Skip to content

Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair: Functional and Anatomical Results at Four Years Follow-up

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02272361
Acronym
PROSPERE4
Enrollment
220
Registered
2014-10-22
Start date
2014-10-01
Completion date
2018-06-20
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystocele

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare with PFDI-20 questionnaire the functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and vaginal mesh surgery in the treatment of symptomatic exteriorised cystocele up to 4 years after surgery. The secondary objectives of this study are the following: 1. to compare the two techniques for anatomical results based on the clinical evaluation of patients with POP-Q. 2. to overall quality of life assessment and expectations of patients. 3. to compare the two techniques for the long-term safety. The evaluation will focus on the adverse effects of long-term sexual and genital symptoms, urinary and digestive functional symptoms, and chronic pelvic pain. 4. to compare the improvement of the functional outcome assessed by PFDI-20 questionnaire (matched-analysis before versus after).

Interventions

OTHERvaginal mesh surgery

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All the patients included in the PROSPERE study will be included in the PROSPERE-4 study. The inclusion criterias for the PROSPERE study are: * Written informed consent * insured under the French social security system

Exclusion criteria

* Unwillingness or inability to comply with the requirements of this protocol, including the presence of any condition (physical, mental, or social) that is likely to affect the subject's ability to comply with the study protocol * Participation in another trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PFDI-20 score4 yearsThe patient-reported outcome of the intervention will be evaluated using the symptom score calculated using the PFDI-20. It is a self-administered questionnaire on symptoms of prolapse

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJean-Philippe LUCOT, MD,

University Hospital, Lille

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026