Skip to content

Concussion Device Audiological Measures

Concussion Device Audiological Measures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02262507
Enrollment
410
Registered
2014-10-13
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2020-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Concussion, Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Brain, Hearing, MTBI

Brief summary

Significant morbidity, mortality, and related costs are caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI). A simple, effective, and lightweight device worn by athletes or war fighters in the field, designed to mitigate TBI resulting from blast trauma or concussive events, would save lives, and the huge costs currently being experienced for life-treatment of surviving victims. An externally-worn medical device that applies mild jugular compression according to the principle of the Queckenstedt Maneuver (the Device) is being developed by Q30 Labs, LLC (Q30). Initial research suggests that the Device has the potential to reduce the likelihood of TBI. The rationale for testing wideband absorbance and Oto-acoustics emissions (OAE) is that the investigators need a physiologic, non-invasive method to evaluate the brain responses to mild jugular compression across multiple age groups. To determine this with MR imaging is currently cost prohibitive. The investigators pilot data from the parent IRB indicates a consistent response measured via wideband absorbance in young adults. Therefore, a preliminary step to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the neck collar device is to employ this technology across a wide range of ages.

Detailed description

For the testing sessions, subjects may either come to our testing site or the investigators may bring the testing to their location (e.g. schools, work). The subjects will be fitted with a device around your neck, like a neck tie. The Device incorporates two bulges localized over the site of the internal jugular veins bilaterally. Experiments performed with jugular Doppler ultrasound demonstrate that while wearing the Device, flows within the jugular veins are reduced, while flow within the carotid arteries and all portions of the cerebrum are preserved (JA Fisher, unpublished data). Thus, application of the Device to the subject will not cause any untoward health risks (IRB# 2013-2240 safety testing performed on this Device). The pressure exerted by the Device on the region of the neck superficial to the internal jugular vein is akin to the pressure felt when a person yawns or wears a snugly fitting necktie. The methods are utilized in prior approved IRB (2013-2240).. Station I: Consent to Participate Each participant will review the Institutional Review Board approved consent to participate form prior to data collection. They will be given an adequate amount of time to ask questions to the study coordinator, or the person obtaining consent, and then make their decision to participate or not participate. If they wish to participate, they will be asked to sign the informed consent form. For middle school and high school subjects recruited via the investigators relationship with the schools, this station will be designated to review consent and assent forms to ensure that proper signatures have been obtained. Station II: Device Fitting and Ultrasound The subjects will be outfitted with the device by a staff member appropriately trained in fitting the device in the proper location. Station III: Wideband Absorbance and Oto-Acoustic Emissions This station will help determine the effectiveness of the device by measuring the auditory response of a clicking noise that will be non-invasively imparted into the subject's outer ear. For both tests, a soft silicone tip is placed into the outer ear, and sounds are delivered via a miniature speaker. For the wideband absorbance test, absorbed acoustic responses will be monitored to provide information on the operation of the collar device. These are measured as changes in the acoustic absorbance of the ear. For the oto-acoustic emission test, tones or clicks will be presented to the ear with the same soft ear probe and recording microphones pick up the oto-acoustic emission coming back from the outer hair cells of the inner ear. The computer averages and processes the responses in reference to a noise floor across a specified frequency range, displaying the results on the computer screen for the tester. The oto-acoustic emissions test also provides a brief hearing screening to determine if hearing is normal. Evidence indicates that wideband absorbance and oto-acoustic emissions will be altered with increased intracranial pressure, thus this simple, non-invasive exam will provide feedback on the effectiveness of the device. During the wideband absorbance and oto-acoustic emissions testing the study participants will also be fitted with a compressive circumferential neck collar which can provide variable and specific levels of pressure. The pressure is achieved by inflatable pods that sit adjacent to the trachea affixed to a non-stretch adjustable collar. Manual inflation is regulated and monitored by an experience operator/ technician through a bulb style pump and an electronic gauge. Testing will occur without pressure and then with pressures applied up to 40mmHg. Station IV: Hearing Assessment Otoscopy will be performed by an audiologist to note any ear blockages, such as wax or drainage for exclusion purposes. The oto-acoustic emissions test will be interpreted to determine if normal responses were obtained in each ear. If abnormal, a hearing screening using pure tone audiometry screening will be provided free of charge. In the event that the hearing screening is determined to be abnormal, the subject will receive the results which may be shared with their primary care provider to determine any need for referral for follow-up. If a subject is seen for follow-up at CCHMC following an abnormal hearing assessment, this visit and any follow up visits will not be paid for by this project and will be subject to insurance billing.

Interventions

DEVICEDevice Wearing

Q30 collar - collar designed to be worn around the neck to apply slight pressure to jugular veins. Each subject will undergo repeat oto-acoustic measures both wearing the device and not wearing the device

Sponsors

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* • Normal healthy volunteer * Able to provide written consent

Exclusion criteria

* • Unable to provide written consent * History of neurological deficits, previous cerebral infarction, or head trauma * Hydrocephalus * Known carotid hypersensitivity * Known increased intracranial pressure * Central vein thrombosis * Active concussion symptoms * Ventricular shunt or neurologic condition * Internal or external hardware that has been surgically placed in the neck * Any altered level of consciousness * Inability to sit still for 10 minutes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Undergoing Acoustic Reflectancewithin single dayNumber of participants undergoing acoustic reflectance with and without the compression collar

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Device Wearing
All subjects who meet the study criteria and volunteer to participate will be included in the study. Q Collar: Q30 collar - collar designed to be worn around the neck to apply slight pressure to jugular veins
410
Total410

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDevice Wearing
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
335 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
74 Participants
Age, Continuous18.5 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
410 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
251 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
159 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 410
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 410

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Undergoing Acoustic Reflectance

Number of participants undergoing acoustic reflectance with and without the compression collar

Time frame: within single day

Population: Subjects

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Device WearingNumber of Participants Undergoing Acoustic Reflectance410 participants
Non Device WearingNumber of Participants Undergoing Acoustic Reflectance410 participants
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026