Skip to content

To Compare Efficacy and Safety Between CT-P10 and Rituxan in Patients With Low Tumour Burden Follicular Lymphoma

A Phase 3, Randomised, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Double-blind Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety Between CT-P10 and Rituxan in Patients With Low Tumour Burden Follicular Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02260804
Enrollment
258
Registered
2014-10-09
Start date
2015-11-09
Completion date
2019-09-04
Last updated
2021-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Follicular Lymphoma

Brief summary

To demonstrate that CT-P10 is similar to Rituxan in terms of efficacy as determined by overall response rate at 7 months

Interventions

BIOLOGICALCT-P10

375mg/m2, IV on day1 of 4 cycles in induction period, and 12 cycles in maintenance period.

BIOLOGICALRituxan

375mg/m2, IV on day1 of 4 cycles in induction period, Rituxan for the first 6 cycles and CT-P10 for the last 6 cycles in maintenance period.

Sponsors

Celltrion
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of low tumour burden, CD20+ follicular lymphoma * Ann Arbor Stage II, III or IV

Exclusion criteria

* Has receive rituximab * Allergies or hypersensitivity to murine, chimeric, human or humanised proteins * Previous treatment for NHL * Any malignancy * Current or recent treatment with any other investigational medicinal product or device * pregnant or lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Response Rate by 7 MonthsDuring the Month 7 (up to Maintenance Cycle 3; Week 28)ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with the best response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed CR (CRu), or partial response (PR) by central review. Per 1999 IWG criteria, the disease status was assessed by using contrasted CT and/or MRI, and CR, CRu, and PR were defined as followings; CR=Disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease: regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of B-symptoms, bone marrow involvement, and organomegaly, and normal LDH level; CRu=Regression of measurable disease: \>75% decrease in SPD of target lesions and in each target lesions. no increase in the size of non-target lesions, neither new lesion nor organomegaly measured; PR=Regression of measurable disease: ≥50% decrease in SPD of target lesions and no evidence of disease progression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Baseline, Induction Cycle 1 (predose, 1 hr postdose), Induction Cycle 2 to 4 (predose), EOT1/EOT2 (anytime), Maintenance Cycle 1 to 2 (predose, 1hr postdose) and Maintenance Cycle 3 (predose).B-cell kinetics were demonstrated by median values of B-cell counts. Any values below the LLoQ were set as LLoQ which was 20 cells/μL.
Secondary PK Endpoints - Cmax1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 20 weeks (predose, 1 hr post dose), EOT1/EOT2 (anytime during the day) and 28 week (predose)
Secondary PK Endpoints - Ctrough1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 20 weeks (predose, 1 hr post dose), EOT1/EOT2 (anytime during the day) and 28 week (predose)
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - ORR Over the Study Periodup to 27 monthsORR was defined as the proportion of patients with the best response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed CR (CRu), or partial response (PR). Per 1999 IWG criteria, the disease status was assessed by using contrasted CT and/or MRI, and CR, CRu, and PR were defined as followings; CR=Disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease: regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of B-symptoms, bone marrow involvement, and organomegaly, and normal LDH level; CRu=Regression of measurable disease: \>75% decrease in SPD of target lesions and in each target lesions. no increase in the size of non-target lesions, neither new lesion nor organomegaly measured; PR=Regression of measurable disease: ≥50% decrease in SPD of target lesions and no evidence of disease progression.
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)Overall study period (median follow-up of 29.2 months)Overall survival was defined as the interval between randomization and death from any cause. Locally reviewed data was used for the secondary efficacy analyses.
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time-to Progression (TTP)Overall study period (Baseline, Month 3, 7, 13, 19 27, and every 6 months thereafter).Time to progression was defined as the interval between randomization and disease progression/relapse by IWG 1999 (at least a 50% increase of any single nodal after smallest decrease) or death as a result of lymphoma, whichever occurred first. Locally reviewed data was used for the secondary efficacy analyses.
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Progression-free Survival (PFS)Overall study period (Baseline, Month 3, 7, 13, 19 27, and every 6 months thereafter).PFS was defined as the interval between randomization and disease progression/relapse by IWG 1999 (at least a 50% increase of any single nodal after smallest decrease) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Locally reviewed data was used for the secondary efficacy analyses.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 402 participants were screened for the study. Of those, 144 participants failed screening and 258 participants were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CT-P10
CT-P10 375mg/m2, IV, 4 cycles in induction period and additional 12 cycles in maintenance period
130
Rituxan
Rituxan, 375mg/m2, IV, 4 cycles in induction period, Rituxan for the first 6 cycles and CT-P10 for the last 6 cycles in maintenance period.
128
Total258

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
1st Year of the Maintenance Period (MP1)Adverse Event31
1st Year of the Maintenance Period (MP1)Death01
1st Year of the Maintenance Period (MP1)Lack of Efficacy69
1st Year of the Maintenance Period (MP1)Lost to Follow-up01
1st Year of the Maintenance Period (MP1)Physician Decision13
1st Year of the Maintenance Period (MP1)Protocol Violation10
1st Year of the Maintenance Period (MP1)Withdrawal by Subject10
2nd Year of the Maintenance Period (MP2)Adverse Event30
2nd Year of the Maintenance Period (MP2)Lack of Efficacy65
2nd Year of the Maintenance Period (MP2)Withdrawal by Subject01
Induction Study PeriodProtocol Violation20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCT-P10RituxanTotal
Age, Continuous57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.53
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
110 Participants116 Participants226 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants71 Participants135 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants57 Participants123 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 1303 / 128
other
Total, other adverse events
93 / 13086 / 128
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 13014 / 128

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Response Rate by 7 Months

ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with the best response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed CR (CRu), or partial response (PR) by central review. Per 1999 IWG criteria, the disease status was assessed by using contrasted CT and/or MRI, and CR, CRu, and PR were defined as followings; CR=Disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease: regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of B-symptoms, bone marrow involvement, and organomegaly, and normal LDH level; CRu=Regression of measurable disease: \>75% decrease in SPD of target lesions and in each target lesions. no increase in the size of non-target lesions, neither new lesion nor organomegaly measured; PR=Regression of measurable disease: ≥50% decrease in SPD of target lesions and no evidence of disease progression.

Time frame: During the Month 7 (up to Maintenance Cycle 3; Week 28)

Population: The ITT population consisted of all patients enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a study drug, regardless of whether or not any study drug dosing was completed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CT-P10Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Response Rate by 7 Months108 Participants
RituxanPrimary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Response Rate by 7 Months104 Participants
90% CI: [-6.43, 10.2]
Secondary

Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - ORR Over the Study Period

ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with the best response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed CR (CRu), or partial response (PR). Per 1999 IWG criteria, the disease status was assessed by using contrasted CT and/or MRI, and CR, CRu, and PR were defined as followings; CR=Disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease: regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of B-symptoms, bone marrow involvement, and organomegaly, and normal LDH level; CRu=Regression of measurable disease: \>75% decrease in SPD of target lesions and in each target lesions. no increase in the size of non-target lesions, neither new lesion nor organomegaly measured; PR=Regression of measurable disease: ≥50% decrease in SPD of target lesions and no evidence of disease progression.

Time frame: up to 27 months

Population: The ITT population consisted of all patients enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a study drug, regardless of whether or not any study drug dosing was completed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - ORR Over the Study Period109 Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - ORR Over the Study Period112 Participants
Secondary

Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the interval between randomization and death from any cause. Locally reviewed data was used for the secondary efficacy analyses.

Time frame: Overall study period (median follow-up of 29.2 months)

Population: The ITT population consisted of all patients enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a study drug, regardless of whether or not any study drug dosing was completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)12 months0.98 Proportion of Participants
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)24 months0.98 Proportion of Participants
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)36 months0.98 Proportion of Participants
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)42 months0.98 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)42 months0.97 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)12 months0.98 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)36 months0.97 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Overall Survival (OS)24 months0.98 Proportion of Participants
Secondary

Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the interval between randomization and disease progression/relapse by IWG 1999 (at least a 50% increase of any single nodal after smallest decrease) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Locally reviewed data was used for the secondary efficacy analyses.

Time frame: Overall study period (Baseline, Month 3, 7, 13, 19 27, and every 6 months thereafter).

Population: The ITT population consisted of all patients enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a study drug, regardless of whether or not any study drug dosing was completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Progression-free Survival (PFS)12 months0.93 Proportion of Participants
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Progression-free Survival (PFS)24 months0.88 Proportion of Participants
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Progression-free Survival (PFS)36 months0.80 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Progression-free Survival (PFS)12 months0.89 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Progression-free Survival (PFS)24 months0.83 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Progression-free Survival (PFS)36 months0.68 Proportion of Participants
Secondary

Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time-to Progression (TTP)

Time to progression was defined as the interval between randomization and disease progression/relapse by IWG 1999 (at least a 50% increase of any single nodal after smallest decrease) or death as a result of lymphoma, whichever occurred first. Locally reviewed data was used for the secondary efficacy analyses.

Time frame: Overall study period (Baseline, Month 3, 7, 13, 19 27, and every 6 months thereafter).

Population: The ITT population consisted of all patients enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a study drug, regardless of whether or not any study drug dosing was completed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time-to Progression (TTP)36 months0.82 Proportion of Participants
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time-to Progression (TTP)12 months0.94 Proportion of Participants
CT-P10Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time-to Progression (TTP)24 months0.89 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time-to Progression (TTP)24 months0.84 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time-to Progression (TTP)36 months0.68 Proportion of Participants
RituxanSecondary Efficacy Endpoint - Time-to Progression (TTP)12 months0.89 Proportion of Participants
Secondary

Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)

B-cell kinetics were demonstrated by median values of B-cell counts. Any values below the LLoQ were set as LLoQ which was 20 cells/μL.

Time frame: Baseline, Induction Cycle 1 (predose, 1 hr postdose), Induction Cycle 2 to 4 (predose), EOT1/EOT2 (anytime), Maintenance Cycle 1 to 2 (predose, 1hr postdose) and Maintenance Cycle 3 (predose).

Population: The PD population consisted of all patients who received at least 1 dose (full) of study drug and had at least 1 posttreatment PD result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Induction Cycle 3 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 1 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Induction Cycle 2 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 1 (1hr after end of infusion)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Induction Cycle 4 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 2 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Induction Cycle 1 (1hr after end of infusion)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 2 (1hr after end of infusion)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)EOT1 (anytime)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 3 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10Secondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Baseline95.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 3 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Baseline120.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Induction Cycle 1 (1hr after end of infusion)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Induction Cycle 2 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Induction Cycle 3 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Induction Cycle 4 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)EOT1 (anytime)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 1 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 1 (1hr after end of infusion)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 2 (predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanSecondary PD Endpoint - B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Maintenance Cycle 2 (1hr after end of infusion)20.0 cells/uL
Secondary

Secondary PK Endpoints - Cmax

Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 20 weeks (predose, 1 hr post dose), EOT1/EOT2 (anytime during the day) and 28 week (predose)

Population: The PK population consisted of all patients who received at least 1 dose (full) of study drug and had at least 1 posttreatment PK result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CmaxInduction Cycle 2283.35 μg/mLStandard Deviation 53.84
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CmaxInduction Cycle 4373.46 μg/mLStandard Deviation 70.5
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CmaxInduction Cycle 1212.86 μg/mLStandard Deviation 50.64
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CmaxMaintenance Cycle 1256.97 μg/mLStandard Deviation 65.61
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CmaxInduction Cycle 3327.32 μg/mLStandard Deviation 71.05
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CmaxMaintenance Cycle 2239.70 μg/mLStandard Deviation 65.72
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CmaxMaintenance Cycle 2249.86 μg/mLStandard Deviation 69.02
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CmaxInduction Cycle 1217.38 μg/mLStandard Deviation 56.33
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CmaxInduction Cycle 2285.98 μg/mLStandard Deviation 62.26
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CmaxInduction Cycle 3341.59 μg/mLStandard Deviation 77.95
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CmaxInduction Cycle 4383.05 μg/mLStandard Deviation 83.86
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CmaxMaintenance Cycle 1265.03 μg/mLStandard Deviation 53.73
Secondary

Secondary PK Endpoints - Ctrough

Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 20 weeks (predose, 1 hr post dose), EOT1/EOT2 (anytime during the day) and 28 week (predose)

Population: The PK population consisted of all patients who received at least 1 dose (full) of study drug and had at least 1 posttreatment PK result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CtroughInduction Cycle 164.66 μg/mLStandard Deviation 24.88
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CtroughInduction Cycle 2113.23 μg/mLStandard Deviation 34.6
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CtroughInduction Cycle 3149.53 μg/mLStandard Deviation 43.65
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CtroughInduction Cycle 434.78 μg/mLStandard Deviation 33.58
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CtroughMaintenance Cycle 122.68 μg/mLStandard Deviation 37.22
CT-P10Secondary PK Endpoints - CtroughMaintenance Cycle 216.96 μg/mLStandard Deviation 9.61
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CtroughMaintenance Cycle 121.35 μg/mLStandard Deviation 20.9
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CtroughInduction Cycle 172.94 μg/mLStandard Deviation 40.39
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CtroughInduction Cycle 431.38 μg/mLStandard Deviation 19.15
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CtroughInduction Cycle 2120.92 μg/mLStandard Deviation 36.02
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CtroughMaintenance Cycle 218.37 μg/mLStandard Deviation 10.86
RituxanSecondary PK Endpoints - CtroughInduction Cycle 3161.80 μg/mLStandard Deviation 43.91

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026