Skip to content

Optimal Anemia Treatment in End Stage Renal Disease (ERSD)

Single-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Anemia Management Improvement in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02273570
Acronym
OPTIMAL
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-10-24
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2015-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary

Keywords

Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary, Anemia, Vascular Stiffness, Vascular Calcification

Brief summary

Clinical study aimed at improving anemia management in End Stage Renal Disease Patient (ESRD) on maintenance Hemodialysis with evidence of Chronic Kidney disease Mineral Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD)

Detailed description

Anemia is one of the most worrisome complications of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Numerous prospective studies have repeatedly documented an increase risk of morbidity and mortality associated with lower levels of hemoglobin (Hb). Hence the international guidelines on patient care suggest the use of Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESA), iron, folates supplementation for anemia correction. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have demonstrated that hemoglobin correction to normal levels increases the risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events. Though, the reasons are still unclear, the cumulative ESA dose may at least partly explain these findings suggesting limiting ESA to the minimal dose allowed to achieve the suggested Hb targets in ESRD patients. Among other factors, CKD-MBD has been repeatedly associated with poor more severe anemia and higher dose of ESA. However, the latest Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines on CKD-MBD management suggest a higher reference target for intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) (2-9 fold the upper level of the normal range) when compared to the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) guidelines published in 2003 (150-300 pg/ml). A few observational studies suggest a linear inverse association between intact iPTH and ESA dose even for iPTH value within the iPTH target level proposed by the KDIGO working group. Similarly, a large body of evidence supports the notion that the higher the iPTH the faster the CV system deterioration in ESRD. Aim of the study is to test whether a tighter iPTH control to achieve a iPTH level lower than 300 pg/ml vs iPTH levels between 300-540 pg/ml is associated with a ESA dose reduction and a slower CV system deterioration in ESRD patients receiving dialysis. STUDY DESIGN Pilot, single center, open label with blinded end point (PROBE-Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point) aimed at improving patient care. Eligible patients will be randomized (1:1) to either: (A) Control group: standard care. The iPTH target in this group is 300-540 pg/ml (B) Optimal CKD-MBD control: in this group the iPTH target is150-300 pg/ml to be achieved with a therapeutic algorithm. TREATMENTS All patients will be randomized (1:1) to either: (A) Control group: standard care. The iPTH target in this group is 300-540 pg/ml. (B) Optimal CKD-MBD control:: in this group the iPTH target is 150-300 pg/ml to be achieved with a therapeutic algorithm: I. iPTH control: in order to achieve the iPTH target (150-300 pg/ml), all patients will receive 400 IU/day of vitamin-25-OH-D (25OHD) and a flexible dose of any active vitamin D available in Italy (calcitriol and paricalcitol-Zemplar®) at the maximum dose of 6 mcg/week of paricalcitol(Zemplar®)of equivalent (see existing conversion table). Patients will also receive a flexible dose of cinacalcet(Mimpara®) to a maximum dose of 90 mg/day. II. Phosphorous control: all patients need to achieve a serum phosphorous level lower than 5.5 mg/dl. All available phosphate binders are allowed \[sevelamer(Renvela®), calcium carbonate, calcium acetate(Phoslo®), calcium acetate/magnesium carbonate (Osvaren®), lanthanum carbonate Foznol®). A rescue therapy with aluminum(Maalox®) is allowed for no more than 30 days. III. Serum calcium control: the suggested target is less than 9.5 mg/dl. In case of serum calcium greater than 9.5 mg/dl the calcium and vitamin D dose should be lowered in order to lower the risk of vascular calcification deposition and progression

Interventions

DRUGstandard care

Standard care. Patients allocated to this study arm will be treated with all drugs available for PTH control (at the investigator discretion) to obtain a iPTH of 300-540 pg/ml.

DRUGOptimal (I. iPTH control: Zemplar®,Mimpara®; phosphorous control: Renvela®, Phoslo®, Osvaren®, Foznol®,Maalox®; calcium control: calcium and vitamin D

Optimal care. Patients allocated to this study arm will be treated with all drugs available for PTH control (at the investigator discretion - see therapeutic algorithm) to obtain a iPTH of less than 300 pg/ml.

Sponsors

Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Anna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

. * Men and women * Age \>18 years * Maintenance dialysis via Artero-Venous fistula * ESA use * iPTH between 300-600 pg/ml * Hb between 10.0-11.5 * Kt/V greater/equal than 1.2 * Signed informed consent prior to the initiation of the study

Exclusion criteria

None.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
percent reduction in weekly ESA consumption to maintain Hb levels within the recommended range 10.0-11.5 g/dlbaseline and after 12 months of followupPrimary objective: to test whether a tighter PTH control to achieve a PTH level lower than 300 pg/ml vs PTH levels between 300-540 pg/ml is associated with a lower ESA dose use to achieve the target Hb of 10.0-11.5 g/dl

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in iron status and storage.baseline and after 12 months of followupSecondary objective: to test whether a tighter PTH control to achieve a PTH level lower than 300 pg/ml vs PTH levels between 300-540 pg/ml is associated with a better iron storage and mobilization.
Difference in prevalence of cardiac valvular calcification progression detected by echocardiography between groups.baseline and after 12 months of followupSecondary objective: to test whether a tighter PTH control to achieve a PTH level lower than 300 pg/ml vs PTH levels between 300-540 pg/ml is associated with cardiac valves deposition and progression attenuation.
Difference in pulse wave velocity assessed by applanation tonometry between groups.baseline and after 12 months of followupSecondary objective: to test whether a tighter PTH control to achieve a PTH level lower than 300 pg/ml vs PTH levels between 300-540 pg/ml is associated with arterial stiffness increase attenuation
CKD-MBD controlbaseline and after 12 months of followupSecondary objective: to test whether a tighter PTH control to achieve a PTH level lower than 300 pg/ml vs PTH levels between 300-540 pg/ml is associated with a better CKD-MBD control

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactAntonio Bellasi, MD
antonio.bellasi@hsacomo.org

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026