Skip to content

B Cell Induction in Pediatric Lung Transplantation

B Cell Targeted Induction to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric Lung Transplantation (CTOTC-08)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02266888
Enrollment
45
Registered
2014-10-17
Start date
2015-01-22
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2021-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Transplant

Keywords

B cells, lung transplant recipient, rituximab, placebo, standard of care

Brief summary

In this study, doctors are trying to see if a study drug called rituximab (Rituxan®) will lower the number of B cells in the body. Doctors are also trying to see if decreasing B cells with rituximab (Rituxan®) can prevent injury to the transplanted lung. This treatment has been studied in other types of solid organ transplants.

Detailed description

Patients who receive a lung transplant are at risk for rejection of the transplanted lung(s). Rejection occurs when the new lung triggers the body's defense (immune) system. When the immune system is triggered special cells are sent out to destroy the new lung and eventually the lung may not be able to function as it should. These special cells include B cells. B cells are an important part of the immune system and help the body fight infection. One way B cells fight infection is by producing antibodies. B cells and the antibodies they produce are involved in some kinds of rejection after organ transplantation.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALRituximab (Rituxan®)

2 Doses: 375 mg/m\^2 on Day 0 (within 12 hours of return to ICU following transplant) and Day 12 (+/-2 days).

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Placebo for Rituximab (Rituxan®). 2 Doses: 375 mg/m\^2 on Day 0 (within 12 hours of return to ICU following transplant) and Day 12 (+/-2 days).

Sponsors

Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children
CollaboratorOTHER
Rho Federal Systems Division, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Enrollment: 1. Subject and/or parent guardian must be able to understand and provide informed consent; 2. Candidate for a primary lung transplant (listed for lung transplant); 3. Female and male subjects with reproductive potential must agree to use FDA approved methods of birth control for 12-months after completion of treatment. 4. Adequate bone marrow functions based on the following criteria: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC): \>1000mm\^3 * Platelets: \>100,000/mm\^3 * Hemoglobin: \>7 gm/dL * AST or ALT\< 2x Upper Limit of Normal unless related to primary disease Randomization: Individuals who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for randomization: 1. Serum IgG immunoglobulin level greater than lower level of normal for age based on local laboratory ranges or 400mg/dL within 90 days prior to randomization; 2. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 4 hours of transplant; 3. Negative for Hepatitis B infection (if at time of transplant, participant does not exhibit effective immunization, the participant should be re-tested).

Exclusion criteria

Enrollment: Individuals who meet any of these criteria are not eligible for enrollment as study participants: 1. Inability or unwillingness of a participant to give written informed consent or comply with study protocol; 2. Multi-organ transplant; 3. Previous treatment with rituximab (Rituxan®); 4. History of severe allergic anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies; 5. History of severe reaction to previous therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); 6. History of Burkholderia cenocepacia; 7. History of anti-CD20 therapy; 8. Persistent hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG \< lower level of normal for age based on local laboratory ranges or 400 gm/dL for \>2 months) and/or IVIG replacement therapy; 9. Positive blood culture, sepsis or other disease process with hemodynamic instability at time of enrollment; 10. Any history of serologic positivity to HIV, HBsAg, HBcAb and HCV Ab; 11. History of malignancy less than 2 years in remission of malignancy (any history of adequately treated in-situ cervical carcinoma, or adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin will be permitted); 12. Any condition, including psychiatric disorders, that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with study requirements; 13. Participation in another investigational trial within 4 weeks of enrollment; 14. Currently lactating or plans to become pregnant during the timeframe of the study follow-up period; 15. Past or current medical problems or findings from physical examination or laboratory testing that are not listed above, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may pose additional risks from participation in the study, may interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study requirements or that may impact the quality or interpretation of the data obtained from the study. Randomization: Individuals who meet any of these criteria are not eligible for randomization: 1. Use of an induction agent other than Thymoglobulin®; 2. Renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis or ultrafiltration; 3. Inability to obtain intravenous access; 4. Positive blood culture, sepsis or other disease process with hemodynamic instability at time of transplant; 5. Use of investigational agent(s) within 5 half-lives of the investigational drug or 4 weeks, whichever is longer; 6. Receipt of a MMR vaccine within 30 days prior to randomization; 7. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with study requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Earliest Time to Any of the Following Events: Chronic Allograft Dysfunction, Listed for Retransplant or DeathUp to 35 months post-transplantThis composite outcome measures is defined as the earliest time post-transplant to any of the following events during the follow-up period: * Chronic Allograft Dysfunction (defined as the occurrence of confirmed Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) grade 0-p or higher or a diagnosis of Obliterative Bronchiolitis (OB)), * Listed for re-transplant (e.g., second lung transplant), or * Death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants Diagnosed With Chronic Allograft DysfunctionUp to 35 months post-transplantChronic allograft dysfunction is defined as Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) ≥Grade 0p according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria, or biopsy proven histologic evidence of obliterans bronchiolitis. BOS is an indicator of post-transplant loss of lung function, a sign of allograft dysfunction that presents as a persistent decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25-75% (often accompanied by evidence of airway obstruction) that is not the result of other causes such as acute rejection, acute infection, and/or airway stenosis. * BOS grade: Spirometry % of baseline * 0: FEV1 \>90% and FEF25-75% \>75% * 0-p: FEV1 81-90% and FEF25-75% ≤75% * 1: FEV1 66-80% * 2: FEV1 51-65% * 3: FEV1 ≤50%
Percent of Participants Listed for Re-Transplant During the Study Follow-Up PeriodUp to 35 months post-transplantParticipants with a reported date of listing for a second lung transplant during the study follow-up period.
Percent of Participants Who Died During the Study Follow-Up PeriodUp to 35 months post-transplantParticipants with a reported date of death were considered to have met this outcome.
Percent of Participants With Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD)Up to 72 hours post-transplantThe International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation's (ISHLT) grading for Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) was used. The severity of PGD is graded 0 - 3 based on the presence or absence of diffuse opacities on chest radiograph and the ratio of arterial oxygen pressure to inspired oxygen concentration. The grading system predicts post-lung transplant outcomes with Grade 3 being the worse. Participants were classified as having PGD if graded as 2 or 3 at any time during the first 72 hours post-transplant.
Percent of Participants With Occurrence of Grade A Acute RejectionUp to 24 months post-transplantPulmonary allograft rejection was defined according to the 2007 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation's (ISHLT). Each transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) was evaluated by the local center's pathologist and graded as described below. Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) Grade Classification: * A0: None * A1: Minimal * A2: Mild * A3: Moderate * A4: Severe Participants met this outcome if at any point in time their biopsy was classified as A2, A3, or A4.
Percent of Participants With Occurrence of Antibody Mediated RejectionUp to 24 months post-transplantAntibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) was defined based on the revision of the 1996 Working Formulation for the Standardization of Nomenclature in the Diagnosis of Lung Rejection, the Pathology of pulmonary AMR and the 2012 update from the Pathology Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). AMR was diagnosed locally and graded as: * Grade I: Latent humoral response - Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) or autoantibody present and absence of both abnormal histology and unexplained graft dysfunction * Grade II: Subclinical humoral rejection - DSA or autoantibody present and abnormal histology present with an absence of unexplained graft dysfunction * Grade III: Humoral rejection - DSA or autoantibody present and abnormal histology present and unexplained graft dysfunction present. Higher grades indicate more severe AMR. Participants were considered to have met this outcome if at any point in time their biopsy was classified as Grade II or III.
Percent of Participants Meeting Tacrolimus Variability ThresholdUp to 24 months post-transplantTacrolimus trough levels are generally collected post-transplant to allow clinicians to monitor transplant recipients' adherence to prescribed tacrolimus dosing. This outcome was designed for research purposes as an indicator of adherence to tacrolimus over time. Beginning at 3 months post-transplant, a rolling standard deviation (SD) was estimated for each participant who had at least 3 outpatient trough levels collected and recorded. The estimated SD could derive from up to 1 year worth of trough levels at any given time. The larger the SD (variation) of tacrolimus levels, the greater the nonadherence of participant(s) taking tacrolimus as prescribed. Nonadherence is a major reason for post-transplant morbidity. Participants were considered to have met this outcome, the tacrolimus variability threshold, if their estimated SD of tacrolimus medication levels at any time was 2.0 ng/mL or greater.
Percent of Participants Meeting Tacrolimus Variability Threshold Who Completed Tacrolimus Variability InterventionUp to 27 months post-transplantFor participants who met the Tacrolimus Variability Threshold and agreed to participate in the Tacrolimus Variability Intervention (TVI), a series of calls with the participant, parent(s)/guardian(s), and trained call center personnel were conducted to address barriers to adherence. Refer to Outcome Measure 8 for a description of tacrolimus variability threshold methodology.
Magnitude of Change in Standard Deviation of Tacrolimus Levels Following InterventionUp to 19 months post-transplantStandard deviation (SD) is a number that describes how a group of measurements are spread out around the average value for that group. A low SD value means the numbers are close to the average; a high SD means the numbers are more spread out. The change in SD of tacrolimus levels was calculated by subtracting each participant's pre-intervention SD from their SD 180 days after enrollment into the intervention (i.e., value of SD 180 days after enrollment minus value of SD before enrollment). A change less than zero (i.e., a negative number) would indicate a decrease in SD, which is good, possibly as a result of the intervention.
Percent of Participants Experiencing an Infection EpisodeUp to 24 months post-transplantDefined by: * A local report of bacterial, fungal, or viral infection through either the organism specific case report form (CRF) or adverse event reporting; or * Presence of symptoms at the time of a study visit without a local report of infection but with a corresponding Core Lab identified viral infection * All symptoms reported at the time of a study visit were evaluated for any Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections identified by the Core Lab * For any other infections identified in Core Lab Nasopharyngeal (NP) and Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) biospecimens: shortness of breath, new x-ray or other imaging finding, new supplemental oxygen requirement, cough with sputum, and decreased spirometry were evaluated signs/symptoms. Participants were considered to have met this outcome if at any point in time they had an infection meeting the referenced criteria.
Number of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesUp to 24 months post-transplantThe severity of infection episodes was determined by the site Principal Investigator (PI) using the adverse event (AE) scale of mild to moderate (Grade \<3), severe (Grade 3), life-threatening (Grade 4), or fatal (Grade 5). Since the protocol restricted AE reporting to only those events which met National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 grading criteria of Grade 3 (moderate) or higher, any infection not reported as an AE was assigned a severity of Grade \<3 (effectively combining Grades 1 and 2); all other infections utilized the assigned CTCAE severity grade of the corresponding AE. A higher severity grade indicates a more severe event.
Percent of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Related to RituximabUp to 35 months post-transplantThe percentage of participants with Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as determined by the trial's medical monitor to be related to rituximab is reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Seven sites in the United States enrolled 45 participants into this trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab
Induction: Rituximab was administered in two 375 mg/m\^2 doses: on Day 0 within 12 hours of return to ICU following transplant and on Day 12 (+/-2 days). Standard of care immunosuppression (thymoglobulin induction, tacrolimus or equivalent, MMF or equivalent, and steroids) was also utilized at each site.
15
Placebo
Induction: Rituximab placebo was administered in two 375 mg/m\^2 doses: on Day 0 within 12 hours of return to ICU following transplant and on Day 12 (+/-2 days). Standard of care immunosuppression (thymoglobulin induction, tacrolimus or equivalent, MMF or equivalent, and steroids) was also utilized at each site.
12
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath2242
Overall StudyNo Longer Eligible0002
Overall StudyPersonnel unavailable at transplant0001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0122
Overall StudyRandomization Closed0040
Overall StudyStudy Terminated5100
Overall StudyTransfer of care0010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRituximabPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
15 Participants11 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous12.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.55
13.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.47
12.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.44
Donor and Recipient Gender
Female Donor, Female Recipient
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Donor and Recipient Gender
Female Donor, Male Recipient
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Donor and Recipient Gender
Male Donor, Female Recipient
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Donor and Recipient Gender
Male Donor, Male Recipient
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Pre-Transplant Lung Allocation Score (LAS) Diagnosis Group
Group A
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Pre-Transplant Lung Allocation Score (LAS) Diagnosis Group
Group B
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Pre-Transplant Lung Allocation Score (LAS) Diagnosis Group
Group C
8 Participants10 Participants18 Participants
Pre-Transplant Lung Allocation Score (LAS) Diagnosis Group
Group D
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 153 / 124 / 112 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 154 / 120 / 110 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 159 / 123 / 113 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Earliest Time to Any of the Following Events: Chronic Allograft Dysfunction, Listed for Retransplant or Death

This composite outcome measures is defined as the earliest time post-transplant to any of the following events during the follow-up period: * Chronic Allograft Dysfunction (defined as the occurrence of confirmed Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) grade 0-p or higher or a diagnosis of Obliterative Bronchiolitis (OB)), * Listed for re-transplant (e.g., second lung transplant), or * Death.

Time frame: Up to 35 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RituximabEarliest Time to Any of the Following Events: Chronic Allograft Dysfunction, Listed for Retransplant or DeathNA Days
PlaceboEarliest Time to Any of the Following Events: Chronic Allograft Dysfunction, Listed for Retransplant or Death703 Days
p-value: 0.51490% CI: [0.248, 1.826]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Magnitude of Change in Standard Deviation of Tacrolimus Levels Following Intervention

Standard deviation (SD) is a number that describes how a group of measurements are spread out around the average value for that group. A low SD value means the numbers are close to the average; a high SD means the numbers are more spread out. The change in SD of tacrolimus levels was calculated by subtracting each participant's pre-intervention SD from their SD 180 days after enrollment into the intervention (i.e., value of SD 180 days after enrollment minus value of SD before enrollment). A change less than zero (i.e., a negative number) would indicate a decrease in SD, which is good, possibly as a result of the intervention.

Time frame: Up to 19 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion, which was subset to participants who qualified for and agreed to participate in the TVI and who had both a pre-TVI and post-TVI measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabMagnitude of Change in Standard Deviation of Tacrolimus Levels Following InterventionPre-TVI enrollment3.95 Standard deviation per participantStandard Deviation 1.664
RituximabMagnitude of Change in Standard Deviation of Tacrolimus Levels Following Intervention180 Days after TVI enrollment3.03 Standard deviation per participantStandard Deviation 0.948
PlaceboMagnitude of Change in Standard Deviation of Tacrolimus Levels Following InterventionPre-TVI enrollment5.18 Standard deviation per participantStandard Deviation 2.423
PlaceboMagnitude of Change in Standard Deviation of Tacrolimus Levels Following Intervention180 Days after TVI enrollment2.86 Standard deviation per participantStandard Deviation 1.636
Comparison: This is not a comparison between treatment groups, but rather a comparison between timepoints.The Rituximab and Placebo groups were combined for purposes of testing the hypothesis that there would be no change in SD between pre-enrollment and 180 days post-enrollment into the TVI.p-value: 0.01590% CI: [-2.64, -0.6]Paired t-Test
Secondary

Number of Participants With Severity of Infection Episodes

The severity of infection episodes was determined by the site Principal Investigator (PI) using the adverse event (AE) scale of mild to moderate (Grade \<3), severe (Grade 3), life-threatening (Grade 4), or fatal (Grade 5). Since the protocol restricted AE reporting to only those events which met National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 grading criteria of Grade 3 (moderate) or higher, any infection not reported as an AE was assigned a severity of Grade \<3 (effectively combining Grades 1 and 2); all other infections utilized the assigned CTCAE severity grade of the corresponding AE. A higher severity grade indicates a more severe event.

Time frame: Up to 24 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RituximabNumber of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesGrade 3 (Severe)8 Participants
RituximabNumber of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesGrade < 3 (Mild to Moderate)4 Participants
RituximabNumber of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesGrade 4 (Life-threatening or Disabling)1 Participants
RituximabNumber of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesGrade 5 (Fatal)2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesGrade 5 (Fatal)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesGrade 4 (Life-threatening or Disabling)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesGrade < 3 (Mild to Moderate)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severity of Infection EpisodesGrade 3 (Severe)7 Participants
p-value: 0.502Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent of Participants Diagnosed With Chronic Allograft Dysfunction

Chronic allograft dysfunction is defined as Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) ≥Grade 0p according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria, or biopsy proven histologic evidence of obliterans bronchiolitis. BOS is an indicator of post-transplant loss of lung function, a sign of allograft dysfunction that presents as a persistent decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25-75% (often accompanied by evidence of airway obstruction) that is not the result of other causes such as acute rejection, acute infection, and/or airway stenosis. * BOS grade: Spirometry % of baseline * 0: FEV1 \>90% and FEF25-75% \>75% * 0-p: FEV1 81-90% and FEF25-75% ≤75% * 1: FEV1 66-80% * 2: FEV1 51-65% * 3: FEV1 ≤50%

Time frame: Up to 35 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who 1.) Received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion and 2.) Had at least one biopsy evaluable for OB and sufficient pulmonary function tests for evaluation of BOS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants Diagnosed With Chronic Allograft Dysfunction28.6 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants Diagnosed With Chronic Allograft Dysfunction27.3 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants Experiencing an Infection Episode

Defined by: * A local report of bacterial, fungal, or viral infection through either the organism specific case report form (CRF) or adverse event reporting; or * Presence of symptoms at the time of a study visit without a local report of infection but with a corresponding Core Lab identified viral infection * All symptoms reported at the time of a study visit were evaluated for any Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections identified by the Core Lab * For any other infections identified in Core Lab Nasopharyngeal (NP) and Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) biospecimens: shortness of breath, new x-ray or other imaging finding, new supplemental oxygen requirement, cough with sputum, and decreased spirometry were evaluated signs/symptoms. Participants were considered to have met this outcome if at any point in time they had an infection meeting the referenced criteria.

Time frame: Up to 24 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants Experiencing an Infection Episode100 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants Experiencing an Infection Episode100 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Related to Rituximab

The percentage of participants with Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as determined by the trial's medical monitor to be related to rituximab is reported.

Time frame: Up to 35 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Related to Rituximab73.3 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Related to Rituximab58.3 Percent of Participants
p-value: 0.448Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percent of Participants Listed for Re-Transplant During the Study Follow-Up Period

Participants with a reported date of listing for a second lung transplant during the study follow-up period.

Time frame: Up to 35 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants Listed for Re-Transplant During the Study Follow-Up Period0 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants Listed for Re-Transplant During the Study Follow-Up Period8.3 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants Meeting Tacrolimus Variability Threshold

Tacrolimus trough levels are generally collected post-transplant to allow clinicians to monitor transplant recipients' adherence to prescribed tacrolimus dosing. This outcome was designed for research purposes as an indicator of adherence to tacrolimus over time. Beginning at 3 months post-transplant, a rolling standard deviation (SD) was estimated for each participant who had at least 3 outpatient trough levels collected and recorded. The estimated SD could derive from up to 1 year worth of trough levels at any given time. The larger the SD (variation) of tacrolimus levels, the greater the nonadherence of participant(s) taking tacrolimus as prescribed. Nonadherence is a major reason for post-transplant morbidity. Participants were considered to have met this outcome, the tacrolimus variability threshold, if their estimated SD of tacrolimus medication levels at any time was 2.0 ng/mL or greater.

Time frame: Up to 24 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion and who had at least 3 outpatient tacrolimus trough levels collected that were at least 3 months post-transplant.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants Meeting Tacrolimus Variability Threshold93.3 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants Meeting Tacrolimus Variability Threshold100 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants Meeting Tacrolimus Variability Threshold Who Completed Tacrolimus Variability Intervention

For participants who met the Tacrolimus Variability Threshold and agreed to participate in the Tacrolimus Variability Intervention (TVI), a series of calls with the participant, parent(s)/guardian(s), and trained call center personnel were conducted to address barriers to adherence. Refer to Outcome Measure 8 for a description of tacrolimus variability threshold methodology.

Time frame: Up to 27 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion, which was subset to participants who qualified for and agreed to participate in the TVI.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants Meeting Tacrolimus Variability Threshold Who Completed Tacrolimus Variability Intervention85.7 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants Meeting Tacrolimus Variability Threshold Who Completed Tacrolimus Variability Intervention100 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants Who Died During the Study Follow-Up Period

Participants with a reported date of death were considered to have met this outcome.

Time frame: Up to 35 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants Who Died During the Study Follow-Up Period13.3 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants Who Died During the Study Follow-Up Period25.0 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Occurrence of Antibody Mediated Rejection

Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR) was defined based on the revision of the 1996 Working Formulation for the Standardization of Nomenclature in the Diagnosis of Lung Rejection, the Pathology of pulmonary AMR and the 2012 update from the Pathology Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). AMR was diagnosed locally and graded as: * Grade I: Latent humoral response - Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) or autoantibody present and absence of both abnormal histology and unexplained graft dysfunction * Grade II: Subclinical humoral rejection - DSA or autoantibody present and abnormal histology present with an absence of unexplained graft dysfunction * Grade III: Humoral rejection - DSA or autoantibody present and abnormal histology present and unexplained graft dysfunction present. Higher grades indicate more severe AMR. Participants were considered to have met this outcome if at any point in time their biopsy was classified as Grade II or III.

Time frame: Up to 24 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants With Occurrence of Antibody Mediated Rejection0 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Occurrence of Antibody Mediated Rejection16.7 Percent of Participants
p-value: 0.188Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Occurrence of Grade A Acute Rejection

Pulmonary allograft rejection was defined according to the 2007 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation's (ISHLT). Each transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) was evaluated by the local center's pathologist and graded as described below. Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) Grade Classification: * A0: None * A1: Minimal * A2: Mild * A3: Moderate * A4: Severe Participants met this outcome if at any point in time their biopsy was classified as A2, A3, or A4.

Time frame: Up to 24 months post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants With Occurrence of Grade A Acute Rejection13.3 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Occurrence of Grade A Acute Rejection16.7 Percent of Participants
p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD)

The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation's (ISHLT) grading for Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) was used. The severity of PGD is graded 0 - 3 based on the presence or absence of diffuse opacities on chest radiograph and the ratio of arterial oxygen pressure to inspired oxygen concentration. The grading system predicts post-lung transplant outcomes with Grade 3 being the worse. Participants were classified as having PGD if graded as 2 or 3 at any time during the first 72 hours post-transplant.

Time frame: Up to 72 hours post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least a portion of the initial rituximab or placebo infusion and had available blood gas (e.g., arterial oxygen pressure) data during the first 72 hours post-transplant.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercent of Participants With Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD)25.0 Percent of Participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD)14.3 Percent of Participants
p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026