Pain Management, Severe Chronic Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Pain Management, Europe, Intrathecal
Brief summary
This is an open-label, long-term, multi-center multi-national post-marketing observational registry. The objective of this study is to monitor the long-term efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life outcomes associated with ziconotide (Prialt) and other analgesics utilized in the intrathecal (IT) management of severe chronic pain.
Detailed description
This is an observational non-interventional registry. All patients will sign and date an Informed Consent Form (ICF) before enrollment (Baseline Visit). Normal clinical practice will be followed. Patients will continue to follow their usual schedule of clinic visits as determined by their physician, during which information and patient-completed questionnaires will be collected (at scheduled intervals timed to coincide with pump refill).
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients will be eligible to enroll onto the registry if they have given informed consent and meet the following criteria: * Patient's physician has deemed that the initiation/switch of intrathecal analgesia appropriate, or patient is presently utilizing ziconotide (Prialt) * Patient has a diagnosis of severe, chronic pain for which intrathecal infusion is indicated * Patient is at least 18 years of age at time of study entry All patients starting ziconotide (Prialt) should comply with the indications and warnings in the current approved version of the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
Exclusion criteria
Patients who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible to enroll in the registry: * Patient is a pregnant or lactating female * Patient is receiving intrathecal chemotherapy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 8 (Visit 4), Month 12 (Visit 5), and Termination Visit (12 months after last participant was enrolled) | VASPI is a worldwide validated measure of pain intensity. A Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain is determined by using a horizontal line, 100-millimeter (mm) in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end; no pain (0 mm) on the left end and worst imaginable pain (100 mm) on the right end. The participant was asked to mark on the line the point that they feel represents their current state of pain. A VAS for least pain (over last two weeks), usual pain (over last two weeks), and pain today was determined and averaged to derive the total VAS score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable). A last observation carried forward (LOCF) dataset was used to account for missing data where First Visit data could be carried forward. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) survey is made up of two dimensions: pain intensity/severity and pain interference, with each dimension containing specific items that are graded (e.g. mood, walking ability, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, etc.). Each item was graded on an 11-point Likert scale. The pain intensity/severity survey was used to measure pain severity, where 0 was no pain and 10 was pain as bad as you can imagine for each item listed. The pain interference survey scored each item on a scale, where 0 was does not interfere to 10 was completely interferes. The change in pain severity and pain interference from Baseline (Visit 1) were calculated from the scores. |
| Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit (12 Months after last participant was enrolled) | The BPI-SF survey is made up of two dimensions: pain intensity/severity and pain interference, with each dimension containing specific items that are graded (e.g. mood, walking ability, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, etc.). Each item was graded on an 11-point Likert scale. The pain intensity/severity survey was used to measure pain severity, where 0 was no pain and 10 was pain as bad as you can imagine for each item listed. The pain interference survey scored each item on a scale, where 0 was does not interfere to 10 was completely interferes. The change in pain severity and pain interference from Baseline (Visit 1) were calculated from the scores. |
| Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | From first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, for up to approximately 4 years 4 months. | Safety assessments consisted of monitoring and recording all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), any therapeutic interventions including all drug therapies, vital signs, and creatine kinase (CK) if laboratory tests were taken by the physician as part of routine clinical practice. AEs were graded on a 3-point scale; 1) mild - discomfort noticed, but no disruption of normal daily activity, 2) moderate - discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity, 3) severe - incapacitating, with inability to work or to perform normal daily activity. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the First Visit. Where a start date was missing, the AE was considered to be treatment-emergent. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Primary Intrathecal Drug, Including Dose Adjustment and Intervals | 12 months after the last patient was enrolled | Data for this outcome measure was collected as part of the participant's study visit, however was not analyzed as an efficacy endpoint for reporting. |
| Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | Month 12 Visit, End of Study (Termination Visit) | The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used to measure quality of life. It classifies health states across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each domain has three levels (no problems, some/moderate problems, extreme problems). A unique EQ-5D health state was defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions. The response to the question of how good or bad the participant's health was today was given on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100 millimeters (mm), where 0 meant the participant was in the worst imaginable health state today and 100 meant the participant was in the best imaginable health state today. The results for the Health Score were that of the calculated overall score of the five dimensions, where -0.594 is worst health and 1.00 is perfect health. Change is defined as change in actual from the First Visit. |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ziconotide Monotherapy Participants who took ziconotide alone. | 77 |
| Ziconotide Combination Participants who took ziconotide in combination with another intrathecal (IT) therapy. | 72 |
| Other IT Monotherapy Participants who took an IT therapy other than ziconotide. | 30 |
| Other IT Combination Participants who took two (or more) IT therapies in conjunction other than ziconotide. | 40 |
| Total | 219 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 8 | 26 | 7 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Other | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol deviation | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ziconotide Monotherapy | Ziconotide Combination | Other IT Monotherapy | Other IT Combination | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.56 | 55.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46 | 56.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.78 | 54.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.69 | 54.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.39 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 32 Participants | 28 Participants | 11 Participants | 18 Participants | 89 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 45 Participants | 44 Participants | 19 Participants | 22 Participants | 130 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 3 / 83 | 26 / 114 | 7 / 67 | 12 / 71 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 59 / 83 | 70 / 114 | 34 / 67 | 43 / 71 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 26 / 83 | 51 / 114 | 24 / 67 | 30 / 71 |
Outcome results
Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)
VASPI is a worldwide validated measure of pain intensity. A Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain is determined by using a horizontal line, 100-millimeter (mm) in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end; no pain (0 mm) on the left end and worst imaginable pain (100 mm) on the right end. The participant was asked to mark on the line the point that they feel represents their current state of pain. A VAS for least pain (over last two weeks), usual pain (over last two weeks), and pain today was determined and averaged to derive the total VAS score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable). A last observation carried forward (LOCF) dataset was used to account for missing data where First Visit data could be carried forward.
Time frame: Month 8 (Visit 4), Month 12 (Visit 5), and Termination Visit (12 months after last participant was enrolled)
Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) (LOCF) population included all participants who had at least one dose of an IT therapy. Total number of participants for the outcome measures (335) does not match the total number enrolled (219) due to participants switching between treatment arms as allowed per protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 12 (Visit 5) | -3.78 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.424 |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 8 (Visit 4) | -3.23 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.16 |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Termination Visit | -6.01 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.22 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 8 (Visit 4) | -15.24 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.614 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 12 (Visit 5) | -9.33 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.039 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Termination Visit | 0.65 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.208 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 8 (Visit 4) | -1.50 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.736 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Termination Visit | 1.64 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.643 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 12 (Visit 5) | 1.67 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.894 |
| Other IT Combination | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 12 (Visit 5) | -14.33 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Other IT Combination | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Month 8 (Visit 4) | -18.40 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.899 |
| Other IT Combination | Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) | Termination Visit | -14.27 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.62 |
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Safety assessments consisted of monitoring and recording all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), any therapeutic interventions including all drug therapies, vital signs, and creatine kinase (CK) if laboratory tests were taken by the physician as part of routine clinical practice. AEs were graded on a 3-point scale; 1) mild - discomfort noticed, but no disruption of normal daily activity, 2) moderate - discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity, 3) severe - incapacitating, with inability to work or to perform normal daily activity. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the First Visit. Where a start date was missing, the AE was considered to be treatment-emergent.
Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, for up to approximately 4 years 4 months.
Population: Safety population included all participants who had at least one dose of an IT therapy.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Any TEAEs | 66 Participants |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Drug-related TEAEs | 56 Participants |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | SAEs | 26 Participants |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | TEAEs leading to death | 3 Participants |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Drug-related SAEs | 7 Participants |
| Ziconotide Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | TEAEs leading to death | 26 Participants |
| Ziconotide Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Any TEAEs | 88 Participants |
| Ziconotide Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Drug-related TEAEs | 54 Participants |
| Ziconotide Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Drug-related SAEs | 11 Participants |
| Ziconotide Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | SAEs | 51 Participants |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Drug-related TEAEs | 26 Participants |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Any TEAEs | 46 Participants |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | SAEs | 24 Participants |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Drug-related SAEs | 9 Participants |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | TEAEs leading to death | 7 Participants |
| Other IT Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Drug-related SAEs | 5 Participants |
| Other IT Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | SAEs | 30 Participants |
| Other IT Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Drug-related TEAEs | 28 Participants |
| Other IT Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Any TEAEs | 48 Participants |
| Other IT Combination | Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | TEAEs leading to death | 12 Participants |
Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)
The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) survey is made up of two dimensions: pain intensity/severity and pain interference, with each dimension containing specific items that are graded (e.g. mood, walking ability, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, etc.). Each item was graded on an 11-point Likert scale. The pain intensity/severity survey was used to measure pain severity, where 0 was no pain and 10 was pain as bad as you can imagine for each item listed. The pain interference survey scored each item on a scale, where 0 was does not interfere to 10 was completely interferes. The change in pain severity and pain interference from Baseline (Visit 1) were calculated from the scores.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)
Population: ITT LOCF population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Pain severity | -0.41 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.768 |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Pain interference | -0.52 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.645 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Pain interference | -0.42 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.445 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Pain severity | -0.77 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.15 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Pain severity | -0.09 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.741 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Pain interference | -0.43 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.248 |
| Other IT Combination | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Pain severity | -0.99 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.866 |
| Other IT Combination | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5) | Pain interference | -0.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.039 |
Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit
The BPI-SF survey is made up of two dimensions: pain intensity/severity and pain interference, with each dimension containing specific items that are graded (e.g. mood, walking ability, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, etc.). Each item was graded on an 11-point Likert scale. The pain intensity/severity survey was used to measure pain severity, where 0 was no pain and 10 was pain as bad as you can imagine for each item listed. The pain interference survey scored each item on a scale, where 0 was does not interfere to 10 was completely interferes. The change in pain severity and pain interference from Baseline (Visit 1) were calculated from the scores.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit (12 Months after last participant was enrolled)
Population: ITT LOCF population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Pain severity | -0.27 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.219 |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Pain interference | -0.77 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.809 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Pain interference | -1.05 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.798 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Pain severity | -1.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.127 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Pain severity | -0.04 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.957 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Pain interference | -0.73 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.718 |
| Other IT Combination | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Pain severity | -0.74 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.321 |
| Other IT Combination | Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit | Pain interference | -0.72 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.054 |
Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study
The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used to measure quality of life. It classifies health states across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each domain has three levels (no problems, some/moderate problems, extreme problems). A unique EQ-5D health state was defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions. The response to the question of how good or bad the participant's health was today was given on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100 millimeters (mm), where 0 meant the participant was in the worst imaginable health state today and 100 meant the participant was in the best imaginable health state today. The results for the Health Score were that of the calculated overall score of the five dimensions, where -0.594 is worst health and 1.00 is perfect health. Change is defined as change in actual from the First Visit.
Time frame: Month 12 Visit, End of Study (Termination Visit)
Population: ITT population. Missing items/values used in calculating the partially complete Health Score were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | End of Study | -0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.196 |
| Ziconotide Monotherapy | Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | Month 12 | -0.01 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.176 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | Month 12 | -0.06 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.207 |
| Ziconotide Combination | Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | End of Study | 0.04 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | End of Study | -0.03 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.193 |
| Other IT Monotherapy | Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | Month 12 | 0.01 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.217 |
| Other IT Combination | Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | Month 12 | -0.01 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.136 |
| Other IT Combination | Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study | End of Study | -0.02 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.145 |
Changes in Primary Intrathecal Drug, Including Dose Adjustment and Intervals
Data for this outcome measure was collected as part of the participant's study visit, however was not analyzed as an efficacy endpoint for reporting.
Time frame: 12 months after the last patient was enrolled
Population: Data for this outcome measure was collected as part of the participant's study visit, however was not analyzed as an efficacy endpoint for reporting.