Skip to content

Interest of Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) Delivery by EzPAP® After Cardiac Surgery in the Management of Postoperative Atelectasis

Evaluation of the Interest of Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) Delivery by EzPAP® Device Associated With Respiratory Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Postoperative Pulmonary Atelectasis in Patients After Cardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02262182
Acronym
PEPKIN
Enrollment
80
Registered
2014-10-10
Start date
2014-11-01
Completion date
2016-09-01
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Atelectasis

Keywords

Atelectasis, Respiratory physiotherapy, end expiratory pressure, EzPAP®, cardiac surgery

Brief summary

Pulmonary atelectasis is a frequent respiratory postoperative complication in cardiac surgery. Classically, the treatment of these patients is based on manual chest physiotherapy. Our objective is to evaluate the interest of association of positive end expiratory delivery sessions with the EzPAP® device. We perform a prospective monocentric, open label trial. Patients with atelectasis after scheduled cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are included. They benefit from manual chest therapy and are randomised to receive or not positive end expiratory pressure sessions twice a day. The primary endpoint is the effect of this treatment on atelectasis radiological score after 2 days of treatment. The secondary endpoints are: oxygen saturation(SpO2)/inspired oxygen(FiO2) ratio, qualitative evaluation of ventilatory function, respiratory & cardiac rate, pain, inspiratory pressure (sniff test), patient satisfaction, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay.

Interventions

OTHERKP group
OTHERKM group

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients admitted in ICU after cardiac surgery by sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass presenting a pulmonary atelectasis after extubation, diagnosed by chest X-ray in postoperative period (day1 to day 2). * Patients over 18 years of age * Informed patient

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiac arrhythmia * Hemodynamic instability (mean blood pressure \< 65 mmHg or \> 95 mmHg) * Respiratory rate \> 35/min * Undrained pneumothorax * Predictable trachea intubation or emergent surgery * Patient oral refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiological atelectasis scoreDay 2 post-inclusionThis score was first described by Pasquina P et al in 2004

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiological atelectasis scoreDays 1 and 3 post-inclusionThis score was first described by Pasquina P et al in 2004
SpO2/FiO2 ratioDays 1, 2 and 3 post inclusionThis ratio is measured before and after session
Cardiac and respiratory rateDays 1, 2 and 3 post inclusionMeasurement performed at the same time as SPO2 (patients are monitored)
Qualitative evaluation of ventilatory function (nasal flaring, superficial tachypnea, use of accessory muscle, paradoxical abdominal respiration, cough difficulty) before and after sessionDays 1, 2 and 3 post inclusionThis respiratory function assessment is performed in a qualitative way
Dyspnea evaluationDays 1, 2 and 3 post inclusionDyspnea is measured with a visual analogue scale before and after session
Pain evaluationDays 1, 2 and 3 post inclusionPain is measured with a visual analogue scale before and after session
Vesicular murmur intensityDays 1, 2 and 3 post inclusionVesicular murmur absent = 0, reduce = 1, present and normal = 2 Intensity is measured with an electronic stethoscope before and after session
Inspiratory pressure measurementDays 2 and 3 post inclusionThis measurement (so called sniff test) is assessed with MicroRPM device before and after session
Assessment of patient satisfaction and tolerance of EzPAP deviceDay 3 post inclusionA questionnaire of 10 answer with semi-quantitative scale

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026