Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat in the Treatment of Anemia in Participants With ESRD on Stable Dialysis

A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat (FG-4592) in the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Subjects With End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on Stable Dialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02273726
Enrollment
741
Registered
2014-10-24
Start date
2015-01-15
Completion date
2018-09-19
Last updated
2021-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CKD Anemia in Stable Dialysis Patients

Keywords

Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Dialysis, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, hemoglobin, End stage renal disease, Stable Dialysis, erythropoietins, erythropoiesis stimulating agent

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat compared with active control (epoetin alfa) for the maintenance treatment of anemia in participants with ESRD on dialysis.

Detailed description

This study will consist of three study periods as follows: 1. Screening Period of up to 6 weeks (8 weeks if on Mircera) 2. Treatment Period: a minimum of 52 weeks, a maximum of up to 3 years from the date last participant is randomized. Minimum study duration for participants enrolled under Protocol Amendment 1 or 2 may be less than 52 weeks 3. A Follow-up period of 4 weeks. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either roxadustat or epoetin alfa (active control) in an open-label manner.

Interventions

DRUGEpoetin Alfa

Epoetin alfa will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm.

DRUGRoxadustat

Roxadustat will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm.

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Kyntra Bio
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Receiving dialysis for ESRD for ≥3 months. Incident dialysis participants (under Amendment 1 and 2) receiving dialysis for ESRD for ≥ 2 weeks but ≤ 4 months at the time of randomization * Participants must be on ESA for ≥ 8 weeks prior to screening; incident dialysis participants must be on ESA for ≥ 4 weeks prior to screening. * Mean of the 3 most recent central lab Hb values during the Screening Period must be ≥ 9.0 g/dL and ≤ 12.0 g/dL (for incident dialysis participants, mean of the 2 most recent Hb values must be ≥ 8.5 g/dL and ≤ 12.0 g/dL); with an absolute difference of ≤ 1.3 g/dL between the highest and the lowest value. Samples are obtained at least 4 days apart (2 days under Amendment 2) and the last Hb value must be within 10 days prior to the randomization visit * Participants with ferritin level ≥ 100 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL) (\<100 ng/mL under Amendment 2) or transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≥ 20% (\<20% under Amendment 2) at screening may qualify upon receiving iron supplement (per local standard of care) * Participants with a serum folate and Vitamin B12 ≥ lower limit of normal (LLN) (\< LLN under Amendment 2) at screening may qualify upon receiving supplement (per local standard of care) * Participant's alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are ≤3x the upper limit of normal (ULN), and total bilirubin (TBL) is ≤1.5x ULN at screening * Participant's body weight is 45 kilograms (kg) to 160 kg.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has received an red blood cell (RBC) transfusion within 8 weeks (4 weeks under Amendment 2) prior to randomization * Participant has known history of myelodysplastic syndrome or multiple myeloma * Participant has known inherited disease such as thalassemia or sickle cell anemia or other known causes for anemia other than chronic kidney disease. * Participant has known hemosiderosis, hemochromatosis, coagulation disorder,or hypercoagulable condition * Participant has known chronic inflammatory disease that could cause anemia * Participant has anticipated surgery that is expected to cause blood loss * Participant has known gastrointestinal bleeding * Participant has history of chronic liver disease (for example, chronic infectious hepatitis,chronic auto-immune liver disease,cirrhosis, or fibrosis of the liver) * Participant with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure * Participant has had a heart attack, stroke, seizure, or a thrombotic/thromboembolic event (for example, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) within 12 weeks prior to participating in the study * Participant has uncontrolled high blood pressure within 2 weeks prior to participating in the study * Participant has a history of malignancy, except for the following: cancers determined to be cured or in remission for ≥2 years, curatively resected basal cell or squamous cell skin cancers, cervical cancer in situ, or resected colonic polyps.) * Participant is positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B surface antigen, or anti-hepatitis C virus antibody * Participant with prior organ transplant who experience rejection within 6 months or on high doses of immunosuppressive therapy * Participant has any of the following known untreated conditions; proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, macular degeneration or retinal vein occlusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
US (FDA) Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to The Average Level During The Evaluation Period (Weeks 28 to 52), Regardless of Rescue TherapyBaseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 28 to 52Hb values under the influence of rescue therapy were not censored in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion. Baseline Hb was defined the mean of up to 4 last central lab values prior to the first dose of study treatment. The intermittent missing Hb data was imputed for each treatment relying on non-missing data from all participants within each treatment group using the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) imputation model, Monotone missing data were imputed by regression from its own treatment group.
Ex-U.S. Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to the Average Weeks 28 to 36, Without Having Received Rescue Therapy Within 6 Weeks Prior to and During This 8-Week Evaluation Period for Participants Enrolled Under the Original ProtocolBaseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 28 to 36Hb values under the influence of rescue therapy were censored up to 6 weeks in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or RBC transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion. Baseline Hb was defined the mean of up to 4 last central lab values prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Averaged Over Weeks 12 to 28Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 12 to 28Baseline LDL Cholesterol was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Change From Baseline in Hb Levels Averaged Over Weeks 18 to 24 Regardless of Rescue Therapy in Participants Whose Baseline High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)> Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 18 to 24Hb values under the influence of rescue therapy were not censored in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or RBC transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion. Baseline Hb was defined the mean of up to 4 last central lab values prior to the first dose of study treatment. The intermittent missing Hb data was imputed for each treatment relying on non-missing data from all participants within each treatment group using the MCMC imputation model, Monotone missing data were imputed by regression from its own treatment group.
Average Monthly IV Iron Use Per Patient-Exposure-Month (PEM) During Weeks 28 to 52Weeks 28 to 52Monthly iron use for each participant= Total IV iron in mg / \[(last dose date - first dose date of study medication in the period)+1\]/ 28.
US (FDA Submission): Hb Responder Rate- Percentage of Participants With Mean Hb Level ≥10.0 g/dL Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 52, Regardless of Rescue TherapyWeeks 28 to 52Hb values under the influence of rescue therapy were not censored in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or RBC transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion.
Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Averaged Over Weeks 20 to 28Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 20 to 28Baseline MAP was defined as the mean of values obtained within 6 weeks prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Time to First Exacerbation of Hypertension During Weeks 28 to 52Weeks 28 to 52An exacerbation of hypertension was defined as increase from baseline of ≥20 mmHg in systolic blood pressure (sBP) and sBP ≥170 mmHg or an increase from baseline of ≥15 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure (dBP) and dBP ≥100 mmHg. Median time to event (weeks) was calculated using Kaplan Meier Survival Estimates.
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 12 to 28The SF-36 V2 consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical problems (4 items), role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items), general health perceptions (5 items), mental health (5 items), social function (2 items), and vitality (4 items). The physical functioning subscore and vitality subscore are reported. Each scale was transformed into 0-100 score, with higher scores indicating better health status. Baseline score was defined as the last physical functioning value or vitality value, as applicable, prior to the first dose of study drug.
Time to First RBC TransfusionBaseline (Day 1, Week 0) up to last dose of study drug (maximum treatment duration was 183.7 weeks for roxadustat and 180.4 weeks for epoetin alfa)Median time to event (weeks) was calculated using Kaplan Meier Survival Estimates.
Ex-U.S. Submission: Hb Responder Rate- Percentage of Participants With Mean Hb 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 36, Censoring for Rescue TherapyWeeks 28 to 36Hb values under the influence of a rescue therapy were censored up to 6 weeks in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or RBC transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either roxadustat or epoetin alfa.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Roxadustat
Participants received roxadustat tablets, administered orally TIW. Initial roxadustat dose was based on the participant's average prescribed ESA dose in the 4 weeks (if on epoetin or darbepoetin or 8 weeks (if on Mircera®) prior to randomization. Dose adjustments were permitted to maintain a Hb level of approximately 11 g/dL. The maximum roxadustat dose was 3.0 mg/kg per dose or 400 mg per administration (whichever was lower). The maximum treatment duration was 183.7 weeks.
370
Epoetin Alfa
Participants on HD received epoetin alfa, administered IV TIW and participants on home HD or PD received epoetin alfa, administered SC. Initial epoetin alfa dose was based on the participant's average weekly prescribed ESA dose in 4 weeks prior to randomization if on epoetin or darbepoetin, and average monthly (4-week) prescribed ESA dose in 8 weeks prior to randomization if on Mircera®. In case of a change in route of administration from SC to IV (TIW), the initial dose of IV epoetin alfa was determined by the investigator per local SOC. Dose adjustments followed the recommendations as per the approved country-specific product label (USPI or SmPC) or local SOC. The maximum treatment duration was 180.4 weeks.
371
Total741

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event279
Overall StudyDeath7062
Overall StudyKidney transplant3139
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy61
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up63
Overall StudyOther than specified2830
Overall StudyPhysician Decision3015
Overall StudyProtocol Violation40
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4129

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRoxadustatEpoetin AlfaTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
117 Participants125 Participants242 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
253 Participants246 Participants499 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
137 Participants129 Participants266 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
233 Participants242 Participants475 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian/Alaskan Native
10 Participants7 Participants17 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
21 Participants15 Participants36 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black/African American
158 Participants156 Participants314 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
15 Participants6 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
165 Participants184 Participants349 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
183 Participants156 Participants339 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
187 Participants215 Participants402 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
70 / 37062 / 370
other
Total, other adverse events
286 / 370292 / 370
serious
Total, serious adverse events
242 / 370248 / 370

Outcome results

Primary

Ex-U.S. Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to the Average Weeks 28 to 36, Without Having Received Rescue Therapy Within 6 Weeks Prior to and During This 8-Week Evaluation Period for Participants Enrolled Under the Original Protocol

Hb values under the influence of rescue therapy were censored up to 6 weeks in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or RBC transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion. Baseline Hb was defined the mean of up to 4 last central lab values prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 28 to 36

Population: Per protocol set (PPS) population included all participants in full analysis set (FAS) population (all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment) who received at least 8 weeks of treatment and were without major protocol violations. 'Overall number of participants analyzed'=participants evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed'=participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RoxadustatEx-U.S. Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to the Average Weeks 28 to 36, Without Having Received Rescue Therapy Within 6 Weeks Prior to and During This 8-Week Evaluation Period for Participants Enrolled Under the Original ProtocolBaseline10.33 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.639
RoxadustatEx-U.S. Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to the Average Weeks 28 to 36, Without Having Received Rescue Therapy Within 6 Weeks Prior to and During This 8-Week Evaluation Period for Participants Enrolled Under the Original ProtocolChange at Weeks 28 to 360.54 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.022
Epoetin AlfaEx-U.S. Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to the Average Weeks 28 to 36, Without Having Received Rescue Therapy Within 6 Weeks Prior to and During This 8-Week Evaluation Period for Participants Enrolled Under the Original ProtocolBaseline10.35 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.614
Epoetin AlfaEx-U.S. Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to the Average Weeks 28 to 36, Without Having Received Rescue Therapy Within 6 Weeks Prior to and During This 8-Week Evaluation Period for Participants Enrolled Under the Original ProtocolChange at Weeks 28 to 36-0.03 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.897
Comparison: Treatment comparison was made using a mixed model of repeated measures (MMRM) with baseline Hb as a covariate, and treatment, visit, visit-by-treatment interaction, ESA dependent incident dialysis within ≤4 months vs. \>4 months of starting dialysis when randomized, and randomization stratification factors except mean qualifying screening Hb (≤10.5 vs. \>10.5 g/dL) as fixed effects.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.404, 0.687]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

US (FDA) Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to The Average Level During The Evaluation Period (Weeks 28 to 52), Regardless of Rescue Therapy

Hb values under the influence of rescue therapy were not censored in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion. Baseline Hb was defined the mean of up to 4 last central lab values prior to the first dose of study treatment. The intermittent missing Hb data was imputed for each treatment relying on non-missing data from all participants within each treatment group using the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) imputation model, Monotone missing data were imputed by regression from its own treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 28 to 52

Population: ITT Population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RoxadustatUS (FDA) Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to The Average Level During The Evaluation Period (Weeks 28 to 52), Regardless of Rescue TherapyBaseline10.30 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.661
RoxadustatUS (FDA) Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to The Average Level During The Evaluation Period (Weeks 28 to 52), Regardless of Rescue TherapyChange at Weeks 28 to 520.39 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.934
Epoetin AlfaUS (FDA) Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to The Average Level During The Evaluation Period (Weeks 28 to 52), Regardless of Rescue TherapyBaseline10.31 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.656
Epoetin AlfaUS (FDA) Submission: Mean Hb Change From Baseline to The Average Level During The Evaluation Period (Weeks 28 to 52), Regardless of Rescue TherapyChange at Weeks 28 to 52-0.09 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.838
Comparison: Treatment comparison was made using the multiple imputation (MI) strategy by combining the results of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with baseline Hb as a covariate, and treatment, ESA dependent incident dialysis within ≤4 months vs. \>4 months of starting dialysis when randomized, and other randomization stratification factors except mean qualifying screening hemoglobin (≤10.5 vs. \>10.5 g/dL) as fixed effects.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.365, 0.591]ANCOVA
Secondary

Average Monthly IV Iron Use Per Patient-Exposure-Month (PEM) During Weeks 28 to 52

Monthly iron use for each participant= Total IV iron in mg / \[(last dose date - first dose date of study medication in the period)+1\]/ 28.

Time frame: Weeks 28 to 52

Population: FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RoxadustatAverage Monthly IV Iron Use Per Patient-Exposure-Month (PEM) During Weeks 28 to 5217.07 mg/PEMStandard Deviation 53.375
Epoetin AlfaAverage Monthly IV Iron Use Per Patient-Exposure-Month (PEM) During Weeks 28 to 5237.02 mg/PEMStandard Deviation 106.778
Comparison: Treatment comparison was made using an ANCOVA model with baseline iron repletion status, treatment, ESA dependent incident dialysis within ≤4 months vs. \>4 months of starting dialysis when randomized, and randomization stratification factors as fixed effects.p-value: 0.0009195% CI: [-33.842, -6.445]Rank ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hb Levels Averaged Over Weeks 18 to 24 Regardless of Rescue Therapy in Participants Whose Baseline High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)> Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

Hb values under the influence of rescue therapy were not censored in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or RBC transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion. Baseline Hb was defined the mean of up to 4 last central lab values prior to the first dose of study treatment. The intermittent missing Hb data was imputed for each treatment relying on non-missing data from all participants within each treatment group using the MCMC imputation model, Monotone missing data were imputed by regression from its own treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 18 to 24

Population: FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Hb Levels Averaged Over Weeks 18 to 24 Regardless of Rescue Therapy in Participants Whose Baseline High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)> Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)Baseline10.30 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.616
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Hb Levels Averaged Over Weeks 18 to 24 Regardless of Rescue Therapy in Participants Whose Baseline High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)> Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)Change at Weeks 18-240.61 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.02
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Hb Levels Averaged Over Weeks 18 to 24 Regardless of Rescue Therapy in Participants Whose Baseline High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)> Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)Baseline10.24 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.63
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Hb Levels Averaged Over Weeks 18 to 24 Regardless of Rescue Therapy in Participants Whose Baseline High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)> Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)Change at Weeks 18-24-0.03 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.94
Comparison: Treatment comparison was made using the MI strategy by combining the results of ANCOVA model with baseline Hb as a covariate, and treatment, ESA dependent incident dialysis within ≤4 months vs. \>4 months of starting dialysis when randomized, and other randomization stratification factors except mean qualifying screening Hb (≤10.5 vs. \>10.5 g/dL) as fixed effects.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.503, 0.869]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Averaged Over Weeks 12 to 28

Baseline LDL Cholesterol was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 12 to 28

Population: FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Averaged Over Weeks 12 to 28Baseline84.53 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.009
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Averaged Over Weeks 12 to 28Change at Weeks 12 to 28-13.70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.068
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Averaged Over Weeks 12 to 28Change at Weeks 12 to 281.23 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.389
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Averaged Over Weeks 12 to 28Baseline84.45 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.124
Comparison: Treatment comparison was made using a MMRM with baseline as a covariate, and treatment, visit, visit-by-treatment interaction, ESA dependent incident dialysis within ≤4 months vs. \>4 months of starting dialysis when randomized, and randomization stratification factors as fixed effects.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-17.64, -11.695]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Averaged Over Weeks 20 to 28

Baseline MAP was defined as the mean of values obtained within 6 weeks prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 20 to 28

Population: FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Averaged Over Weeks 20 to 28Baseline101.41 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12.591
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Averaged Over Weeks 20 to 28Change at Weeks 20 to 280.46 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.933
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Averaged Over Weeks 20 to 28Baseline100.34 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12.35
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Averaged Over Weeks 20 to 28Change at Weeks 20 to 280.04 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.489
Comparison: Treatment comparison was made using MMRM with baseline as a covariate, and treatment, visit, visit-by-treatment interaction, ESA dependent incident dialysis within ≤4 months vs. \>4 months of starting dialysis when randomized, and randomization stratification factors as fixed effects.p-value: 0.3595% CI: [-0.76, 2.142]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28

The SF-36 V2 consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical problems (4 items), role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items), general health perceptions (5 items), mental health (5 items), social function (2 items), and vitality (4 items). The physical functioning subscore and vitality subscore are reported. Each scale was transformed into 0-100 score, with higher scores indicating better health status. Baseline score was defined as the last physical functioning value or vitality value, as applicable, prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0), Weeks 12 to 28

Population: FAS Population included all randomized/enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had baseline and at least 1 postdose Hb assessment. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Physical functioning subscore: Baseline38.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.202
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Physical functioning subscore: Change at Weeks 12 to 28-0.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.443
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Vitality subscore: Baseline51.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.111
RoxadustatChange From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Vitality subscore: Change at Weeks 12 to 28-0.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.007
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Vitality subscore: Change at Weeks 12 to 280.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.041
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Physical functioning subscore: Baseline39.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.368
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Vitality subscore: Baseline51.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.841
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Version 2 Physical Functioning Subscore and Vitality Subscore at Weeks 12 to 28Physical functioning subscore: Change at Weeks 12 to 28-0.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.38
Secondary

Ex-U.S. Submission: Hb Responder Rate- Percentage of Participants With Mean Hb 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 36, Censoring for Rescue Therapy

Hb values under the influence of a rescue therapy were censored up to 6 weeks in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or RBC transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion.

Time frame: Weeks 28 to 36

Population: The PPS population included all participants in the FAS population (all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment) who received at least 8 weeks of treatment, had at least 1 valid postdose Hb assessment and were without major protocol violations.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RoxadustatEx-U.S. Submission: Hb Responder Rate- Percentage of Participants With Mean Hb 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 36, Censoring for Rescue Therapy64.1 percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaEx-U.S. Submission: Hb Responder Rate- Percentage of Participants With Mean Hb 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 36, Censoring for Rescue Therapy60.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: For the difference of responder rates between 2 treatment groups, the CI analyzed was from the Miettinen \& Nurminen approach adjusting for randomization stratification factors.95% CI: [-4.3, 9.7]
Secondary

Time to First Exacerbation of Hypertension During Weeks 28 to 52

An exacerbation of hypertension was defined as increase from baseline of ≥20 mmHg in systolic blood pressure (sBP) and sBP ≥170 mmHg or an increase from baseline of ≥15 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure (dBP) and dBP ≥100 mmHg. Median time to event (weeks) was calculated using Kaplan Meier Survival Estimates.

Time frame: Weeks 28 to 52

Population: FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RoxadustatTime to First Exacerbation of Hypertension During Weeks 28 to 52NA weeks
Epoetin AlfaTime to First Exacerbation of Hypertension During Weeks 28 to 52NA weeks
Secondary

Time to First RBC Transfusion

Median time to event (weeks) was calculated using Kaplan Meier Survival Estimates.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Week 0) up to last dose of study drug (maximum treatment duration was 183.7 weeks for roxadustat and 180.4 weeks for epoetin alfa)

Population: FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RoxadustatTime to First RBC TransfusionNA weeks
Epoetin AlfaTime to First RBC TransfusionNA weeks
Comparison: Analysis was done using a Cox Proportional Hazards model adjusting for baseline Hb and other stratification factors except mean qualifying screening Hb (≤10.5 vs. \>10.5 g/dL) as fixed effects.p-value: 0.033795% CI: [0.466, 0.97]Cox Proportional Hazards model
Secondary

US (FDA Submission): Hb Responder Rate- Percentage of Participants With Mean Hb Level ≥10.0 g/dL Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 52, Regardless of Rescue Therapy

Hb values under the influence of rescue therapy were not censored in the analysis. Rescue therapy for roxadustat treated participants was defined as recombinant erythropoietin or analogue (ESA) or RBC transfusion, and rescue therapy for epoetin alfa treated participants was defined as RBC transfusion.

Time frame: Weeks 28 to 52

Population: FAS population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose Hb assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RoxadustatUS (FDA Submission): Hb Responder Rate- Percentage of Participants With Mean Hb Level ≥10.0 g/dL Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 52, Regardless of Rescue Therapy66.1 percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaUS (FDA Submission): Hb Responder Rate- Percentage of Participants With Mean Hb Level ≥10.0 g/dL Averaged Over Weeks 28 to 52, Regardless of Rescue Therapy58.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: For the difference of responder rates between 2 treatment groups, the CI analyzed was from the Miettinen \& Nurminen approach adjusting for randomization stratification factors.95% CI: [0.9, 14.3]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026