Skip to content

Patient Registry of Intrathecal Pain Management in Europe for Prialt (Ziconotide Intrathecal Infusion) and Alternative Drugs for the Management of Severe, Chronic Pain.

Patient Registry of Intrathecal Pain Management in Europe: An Open-label, Long-term, Multi-center, Multi-national Post-marketing Observational Study of the Use of Prialt (Ziconotide Intrathecal Infusion) and Alternative Drugs for the Management of Severe, Chronic Pain.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02268812
Acronym
PRIME
Enrollment
219
Registered
2014-10-20
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2018-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Management, Severe Chronic Pain

Keywords

Pain Management, Europe, Intrathecal

Brief summary

This is an open-label, long-term, multi-center multi-national post-marketing observational registry. The objective of this study is to monitor the long-term efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life outcomes associated with ziconotide (Prialt) and other analgesics utilized in the intrathecal (IT) management of severe chronic pain.

Detailed description

This is an observational non-interventional registry. All patients will sign and date an Informed Consent Form (ICF) before enrollment (Baseline Visit). Normal clinical practice will be followed. Patients will continue to follow their usual schedule of clinic visits as determined by their physician, during which information and patient-completed questionnaires will be collected (at scheduled intervals timed to coincide with pump refill).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Eisai Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients will be eligible to enroll onto the registry if they have given informed consent and meet the following criteria: * Patient's physician has deemed that the initiation/switch of intrathecal analgesia appropriate, or patient is presently utilizing ziconotide (Prialt) * Patient has a diagnosis of severe, chronic pain for which intrathecal infusion is indicated * Patient is at least 18 years of age at time of study entry All patients starting ziconotide (Prialt) should comply with the indications and warnings in the current approved version of the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible to enroll in the registry: * Patient is a pregnant or lactating female * Patient is receiving intrathecal chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 8 (Visit 4), Month 12 (Visit 5), and Termination Visit (12 months after last participant was enrolled)VASPI is a worldwide validated measure of pain intensity. A Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain is determined by using a horizontal line, 100-millimeter (mm) in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end; no pain (0 mm) on the left end and worst imaginable pain (100 mm) on the right end. The participant was asked to mark on the line the point that they feel represents their current state of pain. A VAS for least pain (over last two weeks), usual pain (over last two weeks), and pain today was determined and averaged to derive the total VAS score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable). A last observation carried forward (LOCF) dataset was used to account for missing data where First Visit data could be carried forward.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) survey is made up of two dimensions: pain intensity/severity and pain interference, with each dimension containing specific items that are graded (e.g. mood, walking ability, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, etc.). Each item was graded on an 11-point Likert scale. The pain intensity/severity survey was used to measure pain severity, where 0 was no pain and 10 was pain as bad as you can imagine for each item listed. The pain interference survey scored each item on a scale, where 0 was does not interfere to 10 was completely interferes. The change in pain severity and pain interference from Baseline (Visit 1) were calculated from the scores.
Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitBaseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit (12 Months after last participant was enrolled)The BPI-SF survey is made up of two dimensions: pain intensity/severity and pain interference, with each dimension containing specific items that are graded (e.g. mood, walking ability, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, etc.). Each item was graded on an 11-point Likert scale. The pain intensity/severity survey was used to measure pain severity, where 0 was no pain and 10 was pain as bad as you can imagine for each item listed. The pain interference survey scored each item on a scale, where 0 was does not interfere to 10 was completely interferes. The change in pain severity and pain interference from Baseline (Visit 1) were calculated from the scores.
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)From first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, for up to approximately 4 years 4 months.Safety assessments consisted of monitoring and recording all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), any therapeutic interventions including all drug therapies, vital signs, and creatine kinase (CK) if laboratory tests were taken by the physician as part of routine clinical practice. AEs were graded on a 3-point scale; 1) mild - discomfort noticed, but no disruption of normal daily activity, 2) moderate - discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity, 3) severe - incapacitating, with inability to work or to perform normal daily activity. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the First Visit. Where a start date was missing, the AE was considered to be treatment-emergent.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Primary Intrathecal Drug, Including Dose Adjustment and Intervals12 months after the last patient was enrolledData for this outcome measure was collected as part of the participant's study visit, however was not analyzed as an efficacy endpoint for reporting.
Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyMonth 12 Visit, End of Study (Termination Visit)The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used to measure quality of life. It classifies health states across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each domain has three levels (no problems, some/moderate problems, extreme problems). A unique EQ-5D health state was defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions. The response to the question of how good or bad the participant's health was today was given on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100 millimeters (mm), where 0 meant the participant was in the worst imaginable health state today and 100 meant the participant was in the best imaginable health state today. The results for the Health Score were that of the calculated overall score of the five dimensions, where -0.594 is worst health and 1.00 is perfect health. Change is defined as change in actual from the First Visit.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ziconotide Monotherapy
Participants who took ziconotide alone.
77
Ziconotide Combination
Participants who took ziconotide in combination with another intrathecal (IT) therapy.
72
Other IT Monotherapy
Participants who took an IT therapy other than ziconotide.
30
Other IT Combination
Participants who took two (or more) IT therapies in conjunction other than ziconotide.
40
Total219

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event826710
Overall StudyOther5413
Overall StudyPhysician Decision3101
Overall StudyProtocol deviation0010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZiconotide MonotherapyZiconotide CombinationOther IT MonotherapyOther IT CombinationTotal
Age, Continuous53.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.56
55.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46
56.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.78
54.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.69
54.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.39
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants28 Participants11 Participants18 Participants89 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants44 Participants19 Participants22 Participants130 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 8326 / 1147 / 6712 / 71
other
Total, other adverse events
59 / 8370 / 11434 / 6743 / 71
serious
Total, serious adverse events
26 / 8351 / 11424 / 6730 / 71

Outcome results

Primary

Average Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)

VASPI is a worldwide validated measure of pain intensity. A Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain is determined by using a horizontal line, 100-millimeter (mm) in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end; no pain (0 mm) on the left end and worst imaginable pain (100 mm) on the right end. The participant was asked to mark on the line the point that they feel represents their current state of pain. A VAS for least pain (over last two weeks), usual pain (over last two weeks), and pain today was determined and averaged to derive the total VAS score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable). A last observation carried forward (LOCF) dataset was used to account for missing data where First Visit data could be carried forward.

Time frame: Month 8 (Visit 4), Month 12 (Visit 5), and Termination Visit (12 months after last participant was enrolled)

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) (LOCF) population included all participants who had at least one dose of an IT therapy. Total number of participants for the outcome measures (335) does not match the total number enrolled (219) due to participants switching between treatment arms as allowed per protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ziconotide MonotherapyAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 12 (Visit 5)-3.78 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.424
Ziconotide MonotherapyAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 8 (Visit 4)-3.23 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.16
Ziconotide MonotherapyAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Termination Visit-6.01 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.22
Ziconotide CombinationAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 8 (Visit 4)-15.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.614
Ziconotide CombinationAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 12 (Visit 5)-9.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.039
Ziconotide CombinationAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Termination Visit0.65 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.208
Other IT MonotherapyAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 8 (Visit 4)-1.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.736
Other IT MonotherapyAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Termination Visit1.64 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.643
Other IT MonotherapyAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 12 (Visit 5)1.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.894
Other IT CombinationAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 12 (Visit 5)-14.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
Other IT CombinationAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Month 8 (Visit 4)-18.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.899
Other IT CombinationAverage Overall Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI)Termination Visit-14.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.62
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

Safety assessments consisted of monitoring and recording all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), any therapeutic interventions including all drug therapies, vital signs, and creatine kinase (CK) if laboratory tests were taken by the physician as part of routine clinical practice. AEs were graded on a 3-point scale; 1) mild - discomfort noticed, but no disruption of normal daily activity, 2) moderate - discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity, 3) severe - incapacitating, with inability to work or to perform normal daily activity. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the First Visit. Where a start date was missing, the AE was considered to be treatment-emergent.

Time frame: From first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, for up to approximately 4 years 4 months.

Population: Safety population included all participants who had at least one dose of an IT therapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ziconotide MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Any TEAEs66 Participants
Ziconotide MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Drug-related TEAEs56 Participants
Ziconotide MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)SAEs26 Participants
Ziconotide MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)TEAEs leading to death3 Participants
Ziconotide MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Drug-related SAEs7 Participants
Ziconotide CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)TEAEs leading to death26 Participants
Ziconotide CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Any TEAEs88 Participants
Ziconotide CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Drug-related TEAEs54 Participants
Ziconotide CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Drug-related SAEs11 Participants
Ziconotide CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)SAEs51 Participants
Other IT MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Drug-related TEAEs26 Participants
Other IT MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Any TEAEs46 Participants
Other IT MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)SAEs24 Participants
Other IT MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Drug-related SAEs9 Participants
Other IT MonotherapyNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)TEAEs leading to death7 Participants
Other IT CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Drug-related SAEs5 Participants
Other IT CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)SAEs30 Participants
Other IT CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Drug-related TEAEs28 Participants
Other IT CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Any TEAEs48 Participants
Other IT CombinationNumber of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)TEAEs leading to death12 Participants
Secondary

Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)

The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) survey is made up of two dimensions: pain intensity/severity and pain interference, with each dimension containing specific items that are graded (e.g. mood, walking ability, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, etc.). Each item was graded on an 11-point Likert scale. The pain intensity/severity survey was used to measure pain severity, where 0 was no pain and 10 was pain as bad as you can imagine for each item listed. The pain interference survey scored each item on a scale, where 0 was does not interfere to 10 was completely interferes. The change in pain severity and pain interference from Baseline (Visit 1) were calculated from the scores.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)

Population: ITT LOCF population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ziconotide MonotherapyOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Pain severity-0.41 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.768
Ziconotide MonotherapyOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Pain interference-0.52 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.645
Ziconotide CombinationOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Pain interference-0.42 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.445
Ziconotide CombinationOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Pain severity-0.77 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Other IT MonotherapyOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Pain severity-0.09 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.741
Other IT MonotherapyOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Pain interference-0.43 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.248
Other IT CombinationOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Pain severity-0.99 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.866
Other IT CombinationOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Month 12 (Visit 5)Pain interference-0.33 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.039
Secondary

Overall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit

The BPI-SF survey is made up of two dimensions: pain intensity/severity and pain interference, with each dimension containing specific items that are graded (e.g. mood, walking ability, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, etc.). Each item was graded on an 11-point Likert scale. The pain intensity/severity survey was used to measure pain severity, where 0 was no pain and 10 was pain as bad as you can imagine for each item listed. The pain interference survey scored each item on a scale, where 0 was does not interfere to 10 was completely interferes. The change in pain severity and pain interference from Baseline (Visit 1) were calculated from the scores.

Time frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination Visit (12 Months after last participant was enrolled)

Population: ITT LOCF population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ziconotide MonotherapyOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitPain severity-0.27 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.219
Ziconotide MonotherapyOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitPain interference-0.77 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.809
Ziconotide CombinationOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitPain interference-1.05 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.798
Ziconotide CombinationOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitPain severity-1.11 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.127
Other IT MonotherapyOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitPain severity-0.04 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.957
Other IT MonotherapyOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitPain interference-0.73 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.718
Other IT CombinationOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitPain severity-0.74 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.321
Other IT CombinationOverall Change in Pain Severity and Pain Interference From Baseline (Visit 1) to Termination VisitPain interference-0.72 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.054
Other Pre-specified

Change in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of Study

The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used to measure quality of life. It classifies health states across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each domain has three levels (no problems, some/moderate problems, extreme problems). A unique EQ-5D health state was defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions. The response to the question of how good or bad the participant's health was today was given on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100 millimeters (mm), where 0 meant the participant was in the worst imaginable health state today and 100 meant the participant was in the best imaginable health state today. The results for the Health Score were that of the calculated overall score of the five dimensions, where -0.594 is worst health and 1.00 is perfect health. Change is defined as change in actual from the First Visit.

Time frame: Month 12 Visit, End of Study (Termination Visit)

Population: ITT population. Missing items/values used in calculating the partially complete Health Score were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ziconotide MonotherapyChange in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyEnd of Study-0.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.196
Ziconotide MonotherapyChange in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyMonth 12-0.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.176
Ziconotide CombinationChange in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyMonth 12-0.06 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.207
Ziconotide CombinationChange in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyEnd of Study0.04 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Other IT MonotherapyChange in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyEnd of Study-0.03 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.193
Other IT MonotherapyChange in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyMonth 120.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.217
Other IT CombinationChange in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyMonth 12-0.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.136
Other IT CombinationChange in the Actual Overall EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Health Score From First Visit to Month 12 and End of StudyEnd of Study-0.02 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.145
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Primary Intrathecal Drug, Including Dose Adjustment and Intervals

Data for this outcome measure was collected as part of the participant's study visit, however was not analyzed as an efficacy endpoint for reporting.

Time frame: 12 months after the last patient was enrolled

Population: Data for this outcome measure was collected as part of the participant's study visit, however was not analyzed as an efficacy endpoint for reporting.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026