Skip to content

Extension Study to Evaluate Long-Term Effects of Luspatercept in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) (A536-05/MK-6143-003)

An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Effects of ACE-536 for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Previously Enrolled in Study A536-03

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02268383
Enrollment
75
Registered
2014-10-20
Start date
2014-10-09
Completion date
2020-03-19
Last updated
2024-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Brief summary

This study is an open-label extension study for participants previously enrolled in study MK-6143-001 (formerly called A536-03, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01749514), to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of luspatercept (MK-6143) in participants with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS.

Detailed description

This study is an open-label extension study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic effects of up to 24 months of luspatercept treatment in participants with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes previously treated with luspatercept for up to 3 months in MK-6143-001 study (NCT01749514). The starting dose level in this study will be 1.0 mg/kg by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 3 weeks. Dose titration/modification rules will be followed for individual participants and will be based upon safety and efficacy data collected during the course of treatment.

Interventions

DRUGLuspatercept

Luspatercept 1.0 mg/kg once every 3 weeks by subcutaneous injection.

Sponsors

Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completion of the treatment period in the base study MK-6143-001 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01749514) * Adequate birth control measures * Patient is able to adhere to the study visit schedule, understand and comply with all protocol requirements * Patient understands and is able to provide written informed consent * In addition, patients with treatment interruption (defined as patients who complete their end-of-study visit in MK-6143-001 and cannot directly roll over to MK-6143-003) must also meet the following criteria: * Documented diagnosis of idiopathic/de novo MDS or non-proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria 16 (white blood count (WBC) \< 13,000/μL) that meets International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) classification of low or intermediate-1 risk disease as determined by microscopic and standard cytogenetic analyses of the bone marrow and peripheral complete blood count (CBC) obtained during screening; * Anemia defined as: * Mean hemoglobin concentration \< 10.0 g/dL of 2 measurements (one performed within one day prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 and the other performed 7-28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1), for non-transfusion dependent (NTD) patients (defined as having received ˂ 4 units of red blood cells (RBCs) within 8 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1), OR * Transfusion Dependent (TD), defined as having received ≥ 4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Platelet count ≥ 30 x 109/L * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2 (if related to anemia) * Adequate renal (creatinine ≤ 2.0 x upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) and hepatic (total bilirubin \< 2 x ULN and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 3 x ULN) function

Exclusion criteria

* Discontinuation/withdrawal from the base study A536-03 (due to patient request, patient unwillingness or inability to comply with the protocol, pregnancy, use of prohibited medication \[e.g. azacitidine\], medical reason or adverse event (AE), hypersensitivity reaction to the study drug, at the discretion of the sponsor, or loss to follow-up) prior to completion of the treatment period * Prior treatment with azacitidine or decitabine * Treatment within 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 with: * An erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), * Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), * Lenalidomide * Iron chelation therapy if initiated within 56 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Treatment with another investigational drug (including sotatercept \[ACE-011\]) or device, or approved therapy for investigational use ≤ 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, or if the half-life of the previous investigational product is known, within 5 times the half-life prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, whichever is longer * Major surgery within 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1. Patients must have completely recovered from any previous surgery prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 * Known positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), active infectious hepatitis B (HBV) or active infectious hepatitis C (HCV) * Uncontrolled hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 150 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mm Hg * Pregnant or lactating females * History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to recombinant proteins or excipients in the investigational drug * Any other condition not specifically noted above which, in the judgment of the investigator, would preclude the patient from participating in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 5 yearsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The number of participants who experienced an AE was reported.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AEUp to approximately 5 yearsAn adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The number of participants who discontinued luspatercept due to an AE was reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Response CriteriaAny consecutive 8 Weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)Per IWG 2006 response criteria, HI-N response was defined for participants with baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1.0×10\^9/L as the percentage increase ≥100% and an absolute mean increase \>0.5 ×10\^9/L during any rolling 8-week window on treatment compared with baseline. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. Percentage of participants with HI-N response were reported.
Rate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 Response CriteriaAny consecutive 8 Weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)Per IWG 2006 response criteria, HI-P response was defined for participants with baseline platelet count \<100×10\^9/L as the following: 1) For participants with baseline ≥20×10\^9/L, an absolute increase of ≥30×10\^9/L during any rolling 8-week window on treatment and 2) For participants with baseline \<20×10\^9/L, mean value of \>20×10\^9/L and percentage increase ≥100% during any rolling 8-week window on treatment. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. Percentage of participants with HI-P response were reported.
Duration of HI-E in LTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteriaup to approximately 5 yearsFor LTB participants, HI-E was defined as all Hgb increase ≥1.5 g/dL during any rolling 8 weeks window. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Per IWG 2006 response criteria, duration of HI-E was defined as the time from the first day of the first rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response to the last day of the last consecutive rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. When there were multiple disjointed intervals with response, the longest interval was used.
Duration of HI-E in HTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteriaup to approximately 5 yearsFor HTB participants, HI-E was defined as RBC transfusion reduction ≥4 units during any rolling 8 weeks. HTB participants were those who required a transfusion of ≥4 units of RBCs in the 8 weeks prior to baseline. Per IWG 2006 response criteria, duration of HI-E was defined as the time from the first day of the first rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response to the last day of the last consecutive rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. When there were multiple disjointed intervals with response, the longest interval was used.
Time to HI-E in LTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteriaup to approximately 5 yearsFor LTB participants, HI-E was defined as all Hgb increase ≥1.5 g/dL during any rolling 8 weeks window. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Per IWG 2006 response criteria, time to HI-E was defined as the first date of the rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response minus first dose date plus 1. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. When there were multiple disjointed intervals with response, the longest interval was used.
Time to HI-E in HTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response CriteriaAny consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)For HTB participants, HI-E was defined as RBC transfusion reduction ≥4 units during any rolling 8 weeks. HTB participants were those who required a transfusion of ≥4 units of RBCs in the 8 weeks prior to baseline. Per IWG 2006 response criteria, time to HI-E was defined as the first date of the rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response minus first dose date plus 1. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.
Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)Any consecutive 8 Weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)Per protocol, RBC-TI response was defined as not requiring RBC transfusion for 8 or more weeks while on treatment among participants with ≥2 units of RBC transfusions at baseline. The rate of RBC-TI was defined as the percentage of participants with ≥2 units of RBC transfusions at baseline with RBC-TI.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in RBC Transfusion Burden (TB) in HTB ParticipantsBaseline and up to 5 yearsRBC TB was defined as ≥4 units or 50% reduction during rolling 8 weeks among HTB participants. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. HTB participants are those who required a transfusion of ≥4 units of RBCs in the 8 weeks prior to baseline. Mean change from baseline to Week 8 in reduction in RBC TD in HTB participants was reported.
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Hemoglobin Levels ≥1.5 Grams/dL in LTB ParticipantsBaseline and Week 8Baseline hemoglobin levels were the documented pre-transfusion hemoglobin values during the 12 weeks prior to treatment. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Mean change from baseline to Week 8 in hemoglobin levels ≥1.5 grams/dL in LTB participants were reported.
Serum Concentration of LuspaterceptDay 1: Cycles 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, and 81 (each cycle length = 21 days); End of treatment (EOT) Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-determined time points to determine the serum concentration of luspatercept. Serum concentrations that were below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of the assay prior to the first dose were assigned a numerical value of zero. Post-treatment serum concentrations that were below the LOQ of the assay were treated as missing. Serum concentrations assigned a value of missing were omitted from the analysis. The LOQ of the assay was 50 ng/mL.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum IronBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum iron concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of serum iron was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine TIBC. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in TIBC was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response CriteriaAny consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)The mHI-E was defined as a mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase ≥1.5 g/dL over an 8-week period as compared to baseline, not influenced by red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in low transfusion burden (LTB) participants and a decrease of ≥4 units or ≥50% of units of RBCs transfused over a period of 8 weeks, relative to the number of units of RBCs transfused in the 8 weeks immediately prior to baseline in high transfusion burden (HTB) participants. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. HTB participants were those who required a transfusion of ≥4 units of RBCs in the 8 weeks prior to baseline. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin ReceptorBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine soluble transferrin receptor concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of soluble transferrin receptor was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum FerritinBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum ferritin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of serum ferritin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Non-Transferrin Bound Iron (NTBI)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of NTBI. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum HepcidinBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of serum hepcidin. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum ErythropoietinBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum erythropoietin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of serum erythropoietin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Reticulocyte CountBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine reticulocyte count. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in reticulocyte count was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Nucleated RBC (nRBC) CountBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine nRBC. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Direct Bilirubin LevelBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum direct bilirubin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of direct bilirubin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Total Bilirubin LevelBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine total bilirubin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of total bilirubin was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Lactate Dehydrogenase LevelBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum lactate dehydrogenase level. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of lactate dehydrogenase level was reported.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine BSAP. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine CTX. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of TransferrinBaseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum transferrin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of transferrin was reported.
Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG 2006 Response CriteriaAny consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)Per IWG 2006 response criteria, the rate of HI-E was defined as the percentage of participants with an HI-E response by an Hgb increase of ≥1.5 g/dL for participants not transfused or as defined by having received less than 4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks of baseline or reduction by ≥4 units of RBCs transfused (for a Hgb≤9.0 g/dL) during any 8-week period on study, compared with the 8-week period prior to study day 1.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This extension study enrolled participants from base study MK-6143-001 (NCT01749514). Participants were referred as 'Direct Roll Over' participants (n=67; enrolled within \ 28 days after last dose of luspatercept and did not complete post treatment follow up (PTFU) or end of study (EOS) visit of base study) or 'Treatment Interrupted' participants (n=8; completed EOS visit for base study). Per protocol, a total of 75 participants were pooled together in the extension study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Luspatercept Extension Population
Participants received luspatercept dose of either 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.33, or 1.75 mg/kg determined via Fibonacci scheme on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 87 cycles (up to approximately 5 years) as a subcutaneous (SC) injection. Direct Roll Over participants received the highest tolerated dose of luspatercept that was assigned in the base study. Treatment Interrupted participants received an initial dose of luspatercept 1mg/kg on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 21 days) and the subsequent doses were titrated up to 1.75mg/kg Q3W via Fibonacci scheme, on Day 1 of each cycle for up to 87 cycles (for up to approximately 5 years).
75
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath12
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyNot reported12
Overall StudyPresence of ≥1% blasts in peripheral blood1
Overall StudyProtocol deviation3
Overall StudySponsor decision22
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject9

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLuspatercept Extension Population
Age, Continuous70.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
67 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants
Hemoglobin level8.74 grams/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants
Transfusion Status
HTB
25 Participants
Transfusion Status
LTB
50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 24 / 733 / 616 / 49
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 11 / 244 / 7329 / 6138 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 11 / 219 / 7316 / 6134 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The number of participants who discontinued luspatercept due to an AE was reported.

Time frame: Up to approximately 5 years

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Luspatercept Extension PopulationNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE23 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered related to the study drug. The number of participants who experienced an AE was reported.

Time frame: Up to approximately 5 years

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Luspatercept Extension PopulationNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)75 Participants
Secondary

Duration of HI-E in HTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

For HTB participants, HI-E was defined as RBC transfusion reduction ≥4 units during any rolling 8 weeks. HTB participants were those who required a transfusion of ≥4 units of RBCs in the 8 weeks prior to baseline. Per IWG 2006 response criteria, duration of HI-E was defined as the time from the first day of the first rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response to the last day of the last consecutive rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. When there were multiple disjointed intervals with response, the longest interval was used.

Time frame: up to approximately 5 years

Population: All enrolled HTB participants who received at lease one dose of luspatercept and had a HI-E.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationDuration of HI-E in HTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria328 DaysStandard Deviation 286.8
Secondary

Duration of HI-E in LTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

For LTB participants, HI-E was defined as all Hgb increase ≥1.5 g/dL during any rolling 8 weeks window. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Per IWG 2006 response criteria, duration of HI-E was defined as the time from the first day of the first rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response to the last day of the last consecutive rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. When there were multiple disjointed intervals with response, the longest interval was used.

Time frame: up to approximately 5 years

Population: All enrolled LTB participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had a HI-E.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationDuration of HI-E in LTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria299 DaysStandard Deviation 378.3
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Hemoglobin Levels ≥1.5 Grams/dL in LTB Participants

Baseline hemoglobin levels were the documented pre-transfusion hemoglobin values during the 12 weeks prior to treatment. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Mean change from baseline to Week 8 in hemoglobin levels ≥1.5 grams/dL in LTB participants were reported.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: All enrolled LTB participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationMean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Hemoglobin Levels ≥1.5 Grams/dL in LTB Participants2.4 grams/dlStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in RBC Transfusion Burden (TB) in HTB Participants

RBC TB was defined as ≥4 units or 50% reduction during rolling 8 weeks among HTB participants. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. HTB participants are those who required a transfusion of ≥4 units of RBCs in the 8 weeks prior to baseline. Mean change from baseline to Week 8 in reduction in RBC TD in HTB participants was reported.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 5 years

Population: All enrolled HTB participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationMean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in RBC Transfusion Burden (TB) in HTB Participants-4.4 Units of bloodStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria

The mHI-E was defined as a mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase ≥1.5 g/dL over an 8-week period as compared to baseline, not influenced by red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in low transfusion burden (LTB) participants and a decrease of ≥4 units or ≥50% of units of RBCs transfused over a period of 8 weeks, relative to the number of units of RBCs transfused in the 8 weeks immediately prior to baseline in high transfusion burden (HTB) participants. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. HTB participants were those who required a transfusion of ≥4 units of RBCs in the 8 weeks prior to baseline. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and were mHI-E evaluable.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercentage of Participants With Modified Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria81.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Non-Transferrin Bound Iron (NTBI)

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of NTBI. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 1853 in concentration of NTBI.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine BSAP. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 1853 in concentration of BSAP.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine CTX. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 1853 in concentration of CTX.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum erythropoietin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of serum erythropoietin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for erythropoietin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Erythropoietin2252.15 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14490.3
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum ferritin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of serum ferritin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for serum ferritin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Ferritin71.61 Percent changeStandard Deviation 152.948
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Hepcidin

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine concentration of serum hepcidin. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 1853 in concentration of serum hepcidin.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Iron

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum iron concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of serum iron was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for serum iron.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Serum Iron20.38 Percent changeStandard Deviation 70.489
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine soluble transferrin receptor concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of soluble transferrin receptor was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for soluble transferrin receptor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Soluble Transferrin Receptor11.52 Percent changeStandard Deviation 48.541
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Transferrin

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum transferrin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of transferrin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for transferrin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Concentration of Transferrin-11.34 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.587
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Direct Bilirubin Level

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum direct bilirubin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of direct bilirubin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for direct bilirubin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Direct Bilirubin Level110.53 Percent changeStandard Deviation 572.494
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine serum lactate dehydrogenase level. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of lactate dehydrogenase level was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for lactate dehydrogenase.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Lactate Dehydrogenase Level22.98 Percent changeStandard Deviation 43.017
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Nucleated RBC (nRBC) Count

Blood samples were to be collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine nRBC. Baseline was prespecified to be the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: No data were collected for the percent change from baseline to day 1853 in nRBC count.

Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Reticulocyte Count

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine reticulocyte count. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in reticulocyte count was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for reticulocyte.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Reticulocyte Count78.70 Percent changeStandard Deviation 137.168
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Total Bilirubin Level

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine total bilirubin concentration. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in concentration of total bilirubin was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for total bilirubin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Total Bilirubin Level72.17 Percent changeStandard Deviation 236.953
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)

Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time intervals to determine TIBC. The percentage change from baseline to Day 1853 in TIBC was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of luspatercept) and Day 1853

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for TIBC.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationPercent Change From Baseline to Day 1853 in Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC)-11.37 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.979
Secondary

Rate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

Per IWG 2006 response criteria, the rate of HI-E was defined as the percentage of participants with an HI-E response by an Hgb increase of ≥1.5 g/dL for participants not transfused or as defined by having received less than 4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks of baseline or reduction by ≥4 units of RBCs transfused (for a Hgb≤9.0 g/dL) during any 8-week period on study, compared with the 8-week period prior to study day 1.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and were HI-E evaluable.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept Extension PopulationRate of Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria80.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Rate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

Per IWG 2006 response criteria, HI-N response was defined for participants with baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1.0×10\^9/L as the percentage increase ≥100% and an absolute mean increase \>0.5 ×10\^9/L during any rolling 8-week window on treatment compared with baseline. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. Percentage of participants with HI-N response were reported.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 Weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had baseline neutrophil count \<1.0×10\^9/L.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept Extension PopulationRate of Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria64.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Rate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

Per IWG 2006 response criteria, HI-P response was defined for participants with baseline platelet count \<100×10\^9/L as the following: 1) For participants with baseline ≥20×10\^9/L, an absolute increase of ≥30×10\^9/L during any rolling 8-week window on treatment and 2) For participants with baseline \<20×10\^9/L, mean value of \>20×10\^9/L and percentage increase ≥100% during any rolling 8-week window on treatment. The rolling 8-week was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. Percentage of participants with HI-P response were reported.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 Weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had baseline platelet \<100x10\^9/L.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept Extension PopulationRate of Platelet Response (HI-P) Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria36.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Rate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)

Per protocol, RBC-TI response was defined as not requiring RBC transfusion for 8 or more weeks while on treatment among participants with ≥2 units of RBC transfusions at baseline. The rate of RBC-TI was defined as the percentage of participants with ≥2 units of RBC transfusions at baseline with RBC-TI.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 Weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had ≥2 units of RBC transfusions at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luspatercept Extension PopulationRate of RBC Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI)64.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum Concentration of Luspatercept

Blood samples were collected at pre-determined time points to determine the serum concentration of luspatercept. Serum concentrations that were below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of the assay prior to the first dose were assigned a numerical value of zero. Post-treatment serum concentrations that were below the LOQ of the assay were treated as missing. Serum concentrations assigned a value of missing were omitted from the analysis. The LOQ of the assay was 50 ng/mL.

Time frame: Day 1: Cycles 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, and 81 (each cycle length = 21 days); End of treatment (EOT) Day 1853

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had data available for serum concentration analysis available at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 25 Day 17.986 µg/mLStandard Deviation 4.061
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 1 Day 10.509 µg/mLStandard Deviation 0.738
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 5 Day 16.373 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.527
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 9 Day 16.589 µg/mLStandard Deviation 4.32
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 13 Day 17.154 µg/mLStandard Deviation 4.423
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 17 Day 18.136 µg/mLStandard Deviation 4.476
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 21 Day 18.227 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.811
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 29 Day 18.379 µg/mLStandard Deviation 2.884
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 33 Day 18.024 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.035
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 37 Day 18.017 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.724
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 41 Day 17.559 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.582
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 45 Day 18.614 µg/mLStandard Deviation 4.015
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 49 Day 19.447 µg/mLStandard Deviation 2.967
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 53 Day 17.936 µg/mLStandard Deviation 2.982
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 57 Day 18.891 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.053
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 61 Day 18.288 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.753
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 65 Day 18.698 µg/mLStandard Deviation 4.729
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 69 Day 17.603 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.144
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 73 Day 18.559 µg/mLStandard Deviation 3.68
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 77 Day 17.539 µg/mLStandard Deviation 2.555
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptCycle 81 Day 19.837 µg/mL
Luspatercept Extension PopulationSerum Concentration of LuspaterceptEOT (Day 1853)6.732 µg/mLStandard Deviation 4.356
Secondary

Time to HI-E in HTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

For HTB participants, HI-E was defined as RBC transfusion reduction ≥4 units during any rolling 8 weeks. HTB participants were those who required a transfusion of ≥4 units of RBCs in the 8 weeks prior to baseline. Per IWG 2006 response criteria, time to HI-E was defined as the first date of the rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response minus first dose date plus 1. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study.

Time frame: Any consecutive 8 weeks during the study (up to approximately 5 years)

Population: All enrolled HTB participants who received at lease one dose of luspatercept and had a HI-E.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationTime to HI-E in HTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria13 DaysStandard Deviation 22.6
Secondary

Time to HI-E in LTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria

For LTB participants, HI-E was defined as all Hgb increase ≥1.5 g/dL during any rolling 8 weeks window. LTB participants were those who received \<4 units of RBCs within 8 weeks prior to baseline. Per IWG 2006 response criteria, time to HI-E was defined as the first date of the rolling 8 weeks interval of showing response minus first dose date plus 1. Rolling 8 weeks was defined as any consecutive 8 weeks during the study. When there were multiple disjointed intervals with response, the longest interval was used.

Time frame: up to approximately 5 years

Population: All enrolled LTB participants who received at least one dose of luspatercept and had a HI-E.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Luspatercept Extension PopulationTime to HI-E in LTB Participants Per IWG 2006 Response Criteria83 DaysStandard Deviation 86.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026