Skip to content

Collaborative Care to Reduce Depression and Increase Cancer Screening Among Low-Income Urban Women

Collaborative Care to Reduce Depression and Increase Cancer Screening Among Low-Income Urban Women Project

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02273206
Acronym
PCM3
Enrollment
802
Registered
2014-10-23
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2020-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Screening, Depression

Keywords

Depression, Breast Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Screening

Brief summary

Bronx County, New York is the poorest urban county in the U.S.A., and residents are almost entirely Latino or African American. Cancer is the leading cause of premature death in the Bronx, with morality rates significantly higher than for New York City as a whole. Low-income/minority populations are more likely to be diagnosed with preventable and late-stage cancers than the general population, in part, due to lower screening rates. While research has addressed screening barriers in low-income/minority groups, depression, a common,potentially critical barrier, has received scant attention. Research suggests that depressed women are less likely to engage in cancer screening, especially mammography and Pap testing. The link between mental health and cancer screening is particularly important to address in the Bronx, which has the highest rates of self-reported serious psychological distress (a measure closely related to depression) in New York City. Depression affects almost 1 in 4 minority women, and while minorities often seek help for depression in primary care, primary care depression management often does not meet evidence-based standards. Drawing on the expertise and close collaboration of Bronx medical and social service providers and patient stakeholders, this study will determine whether a collaborative care intervention that addresses both depression and cancer screening needs simultaneously among women ages 50-64 is more effective at improving cancer screening and patient-reported outcomes for women with depression than an existing evidence-based cancer screening intervention alone. To achieve this, the investigators will compare the effectiveness of these two interventions using a randomized controlled trial (RCT). In partnership with six Bronx Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), the investigators will recruit approximately 800 women ages 50-64 who screen positive for depression and are non-adherent with recommended cervical, breast, and/or colorectal cancer screenings. The investigators specific aims are to: 1) compare the impact of the two interventions on patient-reported outcomes, including cancer screening knowledge and attitudes, self-efficacy, depression-related stigma, provider referrals, participation in mental health care, medication adherence, quality of life, satisfaction with care and treatment decisions, and depression; 2) compare the effectiveness of the two interventions in increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening; 3) determine whether reducing depression increases the likelihood that low-income women 50-64 will receive cancer screening; 4) determine whether effectiveness of the two interventions in increasing cancer screening varies according to patient characteristics, such as duration of depression, presence of other chronic conditions, and obesity. This study is designed to increase the investigators understanding of how to enhance primary care systems' ability to improve a range of outcomes related to cancer screening and depression among low-income minority women, and how to best support this population in making cancer-screening decisions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPrevention Care Management for Depression and Cancer Screening
BEHAVIORALPrevention Care Management for Cancer Screening

Sponsors

Clinical Directors Network
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Resident of the Bronx * Overdue for breast, cervical or colorectal cancer screening * Screen positive for depression * No cancer diagnosis within the past six months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusBaseline - 12 monthsComparison of the proportion of patients who were up to date for colorectal cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer screenings before and after the intervention. (Chart Review)
Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionBaseline - 12 monthsMultivariate logistic regression model was used to assess which factors contributed to colorectal cancer screening up to date status.
Assessment of Breast Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionBaseline - 12 monthsMultivariate logistic regression model was used to assess which factors contributed to breast cancer screening up to date status
Assessment of Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionBaseline - 12 monthsMultivariate logistic regression model was used to assess which factors contributed to cervical cancer screening up to date status
Comparison of Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score by Intervention ArmBaseline - 12 monthsComparison of change in depression between the CCI and PCM arm before and after intervention. (Self-Report). The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) is a well-validated measure of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for screening and diagnosing depressive episode, assessing severity, and monitoring treatment response. The PHQ9 score ranges from the minimum of 0 (no depression) to the maximum of 27 (severe depression). The detailed PHQ9 scores and corresponding level of depression severity are as follow: 0 (no depression), 1-4 (mild depression), 5-9 (medium-mild depression), 10-14 (moderate depression), 15-19 (moderately severe depression) and 20-27 (severe depression). The mean change in PHQ9 score is the mean of the differences between PHQ9 score at baseline and the PHQ9 score at follow up for all cases in the respective intervention arm; the greater the change in PHQ9 score, the greater the improvement in depression severity.
Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 MonthsBaseline - 6 monthsThe SCL-20 consists of the 20 depression items on a 4-point scale from the SCL-90, and has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure of depression in diverse outpatient and community populations.
Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 MonthsBaseline - 12 monthsThe SCL-20 consists of the 20 depression items on a 4-point scale from the SCL-90, and has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure of depression in diverse outpatient and community populations.
Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningBaseline - 12 monthsSelf-Report: We will ask participants about their participation (yes/no) in specific screening methods: Pap testing (past 3 years), mammography (past 2 years), and colorectal screening (fecal occult blood tests (FOBT)/fecal immunohistochemical tests (FIT)), past year; flexible sigmoidoscopy, the past 5 years; and colonoscopy, past 10 years).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaseline and 12 monthsThis measure was adapted from the Link's Devaluation-Discrimination Scale.The continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut points. The 4 categories were as follows: Low stigma, minimal stigma, moderate stigma and high stigma.
Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThe Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey produces 11 summary measures covering 2 broad dimensions of patients' experiences: quality of physician-patient interactions and organizational features of care. The continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories (High, Moderate, Fair and Low) using quartiles as cut-points.
Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsParticipants were asked how many times in the past six months they had seen a provider to talk about or to receive medication for feeling sad, nervous, hopeless, or blue. This question was adapted from the NCI's HINTS survey. Two categories were created using the median as a cut point. The two categories were high utilization and low utilization.
Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThis 5-item scale measures a sense of perceived self-efficacy associated with accessing and paying for the three different types of cancer screening and utilization of needed mental health services. The continuous study score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut points. The 4 categories are high self-efficacy, moderate self- efficacy, minimal self-efficacy and low self-efficacy.
Medication AdherenceBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsIn this questionnaire, respondents were asked if they had been prescribed medication for depression and about difficulties taking medication(s) regularly. Standard cut points was used for medical adherence. High adherence- around an 8. Medium adherence - 6-7.99. Low adherence would be anything less than 6.
Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThe Satisfaction with Decision Scale is a 6-item measure that uses a five-point Likert-type scale; it is grounded in a conceptual model of an effective decision, i.e., one that is informed, consistent with the decision-maker's values, and behaviorally implemented. This scale has been tailored to healthcare decisions to receive treatment for emotional or mental health and to have cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening.The continuous summary score was converted into two categories using the median as a cut point. The two categories are high satisfaction and low satisfaction.
Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThis questionnaire, adopted from National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), assesses whether patients report that their primary care physician 1) has recommended cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening and 2) has recommended that the patient make an appointment with a mental health provider and/or take psychotropic medication. Two categories were created according to whether the patient received a physician recommendation (yes/no). The category of Recommendation for when they received a recommendation and a category of No Recommendation if they did not receive a recommendation
Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThis Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale is based on diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM-IV) and measures probable anxiety disorder and severity of anxiety symptoms. Patients are asked to rate how often they have been bothered by 7 problems in the last 2 weeks on a 4-point scale. Standard cut points were used for the Generalized Anxiety Disorder measure. Minimal anxiety is (0-4). Mild Anxiety would be count as (5-9). Moderate Anxiety (10-14) and severe anxiety would be (15-21).
Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThe quality of life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a general measure of health status that assess the patient's perceived health status and whether health problems interfere with normal functioning. The SF-12 has demonstrated validity and test-retest reliability in the general population and in patients with chronic health conditions, and has been tested in five languages, including Spanish. It has been used extensively as a quality of life measure in collaborative care studies, including with low-income minority populations. It has also been used frequently in screening studies, for cancer and other conditions. The SF-12 has been validated as an indicator of effects of depression on quality of life in ethnically diverse patients. The continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cutoff points. The four categories are Best Health, Good health, Fair Health and Worst Health.
Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBaseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThis measure was adapted from the National Cancer Institute's HINTS questions for colorectal cancer. The continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut points. The categories for screening attitudes were as follows: positive attitudes, moderate attitudes, fair attitudes and negative attitudes.
Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Baseline, 6 months and 12 monthsThe Satisfaction with Decision Scale is a 6-item measure that uses a five-point Likert-type scale; it is grounded in a conceptual model of an effective decision, i.e., one that is informed, consistent with the decision-maker's values, and behaviorally implemented. This scale has been tailored to healthcare decisions to have cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening.The satisfaction with decision scale of cancer screening and its continuous summary score was converted into two categories (high satisfaction and low satisfaction) using the median as the cutoff point.
Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Mental Health (Data Reported in Secondary Outcome Measure #10)12 monthsThe Satisfaction with Decision Scale is a 6-item measure that uses a five-point Likert-type scale; it is grounded in a conceptual model of an effective decision, i.e., one that is informed, consistent with the decision-maker's values, and behaviorally implemented. This scale has been tailored to healthcare decisions to have mental health care.The satisfaction with decision scale of mental health and its continuous summary score was converted into two categories (high satisfaction and low satisfaction) using the median as the cutoff point.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Among the 802 participants who were recruited for the study, 759 completed the baseline assessment and were randomized to one of the two intervention groups. Two participants were found to be ineligible after randomization and were excluded; as a result, 757 participants are included in the analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)
Participants assigned to the CCI group received the Prevention Care Management (PCM) intervention, as well as motivational support to initiate or follow up on mental health treatment and linkages to social support services.
378
Prevention Care Management (PCM) Intervention
The PCM intervention consisted of cancer screening telephone support, including education, patient navigation, and motivational interviewing to overcome barriers to screening.
379
Total757

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPrevention Care Management (PCM) InterventionCollaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Total
Age, Continuous55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
Cancer history32 Participants28 Participants60 Participants
Cancer Screening
Up to date for Breast Cancer Screening
159 Participants166 Participants325 Participants
Cancer Screening
Up to date for Cervical Cancer Screening
158 Participants160 Participants318 Participants
Cancer Screening
Up to date for Colorectal Cancer Screening
102 Participants83 Participants185 Participants
Comorbid Condition- Asthma123 Participants124 Participants247 Participants
Comorbid Condition- Diabetes152 Participants157 Participants309 Participants
Comorbid Condition- Hyperlipidemia209 Participants220 Participants429 Participants
Comorbid Condition- Hypertension245 Participants242 Participants487 Participants
Country of Birth
Born in U.S.
154 Participants142 Participants296 Participants
Country of Birth
Born outside of U.S.
223 Participants235 Participants458 Participants
Education
8-11 years
131 Participants113 Participants244 Participants
Education
Completed High School
82 Participants90 Participants172 Participants
Education
Less than 8 years
81 Participants89 Participants170 Participants
Education
Post High School and higher
82 Participants84 Participants166 Participants
Employment
Employed
78 Participants76 Participants154 Participants
Employment
Homemaker
59 Participants61 Participants120 Participants
Employment
Other
134 Participants139 Participants273 Participants
Employment
Unemployed
108 Participants102 Participants210 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
301 Participants289 Participants590 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
78 Participants89 Participants167 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Household income
$0 to $9,999
242 Participants258 Participants500 Participants
Household income
$10,000 to $14,999
69 Participants42 Participants111 Participants
Household income
$15,000 or more
62 Participants74 Participants136 Participants
Hysterectomy83 Participants84 Participants167 Participants
Insurance
Employer
17 Participants12 Participants29 Participants
Insurance
Medicaid
285 Participants275 Participants560 Participants
Insurance
Medicaid + Medicare
32 Participants32 Participants64 Participants
Insurance
Medicare
12 Participants17 Participants29 Participants
Insurance
No insurance
33 Participants41 Participants74 Participants
Marital Status
Married/cohabitating
95 Participants95 Participants190 Participants
Marital Status
Other
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Marital Status
Single/divorced/widowed/separated
274 Participants271 Participants545 Participants
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score Group
Mild Depression (5-9)
104 Participants104 Participants208 Participants
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score Group
Moderate Depression (10-14)
147 Participants159 Participants306 Participants
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score Group
Moderately Severe Depression (15-19)
102 Participants80 Participants182 Participants
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score Group
Severe Depression (20-27)
26 Participants34 Participants60 Participants
Primary Language
English
167 Participants163 Participants330 Participants
Primary Language
Spanish
212 Participants215 Participants427 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
67 Participants82 Participants149 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
300 Participants275 Participants575 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants19 Participants31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
379 participants378 participants757 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
379 Participants378 Participants757 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking Status
Current
89 Participants92 Participants181 Participants
Smoking Status
Former
53 Participants50 Participants103 Participants
Smoking Status
Never
178 Participants166 Participants344 Participants
Years receiving care at the community health center before consent
< 3
138 Participants126 Participants264 Participants
Years receiving care at the community health center before consent
≥ 3
239 Participants251 Participants490 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 3781 / 379
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 3784 / 379
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3780 / 379

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of Breast Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After Intervention

Multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess which factors contributed to breast cancer screening up to date status

Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Breast Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Baseline43.9 Percentage of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Breast Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Follow Up66.7 Percentage of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Breast Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Baseline42.0 Percentage of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Breast Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Follow Up66.8 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.850195% CI: [0.753, 1.41]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Assessment of Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After Intervention

Multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess which factors contributed to cervical cancer screening up to date status

Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Baseline42.3 Percentage of participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Follow Up61.6 Percentage of participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Baseline41.7 Percentage of participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Follow Up64.6 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.443295% CI: [0.625, 1.228]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date Status

Comparison of the proportion of patients who were up to date for colorectal cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer screenings before and after the intervention. (Chart Review)

Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusColorectal Cancer Screening - Follow Up56.9 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusCervical Cancer Screening - Baseline42.3 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusBreast Cancer Screening - Follow Up66.7 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusBreast Cancer Screening - Baseline43.9 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusCervical Cancer Screening - Follow Up61.6 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusColorectal Cancer Screening - Baseline22.0 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusCervical Cancer Screening - Follow Up64.6 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusColorectal Cancer Screening - Baseline26.9 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusColorectal Cancer Screening - Follow Up52.8 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusBreast Cancer Screening - Baseline42.0 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusBreast Cancer Screening - Follow Up66.8 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening Up to Date StatusCervical Cancer Screening - Baseline41.7 Percentage (%) of Participants
Comparison: Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Arm Differencep-value: 0.2562Chi-squared
Comparison: Breast Cancer Screening Intervention Arm Differencep-value: 0.9795Chi-squared
Comparison: Cervical Cancer Screening Intervention Arm Differencep-value: 0.3917Chi-squared
Primary

Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After Intervention

Multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess which factors contributed to colorectal cancer screening up to date status.

Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Baseline22.0 percentage of participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Follow Up56.9 percentage of participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Baseline26.9 percentage of participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Screening Up to Date Status After InterventionUp to Date at Follow Up52.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.067795% CI: [0.979, 1.851]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 Months

The SCL-20 consists of the 20 depression items on a 4-point scale from the SCL-90, and has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure of depression in diverse outpatient and community populations.

Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline and 12 months. Not all participants completed all instruments at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 MonthsBaselineMild to Moderate Depression (0.5 - 1.7)198 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 MonthsBaselineNo Depression (<0.5)37 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 MonthsBaselineSevere Depression (> 1.7)92 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 Months12 MonthsNo Depression (<0.5)113 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 Months12 MonthsMild to Moderate Depression (0.5 - 1.7)121 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 Months12 MonthsSevere Depression (> 1.7)63 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 Months12 MonthsMild to Moderate Depression (0.5 - 1.7)141 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 MonthsBaselineMild to Moderate Depression (0.5 - 1.7)189 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 Months12 MonthsNo Depression (<0.5)120 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 MonthsBaselineNo Depression (<0.5)43 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 Months12 MonthsSevere Depression (> 1.7)50 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 MonthsBaselineSevere Depression (> 1.7)101 Participants
Comparison: The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at Baseline.p-value: 0.6Chi-squared
Comparison: The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 12 months.p-value: 0.23Chi-squared
Primary

Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 Months

The SCL-20 consists of the 20 depression items on a 4-point scale from the SCL-90, and has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure of depression in diverse outpatient and community populations.

Time frame: Baseline - 6 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline and 6 months. Not all participants completed all instruments at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 MonthsBaselineNo Depression (<0.5)37 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 MonthsBaselineSevere Depression (> 1.7)92 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 MonthsBaselineMild to Moderate Depression (0.5 - 1.7)198 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 Months6 monthNo Depression (<0.5)100 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 Months6 monthMild to Moderate Depression (0.5 - 1.7)137 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 Months6 monthSevere Depression (> 1.7)55 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 Months6 monthMild to Moderate Depression (0.5 - 1.7)147 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 MonthsBaselineNo Depression (<0.5)43 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 MonthsBaselineMild to Moderate Depression (0.5 - 1.7)189 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 Months6 monthNo Depression (<0.5)97 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 Months6 monthSevere Depression (> 1.7)56 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Change From Baseline in The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 MonthsBaselineSevere Depression (> 1.7)101 Participants
Comparison: The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at baseline.p-value: 0.6Chi-squared
Comparison: The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) at 6 Monthsp-value: 0.86Chi-squared
Primary

Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer Screening

Self-Report: We will ask participants about their participation (yes/no) in specific screening methods: Pap testing (past 3 years), mammography (past 2 years), and colorectal screening (fecal occult blood tests (FOBT)/fecal immunohistochemical tests (FIT)), past year; flexible sigmoidoscopy, the past 5 years; and colonoscopy, past 10 years).

Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline and 12 months. Not all participants completed all instruments at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningBreast Cancer Screening - Baseline69.2 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening - Follow Up71.2 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening - Baseline42.9 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningCervical Cancer Screening - Baseline83.3 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningBreast Cancer Screening - Follow Up89.9 Percentage (%) of Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningCervical Cancer Screening - Follow Up87.2 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningBreast Cancer Screening - Follow Up87.6 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening - Follow Up68.5 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningBreast Cancer Screening - Baseline72.1 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening - Baseline44.1 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningCervical Cancer Screening - Follow Up90.6 Percentage (%) of Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Changes From Baseline in Number of Participants With Colorectal, Breast, and/or Cervical Cancer ScreeningCervical Cancer Screening - Baseline82.2 Percentage (%) of Participants
Comparison: Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Arm Difference at 12 Monthsp-value: 0.4483Chi-squared
Comparison: Cervical Cancer Screening Intervention Arm Difference at 12 Monthsp-value: 0.1706Chi-squared
Comparison: Breast Cancer Screening Intervention Arm Difference at 12 Monthsp-value: 0.3568Chi-squared
Primary

Comparison of Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score by Intervention Arm

Comparison of change in depression between the CCI and PCM arm before and after intervention. (Self-Report). The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) is a well-validated measure of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for screening and diagnosing depressive episode, assessing severity, and monitoring treatment response. The PHQ9 score ranges from the minimum of 0 (no depression) to the maximum of 27 (severe depression). The detailed PHQ9 scores and corresponding level of depression severity are as follow: 0 (no depression), 1-4 (mild depression), 5-9 (medium-mild depression), 10-14 (moderate depression), 15-19 (moderately severe depression) and 20-27 (severe depression). The mean change in PHQ9 score is the mean of the differences between PHQ9 score at baseline and the PHQ9 score at follow up for all cases in the respective intervention arm; the greater the change in PHQ9 score, the greater the improvement in depression severity.

Time frame: Baseline - 12 months

Population: These data are collected at baseline and 12 months. Not all participants completed all instruments at both time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Comparison of Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score by Intervention ArmMean PHQ9 Score at Baseline12.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.22
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Comparison of Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score by Intervention ArmMean Change in PHQ9 Score4.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.67
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Comparison of Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score by Intervention ArmMean PHQ9 Score at Follow Up8.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.67
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Comparison of Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score by Intervention ArmMean PHQ9 Score at Baseline12.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.08
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Comparison of Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score by Intervention ArmMean PHQ9 Score at Follow Up7.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.24
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Comparison of Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) Score by Intervention ArmMean Change in PHQ9 Score5.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.44
Comparison: PHQ9 Intervention Arm Difference between baseline and 12-month follow upp-value: 0.39Two-sample t-test
Secondary

Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey

The Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey produces 11 summary measures covering 2 broad dimensions of patients' experiences: quality of physician-patient interactions and organizational features of care. The continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories (High, Moderate, Fair and Low) using quartiles as cut-points.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Not all participants completed this instrument at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 6 MonthsModerate22 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - BaselineFair23 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 6 MonthsHigh26 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - BaselineHigh24 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 6 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 12 MonthsLow250 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 6 MonthsFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 12 MonthsHigh28 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 6 MonthsLow287 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 12 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 12 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 12 MonthsFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 6 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 12 MonthsLow288 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - BaselineHigh67 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 6 MonthsFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - BaselineLow311 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - BaselineHigh114 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 6 MonthsFair23 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 12 MonthsHigh77 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 6 MonthsLow238 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - BaselineModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 12 MonthsHigh18 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - BaselineModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 12 MonthsModerate9 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - BaselineFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 12 MonthsFair39 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - BaselineLow306 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - BaselineHigh142 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - BaselineLow264 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - BaselineModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 6 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - BaselineFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - BaselineFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - BaselineLow236 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 6 MonthsFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 6 MonthsHigh121 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 6 MonthsHigh30 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 6 MonthsLow192 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 6 MonthsLow232 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 12 MonthsHigh116 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 12 MonthsFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 12 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 6 MonthsHigh81 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 12 MonthsFair0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 12 MonthsLow239 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 12 MonthsLow200 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - BaselineModerate25 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 12 MonthsLow211 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 6 MonthsHigh77 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 6 MonthsLow249 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 12 MonthsHigh108 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 12 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 12 MonthsLow225 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - BaselineHigh23 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - BaselineFair27 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - BaselineLow307 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 6 MonthsFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 6 MonthsLow296 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - BaselineHigh61 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - BaselineModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 6 MonthsHigh19 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 6 MonthsModerate22 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 12 MonthsLow272 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 6 MonthsHigh115 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 6 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - BaselineHigh123 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - BaselineModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - BaselineFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 6 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 6 MonthsFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - 12 MonthsFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - BaselineModerate22 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 6 MonthsHigh30 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 6 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 12 MonthsHigh26 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 12 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 12 MonthsFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyAccess - 12 MonthsLow307 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - BaselineFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - BaselineLow318 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 6 MonthsFair27 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 6 MonthsLow258 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 12 MonthsHigh26 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 12 MonthsModerate4 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyCare Coordination - 12 MonthsFair31 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - BaselineHigh152 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - BaselineModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - BaselineFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - BaselineLow227 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 6 MonthsFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 6 MonthsLow211 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 12 MonthsHigh122 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 12 MonthsModerate0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyQuality - 12 MonthsFair0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Ambulatory Care Experiences as Assessed by Ambulatory Care Experiences SurveyShared Decision Making - BaselineLow256 Participants
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Shared Decision Making at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.5Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Shared Decision Making at six months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.51Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Shared Decision Making at twelve months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.02Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Access at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.91Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Access at six months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.69Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Access at twelve months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.63Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Care Coordination at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.55Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Care Coordination at six months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.34Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Care Coordination at twelve months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.19Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Quality at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.47Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Quality at six months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.38Chi-squared
Comparison: Ambulatory Care Experiences - Quality at twelve months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.98Chi-squared
Secondary

Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening Attitudes

This measure was adapted from the National Cancer Institute's HINTS questions for colorectal cancer. The continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut points. The categories for screening attitudes were as follows: positive attitudes, moderate attitudes, fair attitudes and negative attitudes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Not all participants completed the assessment at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineNegative Attitudes95 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - BaselinePositive Attitudes71 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 12 monthsNegative Attitudes129 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineModerate Attitudes62 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsPositive Attitudes65 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineFair Attitudes136 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 12 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineNegative Attitudes108 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsModerate Attitudes46 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsPositive Attitudes126 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselinePositive Attitudes71 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsFair Attitudes83 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsNegative Attitudes174 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsPositive Attitudes99 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsPositive Attitudes131 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsNegative Attitudes106 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineModerate Attitudes45 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsPositive Attitudes131 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsNegative Attitudes177 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineModerate Attitudes51 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 12 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineFair Attitudes107 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineNegative Attitudes82 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineFair Attitudes161 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - BaselinePositive Attitudes60 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsNegative Attitudes124 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsNegative Attitudes177 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 12 monthsPositive Attitudes98 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineFair Attitudes92 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsNegative Attitudes183 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - BaselinePositive Attitudes64 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineNegative Attitudes81 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 12 monthsPositive Attitudes108 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 12 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 12 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 12 monthsNegative Attitudes142 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselinePositive Attitudes71 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineModerate Attitudes55 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineFair Attitudes152 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineNegative Attitudes95 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsPositive Attitudes64 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsModerate Attitudes39 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsFair Attitudes86 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsNegative Attitudes111 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsPositive Attitudes134 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsNegative Attitudes189 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - BaselinePositive Attitudes79 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineModerate Attitudes61 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineFair Attitudes132 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineNegative Attitudes105 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsPositive Attitudes124 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsNegative Attitudes182 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsPositive Attitudes142 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineModerate Attitudes58 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsPositive Attitudes85 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsModerate Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsFair Attitudes0 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening AttitudesCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsNegative Attitudes145 Participants
Comparison: Colorectal Cancer Screening attitudes at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.74Chi-squared
Comparison: Colorectal Cancer Screening attitudes at 6 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.86Chi-squared
Comparison: Colorectal Cancer Screening attitudes at 12 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.79Chi-squared
Comparison: Breast Cancer Screening attitudes at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.91Chi-squared
Comparison: Breast Cancer Screening attitudes at 6 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.71Chi-squared
Comparison: Breast Cancer Screening attitudes at 12 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.77Chi-squared
Comparison: Cervical Cancer Screening attitudes at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.64Chi-squared
Comparison: Cervical Cancer Screening attitudes at 6 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.11Chi-squared
Comparison: Cervical Cancer Screening attitudes at 12 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 1Chi-squared
Secondary

Devaluation-Discrimination Scale

This measure was adapted from the Link's Devaluation-Discrimination Scale.The continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut points. The 4 categories were as follows: Low stigma, minimal stigma, moderate stigma and high stigma.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline and 12 months. Not all participants completed this instrument at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaselineLow Stigma68 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Devaluation-Discrimination Scale12 monthsMinimal Stigma36 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaselineMinimal Stigma42 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaselineModerate Stigma46 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaselineHigh Stigma36 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Devaluation-Discrimination Scale12 monthsLow Stigma50 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Devaluation-Discrimination Scale12 monthsModerate Stigma30 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Devaluation-Discrimination Scale12 monthsHigh Stigma44 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaselineModerate Stigma49 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Devaluation-Discrimination Scale12 monthsLow Stigma55 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Devaluation-Discrimination Scale12 monthsMinimal Stigma48 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Devaluation-Discrimination Scale12 monthsHigh Stigma34 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaselineLow Stigma50 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaselineHigh Stigma49 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Devaluation-Discrimination ScaleBaselineMinimal Stigma45 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Devaluation-Discrimination Scale12 monthsModerate Stigma26 Participants
Comparison: Devaluation-Discrimination Scale Score at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.18Chi-squared
Comparison: Devaluation-Discrimination Scale score at 12 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.32Chi-squared
Secondary

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

This Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale is based on diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition (DSM-IV) and measures probable anxiety disorder and severity of anxiety symptoms. Patients are asked to rate how often they have been bothered by 7 problems in the last 2 weeks on a 4-point scale. Standard cut points were used for the Generalized Anxiety Disorder measure. Minimal anxiety is (0-4). Mild Anxiety would be count as (5-9). Moderate Anxiety (10-14) and severe anxiety would be (15-21).

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Not all participants completed the assessment at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety Disorder6 monthsSevere Anxiety (15-21)37 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety Disorder6 monthsMild Anxiety (5-9)69 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaselineMild Anxiety (5-9)114 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety Disorder6 monthsModerate Anxiety (10-14)61 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaselineModerate Anxiety (10-14)89 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety Disorder12 monthsSevere Anxiety (15-21)56 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety Disorder12 monthsMinimal Anxiety (0-4)124 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaselineMinimal Anxiety (0-4)79 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety Disorder12 monthsMild Anxiety (5-9)82 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety Disorder6 monthsMinimal Anxiety (0-4)133 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety Disorder12 monthsModerate Anxiety (10-14)46 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaselineSevere Anxiety (15-21)90 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety Disorder12 monthsModerate Anxiety (10-14)56 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety Disorder12 monthsSevere Anxiety (15-21)44 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaselineMild Anxiety (5-9)108 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaselineMinimal Anxiety (0-4)79 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaselineModerate Anxiety (10-14)95 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety DisorderBaselineSevere Anxiety (15-21)90 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety Disorder6 monthsMinimal Anxiety (0-4)127 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety Disorder6 monthsMild Anxiety (5-9)82 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety Disorder6 monthsModerate Anxiety (10-14)42 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety Disorder6 monthsSevere Anxiety (15-21)50 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety Disorder12 monthsMinimal Anxiety (0-4)145 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Generalized Anxiety Disorder12 monthsMild Anxiety (5-9)77 Participants
Comparison: Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale at baseline. Coding of the measure was based on Spitzer, R.L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J.B., \& Lowe, B. (2006).p-value: 0.95Chi-squared
Comparison: Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale score at 6 months. Coding of the measure was based on Spitzer, R.L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J.B., \& Lowe, B. (2006).p-value: 0.08Chi-squared
Comparison: Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale score at 12 months. Coding of the measure was based on Spitzer, R.L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J.B., \& Lowe, B. (2006).p-value: 0.27Chi-squared
Secondary

Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form

The quality of life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a general measure of health status that assess the patient's perceived health status and whether health problems interfere with normal functioning. The SF-12 has demonstrated validity and test-retest reliability in the general population and in patients with chronic health conditions, and has been tested in five languages, including Spanish. It has been used extensively as a quality of life measure in collaborative care studies, including with low-income minority populations. It has also been used frequently in screening studies, for cancer and other conditions. The SF-12 has been validated as an indicator of effects of depression on quality of life in ethnically diverse patients. The continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cutoff points. The four categories are Best Health, Good health, Fair Health and Worst Health.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Not all participants completed the assessment at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaselineFair Health92 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaselineWorst Health96 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form12 monthsBest Health73 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form6 monthsGood Health77 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form6 monthsFair Health65 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form6 monthsWorst Health81 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaselineGood Health86 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form12 monthsGood Health79 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form12 monthsFair Health72 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form6 monthsBest Health70 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form12 monthsWorst Health83 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaselineBest Health96 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form12 monthsWorst Health76 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaselineBest Health88 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form6 monthsBest Health74 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form6 monthsFair Health75 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form6 monthsWorst Health71 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form12 monthsGood Health77 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaselineGood Health95 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaselineFair Health96 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short FormBaselineWorst Health80 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form6 monthsGood Health82 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form12 monthsBest Health83 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey-Short Form12 monthsFair Health83 Participants
Comparison: Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey at baseline. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.54Chi-squared
Comparison: Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey at 6 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.68Chi-squared
Comparison: Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey at 12 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.68Chi-squared
Secondary

Medication Adherence

In this questionnaire, respondents were asked if they had been prescribed medication for depression and about difficulties taking medication(s) regularly. Standard cut points was used for medical adherence. High adherence- around an 8. Medium adherence - 6-7.99. Low adherence would be anything less than 6.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Not all participants completed the assessment at all time points

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication AdherenceBaselineLow Adherence (<6)75 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication Adherence12 monthsMedium Adherence (6-7.99)33 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication Adherence6 monthsLow Adherence (<6)60 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication AdherenceBaselineHigh Adherence (8)20 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication Adherence6 monthsHigh Adherence (8)20 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication Adherence12 monthsHigh Adherence (8)22 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication Adherence6 monthsMedium Adherence (6-7.99)35 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication Adherence12 monthsLow Adherence (<6)60 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Medication AdherenceBaselineMedium Adherence (6-7.99)30 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication Adherence12 monthsLow Adherence (<6)61 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication AdherenceBaselineMedium Adherence (6-7.99)32 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication AdherenceBaselineLow Adherence (<6)74 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication Adherence6 monthsMedium Adherence (6-7.99)23 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication Adherence6 monthsLow Adherence (<6)68 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication Adherence12 monthsHigh Adherence (8)27 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication Adherence12 monthsMedium Adherence (6-7.99)31 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication AdherenceBaselineHigh Adherence (8)25 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Medication Adherence6 monthsHigh Adherence (8)23 Participants
Comparison: Medication Adherence at baseline. Coding of the measure was based on Morisky et al. (2008).p-value: 0.78Chi-squared
Comparison: Medication Adherence at 6 months. Coding of the measure was based on Morisky et al. (2008).p-value: 0.2Chi-squared
Comparison: Medication Adherence at 12 Months. Coding of the measure was based on Morisky et al. (2008).p-value: 0.77Chi-squared
Secondary

Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient Report

Participants were asked how many times in the past six months they had seen a provider to talk about or to receive medication for feeling sad, nervous, hopeless, or blue. This question was adapted from the NCI's HINTS survey. Two categories were created using the median as a cut point. The two categories were high utilization and low utilization.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months for 3 different instruments. Not all participants completed all instruments at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - BaselineLow Utilization216 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - 6 MonthsHigh Utilization116 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - BaselineLow Utilization241 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - 6 MonthsLow Utilization197 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - BaselineHigh Utilization137 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - 12 MonthsHigh Utilization125 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - 12 MonthsLow Utilization191 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - 6 MonthsHigh Utilization126 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - 12 MonthsHigh Utilization128 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - 6 MonthsLow Utilization187 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - 12 MonthsLow Utilization188 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - BaselineHigh Utilization162 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - 12 MonthsLow Utilization198 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - BaselineHigh Utilization165 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - BaselineLow Utilization214 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - 12 MonthsHigh Utilization132 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - 12 MonthsLow Utilization201 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - BaselineHigh Utilization145 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - BaselineLow Utilization234 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - 6 MonthsLow Utilization196 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - 6 MonthsHigh Utilization136 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Visits - 6 MonthsLow Utilization190 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - 6 MonthsHigh Utilization130 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Mental Health Care Utilization: Assessed by Patient ReportMental Health Prescriptions - 12 MonthsHigh Utilization135 Participants
Comparison: Mental Health Care Utilization - Mental Health Visits at baseline.p-value: 0.85Chi-squared
Comparison: Mental Health Care Utilization - Mental Health Visits at 6 months.p-value: 0.23Chi-squared
Comparison: Mental Health Care Utilization - Mental Health Visits at 12 months.p-value: 0.98Chi-squared
Comparison: Mental Health Care Utilization - Mental Health Prescriptions at baseline.p-value: 0.57Chi-squared
Comparison: Mental Health Care Utilization - Mental Health Prescriptions at 6 months.p-value: 0.92Chi-squared
Comparison: Mental Health Care Utilization - Mental Health Prescriptions at 12 months.p-value: 0.99Chi-squared
Secondary

Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health Care

This questionnaire, adopted from National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), assesses whether patients report that their primary care physician 1) has recommended cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening and 2) has recommended that the patient make an appointment with a mental health provider and/or take psychotropic medication. Two categories were created according to whether the patient received a physician recommendation (yes/no). The category of Recommendation for when they received a recommendation and a category of No Recommendation if they did not receive a recommendation

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: Data are collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Not all participants completed the assessment at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineNo Recommendation80 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsNo Recommendation23 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsNo Recommendation31 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineNo Recommendation37 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsRecommendation281 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsRecommendation299 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineRecommendation298 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsNo Recommendation5 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsRecommendation279 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsRecommendation302 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsNo Recommendation10 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsRecommendation281 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineRecommendation309 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsRecommendation281 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineNo Recommendation69 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - BaselineRecommendation206 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsNo Recommendation23 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - BaselineNo Recommendation172 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsNo Recommendation33 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - 6 MonthsNo Recommendation121 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - 6 MonthsRecommendation183 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineRecommendation340 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - 12 MonthsRecommendation182 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - 12 MonthsNo Recommendation130 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsNo Recommendation31 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineRecommendation282 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineNo Recommendation96 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsRecommendation284 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsNo Recommendation30 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsNo Recommendation20 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineRecommendation339 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsRecommendation321 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsRecommendation283 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsRecommendation299 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsNo Recommendation28 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - 6 MonthsNo Recommendation122 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - 12 MonthsNo Recommendation125 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsRecommendation308 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineNo Recommendation37 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsRecommendation303 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - 6 MonthsNo Recommendation11 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareBreast Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsNo Recommendation8 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineRecommendation297 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineNo Recommendation79 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - BaselineRecommendation206 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - BaselineNo Recommendation168 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - 6 MonthsRecommendation191 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Physician Recommendation of Screening/Mental Health CareMental Health Care - 12 MonthsRecommendation203 Participants
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Colorectal Cancer Screening at baseline.p-value: 0.17Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Colorectal Cancer Screening at 6 months.p-value: 0.38Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Colorectal Cancer Screening at 12 months.p-value: 0.07Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Breast Cancer Screening at baseline.p-value: 0.99Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Breast Cancer Screening at 6 months.p-value: 0.15Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Breast Cancer Screening at 12 months.p-value: 0.55Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Cervical Cancer Screening at baseline.p-value: 0.34Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Cervical Cancer Screening at 6 months. .p-value: 0.31Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Cervical Cancer Screening at 12 months.p-value: 0.39Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Mental Health Care at baseline.p-value: 0.87Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Mental Health Care at 6 months.p-value: 0.83Chi-squared
Comparison: Physician Recommendation of Mental Health Care at 12 months.p-value: 0.36Chi-squared
Secondary

Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)

The Satisfaction with Decision Scale is a 6-item measure that uses a five-point Likert-type scale; it is grounded in a conceptual model of an effective decision, i.e., one that is informed, consistent with the decision-maker's values, and behaviorally implemented. This scale has been tailored to healthcare decisions to have cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening.The satisfaction with decision scale of cancer screening and its continuous summary score was converted into two categories (high satisfaction and low satisfaction) using the median as the cutoff point.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Not all participants completed the assessment at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineHigh Satisfaction161 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsHigh Satisfaction135 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineLow Satisfaction212 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsHigh Satisfaction112 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsLow Satisfaction183 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsLow Satisfaction170 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsLow Satisfaction170 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineHigh Satisfaction180 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsHigh Satisfaction131 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsHigh Satisfaction148 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsLow Satisfaction175 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Cancer Screening (Data Reported in Outcome Measure #10)Colorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineLow Satisfaction196 Participants
Secondary

Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Mental Health (Data Reported in Secondary Outcome Measure #10)

The Satisfaction with Decision Scale is a 6-item measure that uses a five-point Likert-type scale; it is grounded in a conceptual model of an effective decision, i.e., one that is informed, consistent with the decision-maker's values, and behaviorally implemented. This scale has been tailored to healthcare decisions to have mental health care.The satisfaction with decision scale of mental health and its continuous summary score was converted into two categories (high satisfaction and low satisfaction) using the median as the cutoff point.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Mental Health (Data Reported in Secondary Outcome Measure #10)High Satisfaction129 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Mental Health (Data Reported in Secondary Outcome Measure #10)Low Satisfaction175 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Mental Health (Data Reported in Secondary Outcome Measure #10)High Satisfaction128 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision Scale- Mental Health (Data Reported in Secondary Outcome Measure #10)Low Satisfaction191 Participants
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in Mental Health Care at 12 months. Recoding of the continuous measure was based on quartiles.p-value: 0.56Chi-squared
Secondary

Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision Scale

The Satisfaction with Decision Scale is a 6-item measure that uses a five-point Likert-type scale; it is grounded in a conceptual model of an effective decision, i.e., one that is informed, consistent with the decision-maker's values, and behaviorally implemented. This scale has been tailored to healthcare decisions to receive treatment for emotional or mental health and to have cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening.The continuous summary score was converted into two categories using the median as a cut point. The two categories are high satisfaction and low satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: This data is collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months for 3 different instruments. Not all participants completed all instruments at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsHigh Satisfaction99 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsHigh Satisfaction135 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineHigh Satisfaction186 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsLow Satisfaction151 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineHigh Satisfaction147 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsLow Satisfaction122 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsHigh Satisfaction107 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsLow Satisfaction119 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleMental Health Care - 12 MonthsHigh Satisfaction129 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleMental Health Care - 12 MonthsLow Satisfaction175 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineHigh Satisfaction161 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsHigh Satisfaction112 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsLow Satisfaction183 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsLow Satisfaction170 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineLow Satisfaction188 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsHigh Satisfaction147 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsHigh Satisfaction150 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsLow Satisfaction157 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineLow Satisfaction148 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineLow Satisfaction212 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsLow Satisfaction158 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineLow Satisfaction196 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsHigh Satisfaction131 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineHigh Satisfaction152 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineHigh Satisfaction192 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - 6 monthsLow Satisfaction170 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsHigh Satisfaction148 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsHigh Satisfaction101 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsHigh Satisfaction160 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - 6 monthsLow Satisfaction130 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - 12 monthsLow Satisfaction175 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsHigh Satisfaction120 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - BaselineLow Satisfaction142 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleCervical Cancer Screening - 12 MonthsLow Satisfaction131 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - BaselineLow Satisfaction184 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleMental Health Care - 12 MonthsHigh Satisfaction128 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - 12 monthsLow Satisfaction163 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleMental Health Care - 12 MonthsLow Satisfaction191 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleBreast Cancer Screening - 6 monthsHigh Satisfaction145 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Satisfaction With Decision to Participate in Screening and Mental Health Care as Assessed by Decision ScaleColorectal Cancer Screening - BaselineHigh Satisfaction180 Participants
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in breast cancer screening at 6 months.p-value: 0.72Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening at 6 months.p-value: 0.17Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening at 12 months.p-value: 0.69Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in breast cancer screening at baseline.p-value: 0.72Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening at baseline.p-value: 0.2Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in breast cancer screening at 12 months.p-value: 0.87Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in cervical cancer screening at baseline.p-value: 0.65Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in cervical cancer screening at 6 months.p-value: 0.82Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in cervical cancer screening at 12 months.p-value: 0.92Chi-squared
Comparison: Satisfaction with decision to participate in Mental Health Care at 12 months.p-value: 0.56Chi-squared
Secondary

Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization

This 5-item scale measures a sense of perceived self-efficacy associated with accessing and paying for the three different types of cancer screening and utilization of needed mental health services. The continuous study score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut points. The 4 categories are high self-efficacy, moderate self- efficacy, minimal self-efficacy and low self-efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Population: Data are collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Not all participants completed the assessment at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization12 monthsModerate Self-Efficacy81 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization12 monthsMinimal Self-Efficacy77 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization12 monthsLow Self-Efficacy77 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaselineHigh Self-Efficacy98 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaselineModerate Self-Efficacy87 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaselineMinimal Self-Efficacy90 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaselineLow Self-Efficacy98 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization6 monthsHigh Self-Efficacy70 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization6 monthsModerate Self-Efficacy68 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization6 monthsMinimal Self-Efficacy77 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization6 monthsLow Self-Efficacy83 Participants
Collaborative Care Intervention (CCI)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization12 monthsHigh Self-Efficacy71 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization6 monthsLow Self-Efficacy80 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization12 monthsModerate Self-Efficacy81 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaselineLow Self-Efficacy101 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization12 monthsMinimal Self-Efficacy79 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization6 monthsMinimal Self-Efficacy74 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization12 monthsLow Self-Efficacy85 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization6 monthsHigh Self-Efficacy74 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaselineHigh Self-Efficacy87 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization12 monthsHigh Self-Efficacy79 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaselineModerate Self-Efficacy98 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health Utilization6 monthsModerate Self-Efficacy76 Participants
Prevention Care Management (PCM)Self-efficacy and Behavior Towards Cancer Screening/Mental Health UtilizationBaselineMinimal Self-Efficacy87 Participants
Comparison: Self-efficacy at baseline.Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.7Chi-squared
Comparison: Self-efficacy at 6 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.89Chi-squared
Comparison: Self-efficacy at 12 months. Continuous summary score was converted into 4 categories using quartiles as cut-points.p-value: 0.95Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026