Skip to content

Ranolazine Among Unrevascularized Chronic Stable Angina Patients

Improvement of Subjective Well-Being by Ranolazine Among Unrevascularized Chronic Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02265796
Acronym
IMWELL
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-10-16
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2019-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angina

Keywords

deferred percutaneous coronary intervention, fractional flow reserve

Brief summary

This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-center (North Florida- South Georgia VA Medical Center) study. The study objective is to determine if ranolazine improves angina symptoms at 4 months compared with placebo among stable coronary artery disease patients who have demonstrable myocardial ischemia, but who do not undergo revascularization

Detailed description

This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-center (North Florida- South Georgia VA Medical Center) study. The study objective is to determine if ranolazine improves angina symptoms at 4 months compared with placebo among stable coronary artery disease patients who have demonstrable myocardial ischemia, but who do not undergo revascularization. Baseline Procedure: Assessments performed exclusively to determine eligibility for this study would be done only after obtaining informed consent. Assessments performed for clinical indications (not exclusively to determine study eligibility) may be used for baseline values even if the studies were done before informed consent was obtained. The assessment will include: * Informed Consent * Review subject eligibility criteria * FFR value calculated at the time of cardiac catheterization * Review previous and concomitant medications * Frequency of symptoms and quality of life prior to study according to Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Screening Visit: The assessments to determine eligibility are: * Review of eligibility criteria * Review of cardiac catheterization and FFR * Review of medications taken in the past 30 days Subjects that meet eligibility criteria will be randomized to receive either the active drug, Ranolazine or a matching placebo (non-active drug). Staff and subjects will not know if the subject will be receiving the active drug or the placebo. Drug schedule will be as follows: * 1st dose of one tablet (500mg) will begin the evening of Day 1 * On Days 2-7, one tablet (500mg) two times a day (12-hours apart). * On Day 8, increase dose of study drug to two tablets (1000mg) twice a day; once in the morning and once in the evening, 12 hours apart. This dose will continue for the duration of the study. The study drug can be taken with or without food. Telephone Follow-up: One week phone calls will be made to determine well being, adverse events, answer questions and remind subjects to increase the study medication dose. Month 4 Follow-up: * Frequency of symptoms and quality of life according to Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) * Assessment of well-being * Any hospitalizations or the need for revascularization

Interventions

DRUGSugar pill

1. 500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then, 2. 500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks

DRUGRanolazine

Ranolazine 500mg tablet 1. 500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then, 2. 500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
North Florida Foundation for Research and Education
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients \>= 18 years of age referred for cardiac catheterization for evaluation of cardiac symptoms ( angina, fatigue, or shortness of breath) * At least 1 indeterminate stenosis (20-80%), * Fractional flow reserve (FFR) \<=0.8 and PCI deferred

Exclusion criteria

* Coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) during the index procedure or anticipated within the next month * acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock * QTc \> 500 milliseconds * use of strong inhibitors of CTP3A (i.e. ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin,nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, indinavir and saquinavir) * use of inducers of CYP3A (i.e. rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, and St. John's wort) * liver cirrhosis * sever renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine clearance \< 30mL/min/1.73 m2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksChange in baseline to 16 weeksThe SAQ quantifies patients' physical limitations caused by angina, the frequency of and recent changes in their symptoms, their satisfaction with treatment, and the degree to which they perceive their disease to affect their quality of life.Each of the 5 dimensions are scored by assigning eachresponse an ordinal value, beginning with 1 for the response that implies the lowest level of functioning, and summing across items within each of the 5 scales. Scale scores then transformed to 0-100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range1 / 3 Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)of the scale and multiplying by 100. No overall scale score is generated. Factors and Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life). .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Well BeingCompare from baseline to month 4overall feeling of well being determined from rating of excellent, good, fair or poor at baseline compared to same at month 4
Ischemia Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization4 monthNumber of participants who reported adverse events for ischemia driven revascularization or hospitalization

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

recruitment period first subject enrolled 9/24/2014 to last subject enrolled 12/12/2015

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ranolazine
Ranolazine 500 mg tablets 1. 500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then, 2. 500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks Ranolazine: Ranolazine 500mg tablet 1. 500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then, 2. 500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks
25
Sugar Pill
Sugar pill that looks like the drug ranolazine 500mg tablet 1. 500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then, 2. 500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks Sugar pill: 1. 500mg tablet two times per day for 7 days then, 2. 500mg tablet (1000mg) two times per day for 15 weeks
25
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall Studystarted on excluded medication10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRanolazineSugar PillTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants13 Participants28 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants12 Participants22 Participants
Diabetes mellitus14 Participants16 Participants30 Participants
history of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft surgery8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
history of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention19 Participants14 Participants33 Participants
Hyperlipidemia16 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Hypertension25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
on Insulin5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants25 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 250 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 2515 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 254 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 Weeks

The SAQ quantifies patients' physical limitations caused by angina, the frequency of and recent changes in their symptoms, their satisfaction with treatment, and the degree to which they perceive their disease to affect their quality of life.Each of the 5 dimensions are scored by assigning eachresponse an ordinal value, beginning with 1 for the response that implies the lowest level of functioning, and summing across items within each of the 5 scales. Scale scores then transformed to 0-100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range1 / 3 Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)of the scale and multiplying by 100. No overall scale score is generated. Factors and Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life). .

Time frame: Change in baseline to 16 weeks

Population: by intention to treat, 46 subjects had baseline and follow up SAQ data completed at 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Stablility 16 weeks58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Frequency group difference16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksPhysical Limitation 16 weeks40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksTreatment Satisfaction baseline80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngia Stability group difference19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksTreatment Statisfaction 16 weeks77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Stability baseline39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksTreatment Satisfaciton group difference-4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Frequency baseline65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksQuality of Life baseline37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksPhysical Limitation group difference-7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksQuality of Life 16 weeks56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Frequency 16 weeks81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksQuality of Life group difference21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
RanolazineSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksPhysical Limitation baseline48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksQuality of Life group difference18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksPhysical Limitation baseline50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksPhysical Limitation 16 weeks60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksPhysical Limitation group difference6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Stability baseline37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Stablility 16 weeks55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngia Stability group difference18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Frequency baseline64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Frequency 16 weeks80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksAngina Frequency group difference15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksTreatment Satisfaction baseline85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksTreatment Statisfaction 16 weeks82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksTreatment Satisfaciton group difference-3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksQuality of Life baseline45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Sugar PillSeattle Angina Questionnaire Score Change From Baseline to 16 WeeksQuality of Life 16 weeks63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Comparison: between group comparison for all SAQ domainsp-value: >0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: within group comparison of change from baselinep-value: >0.05paired t test
Comparison: within group comparison of change from baselinep-value: <0.05paired t test
Comparison: within group comparison of change from baselinep-value: >0.05paired t test
Comparison: within group comparison of change from baselinep-value: <0.05paired t test
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization

Number of participants who reported adverse events for ischemia driven revascularization or hospitalization

Time frame: 4 month

Population: the incidence of ischemia driven hospitalization or catheterization was assessed for all subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanolazineIschemia Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization3 Participants
Sugar PillIschemia Driven Revascularization or Hospitalization5 Participants
p-value: >0.05Fisher Exact
Secondary

Subjective Well Being

overall feeling of well being determined from rating of excellent, good, fair or poor at baseline compared to same at month 4

Time frame: Compare from baseline to month 4

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanolazineSubjective Well BeingBaselineexcellent/good9 Participants
RanolazineSubjective Well BeingBaselinefair/poor12 Participants
RanolazineSubjective Well BeingBaselinemissing1 Participants
RanolazineSubjective Well Being16 Weeksexcellent/good11 Participants
RanolazineSubjective Well Being16 Weeksfair/poor10 Participants
RanolazineSubjective Well Being16 Weeksmissing1 Participants
Sugar PillSubjective Well Being16 Weeksfair/poor10 Participants
Sugar PillSubjective Well BeingBaselineexcellent/good6 Participants
Sugar PillSubjective Well Being16 Weeksexcellent/good10 Participants
Sugar PillSubjective Well BeingBaselinefair/poor16 Participants
Sugar PillSubjective Well Being16 Weeksmissing4 Participants
Sugar PillSubjective Well BeingBaselinemissing2 Participants
Comparison: between group comparison for the excellent/goodp-value: 0.58Fisher Exact
Comparison: Between group analysis for fair/poorp-value: 0.8Fisher Exact
Comparison: within group analysis of change from baseline for excellent/goodp-value: 0.5McNemar
Comparison: within group comparison of change from baseline for fair/poorp-value: 0.48McNemar
Comparison: within group analysis of change from baseline for excellent/goodp-value: 0.19McNemar
Comparison: within group comparison of change from baseline for fair/poorp-value: 0.067McNemar

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026