Skip to content

A Study of Evacetrapib (LY2484595) in Combination With Atorvastatin in Japanese Participants With Primary Hypercholesterolemia

A Double-Blind Efficacy and Safety Study of Evacetrapib in Combination With Atorvastatin in Japanese Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02260648
Enrollment
149
Registered
2014-10-09
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2018-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the study drug known as evacetrapib when administered in combination with atorvastatin for 12 weeks in Japanese participants with primary hypercholesterolemia.

Interventions

Administered orally

DRUGEzetimibe

Administered orally

DRUGAtorvastatin

Administered orally

DRUGPlacebo

Administered orally

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must be treated with atorvastatin 10 mg/day for at least 30 days prior to study initiation. * Japanese outpatients who are diagnosed with primary hypercholesterolemia with LDL-C levels (measured by a direct method) that meet the following criteria. (Participant categories are based on the definition in Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2012 guidelines.) * Category I: 160 mg/deciliter (dL)≤LDL-C * Category II: 140 mg/dL≤LDL-C * Category III: 120 mg/dL≤LDL-C * Secondary prevention: 100 mg/dL≤LDL-C * Have triglycerides (TG) ≤400 mg/dL. * Have HDL-C \<100 mg/dL.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants on LDL apheresis or plasma apheresis. * Participants with secondary hypercholesterolemia or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. * Any planned angiography. If angiography is planned, participants may be screened and enrolled after all such planned procedures are completed. * History of any of the following conditions \< 90 days prior to study initiation * acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction) * symptomatic peripheral arterial disease * invasive treatment of carotid artery disease * ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) * intracranial hemorrhage * History of abdominal aortic aneurysm. * Participants with a history of intolerance/hypersensitivity to ezetimibe or statins. * Have systolic blood pressure (SBP) \> 160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \> 100 mm Hg. * Have a hemoglobin A1c ≥8.4% (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program). * During the study period, participants who plan to use, are likely to require, or unwilling or unable to stop with adequate washout any prescription, over the counter (OTC) medication, supplements or health foods with the intent to treat serum lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TG) including but not limited to these classes of drugs: statin (except for atorvastatin 10 mg), ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrant, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Participants taking probucol, fibrate or nicotinic agents within 8 weeks before study initiation are excluded from the study. * Have been exposed to cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors (for example, anacetrapib or dalcetrapib).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Measured by Beta QuantificationBaseline, Week 12The mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for the Least Squares Mean (LS Mean) estimates at Week 12 for LDL-C adjusting for baseline as response variables, baseline measurement as a covariate, treatment, Visit (4,5,6, or 7), and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C (Direct)Baseline, Week 12The MMRM was used for the LS Mean estimates at Week 12 for LDL-C (direct) adjusting for baseline as response variables, baseline measurement as a covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non HDL-CBaseline, Week 12The MMRM was used for the LS Mean estimates at Week 12 for Non HDL-C adjusting for baseline as response variables, baseline measurement as a covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)Baseline, Week 12The MMRM was used for the LS Mean estimates at Week 12 for HDL-C adjusting for baseline as response variables, baseline measurement as a covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A-IBaseline, Week 12The ANCOVA model using last observation carried forward (LOCF) was applied to analyze percent changes from baseline.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein BBaseline, Week 12The ANCOVA model using last observation carried forward (LOCF) was applied to analyze percent changes from baseline.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein-aBaseline, Week 12The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model using last observation carried forward (LOCF) was applied to analyze percent changes from baseline.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Evacetrapib
130 mg evacetrapib and 10 mg atorvastatin administered PO once a day for 12 weeks.
53
Placebo
Placebo and 10 mg atorvastatin administered PO once a day for 12 weeks.
46
Ezetimibe
10 mg ezetimibe and 10 mg atorvastatin administered PO once a day for 12 weeks as a reference arm.
50
Total149

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event301
Overall StudyDiscontinue Due to Study Termination13127
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEvacetrapibTotalEzetimibePlacebo
Age, Continuous58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.53
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.87
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
53 Participants149 Participants50 Participants46 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
53 Participants149 Participants50 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants67 Participants24 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants82 Participants26 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 5313 / 4612 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 530 / 460 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Measured by Beta Quantification

The mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for the Least Squares Mean (LS Mean) estimates at Week 12 for LDL-C adjusting for baseline as response variables, baseline measurement as a covariate, treatment, Visit (4,5,6, or 7), and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EvacetrapibPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Measured by Beta Quantification-26.37 percent change in LDL-CStandard Error 3.108
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Measured by Beta Quantification-3.75 percent change in LDL-CStandard Error 3.264
EzetimibePercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Measured by Beta Quantification-27.31 percent change in LDL-CStandard Error 3.128
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A-I

The ANCOVA model using last observation carried forward (LOCF) was applied to analyze percent changes from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EvacetrapibPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A-I42.8 percent change in Apolipoprotein A-IStandard Error 2.27
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A-I0.6 percent change in Apolipoprotein A-IStandard Error 2.44
EzetimibePercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein A-I-0.6 percent change in Apolipoprotein A-IStandard Error 2.34
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B

The ANCOVA model using last observation carried forward (LOCF) was applied to analyze percent changes from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EvacetrapibPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B-20.4 percent change in Apolipoprotien BStandard Error 2.42
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B-3.0 percent change in Apolipoprotien BStandard Error 2.6
EzetimibePercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B-20.4 percent change in Apolipoprotien BStandard Error 2.48
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

The MMRM was used for the LS Mean estimates at Week 12 for HDL-C adjusting for baseline as response variables, baseline measurement as a covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EvacetrapibPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)108.96 percent change in HDL-CStandard Error 5.15
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-0.90 percent change in HDL-CStandard Error 5.363
EzetimibePercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-3.12 percent change in HDL-CStandard Error 5.166
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C (Direct)

The MMRM was used for the LS Mean estimates at Week 12 for LDL-C (direct) adjusting for baseline as response variables, baseline measurement as a covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EvacetrapibPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C (Direct)-27.17 percent change in LDL-C (Direct)Standard Error 2.708
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C (Direct)-3.40 percent change in LDL-C (Direct)Standard Error 2.845
EzetimibePercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C (Direct)-28.96 percent change in LDL-C (Direct)Standard Error 2.726
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein-a

The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model using last observation carried forward (LOCF) was applied to analyze percent changes from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EvacetrapibPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein-a-33.17 percent change in Lipoprotein-aStandard Error 4.024
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein-a7.78 percent change in Lipoprotein-aStandard Error 3.895
EzetimibePercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein-a0.68 percent change in Lipoprotein-aStandard Error 3.704
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non HDL-C

The MMRM was used for the LS Mean estimates at Week 12 for Non HDL-C adjusting for baseline as response variables, baseline measurement as a covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EvacetrapibPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non HDL-C-22.01 percent change in non HDL-CStandard Error 2.455
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non HDL-C-6.42 percent change in non HDL-CStandard Error 2.577
EzetimibePercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non HDL-C-27.35 percent change in non HDL-CStandard Error 2.468

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026