 2Day 35 - assessed by subject-4.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by ESAS in Phase 2Day 35 - assessed by investigator-12.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by ESAS in Phase 2Day 42 - assessed by subject-10.5 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by ESAS in Phase 2Day 42 - assessed by investigator-13.5 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by ESAS in Phase 2Day 56 - assessed by subject-8.0 units on a scale
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by ESAS in Phase 2Day 56 - assessed by investigator-9.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Median Time Between First Lanreotide Autogel® Injection and Clinical Response in Phase 1

The time for clinical response in Phase 1 (up to Day 28) was defined as the time from inclusion (Day 0) to the date of clinical response. A response was defined as occurrence of ≤ 2 vomiting episodes/day for at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Day 28 (for patients without NGT use at baseline) or the removal of NGT for at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Day 28 without vomiting recurrence (for patients with NGT use at baseline). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time to clinical response are presented.

Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgMedian Time Between First Lanreotide Autogel® Injection and Clinical Response in Phase 19.00 days
Secondary

Percentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 Timepoints

This endpoint assessed the overall percentage of subjects continuing from Phase 1 and confirmed as a responder at the end of Phase 1, showing a continued response at Days 35, 42 and 56. A responder was defined as a subject experiencing ≤2 vomiting episodes/day during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Days 35, 42, 56 (for subjects without NGT at baseline), or as a subject in whom the NGT had been removed during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Days 35, 42, 56 without vomiting recurrence (for subjects with NGT at baseline), as recorded on diary cards which were completed every day.

Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 56

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population) and were continuing in Phase 2 of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 35: Without NGT at Baseline100 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 35: With NGT at Baseline100 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 35: All Subjects100 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 42: Without NGT at Baseline100 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 42: With NGT at Baseline100 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 42: All Subjects100 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 56: Without NGT at Baseline100 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 56: With NGT at Baseline100 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders Before or at Phase 2 TimepointsBy Day 56: All Subjects (n=21)100 percentage of responders
Secondary

Percentage of Responders in Phase 1

This endpoint assessed the overall percentage of responding subjects at the Phase 1 timepoints of Days 14 and 28. A responder was defined as a subject experiencing ≤ 2 vomiting episodes/day during at least 3 consecutive days at any timepoint between Day 0 and Days 14 or 28 (for subjects without NGT at baseline) or as a subject in whom the NGT has been removed, during at least 3 consecutive days without vomiting recurrence, at any timepoint between Day 0 and Days 14 and 28 (for subjects with NGT at baseline), as recorded on diary cards which were completed every day.

Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 28

Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication (ITT population).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders in Phase 1By Day 28: All Subjects65.4 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders in Phase 1By Day 14: Without NGT at Baseline88.2 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders in Phase 1By Day 14: With NGT at Baseline45.7 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders in Phase 1By Day 14: All Subjects59.6 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders in Phase 1By Day 28: Without NGT at Baseline88.2 percentage of responders
Lanreotide Autogel® 120 mgPercentage of Responders in Phase 1By Day 28: With NGT at Baseline54.3 percentage of responders

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026