Skip to content

ODYSSEY (PENTA 20)

A Randomised Trial of Dolutegravir (DTG)-Based Antiretroviral Therapy vs. Standard of Care (SOC) in Children With HIV Infection Starting First-line or Switching to Second-line ART

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02259127
Enrollment
792
Registered
2014-10-08
Start date
2016-09-20
Completion date
2023-12-07
Last updated
2025-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infection

Brief summary

A new anti-HIV medicine (Dolutegravir) combined with 2 currently used anti-HIV medicines is non-inferior to the standard combination of medicines used in terms of efficacy and better in terms of toxicity.

Detailed description

The ODYSSEY study was an international randomised trial evaluating dolutegravir based antiretroviral therapy (ART) versus standard of care in HIV-infected children aged less than 18 years who were starting first line treatment (ODYSSEY A) or switching to second line treatment (ODYSSEY B). Participants had visits 4 weeks and 12 weeks after randomisation and every 12 weeks subsequent of that. They were followed up for a minimum of 96 weeks. The primary objective of the study was to assess the difference in virological or clinical failure by 96 weeks between children receiving a DTG-based regimen and those on standard of care. At the end of study visit for the randomised phase, children and carers were invited to consent to extended follow-up. Children's visit schedules and care were as per local clinic guidelines. Participants were followed up until July 2023 in this phase of the trial. The objectives of the extended follow-up were two-fold: 1. to provide safety data for ViiV Healthcare for participants who, in the opinion of the treating physician, continue to derive benefit from dolutegravir and receive dolutegravir from ViiV Healthcare where it was not available through their country's national HIV treatment programme; 2. to monitor long-term safety and effectiveness of dolutegravir versus standard of care.

Interventions

DRUGDolutegravir
DRUGStandard of Care

PI or non nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors

Sponsors

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Program for HIV Prevention and Treatment (PHPT)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
ViiV Healthcare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
MRC CTU at UCL
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
PENTA Foundation
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
28 Days to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

ALL PATIENTS: * Children ≥28 days and \<18 years weighing ≥3kg with confirmed HIV-1 infection * Parents/carers and children, where applicable, give informed written consent * Girls aged 12 years or older who have reached menses must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and be willing to adhere to effective methods of contraception if sexually active * Children with co-infections who need to start ART can be enrolled into ODYSSEY according to local/national guidelines * Parents/carers and children, where applicable, willing to adhere to a minimum of 96 weeks' follow-up * Children weighing 3 to \<14kg must be eligible and willing to participate in the Weight band (WB)-Pharmacokinetics (PK)1 substudy unless direct enrolment for the child's weight band has opened following the WB-PK1 substudy and/or dosing information has become available from the IMPAACT P1093 DTG dose-finding study. ADDITIONAL CRITERIA FOR ODYSSEY A: • Planning to start first-line ART ADDITIONAL CRITERIA FOR ODYSSEY B: * Planning to start second-line ART defined as either: (i) switch of at least 2 ART drugs due to treatment failure; or (ii) switch of only the third agent due to treatment failure where drug sensitivity tests show no mutations conferring Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NRTI) resistance * Treated with only one previous ART regimen. Single drug substitutions for toxicity, simplification, changes in national guidelines or drug availability are allowed * At least one NRTI with predicted preserved activity available for a background regimen * In settings where resistance tests are routinely available, at least one new active NRTI from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, abacavir or zidovudine should have preserved activity based on cumulative results of resistance tests * In settings where resistance tests are not routinely available, children who are due to switch according to national guidelines should have at least one new NRTI predicted to be available from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, abacavir or zidovudine * Viral load ≥ 500 c/ml at screening visit

Exclusion criteria

* History or presence of known allergy or contraindications to dolutegravir * History or presence of known allergy or contraindications to proposed available NRTI backbone or proposed available SOC third agent. * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 5 times the upper limit of normal, OR ALT ≥3x upper limit of normal and bilirubin ≥2x upper limit of normal * Patients with severe hepatic impairment or unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones) * Anticipated need for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy during the study * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Evidence of lack of susceptibility to integrase inhibitors or more than a 2-week exposure to antiretrovirals of this class

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)96 weeks post randomisationTreatment failure by 96 weeks. Estimated using time to the first occurrence of any of the following components: * Insufficient virological response defined as \< 1 log10 drop at week 24 and switch to second/third line ART for treatment failure * Viral Load (VL)\>400 c/ml at or after 36 weeks confirmed by next visit * Death due to any cause * Any new or recurrent AIDS defining event (WHO 4) or severe WHO 3 events, adjudicated by the Endpoint Review Committee

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Failure by 144 Weeks144 weeks post randomisationTreatment failure by 144 weeks. Difference in proportion with clinical or virological failure (as defined above)
HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks96 weeks post randomisationProportion of children with viral load suppression \<50 c/ml at 96 weeks.
HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks96 weeks post randomisationProportion of children with viral load suppression \<400 c/ml at 96 weeks
Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 9696 weeks post randomisationReporting mean change from the global baseline value across both arms.
Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 9696 weeks post randomisationReporting mean change from global baseline value across both arms.
Serious Adverse EventsRandomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).Incidence of serious adverse events
Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse EventsRandomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).Incidence of new clinical and laboratory grade 3 and 4 adverse events
Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any GradeRandomised PhaseIncidence of adverse events (of any grade) leading to treatment modification
Treatment Failure by 48 Weeks48 weeks post randomisationTreatment failure by 48 weeks. Difference in proportion with clinical or virological failure (as defined above)
WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and DeathRandomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).Rate of clinical events : WHO 4, severe WHO 3 events and death
Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks96 weeks post randomisationPer protocol: treatment failure by 96 weeks post randomisation
Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationAny drug class resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.
NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationNRTI resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation. Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.
Health-related Quality of Life QuestionnaireRandomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).Adapted from the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Qol)-5D questionnaire The EQ5D-3L (3-level version of EQ-5D) questionnaire contains five questions about the participants' quality of life: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each question has three dimensions: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. This analysis reports whether the participant reports any problems (some or extreme). Percentages are of participants completing at least one EQ5D-3L questionnaire during follow-up. Reported in \>=14kg cohort paper (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108793)
Acceptability QuestionnaireRandomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).Number of participants reported to have problems with size, taste or swallowing of the medicines as assessed by Acceptability questionnaire Reported in \>=14kg and \<14kg papers. \>=14kg cohort paper (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108793) \<14kg cohort paper (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhiv/article/PIIS2352-3018(22)00163-1/fulltext)
NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationNNRTI resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation. Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.
PI Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationPI resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation. Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.
INSTI Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationINSTI resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.
Emerging Resistance to Any Drug Class After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationEmerging resistance to any drug class after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial.
NRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationNRTI emerging resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom a resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial.
NNRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationNNRTI emerging resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom a resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial.
PI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationPI emerging resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom a resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial.
INSTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure96 weeks post randomisationINSTI emerging resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom a resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial. The integrase gene was not sequenced for the standard of care arm.
Time to Any New or Recurrent AIDS Defining Event (WHO 4) or Severe WHO 3 EventsRandomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).Time to any new or recurrent AIDS defining event (WHO 4) or severe WHO 3 events adjudicated by the Endpoint Review Committee. Reported in \>=14kg and \<14kg papers. \>=14kg cohort paper (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108793) \<14kg cohort paper (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhiv/article/PIIS2352-3018(22)00163-1/fulltext)
Adherence QuestionnaireRandomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).The proportion of adherence questionnaires where the participant/carer reports missing a dose within the last week will be compared between randomised groups. Reported in \>=14kg and \<14kg papers. \>=14kg cohort paper (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108793) \<14kg cohort paper (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhiv/article/PIIS2352-3018(22)00163-1/fulltext)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Weight From Baseline96 weeks post randomisationMean change in weight from baseline to week 96
Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline96 weeks post randomisationMean change in BMI-for-age from baseline to week 96. Reporting mean change from the global baseline value across both arms. z-scores (standard scores) are the number of standard deviations the observed data is above or below the population (z-score of 0 represents the population median). Positive z-scores represent the standard deviations above the median and negative z-scores represent the standard deviations below the median. BMI-for-age Z scores indicate: \<-3SD severe thinness; \<-2SD thinness; -2 to 1SD healthy weight; \>1SD overweight; \>2SD obese.

Countries

Germany, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Thailand, Uganda, United Kingdom, Zimbabwe

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment to the \>=14kg cohort took place between 20th September 2016 and 22nd June 2018 in 8 countries (Germany, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Thailand, Uganda, United Kingdom, and Zimbabwe) across 29 centres. Recruitment to the \<14kg cohort took place between 5th July 2018 and 26th August 2019 in the African countries across 7 centres. The results published relate to the randomised phase of the study for the \>=14kg cohort and \<14kg cohort.

Pre-assignment details

\>=14kg: 819 children assessed for eligibility. 109 were ineligible: 102 failed eligibility criteria, 3 didn't return in window and 4 other reasons. Also, 3 children randomised in error: 1 not ART naïve in ODYSSEY A and 3 randomised before DTG available for weight. \<14kg: 102 children assessed for eligibility. 17 were ineligible: 14 failed eligibility criteria, 1 died before enrolment, 1 carer declined bloods and 1 ineligible due to no protocol approval at site to recruit \<14kg cohort.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)
Experimental arm. DTG + 2 nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors. IMP product Dolutegravir (DTG).
350
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)
Active comparator arm. SOC for ODYSSEY A is defined as a PI or non nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors + 2 or 3 nucleoside transcriptase inhibitor SOC for ODYSSEY B is defined as a PI or non nucleoside transcriptase inhibitor+ 2 nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors
357
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)
Experimental arm. DTG + 2 nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors. IMP product Dolutegravir (DTG).
42
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)
Active comparator arm. SOC for ODYSSEY A is defined as a PI or non nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors + 2 or 3 nucleoside transcriptase inhibitor SOC for ODYSSEY B is defined as a PI or non nucleoside transcriptase inhibitor+ 2 nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors
43
Total792

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)TotalStandard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)
Age, Continuous12.2 years1.3 years1.5 years11.4 years12.1 years
Age, Customized
12-<18 years
182 Participants0 Participants0 Participants364 Participants182 Participants
Age, Customized
1-<2 years
0 Participants22 Participants22 Participants44 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
2-<6 years
15 Participants4 Participants5 Participants35 Participants11 Participants
Age, Customized
6-<12 years
153 Participants0 Participants0 Participants317 Participants164 Participants
Age, Customized
<6 months
0 Participants11 Participants8 Participants19 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
6 months-<1 year
0 Participants5 Participants8 Participants13 Participants0 Participants
BMI-for-age z-score
>=0
92 Participants13 Participants17 Participants221 Participants99 Participants
BMI-for-age z-score
-2-<0
216 Participants20 Participants14 Participants469 Participants219 Participants
BMI-for-age z-score
<-3
22 Participants3 Participants6 Participants42 Participants11 Participants
BMI-for-age z-score
-3-<-2
20 Participants6 Participants6 Participants60 Participants28 Participants
BMI-for-age z-score
missing
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
BMI-for-age z-score-0.6 z-score-1.1 z-score-0.7 z-score-0.6 z-score-0.6 z-score
CD4
<200 cells/mm^3
88 Participants3 Participants4 Participants165 Participants70 Participants
CD4
200 to <500 cells/mm^3
118 Participants2 Participants3 Participants237 Participants114 Participants
CD4
>=500 cells/mm^3
144 Participants36 Participants33 Participants386 Participants173 Participants
CD4
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
CD4444 cells/mm^31639 cells/mm^31221 cells/mm^3494 cells/mm^3486 cells/mm^3
CD4%
<15%
121 Participants7 Participants11 Participants247 Participants108 Participants
CD4%
15-<30%
152 Participants22 Participants18 Participants339 Participants147 Participants
CD4%
>=30%
77 Participants12 Participants11 Participants202 Participants102 Participants
CD4%
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
CD4%20 %24 %23 %21 %22 %
History of WHO Staging
Stage 1-2
253 Participants31 Participants25 Participants574 Participants265 Participants
History of WHO Staging
Stage 3
69 Participants6 Participants8 Participants143 Participants60 Participants
History of WHO Staging
Stage 4
28 Participants5 Participants10 Participants75 Participants32 Participants
Log 10 Viral load copies/mL4.5 copies/mL5.2 copies/mL5.4 copies/mL4.5 copies/mL4.4 copies/mL
ODYSSEY A/B
ODYSSEY A (starting first-line ART)
154 Participants35 Participants37 Participants383 Participants157 Participants
ODYSSEY A/B
ODYSSEY B (Switching to second-line ART)
196 Participants7 Participants6 Participants409 Participants200 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
28 Participants0 Participants0 Participants60 Participants32 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black African
310 Participants41 Participants42 Participants706 Participants313 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
7 Participants1 Participants1 Participants20 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
5 Participants0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
12 Participants0 Participants0 Participants25 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
61 Participants8 Participants12 Participants164 Participants83 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
28 Participants0 Participants0 Participants61 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Uganda
170 Participants22 Participants21 Participants374 Participants161 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Zimbabwe
79 Participants12 Participants10 Participants168 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
174 Participants26 Participants18 Participants389 Participants171 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
176 Participants16 Participants25 Participants403 Participants186 Participants
Viral Load copies/mL
<10,000
93 Participants4 Participants7 Participants227 Participants123 Participants
Viral Load copies/mL
>=100,000
98 Participants25 Participants26 Participants224 Participants75 Participants
Viral Load copies/mL
10,000-<100,000
159 Participants13 Participants5 Participants335 Participants158 Participants
Viral Load copies/mL
Missing
0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Weight
10-<14kg
0 Participants11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants0 Participants
Weight
14-<20kg
39 Participants0 Participants0 Participants82 Participants43 Participants
Weight
20-<25kg
71 Participants0 Participants0 Participants135 Participants64 Participants
Weight
25-<30kg
58 Participants0 Participants0 Participants117 Participants59 Participants
Weight
30-<35kg
38 Participants0 Participants0 Participants89 Participants51 Participants
Weight
35-<40kg
29 Participants0 Participants0 Participants61 Participants32 Participants
Weight
>=40kg
115 Participants0 Participants0 Participants223 Participants108 Participants
Weight
6-<10kg
0 Participants20 Participants20 Participants40 Participants0 Participants
Weight
<6kg
0 Participants11 Participants12 Participants23 Participants0 Participants
Weight30.4 kilogram(s)8.1 kilogram(s)8.2 kilogram(s)28.7 kilogram(s)31.0 kilogram(s)
Weight-for-age z-score
>=0
14 Participants3 Participants3 Participants39 Participants19 Participants
Weight-for-age z-score
-2-<0
78 Participants18 Participants21 Participants200 Participants83 Participants
Weight-for-age z-score
<-3
4 Participants14 Participants13 Participants35 Participants4 Participants
Weight-for-age z-score
-3-<-2
20 Participants7 Participants6 Participants45 Participants12 Participants
Weight-for-age z-score
missing
234 Participants0 Participants0 Participants473 Participants239 Participants
Weight-for-age z-score-1.2 z-score-2.1 z-score-1.8 z-score-1.2 z-score-0.9 z-score

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 3503 / 3572 / 424 / 432 / 1542 / 1570 / 1961 / 200
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3500 / 3570 / 420 / 430 / 1540 / 1570 / 1960 / 200
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 35040 / 35711 / 4211 / 4323 / 15427 / 15712 / 19613 / 200

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)

Treatment failure by 96 weeks. Estimated using time to the first occurrence of any of the following components: * Insufficient virological response defined as \< 1 log10 drop at week 24 and switch to second/third line ART for treatment failure * Viral Load (VL)\>400 c/ml at or after 36 weeks confirmed by next visit * Death due to any cause * Any new or recurrent AIDS defining event (WHO 4) or severe WHO 3 events, adjudicated by the Endpoint Review Committee

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Severe WHO 30 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Confirmed VL>=400 copies/mL40 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)WHO 47 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Death0 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Insufficient virological response0 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)WHO 45 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Confirmed VL>=400 copies/mL64 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Insufficient virological response3 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Death2 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Severe WHO 31 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Confirmed VL>=400 copies/mL9 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Insufficient virological response0 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Severe WHO 30 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)WHO 41 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Death2 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Confirmed VL>=400 copies/mL16 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Severe WHO 30 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)WHO 41 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Death4 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Insufficient virological response0 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Confirmed VL>=400 copies/mL10 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Insufficient virological response0 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Severe WHO 30 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)WHO 45 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Death0 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Death1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Severe WHO 30 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Insufficient virological response2 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)WHO 45 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Confirmed VL>=400 copies/mL26 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Confirmed VL>=400 copies/mL30 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)WHO 42 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Severe WHO 30 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Insufficient virological response0 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Death0 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Confirmed VL>=400 copies/mL38 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Insufficient virological response1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)WHO 40 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Death1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Difference in Proportion With Failure (Clinical or Virological)Severe WHO 31 Participants
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Primary: Diff in adj. KM estimates (\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.00495% CI: [-0.14, -0.03]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (Frequentist \<14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 85~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.05795% CI: [-0.36, 0.02]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Primary: diff in adj. KM estimates (Bayesian \<14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 85~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: 0.0295% CI: [-0.19, -0.02]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (ODYSSEY A\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: 0.00395% CI: [-0.21, -0.04]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: 0.2295% CI: [-0.12, 0.03]Bootstrap method
Secondary

Acceptability Questionnaire

Number of participants reported to have problems with size, taste or swallowing of the medicines as assessed by Acceptability questionnaire Reported in \>=14kg and \<14kg papers. \>=14kg cohort paper (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108793) \<14kg cohort paper (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhiv/article/PIIS2352-3018(22)00163-1/fulltext)

Time frame: Randomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).

Secondary

Adherence Questionnaire

The proportion of adherence questionnaires where the participant/carer reports missing a dose within the last week will be compared between randomised groups. Reported in \>=14kg and \<14kg papers. \>=14kg cohort paper (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108793) \<14kg cohort paper (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhiv/article/PIIS2352-3018(22)00163-1/fulltext)

Time frame: Randomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).

Secondary

Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade

Incidence of adverse events (of any grade) leading to treatment modification

Time frame: Randomised Phase

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade5 participants with events
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade17 participants with events
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade0 participants with events
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade2 participants with events
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade3 participants with events
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade8 participants with events
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade2 participants with events
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Adverse Events Leading to ART Modification Any Grade9 participants with events
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.0195% CI: [0.11, 0.77]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.1395% CI: [0.09, 1.33]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: 0.05595% CI: [0.05, 1.03]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure

Any drug class resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Shown are the numbers of participants with resistance after virologic failure, among those with virologic failure by week 96 who had a post-treatment failure resistance test available for the drug class.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure28 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure23 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure36 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure6 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure12 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure2 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Any Drug Class Resistance After Virologic Failure3 Participants
Secondary

Emerging Resistance to Any Drug Class After Virologic Failure

Emerging resistance to any drug class after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (\>=14kg cohort): 0 participants had resistance to INSTI post failure Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (\<14kg Cohort) - 0 participants with virological failure and any gene sequenced at baseline and post-failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Emerging Resistance to Any Drug Class After Virologic Failure97 percentage of participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Emerging Resistance to Any Drug Class After Virologic Failure22 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Emerging Resistance to Any Drug Class After Virologic Failure19 percentage of participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Emerging Resistance to Any Drug Class After Virologic Failure0 percentage of participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Emerging Resistance to Any Drug Class After Virologic Failure100 percentage of participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Emerging Resistance to Any Drug Class After Virologic Failure50 percentage of participants
Secondary

Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events

Incidence of new clinical and laboratory grade 3 and 4 adverse events

Time frame: Randomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events73 participants with events
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events86 participants with events
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events19 participants with events
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events21 participants with events
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events48 participants with events
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events43 participants with events
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events25 participants with events
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Grade 3 or Above Clinical and Laboratory Adverse Events43 participants with events
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.2495% CI: [0.61, 1.13]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (\<14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 85~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.8395% CI: [0.5, 1.74]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.5795% CI: [0.75, 1.7]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.0195% CI: [0.33, 0.88]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire

Adapted from the Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (Qol)-5D questionnaire The EQ5D-3L (3-level version of EQ-5D) questionnaire contains five questions about the participants' quality of life: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each question has three dimensions: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. This analysis reports whether the participant reports any problems (some or extreme). Percentages are of participants completing at least one EQ5D-3L questionnaire during follow-up. Reported in \>=14kg cohort paper (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108793)

Time frame: Randomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).

Secondary

HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks

Proportion of children with viral load suppression \<400 c/ml at 96 weeks

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks299 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks285 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks33 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks26 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks129 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks124 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks170 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <400c/mL at 96 Weeks161 Participants
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 670~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.225695% CI: [-2, 8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 286~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.953695% CI: [-8, 7]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 384~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.110495% CI: [-1, 12]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.03895% CI: [2, 37]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks

Proportion of children with viral load suppression \<50 c/ml at 96 weeks.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks270 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks252 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks27 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks19 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks117 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks113 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks153 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)HIV-1 RNA <50c/ml at 96 Weeks139 Participants
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 665~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.137795% CI: [-1, 11]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted difference (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 286~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.889595% CI: [-10, 8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 381~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.043595% CI: [0.4, 17]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.02195% CI: [6, 47]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

INSTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure

INSTI emerging resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom a resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial. The integrase gene was not sequenced for the standard of care arm.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Emergent drug resistance estimated only in participants exposed to drug class during trial (SOC arm not exposed to INSTI drug class).~Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (\>=14kg cohort) - 0 participants had resistance post failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)INSTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure18 percentage of participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)INSTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure0 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)INSTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure50 percentage of participants
Secondary

INSTI Resistance After Virologic Failure

INSTI resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Shown are the numbers of participants with resistance after virologic failure, among those with virologic failure by week 96 who had a post-treatment failure resistance test available for the drug class. The integrase gene was not sequenced for standard of care arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)INSTI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)INSTI Resistance After Virologic Failure4 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)INSTI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)INSTI Resistance After Virologic Failure1 Participants
Secondary

Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 96

Reporting mean change from the global baseline value across both arms.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 96265 cells/mm^3Standard Error 17
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 96230 cells/mm^3Standard Error 17
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 9672 cells/mm^3Standard Error 116
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 9651 cells/mm^3Standard Error 118
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 96311 cells/mm^3Standard Error 23
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 96267 cells/mm^3Standard Error 24
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 96228 cells/mm^3Standard Error 24
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 96202 cells/mm^3Standard Error 24
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (\>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of CD4 at week 96, adjusted for randomised arm, baseline CD4 and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.14495% CI: [-12, 82]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of CD4 at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline CD4 and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: 0.18595% CI: [-21, 109]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of CD4 at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline CD4 and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.42795% CI: [-39, 93]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.8695% CI: [-308, 368]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 96

Reporting mean change from global baseline value across both arms.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 96-5.0 mg/dlStandard Error 1.5
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 969.9 mg/dlStandard Error 1.5
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 964.5 mg/dlStandard Error 5.6
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 9629.6 mg/dlStandard Error 5.9
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 962.1 mg/dlStandard Error 2.3
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 9619.6 mg/dlStandard Error 2.3
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 96-10.5 mg/dlStandard Error 1.8
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 962.8 mg/dlStandard Error 1.8
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (\>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of total cholesterol at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline total cholesterol and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-19, -11.1]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (\<14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of total cholesterol at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline total cholesterol and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 85~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.003295% CI: [-40.3, -8.5]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of total cholesterol at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline total cholesterol and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-23.9, -11.1]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of total cholesterol at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline total cholesterol and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-18.5, -8.4]Regression, Linear
Secondary

NNRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure

NNRTI emerging resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom a resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Emergent drug resistance estimated only in participants exposed to drug class during trial (DTG arm not exposed to NNRTI class).~Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (\<14kg Cohort) and Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (\<14kg Cohort) - 0 participants with virological failure, exposed to drug-class, and gene sequenced at baseline and post-failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)NNRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure88 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)NNRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure100 percentage of participants
Secondary

NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure

NNRTI resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation. Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Shown are the numbers of participants with resistance after virologic failure, among those with virologic failure by week 96 who had a post-treatment failure resistance test available for the drug class.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure27 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure22 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure36 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure6 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure11 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure2 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)NNRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure3 Participants
Secondary

NRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure

NRTI emerging resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom a resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (\>=14kg cohort) - 0 participants had resistance post failure.~Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (\<14kg Cohort) and Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (\<14kg Cohort) - 0 participants with virological failure, exposed to drug-class, and gene sequenced at baseline and post-failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure62 percentage of participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)NRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure8 percentage of participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)NRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure10 percentage of participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure100 percentage of participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure100 percentage of participants
Secondary

NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure

NRTI resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation. Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Shown are the numbers of participants with resistance after virologic failure, among those with virologic failure by week 96 who had a post-treatment failure resistance test available for the drug class.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure18 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure21 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure31 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure10 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)NRTI Resistance After Virologic Failure3 Participants
Secondary

Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks

Per protocol: treatment failure by 96 weeks post randomisation

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks44 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks62 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks12 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks20 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks13 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks28 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks31 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Per Protocol: Treatment Failure by 96 Weeks34 Participants
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (\>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 96 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 677~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.01595% CI: [-0.12, -0.01]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted difference (frequentist \<14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 96 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 85~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.07595% CI: [-0.362, 0.029]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 96 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 295~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.00495% CI: [-0.21, -0.036]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 96 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 382~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.54795% CI: [-0.096, 0.056]Bootstrap method
Secondary

PI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure

PI emerging resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations. \>=14kg cohort: among participants with virologic failure and exposure to the drug class, percentage of participants with emerging resistance was estimated under an assumption of the same proportion of new resistance in participants with an available baseline resistance test and those without. \<14kg cohort: percentage reported for participants with whom a resistance test was available post-failure and at baseline, and exposed to drug-class during trial.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Emergent drug resistance estimated only in participants exposed to drug class during trial (DTG arm not exposed to PI class).~Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (\>=14kg cohort) - 0 participants had resistance post failure.~Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (\<14kg Cohort) - 0 participants with virological failure, exposed to drug-class, and gene sequenced at baseline and post-failure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)PI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure5 percentage of participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)PI Emerging Resistance After Virologic Failure100 percentage of participants
Secondary

PI Resistance After Virologic Failure

PI resistance after virologic failure 96 weeks post randomisation. Major International AIDS Society (IAS) drug-resistance mutations were defined according to the 2019 update of the IAS drug-resistance mutations.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Shown are the numbers of participants with resistance after virologic failure, among those with virologic failure by week 96 who had a post-treatment failure resistance test available for the drug class.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)PI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)PI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)PI Resistance After Virologic Failure2 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)PI Resistance After Virologic Failure3 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)PI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)PI Resistance After Virologic Failure2 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)PI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)PI Resistance After Virologic Failure0 Participants
Secondary

Serious Adverse Events

Incidence of serious adverse events

Time frame: Randomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Serious Adverse Events35 participants with events
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Serious Adverse Events40 participants with events
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Serious Adverse Events11 participants with events
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Serious Adverse Events11 participants with events
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Serious Adverse Events23 participants with events
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Serious Adverse Events27 participants with events
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Serious Adverse Events12 participants with events
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Serious Adverse Events13 participants with events
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.5395% CI: [0.55, 1.36]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (\<14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 85~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.8695% CI: [0.47, 2.49]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.5295% CI: [0.48, 1.46]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.8695% CI: [0.42, 2.04]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Time to Any New or Recurrent AIDS Defining Event (WHO 4) or Severe WHO 3 Events

Time to any new or recurrent AIDS defining event (WHO 4) or severe WHO 3 events adjudicated by the Endpoint Review Committee. Reported in \>=14kg and \<14kg papers. \>=14kg cohort paper (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108793) \<14kg cohort paper (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhiv/article/PIIS2352-3018(22)00163-1/fulltext)

Time frame: Randomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).

Secondary

Treatment Failure by 144 Weeks

Treatment failure by 144 weeks. Difference in proportion with clinical or virological failure (as defined above)

Time frame: 144 weeks post randomisation

Population: Note: analysis could not be performed in \<14kg cohort due to shorter follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksDeath0 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksConfirmed viral load>400c/mL48 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksWHO stage 48 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksInsufficient virologic response0 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksSevere WHO stage 31 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksWHO stage 45 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksDeath2 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksConfirmed viral load>400c/mL76 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksInsufficient virologic response3 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksInsufficient virologic response0 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksWHO stage 46 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksDeath0 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksConfirmed viral load>400c/mL13 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksInsufficient virologic response2 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksDeath1 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksConfirmed viral load>400c/mL28 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksWHO stage 45 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksWHO stage 42 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksInsufficient virologic response0 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksConfirmed viral load>400c/mL35 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksDeath0 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksConfirmed viral load>400c/mL48 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksWHO stage 40 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksInsufficient virologic response1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksDeath1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 144 WeeksSevere WHO stage 31 Participants
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (\>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 144 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.00395% CI: [-0.16, -0.04]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 144 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.00995% CI: [-0.21, -0.03]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 144 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.07995% CI: [-0.16, 0.01]Bootstrap method
Secondary

Treatment Failure by 48 Weeks

Treatment failure by 48 weeks. Difference in proportion with clinical or virological failure (as defined above)

Time frame: 48 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksWHO stage 47 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksDeath0 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksInsufficient virologic response0 Participants
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksConfirmed viral load >400c/ml13 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksInsufficient virologic response3 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksConfirmed viral load >400c/ml31 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksDeath2 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksWHO stage 45 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksSevere WHO stage 31 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksDeath2 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksInsufficient virologic response0 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksWHO stage 41 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksConfirmed viral load >400c/ml4 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksConfirmed viral load >400c/ml11 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksDeath3 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksInsufficient virologic response0 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksWHO stage 41 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksWHO stage 45 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksInsufficient virologic response0 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksDeath0 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksConfirmed viral load >400c/ml4 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksConfirmed viral load >400c/ml12 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksInsufficient virologic response2 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksWHO stage 45 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksDeath1 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksSevere WHO stage 30 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksInsufficient virologic response0 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksDeath0 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksWHO stage 42 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksConfirmed viral load >400c/ml9 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksSevere WHO stage 31 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksConfirmed viral load >400c/ml19 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksDeath1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksInsufficient virologic response1 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Treatment Failure by 48 WeeksWHO stage 40 Participants
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (\>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 48 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.00395% CI: [-0.1, -0.02]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 48 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.03595% CI: [-0.13, -0.01]Bootstrap method
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Diff in adj. KM estimates (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Difference in adjusted (for stratification factors) Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates at 48 weeks after randomisation.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.03995% CI: [-0.11, -0.004]Bootstrap method
p-value: 0.05795% CI: [-0.36, 0.02]Other [Bootstrap method]
Secondary

WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death

Rate of clinical events : WHO 4, severe WHO 3 events and death

Time frame: Randomised phase: follow-up was censored when the last participant reached 96 weeks of follow-up (142 weeks (IQR:124 to 159) in ≥14kg cohort and 124 weeks (112 to 137) in <14kg cohort).

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death8 Participants
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death8 Participants
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death3 Participants
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death6 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death6 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death6 Participants
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death2 Participants
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)WHO 4, Severe WHO 3 Events and Death2 Participants
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.99395% CI: [0.38, 2.68]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (\<14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 85~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.3395% CI: [0.13, 2]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.99195% CI: [0.32, 3.12]Regression, Cox
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted time to first event (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.99795% CI: [0.14, 7.13]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline

Mean change in BMI-for-age from baseline to week 96. Reporting mean change from the global baseline value across both arms. z-scores (standard scores) are the number of standard deviations the observed data is above or below the population (z-score of 0 represents the population median). Positive z-scores represent the standard deviations above the median and negative z-scores represent the standard deviations below the median. BMI-for-age Z scores indicate: \<-3SD severe thinness; \<-2SD thinness; -2 to 1SD healthy weight; \>1SD overweight; \>2SD obese.

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline0.24 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.04
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline0.11 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.04
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline1.1 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.3
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline1.5 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.3
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline0.36 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.07
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline0.20 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.07
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline0.14 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.05
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in BMI-for-age Z-score From Baseline0.04 Z-scoreStandard Error 0.05
p-value: 0.595% CI: [-1.1, 0.5]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (\>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of BMI-for-age at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline BMI-for-age and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.03695% CI: [0.01, 0.25]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of BMI-for-age at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline BMI-for-age and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.09295% CI: [-0.03, 0.36]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of BMI-for-age at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline BMI-for-age and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.17695% CI: [-0.05, 0.25]Regression, Linear
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change in Weight From Baseline

Mean change in weight from baseline to week 96

Time frame: 96 weeks post randomisation

Population: Results not presented by ODYSSEY A and B in \<14kg cohort due to due ODYSSEY B having too few participants (n=13).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dolutegravir (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Weight From Baseline7.1 kgStandard Error 0.3
Standard of Care (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Weight From Baseline6.1 kgStandard Error 0.3
Dolutegravir (<14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Weight From Baseline5.0 kgStandard Error 0.2
Standard of Care (<14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Weight From Baseline5.1 kgStandard Error 0.2
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Weight From Baseline7.8 kgStandard Error 0.4
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY A (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Weight From Baseline6.5 kgStandard Error 0.4
Dolutegravir - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Weight From Baseline6.7 kgStandard Error 0.3
Standard of Care - ODYSSEY B (>=14kg Cohort)Mean Change in Weight From Baseline5.9 kgStandard Error 0.3
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (\>=14kg)~Number of subjects included in analysis: 707~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.00495% CI: [0.3, 1.7]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusted Difference (ODYSSEY A \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of weight at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline weight and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 311~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.02495% CI: [0.2, 2.5]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Statistical Analysis Title: Adjusting Difference (ODYSSEY B \>=14kg)~Statistical analysis description: Linear regression of weight at week 96, adjusting for randomised arm, baseline weight and stratification factors. Presenting mean difference between arms.~Number of subjects included in analysis: 396~Analysis Specification: Pre-specifiedp-value: =0.07595% CI: [-0.1, 1.6]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.6795% CI: [-0.8, 0.5]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026