Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Iovera° Device for Temporary Relief From Knee Pain

A Multi-Center, Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Iovera° Device for the Temporary Relief of Pain Associated With Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02260921
Enrollment
180
Registered
2014-10-09
Start date
2014-10-20
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2024-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

This purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the iovera° device for the temporary reduction of pain associated with knee osteoarthritis.

Interventions

DEVICEiovera°
DEVICESham Comparator

Sponsors

Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 35 - 75 years of age * American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee. This includes radiographic evidence of osteophytes and at least one of the following: age ≥ 50 years old, morning stiffness ≤ 30 minute duration or crepitus on motion. * Grade II or III osteoarthritis of the knee as determined by Kellgren-Lawrence classification grading scale on anteroposterior (AP) x-ray within previous 6 months. * Participants are ambulatory without assistive devices. * Knee pain of ≥ 40 mm on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) when performing one of two movements that elicit the worst pain: standing from a seated position or walking up/down stairs. * Participant reports knee pain in the anterior and/or inferior aspect of the knee as documented on the knee pain map in the appropriate areas. * A diagnostic lidocaine (without epinephrine) block of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve results in a 50% reduction in the VAS pain assessment score when performing the activity that elicits the worst pain: standing from a seated position or walking up/down stairs. * Participant is able to tolerate a washout of prescription and over-the-counter pain relief for a duration of 5 times the half-life of the medication prior to the Baseline visit. Participant is able to tolerate a washout of adjunctive therapies for knee pain for 72 hours prior to the Baseline visit. * Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) NRS3.1 Pain subscore ≥ 20 at Baseline/Visit 2. * Participant is able to tolerate discontinuation of all pain medication throughout the duration of the study. Acetaminophen may be used as rescue medication with a maximum dose of 4g per day. * Participant is able to tolerate discontinuation of rescue medication, acetaminophen, for 24 hours prior to all follow-up visits. * Prescription and over-the-counter pain medications must be maintained on a stable schedule for at least two weeks prior to screening. * Participant is willing and able to give written informed consent. * Participant is willing and able to comply with study instructions and commit to all follow-up visits for the duration of the study. * Participant is in good general health and free of any systemic disease state or physical condition that might impair evaluation or which in the Investigator's opinion, exposes the Participant to an unacceptable risk by study participation.

Exclusion criteria

* History of a partial or full knee replacement of the knee to be treated. * Planned partial or full knee replacement within the next 12 months in knee to be treated. * Previous myoscience Focused Cold Therapy\^TM (FCTTM) treatment. * Viscosupplementation within the previous 6 months in knee to be treated. * Participant reports the majority of knee pain outside of the anterior/inferior aspect of the knee. * Intra-articular steroid injection in the knee to be treated within previous 3 months. * Gross deformity of the knee including varus or valgus. * Started physical therapy of the knee to be treated within 3 months of screening. * Received acupuncture for knee pain within 3 months prior to screening. * Body Mass Index ≥ 35. * Prior surgery in the treatment area that may alter the anatomy of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve or result in scar tissue in the treatment area. * Open and/or infected wound in the treatment area. * Disease of the spine, hip, contralateral knee or other lower extremity joint of sufficient degree affecting the assessment of the treated knee. * Acetaminophen intolerance or allergy. * Allergy to lidocaine. * History of cryoglobulinemia * History of paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria. * History of cold urticaria. * History of Raynaud's disease. * History of pes anserinus bursitis in the knee to be treated. * Use of extended-release or long-acting opioids within previous 3 months. * Use of immediate-release opioids for more than 3 days per week within previous month. * Participant is pregnant or planning to become pregnant while enrolled in the study. * Current enrollment in any investigational drug or device study or participation within 30 days prior to screening. * Any additional diagnosis that in the opinion of the Investigator directly contributes to knee pain. * Any concomitant inflammatory disease or other condition that affects the joints (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic bone disease, gout, active infection, etc.) * Any clotting disorder and/or use of an anticoagulant (e.g., aspirin, warfarin, clopidogrel, etc.) within seven (7) days prior to administration of the device. * Any local skin condition at the treatment site that in the Investigator's opinion would adversely affect treatment or outcomes. * Any chronic medical condition that in the Investigator's opinion would prevent adequate participation. * Any chronic medication use (prescription, over-the-counter, etc.) that in the Investigator's opinion would affect study participation or Subject safety. * For any reason, in the opinion of the Investigator, the Subject may not be a suitable candidate for study participation (i.e., history of noncompliance, drug dependency, any related knee injury due to a worker's compensation claim, etc.). * Known liver dysfunction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Day 30Baseline to Day 30The WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No (best) to 10= Extreme (worst)\] with 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 to 50\], 2 questions regarding stiffness \[possible subscale score 0 to 20\] and 17 questions regarding function difficulty \[possible subscale score 0 to 170\]. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used for analyses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at Day 30Baseline to Day 30The WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No (best) to 10= Extreme (worst)\] with 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 to 50\], 2 questions regarding stiffness \[possible subscale score 0 to 20\] and 17 questions regarding function difficulty \[possible subscale score 0 to 170\]. The WOMAC total score was calculated by summing the 3 subscales for a total possible score of 0 to 240. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model was used for analyses.
Change From Baseline in VAS at Day 60Baseline to Day 60VAS pain assessment is a measure of pain intensity. The scale is made up of a 10 cm (100 mm) horizontal line. The far left of the horizontal line is labeled no pain while the far right of the horizontal line is labeled worst imaginable pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model was used for analyses.
WOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate at Day 30Day 30WOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with at least a 30% reduction in the WOMAC pain score at Day 30 compared to Baseline. WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No to 10= Extreme\] with the first 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 (best) to 50 (worst)\].
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 30Baseline to Day 30VAS pain assessment is a measure of pain intensity. The scale is made up of a 10 centimeter (cm) \[100 millimeter (mm)\] horizontal line. The far left of the horizontal line is labeled no pain while the far right of the horizontal line is labeled worst imaginable pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model was used for analyses.
Change From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at Day 60Baseline to Day 60The WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No (best) to 10= Extreme (worst)\] with 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 to 50\], 2 questions regarding stiffness \[possible subscale score 0 to 20\] and 17 questions regarding function difficulty \[possible subscale score 0 to 170\]. The WOMAC total score was calculated by summing the 3 subscales for a total possible score of 0 to 240. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
VAS Responder Rate at Day 60Day 60VAS Responder Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with at least a 30% reduction in VAS at Day 60 compared to Baseline. VAS pain assessment is a measure of pain intensity. The scale is made up of a 10 cm (100 mm) horizontal line. The far left of the horizontal line is labeled no pain while the far right of the horizontal line is labeled worst imaginable pain.
WOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate at Day 60Day 60WOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with at least a 30% reduction in the WOMAC pain score at Day 60 compared to Baseline. WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No (best) to 10= Extreme (worst)\] with the first 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 to 50\].
VAS Responder Rate at Day 30Day 30VAS Responder Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with at least a 30% reduction in VAS at Day 30 compared to Baseline VAS pain assessment is a measure of pain intensity. The scale is made up of a 10 cm (100 mm) horizontal line. The far left of the horizontal line is labeled no pain while the far right of the horizontal line is labeled worst imaginable pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Iovera° Treatment
Treatment with the iovera° device administered by a trained investigator to treat knee pain.
121
Sham Treatment
Sham Treatment (similar device with no active therapeutic treatment) administered by a trained investigator to treat knee pain.
59
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up43
Overall StudyProhibited Treatment for Knee Pain40
Overall StudyWithdraw Consent41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIovera° TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Age, Continuous60.7 years61.3 years61.0 years
Body Mass Index (BMI)29.02 kg/m^229.99 kg/m^229.5 kg/m^2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
110 Participants50 Participants160 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
121 participants59 participants180 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants40 Participants119 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants19 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1210 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
121 / 12159 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1211 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Day 30

The WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No (best) to 10= Extreme (worst)\] with 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 to 50\], 2 questions regarding stiffness \[possible subscale score 0 to 20\] and 17 questions regarding function difficulty \[possible subscale score 0 to 170\]. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used for analyses.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: Per-protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iovera° TreatmentAbsolute Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Day 30-16.33 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.15
Sham TreatmentAbsolute Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Day 30-8.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.63
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-11.48, -3.58]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at Day 30

The WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No (best) to 10= Extreme (worst)\] with 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 to 50\], 2 questions regarding stiffness \[possible subscale score 0 to 20\] and 17 questions regarding function difficulty \[possible subscale score 0 to 170\]. The WOMAC total score was calculated by summing the 3 subscales for a total possible score of 0 to 240. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model was used for analyses.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iovera° TreatmentChange From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at Day 30-77.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.38
Sham TreatmentChange From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at Day 30-43.77 score on a scaleStandard Error 7.61
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at Day 60

The WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No (best) to 10= Extreme (worst)\] with 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 to 50\], 2 questions regarding stiffness \[possible subscale score 0 to 20\] and 17 questions regarding function difficulty \[possible subscale score 0 to 170\]. The WOMAC total score was calculated by summing the 3 subscales for a total possible score of 0 to 240. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 60

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iovera° TreatmentChange From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at Day 60-70.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.52
Sham TreatmentChange From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at Day 60-49.99 score on a scaleStandard Error 7.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline in VAS at Day 60

VAS pain assessment is a measure of pain intensity. The scale is made up of a 10 cm (100 mm) horizontal line. The far left of the horizontal line is labeled no pain while the far right of the horizontal line is labeled worst imaginable pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model was used for analyses.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 60

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iovera° TreatmentChange From Baseline in VAS at Day 60-37.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Sham TreatmentChange From Baseline in VAS at Day 60-28.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.97
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 30

VAS pain assessment is a measure of pain intensity. The scale is made up of a 10 centimeter (cm) \[100 millimeter (mm)\] horizontal line. The far left of the horizontal line is labeled no pain while the far right of the horizontal line is labeled worst imaginable pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model was used for analyses.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 30

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iovera° TreatmentChange From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 30-39.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.74
Sham TreatmentChange From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 30-25.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.89
Secondary

VAS Responder Rate at Day 30

VAS Responder Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with at least a 30% reduction in VAS at Day 30 compared to Baseline VAS pain assessment is a measure of pain intensity. The scale is made up of a 10 cm (100 mm) horizontal line. The far left of the horizontal line is labeled no pain while the far right of the horizontal line is labeled worst imaginable pain.

Time frame: Day 30

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Iovera° TreatmentVAS Responder Rate at Day 3067.9 percentage of participants
Sham TreatmentVAS Responder Rate at Day 3048.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

VAS Responder Rate at Day 60

VAS Responder Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with at least a 30% reduction in VAS at Day 60 compared to Baseline. VAS pain assessment is a measure of pain intensity. The scale is made up of a 10 cm (100 mm) horizontal line. The far left of the horizontal line is labeled no pain while the far right of the horizontal line is labeled worst imaginable pain.

Time frame: Day 60

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Iovera° TreatmentVAS Responder Rate at Day 6065.2 percentage of participants
Sham TreatmentVAS Responder Rate at Day 6055.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

WOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate at Day 30

WOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with at least a 30% reduction in the WOMAC pain score at Day 30 compared to Baseline. WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No to 10= Extreme\] with the first 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 (best) to 50 (worst)\].

Time frame: Day 30

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Iovera° TreatmentWOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate at Day 3067.9 percentage of participants
Sham TreatmentWOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate at Day 3044.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

WOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate at Day 60

WOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with at least a 30% reduction in the WOMAC pain score at Day 60 compared to Baseline. WOMAC is a tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. It consists of 24 questions \[each question is presented in a numerical rating scale format with possible values between 0= No (best) to 10= Extreme (worst)\] with the first 5 questions regarding pain \[possible subscale score 0 to 50\].

Time frame: Day 60

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis Population included all participants who were randomized and underwent the assigned treatment where the treatment was successfully delivered as intended by the device and who are compliant with wash-out of pain medication prior to Baseline visit prior to study visit analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Iovera° TreatmentWOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate at Day 6064.3 percentage of participants
Sham TreatmentWOMAC Pain Score Responder Rate at Day 6048.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026