Skip to content

Pilot Study Using a Pulse Oximeter Derived Photo-plethysmographic Waveform to Guide Hemodialysis Ultrafiltration

Use of Pulse Oximeter Derived Photo-plethysmographic Waveform to Guide Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients to Achieve Euvolemia While Minimizing Intra-dialytic Hypotension

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02264522
Enrollment
10
Registered
2014-10-15
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2016-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypervolemia, Intradialytic Hypotension

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to use the photo-plethysmographic \[PPG\] waveform signal to guide the dialysis and ultrafiltration \[UF\] of chronic maintenance hemodialysis patients, and to further the investigators understanding of homeostasis in hemodialysis. The investigators hypothesize that the signals generated from the PPG device along with traditional monitoring and nursing judgment, will allow experienced, oriented staff to anticipate hemodynamic instability, intervene to prevent or mitigate the intradialytic hypotention \[IDH\], forestalling the onset of non-facilitating compensatory reflexes that preclude the patient from achieving an appropriate post-dialysis weight consistent with euvolemia. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the nephrologist and staff will be able to wean patients from anti-hypertensive medications and craft patient specific dialysis orders and UF profiles that achieve consistent, comfortable treatment to appropriate end points. The study aims include: Aim 1: To confirm the temporal sequence of PPG signals and changes in BP in routine hemodialysis. Aim 2: To refine further the predictive algorithms of PPG, augmented with continuous cardiac event monitoring (pre-intra-post hemodialysis) Aim 3: To develop targeted interventions to reverse the cardiovascular stress indicated by the PPG and to maintain perfusion. Aim 4: To develop care paths approved by the medical staff and primary care nephrologist allowing RNs to respond to signals from the PPG.

Interventions

OTHERPlace dialysis chair into position 3.

Upon device notification event 1, place patient in dialysis chair position 3.

OTHERDecrease dialysate temperature.

Upon device notification event 2, decrease dialysate temperature by 0.5 degree centigrade.

OTHERDecrease ultrafiltration rate by 25%.

Upon device notification event 3, decrease ultrafiltration rate by 25% from baseline ultrafiltration rate.

OTHERDecrease ultrafiltration rate by 50%.

Upon device notification event 4, decrease ultrafiltration rate by 50% from baseline ultrafiltration rate.

Sponsors

Centers for Dialysis Care, Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Intelomed, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 years 2. On dialysis \> 6 months with a stable dialysis program 3. Consistent achievement of a spKt/V ≥ 1.2 4. HGB ≥ 10 gm% ± ESA support 5. Consistent failure to achieve a post weight ≤ dry weight + 0.5Kg 6. Able to give informed consent directly 7. Frequent hypotensive reactions (≥ 1 / treatment in 4 of last 8 treatments) * Symptoms of hypotension * Intervention administered because of IDH (saline, turn downs, early termination, trendelenberg position) * Drop in BP irrespective of symptoms. SBP \< 90 mmHG intra or post HD if pre SBP was \> 110 mmHG; SBP \< 85 mmHG or 15 mmHG drop from start if starting BP ≤ 110 mmHG. * Or judged by the nursing staff to be difficult to achieve dry weight.

Exclusion criteria

1. Dialysis Catheter Access that may interfere with continuous data collection, per PI determination. (Catheter access is a relative exclusion based on the history of catheter performance.) 2. Cognitive Impairment precluding cooperation, and consent 3. Restless or unlikely to wear the monitor head-band 4. Too unstable in the judgment of their nephrologist to be included in a study of this nature.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between prescribed dry weight and actual measured weight at end of dialysis session.8 weeksPercent difference between prescribed dry weight and actual weight at end of dialysis session.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026