Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Reablement in Home Dwelling Adults

The Effectiveness of Reablement in Home Dwelling Adults. A Quasi Experimental Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02273934
Enrollment
500
Registered
2014-10-24
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2015-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Disability

Keywords

Home-based rehabilitation, Activities of daily living, Restorative care, Reablement, Everyday rehabilitation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a special kind of rehabilitation offered to home-dwelling adults is effective with regards to functional ability, health-related quality of life, coping, mental health and municipal costs.

Detailed description

Health promotion and prevention of functional decline among home dwelling adults and immediate onset of rehabilitation, can improve function, and reduce or delay need for home-based assistance and institution placement. In the coming years there will be a significant increase in number of persons in Norway that need interventions aiming at coping with everyday activities. Therefore there is a call for new models for early intervention and rehabilitation in order to give service to a larger amount of home living people. Reablement is a new and promising rehabilitation model which many Norwegian municipalities are implementing in order to meet current and future needs for municipal home-based services. However, very little research has been performed regarding the effectiveness of this intervention. This study aims at assessing the effectiveness of reablement in terms of daily functioning, health-related quality of life, coping, mental health and economic municipal costs. The study will be conducted in 44 municipalities in Norway. It is a quasi-experimental intervention trial, recruiting home-dwelling adults with an initial functional decline in daily activities. The intervention is intensive, multidisciplinary, home-based rehabilitation given by home-trainers, under supervision from an occupational therapist, nurse or a physiotherapist. The control intervention is standard home-based treatment and care. A total of approximately 750 participants will be recruited, including approximately 100 participants the control group. The participants will be assessed at baseline, and at 10 weeks ,6-, and 12 months follow-up. Primary outcomes will be participation, activity, and municipal expenditures. Costs are generated by the working hours of the different professions. Hence, there will be a weekly registration of the working hours different health care professions spend in the private homes of the participants. Data analyses will be performed according to intention to treat. Univariate analysis of covariance will be used to investigate differences between the groups from baseline to the end of intervention. The working hour data is panel data and will be analyzed accordingly; a random or a mixed effect regression model will be employed. Also, descriptive statistics and simpler tests will be carried out.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALReablement

The intervention deals with improving function in daily activities the person defines as important in the areas of self-care, productivity and leisure.

BEHAVIORALStandard treatment

The control intervention is standard home-based treatment/care in Norway.

Sponsors

University of Oslo
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Bergen
CollaboratorOTHER
Frode F. Jacobsen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Home-dwelling person * Applicant of home-based services * Above 18 years old * Functional decline in at least one activity * Able to understand written and oral Norwegian

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive disability * Terminal ill * Being assessed as needing nursing home placement * Being assessed as needing institution-based rehabilitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in score in Canadian Occupational Performance MeasureBaseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 12 monthsActivity and participation will be measured using Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) The COPM is a measure of a client's self-perception of occupational performance in the areas of self-care, productivity and leisure. Outcome measures for the COPM are: the client's most important problems in occupational performance and a total score of performance and a total score of satisfaction for these problems.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ExpenditureWeekly from baseline to 6 monthsMunicipal expenditures will be recorded weekly for six months. Costs will be recorded in accordance with the operating hours of the different health care professions in the private homes of the participants.
Short Physical Performance BatteryBaseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 12 monthsShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) investigates balance, walking function and muscle strength in the lower limbs.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-related Quality of LifeBaseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 12 monthsHealth-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D) measures health-related quality of life states consisting of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of five responses.
Sense of coherenceBaseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 12 monthsSense of coherence (SOC) measures comprehensibility (5 items), manageability (4 items) and meaning (4 items).
Mental Health ContinuumBaseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 12 monthsMental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) measures emotional (3 items), psychological (6 items) and social (5 items) well-being.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026