Skip to content

A Intra-patient Comparison of Closed Loop and Plate Haptic Toric Intraocular Lenses

A Randomised Intra-patient Comparison of Closed Loop and Plate Haptic Toric, Aspheric, Aberration Neutral, Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses in Patients With Bilateral Astigmatism

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02264457
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-10-15
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2020-01-31
Last updated
2019-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Keywords

Lenses, Intraocular

Brief summary

During cataract surgery an artificial lens is implanted in the eye. These artificial lenses are called intraocular lenses (IOLs) and there are many different types of IOL designs. Your eyes have astigmatism, which is a normal and common characteristic of the eye. If left uncorrected the astigmatism would mean that you would need to wear spectacles for viewing distance objects. New IOL designs called toric IOLs help to correct the astigmatism to improve your vision after cataract surgery. This study has been designed to look at how well a toric IOL corrects this astigmatism so that you do not need to wear spectacles for viewing distance objects. There are many designs of these toric IOLs and for this study we are looking to compare two different designs of toric IOLs by putting one lens in your right eye and a different type of lens in your left eye. Both lenses are commercially available and are commonly implanted IOLs. Using new non-invasive methods we hope to be able to better judge the visual performance of these lenses and the ability of these lenses to correct astigmatism. In addition the study will involve imaging and examining the IOLs to determine the prevalence of any post-operative complications.

Interventions

DEVICET-flex Aspheric Toric IOL
DEVICEAT TORBI toric IOL

Sponsors

BMI Southend Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Plymouth
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 50-75 years, bilateral significant corneal astigmatism \>1.50D. * Requiring a Toric IOL within the following power range: * Sphere +6.00D to +30.00D * Cylinder +1.00D to +6.00D

Exclusion criteria

* Amblyopia, * predicted bilateral post-op corneal astigmatism of \<1.50D, * irregular astigmatism, * dilated pupil size smaller than 5mm, * macular pathology, * glaucoma, * retinal disease, * corneal disease, * abnormal iris, * pupil deformation and * any previous corneal or intraocular surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Best-corrected visual acuityVisit 1 (1-2 days post implantation), visit 2 (1-2 weeks post implantation), visit 3 (1-2 months post implantation) and visit 4 (3-4 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Manifest refractionVisit 1 (1-2 days post implantation), visit 2 (1-2 weeks post implantation), visit 3 (1-2 months post implantation) and visit 4 (3-4 months)
Rotational stabilityVisit 1 (1-2 days post implantation), visit 2 (1-2 weeks post implantation), visit 3 (1-2 months post implantation) and visit 4 (3-4 months)
IOL centrationVisit 1 (1-2 days post implantation), visit 2 (1-2 weeks post implantation), visit 3 (1-2 months post implantation) and visit 4 (3-4 months)
Prevalence of posterior capsular Opacificationvisit 4 (3-4 months)

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactPhillip J Buckhurst, PhD
phillip.buckhurst@plymouth.ac.uk+44 (0) 1752 588884

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026