Skip to content

Response Patterns to the Electric Stimulation of Epidural Catheters in Term Pregnant Women

Response Patterns to the Electric Stimulation of Epidural Catheters in Term Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Uniport Versus Multiport Catheters.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02274467
Enrollment
48
Registered
2014-10-24
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2015-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor Pain

Keywords

Tsui Test, Labour, Epidural catheter

Brief summary

Lumbar epidural analgesia is commonly used for labor pain relief due to its effectiveness and safety. Despite its very high success rate, the epidural technique remains a rather blind technique and failures continue to occur. The correct placement of an epidural catheter, however, remains a clinical problem, since there is no imaging technique that could be used at the bedside to determine the exact positioning of the catheter. The technique of a trans-catheter electric stimulation test (TCEST) has been successfully used to detect the proper epidural catheter location for pediatric, post-operative and laboring obstetric patients. The response to the TCEST with the uniport (single hole) epidural catheters has been well described. There is a growing body of evidence that multiport epidural catheters provide an advantage to uniport catheters, since additional ports likely allow for an enhanced distribution of the local anesthetic solution. This was shown to result in a lower incidence of inadequate analgesia, including unilateral sensory blockade and missed sensory segments. The characteristics of the TCEST response using a multiport catheter remain to be determined. The aim of this study is to compare the response patterns to the TCEST using a single port versus multiport wire reinforced epidural catheters. The hypothesis of this study is that the incidence of a bilateral response to the TCEST will be higher in the multiport catheter as compared to the uniport catheter.

Detailed description

This will be a randomized double-blind controlled study. After recruitment of the patient, epidural anesthesia will be performed in the standard fashion employed in the investigators institution by a resident, fellow, or staff. Spinal ultrasound will be used prior to performing the epidural catheter insertion. Patients will be randomly allocated into two different groups to receive either a 19 gauge uniport catheter or a 19 gauge multiorifice catheter (Arrow Flextip plus, Arrow International Inc., Reading, PA). After securement of the catheter, the TCEST will be performed. The test will be repeated at 5 minutes, following a test dose, to determine the change in intensity of current required to elicit the motor response. Following the second testing, a loading dose of the standard anesthetic solution will be administered. The sensory level to ice will be tested at 20 minutes following injection of the loading dose of bupivacaine and fentanyl. The sensory level will be assessed from the sacral to the thoracic levels, bilaterally Failure of the epidural analgesia will be assessed, defined as no evidence of a sensory block to ice and absent pain relief. The need for catheter replacement will be determined within 2 hours of the completion of the loading dose.

Interventions

DEVICETrans-catheter electric stimulation test

Sponsors

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women over 18 years of age requesting an epidural for labor and delivery * Able to communicate in English * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to provide written informed consent * Unable to communicate in English * Allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine, bupivacaine or fentanyl * Abnormal vertebral anatomy, including previous spine surgery and scoliosis * Coexisting neurological disorders * Implanted electronic devices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor response pattern5 minutesMotor response pattern to the electrical stimulation of the epidural catheter, either unilateral or bilateral

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Current (mA)5 minutesThe current (mA) needed to elicit a motor response at control and at 5 minutes after the test dose
Sensory level20 minutesThe sensory level to ice at 20 minutes following injection of the standard epidural loading dose. The sensory level will be assessed from the sacral to the thoracic levels, bilaterally
Epidural block failure20 minutesFailure of the epidural analgesia, defined as no evidence of a sensory block to ice and absent pain relief
Catheter replacement2 hoursNeed for catheter replacement within 2 hours of the completion of the loading dose

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026