Skip to content

A Multi-Center Study of Ibrutinib in Combination With Obinutuzumab Versus Chlorambucil in Combination With Obinutuzumab in Patients With Treatment naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL)

A Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib in Combination With Obinutuzumab Versus Chlorambucil in Combination With Obinutuzumab in Subjects With Treatment-naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02264574
Enrollment
229
Registered
2014-10-15
Start date
2014-10-06
Completion date
2019-09-03
Last updated
2020-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small-Cell Lymphoma

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab compared to chlorambucil in combination with obinutuzumab based on the Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment of progression free survival (PFS). Efficacy will be evaluated according to 2008 International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) criteria with the modification for treatment-related lymphocytosis, in subjects with treatment-naive CLL or SLL.

Interventions

DRUGIbrutinib

Ibrutinib will be supplied as 140 mg hard gelatin capsules for oral (PO) administration.

DRUGObinutuzumab

Obinutuzumab will be supplied as 1000 mg/40 mL solution in a single-use vial for intravenous (IV) administration

DRUGChlorambucil

Chlorambucil will be supplied as 2 mg film-coated tablets for oral (PO) administration

Sponsors

Pharmacyclics LLC.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Disease Related: 1. Diagnosis of CLL/SLL that meets IWCLL diagnostic criteria. 2. Age 65 yrs and older OR if less than 65 years, must have at least one of the following criteria: * Cumulative Illness Rating Score (CIRS) \>6 * Creatinine clearance estimated \<70 mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault equation. * Del 17p by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or TP53 mutation by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or Next Generation Sequencing 3. Active disease meeting at least 1 of the following IWCLL criteria for requiring treatment: * Evidence of progressive marrow failure as manifested by the development of, or worsening of, anemia and thrombocytopenia * Massive, progressive, or symptomatic splenomegaly * Massive nodes (at least 10 cm longest diameter), or progressive or symptomatic lymphadenopathy. * Progressive lymphocytosis with an increase of more than 50 percent over a 2-month period or a lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) of \<6 months. LDT may be obtained by linear regression extrapolation of absolute lymphocyte counts obtained at intervals of 2 weeks over an observation period of 2 to 3 months. In patients with initial blood lymphocyte counts of \<30,000/µL, LDT should not be used as a single parameter to define indication for treatment. In addition, factors contributing to lymphocytosis or lymphadenopathy other than CLL (eg, infections) should be excluded. * Autoimmune hemolytic anemia and/or immune thrombocytopenia that is poorly responsive to corticosteroids or other standard therapy. * Autoimmune hemolytic anemia is defined by at least one marker of hemolysis (indirect bilirubin above the upper limit of normal (ULN) not due to liver disease, increased lactate dehydrogenase (above ULN) without alternative etiology, or increased absolute reticulocytosis (above ULN) or bone marrow erythropoiesis in the absence of bleeding AND at least one marker direct or indirect autoimmune mechanism (positive direct antiglobulin for immunoglobulin G \[IgG\] or C3d, cold agglutinins). * Immune thrombocytopenia is defined by platelets ≤100,000/µL and increased megakaryocytes on the bone marrow exam. * Constitutional symptoms, defined as one or more of the following disease-related symptoms or signs, documented in the patient's record prior to randomization: * unintentional weight loss \>10 percent within 6 months prior to screening. * significant fatigue (inability to work or perform usual activities). * fevers \>100.5°F or 38.0°C for 2 or more weeks prior to screening without evidence of infection. * night sweats for more than 1 month prior to screening without evidence of infection. 4. Measurable nodal disease by computed tomography (CT), defined as at least 1 lymph node \>1.5 cm in the longest diameter in a site that has not been previously irradiated. An irradiated lesion may be assessed for measurable disease only if there has been documented progression in that lesion since radiotherapy has ended. Laboratory 5. Adequate hematologic function independent of transfusion and growth factor support for at least 7 days prior to screening and randomization. 6. Adequate hepatic and renal function 7. Men and women ≥ 18 years of age. 8. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any prior treatment of CLL or SLL 2. Evidence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement with primary disease of CLL/SLL 3. History of other malignancies, except: * Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no known active disease present for ≥3 years before the first dose of study drug and felt to be at low risk for recurrence by treating physician. 4. Uncontrolled autoimmune hemolytic anemia or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura 5. Known or suspected history of Richter's transformation. 6. Concurrent administration of \>20mg/day of prednisone within 7 days of randomization unless indicated for prophylaxis or management of allergic reactions (eg, contrast) 7. Known hypersensitivity to one or more study drugs 8. Vaccinated with live, attenuated vaccines within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug. 9. Any uncontrolled active systemic infection or an infection requiring systemic treatment that was completed ≤ 7 days before randomization. 10. Known bleeding disorders or hemophilia. 11. History of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage within 6 months prior to enrollment. 12. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). 13. Major surgery within 4 weeks of randomization. 14. Any life-threatening illness, medical condition, or organ system dysfunction that, in the investigator's opinion, could compromise the subject's safety or put the study outcomes at undue risk. 15. Currently active, clinically significant cardiovascular disease, such as uncontrolled arrhythmia or Class 3 or 4 congestive heart failure or a history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or acute coronary syndrome within 6 months prior to randomization. 16. Unable to swallow capsules or malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function, or resection of the stomach or small bowel, symptomatic inflammatory bowel disease or ulcerative colitis, or partial or complete bowel obstruction. 17. Concomitant use of warfarin or other vitamin K antagonists. 18. Requires treatment with a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor. 19. Lactating or pregnant 20. Unwilling or unable to participate in all required study evaluations and procedures. 21. Unable to understand the purpose and risks of the study and to provide a signed and dated informed consent form (ICF) and authorization to use protected health information (in accordance with national and local subject privacy regulations).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Analysis: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 30Month 30 (Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis [data cutoff date: 26 March 2018]).PFS was defined as time from the date randomization to the date of first IRC-confirmed disease progression (PD) or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of the use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy prior to documented PD or death. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria (Halleck et al) with the modification that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the absence of other signs or symptoms of disease progression was not considered progressive disease. The primary analysis was performed after observing 94 PFS events as pre-specified in the study protocol. As the median PFS was not reached in the experimental (IBR+OB) arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the PFS rate at 30 months (that is, the estimated percentage of participants with progression-free survival at Month 30) are presented.
Final Analysis: PFS Based on Investigator Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 48Month 48 (Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis [data cutoff date: 17 October 2019]).PFS was defined as time from the date randomization to the date of first investigator-confirmed PD or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of the use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy prior to documented PD or death. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria (Halleck et al) with the modification that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the absence of other signs or symptoms of disease progression was not considered progressive disease. As the median PFS was not reached in the experimental (IBR+OB) arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the PFS rate at 48 months (that is, the estimated percentage of participants with progression-free survival at Month 48) are presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Analysis: Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative ResponseMedian follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).Percentage of participants who achieved MRD-negative response, defined as \< 1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes as assessed by flow cytometry of a bone marrow aspirate per central laboratory. MRD samples were collected before initiation of subsequent antineoplastic treatment and MRD status was reported by central lab within 5 days after collection date. Participants with missing MRD data were considered non-responders.
Primary Analysis: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC AssessmentMedian follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).ORR, defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of protocol-specified complete response (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR), or partial response (PR) per IRC assessment at or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. Assessment of response included physical examination, radiographic imaging, and evaluation of blood and marrow (if applicable), evaluated in accordance with the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Halleck et al). CR, CRi, nPR, and PR required confirmation with 2 consecutive assessments that were at least 56 days apart and no use of blood supportive product and/or growth factor during this period. Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Primary Analysis: Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 30Month 30 (Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis [data cutoff date: 26 March 2018]).OS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. All deaths observed as the time of the analysis were considered as events. For participants who were not known to have died at the time of the analysis, OS data were censored at the date last known alive. As the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the OS rate (that is, the estimated percentage of participants still surviving at Month 30 \[primary analysis\]) are presented.
Primary Analysis: Rate of Grade ≥ 3 or Serious Infusion-Related Reaction (IRR) Adverse EventsMedian follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).Percentage of participants experiencing grade ≥ 3 (severe or life threatening) or serious IRR adverse events that started on the day of an obinutuzumab infusion and were assessed as related or possibly related to obinutuzumab. Categories included those events with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) dictionary preferred term of IRR and those events which are among the customized standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) for IRR.
Primary Analysis: Rate of Sustained Platelet ImprovementMedian follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).Percentage of participants with platelet counts increase ≥ 50% over baseline continuously for ≥ 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors.
Primary Analysis: Rate of Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EuroQol Five-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).Percentage of participants with EQ-5D-5L utility score increase ≥ 0.08 points over baseline at or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life, comprising 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the participant's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. A unique EQ-5D-5L health state is defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score is normalized from -0.594 to 1.000, with higher scores representing a better health state. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement. Participants with missing EQ-5D-5L data were considered not achieving clinically meaningful improvement.
Primary Analysis: PFS in High-Risk Sub-Population (del17p/TP53 Mutation/Del 11q) Based on IRC Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 30Month 30 (Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis [data cutoff date: 26 March 2018]).PFS was analyzed within the high-risk sub-population of participants with del17p or TP53 mutation or del 11q at baseline per central lab results. PFS was defined as time from the date randomization to the date of first IRC-confirmed PD or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of the use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy prior to documented PD or death. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Halleck et al) with the modification that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the absence of other signs or symptoms of PD was not considered progressive disease. As the median PFS was not reached in the experimental (IBR+OB) arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the PFS rate at 30 months (that is, the estimated percentage of participants with progression-free survival at Month 30) are presented.
Final Analysis: Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin ImprovementMedian follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis (data cutoff date: 17 October 2019).Percentage of participants with sustained hemoglobin improvement, defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 2 g/dL over baseline continuously for ≥ 56 days without blood transfusions or growth factors.
Final Analysis: Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative ResponseMedian follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis (data cutoff date: 17 October 2019).Percentage of participants who achieved MRD-negative response, defined as \< 1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes as assessed by flow cytometry of a bone marrow aspirate per central laboratory. MRD samples were collected before initiation of subsequent antineoplastic treatment and MRD status was reported by central lab within 5 days after collection date. Participants with missing MRD data were considered non-responders.
Final Analysis: ORR Based on Investigator AssessmentMedian follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis (data cutoff date: 17 October 2019).ORR, defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of protocol-specified CR, CRi, nPR or PR per investigator assessment at or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. Assessment of response included physical examination, radiographic imaging, and evaluation of blood and marrow (if applicable), evaluated in accordance with the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Halleck et al). CR, CRi, nPR, and PR required confirmation with 2 consecutive assessments that were at least 56 days apart and no use of blood supportive product and/or growth factor during this period. Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Final Analysis: Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 48Month 48 (Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis [data cutoff date: 17 October 2019]).OS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. All deaths observed as the time of the analysis were considered as events. For participants who were not known to have died at the time of the analysis, OS data were censored at the date last known alive. As the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier point estimates of the OS rate (that is, the estimated percentage of participants still surviving at Month 48 \[final analysis\]) are presented.
Final Analysis: Rate of Sustained Platelet ImprovementMedian follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis (data cutoff date: 17 October 2019).Percentage of participants with platelet counts increase ≥ 50% over baseline continuously for ≥ 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors.
Final Analysis: PFS in High-Risk Population (del17p/TP53 Mutation/Del 11q/Unmutated Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region [IGHV]) Based on Investigator Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 48Month 48 (Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis [data cutoff date: 17 October 2019]).PFS was analyzed within the high-risk population of participants with del17p or TP53 mutation or del 11q or IGHV unmutated at baseline per central lab results. PFS was defined as time from the date randomization to the date of first investigator-confirmed PD or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of the use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy prior to documented PD or death. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Halleck et al) with the modification that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the absence of other signs or symptoms of PD was not considered progressive disease. As the median PFS was not reached in the experimental (IBR+OB) arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the PFS rate at 48 months (that is, the estimated percentage of participants with progression-free survival at Month 48) are presented.
Primary Analysis: Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin ImprovementMedian follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).Percentage of participants with sustained hemoglobin improvement, defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 2 g/dL over baseline continuously for ≥ 56 days without blood transfusions or growth factors.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted in 71 sites: 8 in the US, 36 in the EU, and 27 sites in 6 additional countries (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Russia, Israel, Turkey). The first participant consented 06 October 2014. The last visit of the last participant was 03 September 2019, with a final database lock of 17 October 2019.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were required to have had a diagnosis of active CLL/SLL conformant to IWCLL 2008 criteria. All subjects were required to have measurable nodal disease. Key exclusion criteria included any previous CLL/SLL treatment; known lymphoma or leukemia of the central nervous system, history/current evidence of Richter's transformation.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IBR+OB
Ibrutinib (IBR) given orally at a dose of 420 mg/day until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Intravenous obinutuzumab (OB) given on Days 1 and 2 (100 mg on Day 1 and 900 mg on Day 2), 1000 mg on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of each cycle up to 6 cycles or until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
113
CLB+OB
Chlorambucil (CLB) given orally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight up to a total of 6 cycles on Days 1 and 15 of each cycle or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Intravenous obinutuzumab (OB) given on Days 1 and 2 (100 mg on Day 1 and 900 mg on Day 2), 1000 mg on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of each cycle up to 6 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
116
Total229

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath2121
Overall StudyOther, Not Specified03
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject86

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIBR+OBCLB+OBTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
91 Participants92 Participants183 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants24 Participants46 Participants
Age, Continuous70.0 years72.0 years71.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
109 Participants110 Participants219 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
109 Participants111 Participants220 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
6 participants8 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
8 participants6 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
5 participants11 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
13 participants15 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
0 participants9 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
11 participants9 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
17 participants9 participants26 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
8 participants3 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
15 participants13 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants11 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants37 Participants83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants79 Participants146 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
22 / 11321 / 115
other
Total, other adverse events
112 / 113111 / 115
serious
Total, serious adverse events
69 / 11341 / 115

Outcome results

Primary

Final Analysis: PFS Based on Investigator Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 48

PFS was defined as time from the date randomization to the date of first investigator-confirmed PD or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of the use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy prior to documented PD or death. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria (Halleck et al) with the modification that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the absence of other signs or symptoms of disease progression was not considered progressive disease. As the median PFS was not reached in the experimental (IBR+OB) arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the PFS rate at 48 months (that is, the estimated percentage of participants with progression-free survival at Month 48) are presented.

Time frame: Month 48 (Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis [data cutoff date: 17 October 2019]).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBFinal Analysis: PFS Based on Investigator Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 4874.0 percentage of participants
CLB+OBFinal Analysis: PFS Based on Investigator Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 4822.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.162, 0.389]Log Rank
Primary

Primary Analysis: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 30

PFS was defined as time from the date randomization to the date of first IRC-confirmed disease progression (PD) or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of the use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy prior to documented PD or death. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria (Halleck et al) with the modification that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the absence of other signs or symptoms of disease progression was not considered progressive disease. The primary analysis was performed after observing 94 PFS events as pre-specified in the study protocol. As the median PFS was not reached in the experimental (IBR+OB) arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the PFS rate at 30 months (that is, the estimated percentage of participants with progression-free survival at Month 30) are presented.

Time frame: Month 30 (Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis [data cutoff date: 26 March 2018]).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 3078.5 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 3031.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.145, 0.367]Log Rank
Secondary

Final Analysis: ORR Based on Investigator Assessment

ORR, defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of protocol-specified CR, CRi, nPR or PR per investigator assessment at or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. Assessment of response included physical examination, radiographic imaging, and evaluation of blood and marrow (if applicable), evaluated in accordance with the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Halleck et al). CR, CRi, nPR, and PR required confirmation with 2 consecutive assessments that were at least 56 days apart and no use of blood supportive product and/or growth factor during this period. Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis (data cutoff date: 17 October 2019).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBFinal Analysis: ORR Based on Investigator Assessment91.2 percentage of participants
CLB+OBFinal Analysis: ORR Based on Investigator Assessment81.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.027395% CI: [1.013, 1.25]Chi-squared
Secondary

Final Analysis: Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 48

OS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. All deaths observed as the time of the analysis were considered as events. For participants who were not known to have died at the time of the analysis, OS data were censored at the date last known alive. As the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier point estimates of the OS rate (that is, the estimated percentage of participants still surviving at Month 48 \[final analysis\]) are presented.

Time frame: Month 48 (Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis [data cutoff date: 17 October 2019]).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBFinal Analysis: Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 4880.5 percentage of participants
CLB+OBFinal Analysis: Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 4881.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.793495% CI: [0.595, 1.973]Log Rank
Secondary

Final Analysis: PFS in High-Risk Population (del17p/TP53 Mutation/Del 11q/Unmutated Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region [IGHV]) Based on Investigator Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 48

PFS was analyzed within the high-risk population of participants with del17p or TP53 mutation or del 11q or IGHV unmutated at baseline per central lab results. PFS was defined as time from the date randomization to the date of first investigator-confirmed PD or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of the use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy prior to documented PD or death. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Halleck et al) with the modification that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the absence of other signs or symptoms of PD was not considered progressive disease. As the median PFS was not reached in the experimental (IBR+OB) arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the PFS rate at 48 months (that is, the estimated percentage of participants with progression-free survival at Month 48) are presented.

Time frame: Month 48 (Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis [data cutoff date: 17 October 2019]).

Population: High-Risk Population Analysis Set: participants with del17p or TP53 mutation or del 11q or IGHV unmutated at baseline per central lab results.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBFinal Analysis: PFS in High-Risk Population (del17p/TP53 Mutation/Del 11q/Unmutated Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region [IGHV]) Based on Investigator Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 4870.3 percentage of participants
CLB+OBFinal Analysis: PFS in High-Risk Population (del17p/TP53 Mutation/Del 11q/Unmutated Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable Region [IGHV]) Based on Investigator Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 488.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.102, 0.282]Log Rank
Secondary

Final Analysis: Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response

Percentage of participants who achieved MRD-negative response, defined as \< 1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes as assessed by flow cytometry of a bone marrow aspirate per central laboratory. MRD samples were collected before initiation of subsequent antineoplastic treatment and MRD status was reported by central lab within 5 days after collection date. Participants with missing MRD data were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis (data cutoff date: 17 October 2019).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBFinal Analysis: Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response24.8 percentage of participants
CLB+OBFinal Analysis: Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response17.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.1612Chi-squared
Secondary

Final Analysis: Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement

Percentage of participants with sustained hemoglobin improvement, defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 2 g/dL over baseline continuously for ≥ 56 days without blood transfusions or growth factors.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis (data cutoff date: 17 October 2019).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBFinal Analysis: Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement44.2 percentage of participants
CLB+OBFinal Analysis: Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement44.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.9657Chi-squared
Secondary

Final Analysis: Rate of Sustained Platelet Improvement

Percentage of participants with platelet counts increase ≥ 50% over baseline continuously for ≥ 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 44.6 months at the time of the final analysis (data cutoff date: 17 October 2019).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBFinal Analysis: Rate of Sustained Platelet Improvement30.1 percentage of participants
CLB+OBFinal Analysis: Rate of Sustained Platelet Improvement14.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.005Chi-squared
Secondary

Primary Analysis: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Assessment

ORR, defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of protocol-specified complete response (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR), or partial response (PR) per IRC assessment at or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. Assessment of response included physical examination, radiographic imaging, and evaluation of blood and marrow (if applicable), evaluated in accordance with the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Halleck et al). CR, CRi, nPR, and PR required confirmation with 2 consecutive assessments that were at least 56 days apart and no use of blood supportive product and/or growth factor during this period. Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Assessment88.5 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on IRC Assessment73.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: 0.003595% CI: [1.062, 1.373]Chi-squared
Secondary

Primary Analysis: Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 30

OS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. All deaths observed as the time of the analysis were considered as events. For participants who were not known to have died at the time of the analysis, OS data were censored at the date last known alive. As the median OS was not reached in either treatment arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the OS rate (that is, the estimated percentage of participants still surviving at Month 30 \[primary analysis\]) are presented.

Time frame: Month 30 (Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis [data cutoff date: 26 March 2018]).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 3085.5 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Overall Survival (OS) - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 3084.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: 0.805795% CI: [0.479, 1.772]Log Rank
Secondary

Primary Analysis: PFS in High-Risk Sub-Population (del17p/TP53 Mutation/Del 11q) Based on IRC Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 30

PFS was analyzed within the high-risk sub-population of participants with del17p or TP53 mutation or del 11q at baseline per central lab results. PFS was defined as time from the date randomization to the date of first IRC-confirmed PD or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, regardless of the use of subsequent antineoplastic therapy prior to documented PD or death. Assessment of PD was conducted in accordance with the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Halleck et al) with the modification that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the absence of other signs or symptoms of PD was not considered progressive disease. As the median PFS was not reached in the experimental (IBR+OB) arm at the time of the analysis, Kaplan Meier landmark estimates of the PFS rate at 30 months (that is, the estimated percentage of participants with progression-free survival at Month 30) are presented.

Time frame: Month 30 (Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis [data cutoff date: 26 March 2018]).

Population: High-Risk Sub-Population Analysis Set: participants with del17p or TP53 mutation or del 11q at baseline per central lab results.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: PFS in High-Risk Sub-Population (del17p/TP53 Mutation/Del 11q) Based on IRC Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 3082.4 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: PFS in High-Risk Sub-Population (del17p/TP53 Mutation/Del 11q) Based on IRC Assessment - Kaplan Meier Landmark Estimates at Month 3014.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.046, 0.307]Log Rank
Secondary

Primary Analysis: Rate of Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EuroQol Five-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)

Percentage of participants with EQ-5D-5L utility score increase ≥ 0.08 points over baseline at or prior to initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized non-disease specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life, comprising 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe the participant's current health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. A unique EQ-5D-5L health state is defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score is normalized from -0.594 to 1.000, with higher scores representing a better health state. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement. Participants with missing EQ-5D-5L data were considered not achieving clinically meaningful improvement.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants with a baseline and post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EuroQol Five-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)54.9 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Clinically Meaningful Improvement in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EuroQol Five-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)56.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: 0.859Chi-squared
Secondary

Primary Analysis: Rate of Grade ≥ 3 or Serious Infusion-Related Reaction (IRR) Adverse Events

Percentage of participants experiencing grade ≥ 3 (severe or life threatening) or serious IRR adverse events that started on the day of an obinutuzumab infusion and were assessed as related or possibly related to obinutuzumab. Categories included those events with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) dictionary preferred term of IRR and those events which are among the customized standardized MedDRA query (SMQ) for IRR.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Grade ≥ 3 or Serious Infusion-Related Reaction (IRR) Adverse EventsIRR (Preferred Term)2.7 percentage of participants
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Grade ≥ 3 or Serious Infusion-Related Reaction (IRR) Adverse EventsBy Customized SMQ4.4 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Grade ≥ 3 or Serious Infusion-Related Reaction (IRR) Adverse EventsIRR (Preferred Term)8.6 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Grade ≥ 3 or Serious Infusion-Related Reaction (IRR) Adverse EventsBy Customized SMQ9.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: IRR Preferred Term~To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: 0.0835Fisher Exact
Comparison: IRR By Customized SMQ~To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: 0.1944Fisher Exact
Secondary

Primary Analysis: Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response

Percentage of participants who achieved MRD-negative response, defined as \< 1 CLL cell per 10,000 leukocytes as assessed by flow cytometry of a bone marrow aspirate per central laboratory. MRD samples were collected before initiation of subsequent antineoplastic treatment and MRD status was reported by central lab within 5 days after collection date. Participants with missing MRD data were considered non-responders.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response20.4 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response17.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: 0.5465Chi-squared
Secondary

Primary Analysis: Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement

Percentage of participants with sustained hemoglobin improvement, defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 2 g/dL over baseline continuously for ≥ 56 days without blood transfusions or growth factors.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement39.8 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement44.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: 0.5253Chi-squared
Secondary

Primary Analysis: Rate of Sustained Platelet Improvement

Percentage of participants with platelet counts increase ≥ 50% over baseline continuously for ≥ 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 31.3 months at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff date: 26 March 2018).

Population: Intent to Treat population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IBR+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Sustained Platelet Improvement29.2 percentage of participants
CLB+OBPrimary Analysis: Rate of Sustained Platelet Improvement13.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: To preserve the study wise type I error rate of 0.05, the primary and secondary endpoints were tested based on serial gatekeeping testing procedure at the two-sided significance level of 0.05 according to the hierarchical order of the primary analysis outcome measures presented in this record.p-value: 0.0045Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026